Protocol for a phase II, open-label exploratory study investigating the efficacy of fesoterodine for treatment of adult patients with spinal cord injury suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity for amelioration of autonomic dysreflexia

Matthias Walter, Andrea L Ramirez, Amanda Hx Lee, Daniel Rapoport, Alex Kavanagh, Andrei V Krassioukov, Matthias Walter, Andrea L Ramirez, Amanda Hx Lee, Daniel Rapoport, Alex Kavanagh, Andrei V Krassioukov

Abstract

Introduction: Managing and preventing risk factors associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular impairment is well studied in able-bodied individuals. However, individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) at or above the spinal segment T6 are prone to experience autonomic dysreflexia (AD) but also to suffer from neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Treatment of NDO would not only improve lower urinary tract function but could also reduce the severity and frequency of life-threatening episodes of AD. Fesoterodine, an antimuscarinic drug, has been successfully employed as a first-line treatment for detrusor overactivity in individuals without an underlying neurological disorder. Thus, our aim is to investigate the efficacy of fesoterodine to improve NDO and ameliorate AD in individuals with SCI.

Methods and analysis: This phase II, open-label exploratory, non-blinded, non-randomised, single-centre study will investigate the efficacy of fesoterodine to improve NDO and ameliorate AD in individuals with chronic SCI at or above T6. During screening, we will interview potential candidates (with a previous history of NDO and AD) and assess their injury severity. At baseline, we will perform cardiovascular and cerebrovascular monitoring (blood pressure (BP), heart rate and cerebral blood flow velocity) during urodynamics (UDS) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) during daily life to assess severity and frequency of AD episodes (ie, maximum increase in systolic BP). The primary outcome is a reduction of artificially induced (during UDS) and spontaneous (during daily life) episodes of AD as a display of treatment efficacy. To answer this, we will repeat UDS and 24-hour ABPM during the last cycle of the treatment phase (12 weeks overall, ie, three cycles of 4 weeks each). At the end of each treatment cycle, participants will be asked to answer standardised questionnaires (AD symptoms and quality of life) and present bladder and bowel diaries, which will provide additional subjective information.

Ethics and dissemination: The University of British Columbia Research Ethics Boards (H15-02364), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute (V15-02364) and Health Canada (205857) approved this study. The findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings. This protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials and CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials statements.

Trial registration number: NCT02676154; Pre-results.

Keywords: autonomic dysreflexia; fesoterodine; neurogenic detrusor overactivity; open-label study; protocol; spinal cord injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study timeline. The study timeline is showing each study visit and the expected duration of study participation. *The follow-up visit should be conducted via telephone 4 weeks following the end of treatment (ie, visit 6) or last scheduled visit in case of early termination of treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Drug administration protocol. Beginning of treatment at visit 3. Eligible individuals will receive a 4-week supply of 4 mg daily doses of fesoterodine. They will also receive instructions for use of medication and reporting adverse events. During the treatment period, individuals will return to the clinic, at least 2 days before their supply runs out, for visits 4 and 5. During these visits, individuals will be assessed for dose efficacy. In consultation with the investigator, individuals will have a choice to either increase the dose of the study drug to 8 mg (green arrow) or stay at the same dose. Individuals who elect to increase their dose to 8 mg per day may return to 4 mg at any time (red arrow). However, individuals may only increase their dose once. Meaning that following a dose reduction, no increases in dose will be permitted. Up to 14 days before the end of treatment period (ie, visit 6), individuals will undergo treatment efficacy evaluations in comparison to baseline (ie, visit 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protocol for the evaluation of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) during urodynamic studies. After arrival and a 5 min rest, blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) measurements will be recorded three times from the right brachial cuff. The individual will be placed in the urodynamic studies (UDS) chair in a supine position. After another 5 min rest, BP and HR measurements will be recorded again three times from the right brachial cuff. Thereafter, urethral and rectal measuring catheters will be inserted. Episodic BP/HR measurement and monitoring for symptoms of AD will be assessed at given time points (ie, start of bladder filling, first sensation, first urge/desire, strong urge/desire or leakage point). In addition, we will continuously record the following: cardiovascular changes ‘beat-to-beat’ of BP and HR from the left finger cuff, electrocardiography and cerebral blood flow. In case of prolonged AD after UDS, BP/HR measurements will be continued until SBP returns to a value below the individual’s threshold for AD. CIC, clean intermittent catheterisation.

References

    1. Ackery A, Tator C, Krassioukov A. A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:1355–70. 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1355
    1. Kovacs CW. A personal perspective on catastrophic case management. Prof Case Manag 2010;15:341–2. 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182005e98
    1. Krassioukov A, Biering-Sørensen F, Donovan W, et al. . International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35:201–10. 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053
    1. Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Cardiovascular complications after acute spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E13 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E13
    1. Karlsson AK. Autonomic dysreflexia. Spinal Cord 1999;37:383–91. 10.1038/sj.sc.3100867
    1. Wan D, Krassioukov AV. Life-threatening outcomes associated with autonomic dysreflexia: a clinical review. J Spinal Cord Med 2014;37:2–10. 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000098
    1. Ho CP, Krassioukov AV. Autonomic dysreflexia and myocardial ischemia. Spinal Cord 2010;48:714–5. 10.1038/sc.2010.2
    1. Eltorai I, Kim R, Vulpe M, et al. . Fatal cerebral hemorrhage due to autonomic dysreflexia in a tetraplegic patient: case report and review. Paraplegia 1992;30:355–60. 10.1038/sc.1992.82
    1. Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Hughes PL, et al. . Fatal cerebral hemorrhage in a tetraplegic patient due to autonomic dysreflexia triggered by delay in emptying urinary bladder after unsuccessful intermittent catheterization by carer: lessons learned. Int Med Case Rep J 2018;11:53–8. 10.2147/IMCRJ.S143077
    1. Tang DH, Colayco D, Piercy J, et al. . Impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life, daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. BMC Neurol 2014;14:74 10.1186/1471-2377-14-74
    1. Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, et al. . Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol 2016;69:324–33. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071
    1. Walter M, Knüpfer SC, Cragg JJ, et al. . Prediction of autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med 2018;16:53 10.1186/s12916-018-1040-8
    1. Walter M, Knüpfer SC, Leitner L, et al. . Autonomic dysreflexia and repeatability of cardiovascular changes during same session repeat urodynamic investigation in women with spinal cord injury. World J Urol 2016;34:391–7. 10.1007/s00345-015-1589-1
    1. Liu N, Fougere R, Zhou MW, et al. . Autonomic dysreflexia severity during urodynamics and cystoscopy in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2013;51:863–7. 10.1038/sc.2013.113
    1. Teasell RW, Arnold JM, Krassioukov A, et al. . Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:506–16. 10.1053/mr.2000.3848
    1. Fougere RJ, Currie KD, Nigro MK, et al. . Reduction in Bladder-Related autonomic dysreflexia after onabotulinumtoxina treatment in spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:1651–7. 10.1089/neu.2015.4278
    1. Malhotra B, El-Tahtawy A, Wang EQ, et al. . Dose-escalating study of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fesoterodine in children with overactive bladder. J Pediatr Urol 2012;8:336–42. 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.02.008
    1. Scarpero H, Sand PK, Kelleher CJ, et al. . Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in men and women with overactive bladder symptoms. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27:921–30. 10.1185/03007995.2011.559581
    1. Callegari E, Malhotra B, Bungay PJ, et al. . A comprehensive non-clinical evaluation of the CNS penetration potential of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;72:235–46. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03961.x
    1. Herschorn S, Swift S, Guan Z, et al. . Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head-to-head placebo-controlled trial. BJU Int 2010;105:58–66. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09086.x
    1. Kaplan SA, Schneider T, Foote JE, et al. . Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial. BJU Int 2011;107:1432–40. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09640.x
    1. Cragg JJ, Noonan VK, Krassioukov A, et al. . Cardiovascular disease and spinal cord injury: results from a national population health survey. Neurology 2013;81:723–8. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a1aa68
    1. Ethans KD, Nance PW, Bard RJ, et al. . Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in people with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27:214–8. 10.1080/10790268.2004.11753751
    1. Kennelly MJ, Lemack GE, Foote JE, et al. . Efficacy and safety of oxybutynin transdermal system in spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence: an open-label, dose-titration study. Urology 2009;74:741–5. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.008
    1. Stöhrer M, Mürtz G, Kramer G, et al. . Propiverine compared to oxybutynin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity--results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 2007;51:235–42. 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.016
    1. Stöhrer M, Mürtz G, Kramer G, et al. . Efficacy and tolerability of propiverine hydrochloride extended-release compared with immediate-release in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Spinal Cord 2013;51:419–23. 10.1038/sc.2012.174
    1. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. . International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:535–46. 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695
    1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. . The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167–78. 10.1002/nau.10052
    1. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. . Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:261–74. 10.1002/nau.10066
    1. Phillips AA, Krassioukov AV, Ainslie PN, et al. . Perturbed and spontaneous regional cerebral blood flow responses to changes in blood pressure after high-level spinal cord injury: the effect of midodrine. J Appl Physiol 2014;116:645–53. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2013
    1. Hubli M, Gee CM, Krassioukov AV. Refined assessment of blood pressure instability after spinal cord injury. Am J Hypertens 2015;28:173–81. 10.1093/ajh/hpu122
    1. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:920–4. 10.3109/00365529709011203
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    1. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, et al. . Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 1996;47:67–71. 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7
    1. Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, et al. . Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord 2006;44:625–31. 10.1038/sj.sc.3101887
    1. Pfizer. Product monograph toviaz part iii: consumer information. 2017. (Accessed 09 Jul 2018).
    1. Harmonisation ICo. Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). 1996. (Accessed 09 Jul 2018).
    1. Standardization TIOf. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — Good clinical practice. 2011. (Accessed 09 Jul 2018).
    1. Seidel JA, Miller SD, Chow DL. Effect size calculations for the clinician: methods and comparability. Psychother Res 2014;24:470–84. 10.1080/10503307.2013.840812

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit