Treatment fidelity in the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial

Roberta W Scherer, Sue Ann Erdman, Susan Gold, Craig Formby, TRTT Research Group, Roberta W Scherer, Sue Ann Erdman, Susan Gold, Craig Formby, TRTT Research Group

Abstract

Background: Treatment fidelity, defined as ensuring that the recipient receives the intended intervention, is a critical component for accurate estimation of treatment efficacy. Ensuring fidelity and protocol adherence in behavioral trials requires careful planning during the design phase and implementation during the trial. The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT) randomized individuals with severe tinnitus to tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT, comprised of tinnitus-specific educational counseling (TC) and sound therapy (ST) using conventional sound generators (SGs)); Partial TRT (TC and placebo SGs); or standard of care (SOC), using a patient-centered care approach. Study audiologists administered both types of counseling in the TRTT, creating a challenge for managing protocol adherence.

Methods: We developed methods to enhance treatment fidelity including training, competency assessment, scripts, visual aids, and fidelity monitoring. Protocol monitors identified critical topics and content to be addressed for each type of counseling session, prepared corresponding scripts, and developed training aids and treatment-specific checklists covering those topics. Study audiologists' competency assessment required submission and review by the protocol monitors of an audiotape of one TC and one SOC counseling session. Treatment-specific aids included scripts, a 3-D model of the ear, handouts, and for TC, an illustrated flip-chart with talking points that followed the scripted content. During the trial, audiologists completed treatment-specific checklists during each counseling session, indicating topics covered/discussed and submitted audiotapes of counseling sessions. Protocol monitors reviewed audiotapes using corresponding treatment-specific checklists. Results for individual checklist items were tabulated and proportions calculated.

Results: Twenty-five audiologists were certified for TC and/or SOC counseling and 24 completed at least one counseling session. Adherence to each of 33 critical items on the TC checklist as assessed by the protocol monitor ranged from 70 to 100% across 37 counseling sessions (median 97%), with no difference between adherence for TRT (median, 97%) and partial TRT (median, 100%). Adherence to each of 44 critical items on the SOC checklist across 30 SOC counseling sessions ranged from 42 to 100% (median, 87.5%).

Conclusion: The TRTT used multiple methods to address treatment fidelity. The close adherence to each treatment type was critical for evaluating the efficacy of the study interventions in this randomized trial.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01177137 . Registered on 5 August 2010.

Keywords: Protocol adherence; Randomized trial; Tinnitus; Treatment fidelity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

    1. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443–451. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443.
    1. Baker FA, Tamplin J, Clark IN, Lee YC, Geretsegger M, Gold C. Treatment fidelity in a music therapy multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial for people living with dementia: the MIDDEL Project Intervention Fidelity Protocol. J Music Ther. 2019;56(2):125–148. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thy023.
    1. Kechter A, Amaro H, Black DS. Reporting of treatment fidelity in mindfulness-based intervention trials: a review and new tool using NIH Behavior Change Consortium guidelines. Mindfulness. 2019;10:215–233. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0974-4.
    1. Beck AK, Forbes E, Baker AL, Britton B, Oldmeadow C, Carter G. Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e028417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028417.
    1. Walton H, Spector A, Tombor I, Michie S. Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: a systematic review of measure quality. Br J Health Psychol. 2017;22(4):872–903. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12260.
    1. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71(s1):S52–s63. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.
    1. Robb SL, Burns DS, Docherty SL, Haase JE. Ensuring treatment fidelity in a multi-site behavioral intervention study: implementing NIH Behavior Change Consortium recommendations in the SMART trial. Psycho-oncology. 2011;20(11):1193–1201. doi: 10.1002/pon.1845.
    1. Gearing RE, El-Bassel N, Ghesquiere A, Baldwin S, Gillies J, Ngeow E. Major ingredients of fidelity: a review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(1):79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.007.
    1. Scherer RW, Formby C, Gold S, Erdman S, Rodhe C, Carlson M, et al. The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:396. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-396.
    1. Erdman SA, Scherer RW, Sierra-Irizarry B, Formby C. The tinnitus retraining therapy Trial's standard of care control condition: rationale and description of a patient-centered protocol. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(3):534–547. doi: 10.1044/2019_aja-18-0068.
    1. Scherer RW, Formby C. Effect of tinnitus retraining therapy vs standard of care on tinnitus-related quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(7):597–608. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0821.
    1. Hallam RS. Manual of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) London: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
    1. Meikle MB, Henry JA, Griest SE, Stewart BJ, Abrams HB, McArdle R, et al. The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus. Ear & Hearing. 2012;33(2):153–176. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
    1. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):143–148. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007.
    1. Henry JA, Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ, Schechter MA, Fausti SA. Guide to conducting tinnitus retraining therapy initial and follow-up interviews. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(2):157–177. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.03.0159.
    1. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP. Tinnitus retraining therapy: implementing the neurophysiological model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
    1. Jastreboff PJ. The neurophysiological model of tinnitus. In: Snow JBJ, editor. Tinnitus: theory and management. Hamilton London: BC Decker; 2004. pp. 96–106.
    1. Perepletchikova F, Kazdin EE. Treatment integrity and therapeutic change: issues and resarch recommendations. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2005;12(4):365–383. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpi045.
    1. Gold SL, Formby C, Gray WC. Celebrating a decade of evaluation and treatment: the University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center. Am J Audiol. 2000;9(2):69–74. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2000/014).
    1. O’Malley KA, Qualls SH. Application of treatment fidelity in tailored caregiver interventions. Aging Ment Health. 2019:1–9. 10.1080/13607863.2019.1647134.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit