Slowed saccades and increased square wave jerks in essential tremor

George T Gitchel, Paul A Wetzel, Mark S Baron, George T Gitchel, Paul A Wetzel, Mark S Baron

Abstract

Background: Eye movements in essential tremor (ET) are poorly described and may present useful information on the underlying pathophysiology of the disorder.

Methods: Sixty patients with ET, including 15 de novo untreated patients, and 60 age-matched controls constitute the study population. A video-based eye tracker was used to assess binocular eye position. Oculomotor function was assessed while subjects followed random horizontally and vertically step-displaced targets.

Results: For all reflexive saccades, latencies were increased in ET subjects by a mean of 16.3% (p<0.01). Saccades showed reduced peak velocities with a lengthy, wavering velocity plateau, followed by slowed decelerations. For larger 30°+ saccades, peak velocities were decreased by a mean of 25.2% (p<0.01) and durations increased by 31.8% (p<0.01). The frequency of square wave jerks (SWJs) in patients was more than triple that of controls (p<0.0001). Despite frequent interruptions by SWJs, fixations were otherwise stable and indistinguishable from controls (root mean square [RMS] velocity, p = 0.324). The abnormal eye movement parameters were independent of disease duration, tremor severity, and medication therapy.

Discussion: In contrast to normally swift onset and efficient acceleration/deceleration movements, saccades in ET are characterized by abnormally prolonged latencies and slowed velocity profiles. Although ET subjects maintain highly stable fixations, they are interrupted by increased numbers of SWJs. This study reveals novel oculomotor deficits in ET, which are distinct from the eye movement dysfunction of other movement disorders, supporting a role for eye tracking to assist in the differential diagnoses of not only atypical, but also more common movement disorders.

Keywords: Essential tremor; cerebellum; main sequence; ocular motility; saccades; square wave jerks.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Financial disclosures: None.

Figures

Figure 1. Frequency of Square Wave Jerks…
Figure 1. Frequency of Square Wave Jerks while Fixating.
Essential tremor patients exhibit appreciably more square wave jerks than age matched controls (p

Figure 2. Latency of Reflexive Saccades to…

Figure 2. Latency of Reflexive Saccades to Randomly Displaced Targets

Patients with essential tremor have…

Figure 2. Latency of Reflexive Saccades to Randomly Displaced Targets
Patients with essential tremor have increased saccadic latencies compared with age-matched controls (p

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades.…

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades. Single velocity traces are shown for 18 representative…

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades. Single velocity traces are shown for 18 representative essential tremor (ET) subjects and 18 control subjects.
The velocity profiles were aligned at t = 10 ms at the defined saccadic onset threshold (20°/second). Note the lower peak velocity, velocity plateau, and prolonged duration of saccades in ET subjects. The integral was taken of each individual velocity curve, and no difference was found between each group (p = 0.59). This further supports that despite abnormal velocity behavior during saccadic flight, that subjects with ET maintain accurate saccadic amplitudes, and reach the intended target position.

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main…

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main Sequence.

(A) Peak velocity vs. amplitude of saccades.…

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main Sequence.
(A) Peak velocity vs. amplitude of saccades. For all movement amplitudes, subjects with essential tremor generally exhibit lower peak velocities than controls (Vmax = 400°/second for essential tremor [ET] subjects vs. 500°/second for controls, C  =  19.9 for ET subjects vs. 9.1 for controls). (B) Saccadic duration vs. amplitude. Saccades are generally slower for subjects with ET compared to controls, with the group differences becoming progressively greater with increasing saccadic amplitude (average duration of a one degree saccade (D1)  =  28.8 ms for ET subjects vs. 20.6 ms for controls, exponential value (n) for ET subjects  =  0.41 vs. 0.39 for controls).
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Zesiewicz TA, Chari A, Jahan I, Miller AM, Sullivan KL. Overview of essential tremor. Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 2010;6:401–408. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S4795. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M, Ad Hoc Scientific Committee Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor. Mov Disord. 1998;13(Suppl. 3):2–23. - PubMed
    1. Whaley NR, Putzke JD, Baba Y, et al. Essential Tremor: phenotypic expression in a clinical cohort. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louis ED, Ottoman R, Hauser WA. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Estimates of the prevalence of essential tremor throughout the world. Mov Disord. 1998;13:5–10. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helmchen C, Hagenow J, Miesner A, et al. Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor may indicate cerebellar dysfunction. Brain. 2003;126:1319–1332. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg132. - DOI - PubMed
Show all 40 references
Related information
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2. Latency of Reflexive Saccades to…
Figure 2. Latency of Reflexive Saccades to Randomly Displaced Targets
Patients with essential tremor have increased saccadic latencies compared with age-matched controls (p

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades.…

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades. Single velocity traces are shown for 18 representative…

Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades. Single velocity traces are shown for 18 representative essential tremor (ET) subjects and 18 control subjects.
The velocity profiles were aligned at t = 10 ms at the defined saccadic onset threshold (20°/second). Note the lower peak velocity, velocity plateau, and prolonged duration of saccades in ET subjects. The integral was taken of each individual velocity curve, and no difference was found between each group (p = 0.59). This further supports that despite abnormal velocity behavior during saccadic flight, that subjects with ET maintain accurate saccadic amplitudes, and reach the intended target position.

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main…

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main Sequence.

(A) Peak velocity vs. amplitude of saccades.…

Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main Sequence.
(A) Peak velocity vs. amplitude of saccades. For all movement amplitudes, subjects with essential tremor generally exhibit lower peak velocities than controls (Vmax = 400°/second for essential tremor [ET] subjects vs. 500°/second for controls, C  =  19.9 for ET subjects vs. 9.1 for controls). (B) Saccadic duration vs. amplitude. Saccades are generally slower for subjects with ET compared to controls, with the group differences becoming progressively greater with increasing saccadic amplitude (average duration of a one degree saccade (D1)  =  28.8 ms for ET subjects vs. 20.6 ms for controls, exponential value (n) for ET subjects  =  0.41 vs. 0.39 for controls).
Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades.…
Figure 3. Velocity profiles of 10° saccades. Single velocity traces are shown for 18 representative essential tremor (ET) subjects and 18 control subjects.
The velocity profiles were aligned at t = 10 ms at the defined saccadic onset threshold (20°/second). Note the lower peak velocity, velocity plateau, and prolonged duration of saccades in ET subjects. The integral was taken of each individual velocity curve, and no difference was found between each group (p = 0.59). This further supports that despite abnormal velocity behavior during saccadic flight, that subjects with ET maintain accurate saccadic amplitudes, and reach the intended target position.
Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main…
Figure 4. Saccadic Dynamics along the Main Sequence.
(A) Peak velocity vs. amplitude of saccades. For all movement amplitudes, subjects with essential tremor generally exhibit lower peak velocities than controls (Vmax = 400°/second for essential tremor [ET] subjects vs. 500°/second for controls, C  =  19.9 for ET subjects vs. 9.1 for controls). (B) Saccadic duration vs. amplitude. Saccades are generally slower for subjects with ET compared to controls, with the group differences becoming progressively greater with increasing saccadic amplitude (average duration of a one degree saccade (D1)  =  28.8 ms for ET subjects vs. 20.6 ms for controls, exponential value (n) for ET subjects  =  0.41 vs. 0.39 for controls).

References

    1. Zesiewicz TA, Chari A, Jahan I, Miller AM, Sullivan KL. Overview of essential tremor. Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 2010;6:401–408. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S4795.
    1. Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M, Ad Hoc Scientific Committee Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor. Mov Disord. 1998;13(Suppl. 3):2–23.
    1. Whaley NR, Putzke JD, Baba Y, et al. Essential Tremor: phenotypic expression in a clinical cohort. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13:333–339. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.12.004.
    1. Louis ED, Ottoman R, Hauser WA. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Estimates of the prevalence of essential tremor throughout the world. Mov Disord. 1998;13:5–10. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130105.
    1. Helmchen C, Hagenow J, Miesner A, et al. Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor may indicate cerebellar dysfunction. Brain. 2003;126:1319–1332. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg132.
    1. Trillenberg P, Führer J, Sprenger A, et al. Eye-hand coordination in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2006;21:373–379. doi: 10.1002/mds.20729.
    1. Straube A, Scheurer W, Eggert T. Unilateral cerebellar lesions affect initiation of ipsilateral smooth pursuit eye movements in humans. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:891–898. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420611.
    1. Moschner C, Crawford TJ, Heide W, Trillenburg P, Kömpf D, Kennard C. Deficits of smooth pursuit initiaion in patinets with degenerative cerebellar lesions. Brain. 1999;122:2147–2158. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.11.2147.
    1. Hain TC, Zee DS, Maria BL. Tilt suppression of vestibulo-ocular reflex in patients with cerebellar lesions. Acta Otolaryngol. 1988;105:13–20. doi: 10.3109/00016488809119440.
    1. Bahill AT, Clark MR, Stark L. The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements. Math Biosci. 1975;24:194. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(75)90075-9.
    1. Harwood MR, Mezey LE, Harris CM. The spectral main sequence of human saccades. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9098–9106.
    1. Baloh RW, Konrad HR, Sills AW, Honrubia V. The Saccade Velocity Test. Neurology. 1975;25:1071–1076. doi: 10.1212/WNL.25.11.1071.
    1. Gitchel GT, Wetzel PA, Baron MS. Pervasive ocular tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1011–1017. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.70.
    1. Rabiah PK, Bateman JB, Demer JL, et al. Ophthalmologic findings in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:108–117.
    1. Garbutt S, Riley DE, Kumar AN, et al. Abnormalities of optokinetic nystagmus in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1386–1394. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.027367.
    1. Herishanu Y, Sharpe JA. Normal Square Wave Jerks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:268–272.
    1. Shallo-Hoffmann J, Sendler B, Muhlendyck H. Normal square wave jerks in differing age groups. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1649–1652.
    1. Abadi RV, Gowen E. Characteristics of saccadic intrusions. Vision Research. 2004;44:2675–90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.009.
    1. Rascol O, Sabatini U, Simonetta-Moreau M, et al. Square wave jerks in parkinsonian syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:599–602. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.7.599.
    1. Rajput AH, Robinson CA, Rajput ML, Rajput A. Cerebellar purkinje cell loss is not pathognomonic of essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.08.009.
    1. Rajput AH, Robinson CA, Rajput ML, Robinson SL, Rajput A. Essential tremor is not dependent upon cerebellar purkinje cell loss. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:626–628. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.01.013.
    1. Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, et al. Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 12):3297–3307. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm266.
    1. Axelrad JE, Louis ED, Honig LS, et al. Reduced Purkinje cell number in essential tremor: a postmortem study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:101–107. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.8.
    1. Louis ED, Faust PL, Ma KJ, Yu M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP. Torpedoes in the cerebellar vermis in essential tremor cases vs. controls. Cerebellum. 2011;10:812–819. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0291-0.
    1. Rucker JC, Leigh RJ, Optican LM, Keller EL, Büttner-Ennever JA. Ocular motor anatomy in a case of interrupted saccades. In: Kennard C, Leigh RJ, . Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; editors. Progress in brain research. (Vol 171. Chapter 6.11).
    1. Rucker JC, Shapiro BE, Han YH, et al. Neuro-ophthalmology of late-onset Tay-Sachs disease (LOTS) Neurology. 2004;63:1918–1926. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000144275.76658.F4.
    1. Rucker JC, Ying SH, Moore W, et al. Do brainstem omnipause neurons terminate saccades? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1233:48–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06170.x.
    1. Quaia C, Lefevre P, Optican LM. Model of the control of saccades by Superior colliculus and cerebellum. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:999–1018.
    1. Optican LM, Quaia C. Distributed model of collicular and cerebellar functions during saccades. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;956:164–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02817.x.
    1. Kaski D, Saifee TA, Buckwell D, Bronstein AM. Ocular tremor in Parkinson’s disease is due to head oscillation. Mov Disord. 2013;28:534–537. doi: 10.1002/mds.25342.
    1. Baron MS, Gitchel GT, Wetzel PA. Ocular tremor in Parkinson’s disease is due to eye, not head oscillation. Mov Disord. 2013;28:844. doi: 10.1002/mds.25461.
    1. Leigh RJ, Martinez-Conde S. Tremor of the eyes, or of the head, in Parkinson’s disease? Mov Disord. 2013;28:691–693. doi: 10.1002/mds.25478.
    1. Duval C. Ocular tremor in Parkinon’s disease: the debate is not over. Mov Disord. 2013;28:713–714. doi: 10.1002/mds.25514.
    1. Benito-León J, Louis ED. Update on essential tremor. Minerva Med. 2011;102:417–440.
    1. Baumann CR. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease tremor. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 2012;18(Suppl. 1):S90–S92. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(11)70029-3.
    1. Shahed J, Jankovic J. Exploring the relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2006.05.033.
    1. Jain S, Lo SE, Louis ED. Common misdiagnosis of a common neurological disorder: how are we misdiagnosing essential tremor? Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1100–1104. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.8.1100.
    1. Pahwa R, Lyons KE. Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: recommendations from diagnostic clinical guidelines. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:S94–S99.
    1. Kumar AN, Han YH, Liao K, et al. Evaluating large saccades in patients with brain-stem or cerebellar disorders. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2005;1039:404–16. doi: 10.1196/annals.1325.038.
    1. Leigh RJ, Kennard C. Using saccades as a research tool in the clinical neurosciences. Brain. 2004;127:460–477. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh035.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit