Nurses' and midwives' experiences of providing group antenatal and postnatal care at 18 health centers in Rwanda: A mixed methods study

Tiffany Lundeen, Sabine Musange, Hana Azman, David Nzeyimana, Nathalie Murindahabi, Elizabeth Butrick, Dilys Walker, Tiffany Lundeen, Sabine Musange, Hana Azman, David Nzeyimana, Nathalie Murindahabi, Elizabeth Butrick, Dilys Walker

Abstract

Background: The East Africa Preterm Birth Initiative-Rwanda began a cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) in Rwanda in 2017. That trial will report its primary outcome, gestational length at birth, after data collection concludes in 2019. This nested study includes providers of ANC and/or PNC at the 18 health centers randomized to provide the group model of ANC/PNC and the 18 health centers randomized to continue providing ANC/PNC in the traditional, individual visit model. The objective of this study is to understand the experiences of providers of group ANC/PNC and compare their job satisfaction and perceived stress with individual ANC/PNC providers.

Methods: We collected both quantitative and qualitative data from providers (nurses and midwives) who were recruited by health center directors to participate as group ANC and PNC facilitators at intervention sites and from a similar number of providers of standard ANC and PNC at control sites. Quantitative data was collected with questionnaires administered at baseline and approximately 9 months later (follow up). Qualitative data was collected in 3 focus groups of group ANC/PNC providers conducted one year after group care began.

Results: Eighty-six percent of nurses and midwives surveyed who implemented group ANC and PNC reported that they prefer group care to the traditional individual model of ANC and PNC. Perceived stress levels and job satisfaction results were similar between groups. Mixed focus group discussions among both nurses and midwives experienced in group ANC and PNC suggest that the group model of care has advantages for both service beneficiaries and providers. When providers described implementation challenges, their peers in the focus groups offered them suggestions to cope and improve service delivery.

Discussion: These results are consistent with studies of providers of group ANC and PNC in other LMIC contexts with respect to the perceived benefits of group care. This study adds new insights into the ways peer providers can help one another solve implementation problems. When given the opportunity to meet as a group, these study participants offered one another peer support and shared knowledge about best practices for successful implementation of group ANC/PNC. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03154177.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Mazzoni SE, Carter EB. Group prenatal care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017.
    1. Sayinzoga F, Lundeen T, Gakwerere M, Manzi E, Nsaba Y, Umuziga M, et al. Use of a Facilitated Group Process to Design and Implement a Group Antenatal and Postnatal Care Program in Rwanda. J Midwifery Womens Heal. 2018;J Midwifer(Sept 25).
    1. Patil CL, Klima CS, Steffen AD, Leshabari SC, Pauls H, Norr K. Implementation challenges and outcomes of a randomized controlled pilot study of a group prenatal care model in Malawi and Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;139(3):290–6.
    1. Bloomfield J, Rising SS. CenteringParenting: An innovative dyad model for group mother-infant care. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 2013.
    1. Lori JR, Ofosu-Darkwah H, Boyd CJ, Banerjee T, Adanu RMK. Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017;17(1):228 Available from:
    1. Novick G, Reid AE, Lewis J, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Ickovics JR. Group prenatal care: Model fidelity and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(2).
    1. Schindler Rising S, Powell Kennedy H, Klima CS. Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy. J Midwifery Women’s Heal. 2004;49(5):398–404.
    1. Gaudion A, Menka Y, Demilew J, Walton C, Yiannouzis K, Robbins J, et al. Findings from a UK feasibility study of the CenteringPregnancy model. Br J Midwifery [Internet]. 2011;19(12):796–802. Available from:
    1. Patil CL, Abrams ET, Klima C, Kaponda CPN, Leshabari SC, Vonderheid SC, et al. Centeringpregnancy-africa: A pilot of group antenatal care to address millennium development goals. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1190–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.008
    1. Teate A, Leap N, Homer CSE. Midwives’ experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: A pilot study in Sydney, Australia. Women and Birth. 2013;
    1. McNeil DA, Vekved M, Dolan SM, Siever J, Horn S, Tough SC. A qualitative study of the experience of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care for physicians. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;
    1. Kania-Richmond A, Hetherington E, McNeil D, Bayrampour H, Tough S, Metcalfe A. The Impact of Introducing Centering Pregnancy in a Community Health Setting: A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perspectives of Health Center Clinical and Support Staff. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(6):1327–35. 10.1007/s10995-016-2236-1
    1. Klima C, Norr K, Vonderheid S, Handler A. Introduction of CenteringPregnancy in a Public Health Clinic. J Midwifery Women’s Heal. 2009;
    1. Baldwin K, Phillips G. Voices Along the Journey: Midwives’ Perceptions of Implementing the CenteringPregnancy Model of Prenatal Care. J Perinat Educ. 2011;
    1. Kamugundu D, Munyarugerero J, Ayabateranya P, Gasugi A. Rwanda Master Facility List [Internet]. Kigali, Rwanda;
    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Ministry of Health TDPII. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey, 2015–2016. [Internet]. Kigali, Rwanda: NISR, MOH, and ICF International.; 2016. . Accessed 13 June 2018.
    1. Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377–81.
    1. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;
    1. Benediktsson I, McDonald SW, Vekved M, McNeil DA, Dolan SM, Tough SC. Comparing CenteringPregnancy to standard prenatal care plus prenatal education. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5 Available from:
    1. Patil CL, Abrams ET, Klima C, Kaponda CPN, Leshabari SC, Vonderheid SC, et al. Centeringpregnancy-africa: A pilot of group antenatal care to address millennium development goals. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1190–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.008
    1. WHO. WHO | Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. Draft Glob Strateg Hum Resour Heal Work 2030; A69/38. 2016;

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit