Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences

Angele Musabyimana, Tiffany Lundeen, Elizabeth Butrick, Felix Sayinzoga, Bernard Ngabo Rwabufigiri, Dilys Walker, Sabine F Musange, Angele Musabyimana, Tiffany Lundeen, Elizabeth Butrick, Felix Sayinzoga, Bernard Ngabo Rwabufigiri, Dilys Walker, Sabine F Musange

Abstract

Background: The Preterm Birth Initiative-Rwanda is conducting a 36-cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal and postnatal care. In the context of this trial, we collected qualitative data before and after implementation. The purpose was two-fold. First, to inform the design of the group care program before implementation and second, to document women's experiences of group care at the mid-point of the trial to make ongoing programmatic adjustments and improvements.

Methods: We completed 8 focus group discussions among women of reproductive age before group care implementation and 6 focus group discussions among women who participated in group antenatal care and/or postnatal care at 18 health centers that introduced the model, approximately 9 months after implementation.

Results: Before implementation, focus group participants reported both enthusiasm for the potential for support and insight from a group of peers and concern about the risk of sharing private information with peers who may judge, mock, or gossip. After implementation, group care participants reported benefits including increased knowledge, peer support, and more satisfying relationships with providers. When asked about barriers to group care participation, none of them cited concern about privacy but instead cited lack of financial resources, lack of cooperation from a male partner, and long distances to the health center. Finally, women stated that the group care experience would be improved if all participants and providers arrived on time and remained focused on the group care visit throughout.

Discussion: These results are consistent with other published reports of women's perceptions of group antenatal care, especially increased pregnancy- and parenting-related knowledge, peer support, and improved relationships with health care providers. Some results were unexpected, especially the consequences of staff allocation patterns that resulted in providers arriving late for group visits or having to leave during group visits to attend to other facility services, which diminished women's experiences of care.

Conclusion: Group antenatal and postnatal care provide compelling benefits to women and families. If the model requires the addition of human resources at the health center, intensive reminder communications, and large-scale community outreach to benefit the largest number of pregnant and postnatal mothers, those additional resources required must be factored into any future decision to scale a group care model.

Trial registration: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03154177 .

Keywords: Antenatal care; Clients’ perspectives; Group care; Postnatal care; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Qualitative study; Rwanda; Sub-Saharan Africa.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial or non-financial competing interests to declare.

References

    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Ministry of Health TDPII. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey, 2015–2016. Kigali, Rwanda: NISR, MOH, and ICF International.; 2016. . Accessed 12 June 2019.
    1. Ministry of health R of R. Health Sector Policy. Kigali; 2015.
    1. Villar J, Ba’aqeel H, Piaggio G, et al. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357(9268):1551–1564. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X.
    1. Manzi A, Nyirazinyoye L, Ntaganira J, et al. Beyond coverage: improving the quality of antenatal care delivery through integrated mentorship and quality improvement at health centers in rural Rwanda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. 10.1186/s12913-018-2939-7.
    1. Hitimana R, Lindholm L, Krantz G, Nzayirambaho M, Pulkki-Brännström AM. Cost of antenatal care for the health sector and for households in Rwanda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3013-1.
    1. Manzi A, Munyaneza F, Mujawase F, et al. Assessing predictors of delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: a secondary analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. 10.1186/1471-2393-14-290.
    1. Påfs Jessica, Musafili Aimable, Binder-Finnema Pauline, Klingberg-Allvin Marie, Rulisa Stephen, Essén Birgitta. ‘They would never receive you without a husband’: Paradoxical barriers to antenatal care scale-up in Rwanda. Midwifery. 2015;31(12):1149–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.010.
    1. Lu Chunling, Chin Brian, Lewandowski Jiwon Lee, Basinga Paulin, Hirschhorn Lisa R., Hill Kenneth, Murray Megan, Binagwaho Agnes. Towards Universal Health Coverage: An Evaluation of Rwanda Mutuelles in Its First Eight Years. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039282.
    1. Maternal, child, and community health division, Ministry of Health R of R . National Postnatal Care Guideline for Mother and Newborn. 2015.
    1. Sayinzoga Felix, Lundeen Tiffany, Gakwerere Mathias, Manzi Emmanuel, Nsaba Yvonne Delphine U., Umuziga M. Providence, Kalisa Ina R., Musange Sabine F., Walker Dilys. Use of a Facilitated Group Process to Design and Implement a Group Antenatal and Postnatal Care Program in Rwanda. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2018;63(5):593–601. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12871.
    1. Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.
    1. Carter Ebony B., Temming Lorene A., Akin Jennifer, Fowler Susan, Macones George A., Colditz Graham A., Tuuli Methodius G. Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;128(3):551–561. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
    1. Mazzoni SE, Carter EB. Group prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):552–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006.
    1. Byerley BM, Haas DM. A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. 10.1186/s12884-017-1522-2.
    1. Organization world health. WHO Recommendation on Antenatal care for positive pregnancy experience. WHO Recomm Antenatal care Posit pregnancy Exp. 2016:152. doi: ISBN 978 92 4 154991 2.
    1. Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A. Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women? Iran J Public Heal. 2010;39(2):52–62.
    1. L R. Afya Jamii: Evaluation of a Group Antenatal and Well-Child Care Program in Kenya. Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 2016.
    1. Patil CL, Klima CS, Steffen AD, Leshabari SC, Pauls H, Norr K. Implementation challenges and outcomes of a randomized controlled pilot study of a group prenatal care model in Malawi and Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;139(3):290–296. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12324.
    1. Arnold J, Morgan AMB. Paternal perceptions of and satisfaction with group prenatal Care in Botswana. Online J Cult Competence Nurs Heal. 2014;4(2):17–26. doi: 10.9730/.
    1. Ghani R. Perception toward conducting the centering pregnancy model in the Egyptian teaching hospitals: a step to improve the quality of antenatal care. Eur J Biol Med Sci Res. 2014;2(2):45–54.
    1. Lori J, Ofosu-Darkwah H, Boyd C, Banerjee T, Adanu R. Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1414-5.
    1. Sharma J, O’Connor M, Rima Jolivet R. Group antenatal care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2018. 10.1186/s12978-018-0476-9.
    1. Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K, Hantoushzadeh S. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of group prenatal care: a new experience in Iran maternal and neonatal outcomes of group prenatal care: a new experience in Iran. Health Care Women Int. 2010;31(7):571–584. doi: 10.1080/07399331003646323.
    1. Patil CL, Klima CS, Leshabari SC, et al. Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. 10.1186/s12884-017-1493-3.
    1. Lori JR, Ofosu-Darkwah H, Boyd CJ, Banerjee T, Adanu RMK. Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1414-5.
    1. Sultana M, Mahumud RA, Ali N, et al. The effectiveness of introducing group prenatal care (GPC) in selected health facilities in a district of Bangladesh: study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1227-6.
    1. Sultana M, Mahumud R, Ali N, et al. Cost of introducing group prenatatl care (GPC) in Bangladesh: a supply-side perspective. BMC Saf Heal. 2017;3(8). 10.1186/s40886-017-0059-4.
    1. Ruhl L., Christoffersen-Deb A., Elung'at J., Songok J. AfyaJamii: Introducing a group prenatal and postnatal care model in Kenya. Annals of Global Health. 2015;81(1):199. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.02.957.
    1. Sayinzoga F, Lundeen T, Gakwerere M, et al. Use of a facilitated group process to design and implement a group antenatal and postnatal care program in Rwanda. J Midwifery Womens Heal 2018;J Midwifer (Sept 25).
    1. Jolivet RR, Uttekar BV, O’Connor M, Lakhwani K, Sharma JWM. Exploring perceptions of group antenatal Care in Urban India: results of a feasibility study. Repro Heal. 2018;15(57).
    1. Patil CL, Abrams ET, Klima C, et al. Centeringpregnancy-africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address millennium development goals. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1190–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.008.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit