Vision-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, N Venkatesh Prajna, K Tiruvengada Krishnan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Muthiah Srinivasan, Anita Raghavan, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kieran S O'Brien, Kathryn J Ray, Stephen D McLeod, Travis C Porco, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, Jeremy D Keenan, Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I Group, N Venkatesh Prajna, Prajna Lalitha, Jeena Mascarenhas, Muthiah Srinivasan, Rajarathinam Karpagam, Malaiyandi Rajkumar, S R Sumithra, C Sundar, Revathi Rajaraman, Anita Raghavan, P Manikandan, K Tiruvengada Krishnan, N Shivananda, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, Stephen D McLeod, John P Whitcher, Salena Lee, Vicky Cevallos, Brett L Shapiro, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kieran S O'Brien, Kevin C Hong, Marian Fisher, Anthony Aldave, Donald Everett, Jacqueline Glover, K Ananda Kannan, Steven Kymes, Ivan Schwab, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, David Glidden, Stephen D McLeod, John P Whitcher, Salena Lee, Kathryn Ray, Vicky Cevallos, Brett L Shapiro, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kevin C Hong, Kieran S O'Brien, Donald F Everett, Michael E Zegans, Christine M Kidd, Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer, N Venkatesh Prajna, K Tiruvengada Krishnan, Jeena Mascarenhas, Revathi Rajaraman, Muthiah Srinivasan, Anita Raghavan, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kieran S O'Brien, Kathryn J Ray, Stephen D McLeod, Travis C Porco, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, Jeremy D Keenan, Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I Group, N Venkatesh Prajna, Prajna Lalitha, Jeena Mascarenhas, Muthiah Srinivasan, Rajarathinam Karpagam, Malaiyandi Rajkumar, S R Sumithra, C Sundar, Revathi Rajaraman, Anita Raghavan, P Manikandan, K Tiruvengada Krishnan, N Shivananda, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, Stephen D McLeod, John P Whitcher, Salena Lee, Vicky Cevallos, Brett L Shapiro, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kieran S O'Brien, Kevin C Hong, Marian Fisher, Anthony Aldave, Donald Everett, Jacqueline Glover, K Ananda Kannan, Steven Kymes, Ivan Schwab, Thomas M Lietman, Nisha R Acharya, David Glidden, Stephen D McLeod, John P Whitcher, Salena Lee, Kathryn Ray, Vicky Cevallos, Brett L Shapiro, Catherine E Oldenburg, Kevin C Hong, Kieran S O'Brien, Donald F Everett, Michael E Zegans, Christine M Kidd

Abstract

Importance: Given the limitations in health care resources, quality-of-life measures for interventions have gained importance.

Objective: To determine whether vision-related quality-of-life outcomes were different between the natamycin and voriconazole treatment arms in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial I, as measured by an Indian Vision Function Questionnaire.

Design, setting, and participants: Secondary analysis (performed October 11-25, 2014) of a double-masked, multicenter, randomized, active comparator-controlled, clinical trial at multiple locations of the Aravind Eye Care System in South India that enrolled patients with culture- or smear-positive filamentous fungal corneal ulcers who had a baseline visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/400 (logMAR of 0.3-1.3).

Interventions: Study participants were randomly assigned to topical voriconazole, 1%, or topical natamycin, 5%.

Main outcomes and measures: Subscale score on the Indian Vision Function Questionnaire from each of the 4 subscales (mobility, activity limitation, psychosocial impact, and visual function) at 3 months.

Results: A total of 323 patients were enrolled in the trial, and 292 (90.4%) completed the Indian Vision Function Questionnaire at 3 months. The majority of study participants had subscale scores consistent with excellent function. After adjusting for baseline visual acuity and organism, we found that study participants in the natamycin-treated group scored, on average, 4.3 points (95% CI, 0.1-8.5) higher than study participants in the voriconazole-treated group (P = .046). In subgroup analyses looking at ulcers caused by Fusarium species and adjusting for baseline best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, the natamycin-treated group scored 8.4 points (95% CI, 1.9-14.9) higher than the voriconazole-treated group (P = .01). Differences in quality of life were not detected for patients with Aspergillus or other non-Fusarium species as the causative organism (1.5 points [95% CI, -3.9 to 6.9]; P = .52).

Conclusions and relevance: We found evidence of improvement in vision-related quality of life among patients with fungal ulcers who were randomly assigned to natamycin compared with those randomly assigned to voriconazole, and especially among patients with Fusarium species as the causative organism. Incorporation of quality-of-life measures in clinical trials is important to fully evaluate the effect of the studied interventions.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00996736.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest, and Ms O’Brien reports having received grants from the NEI during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure. IND-VFQ Subscale Scores by Treatment Arm
Figure. IND-VFQ Subscale Scores by Treatment Arm
The horizontal line in each box indicates the median, while the top and bottom borders of the box mark the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers above and below the box mark the 90th and 10th percentiles, respectively. The points beyond the whiskers are outliers beyond the 10th percentile. IND-VFQ indicates Indian Vision Function Questionnaire.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit