Behavioural intervention for adolescent uptake of family planning: a randomized controlled trial, Uganda

Sara Flanagan, Arielle Gorstein, Martha Nicholson, Stephanie Bradish, Diana Amanyire, Andrew Gidudu, Francis Aucur, Julius Twesigye, Faith Kyateka, Samuel Balamaga, Alison Buttenheim, Emily Zimmerman, Sara Flanagan, Arielle Gorstein, Martha Nicholson, Stephanie Bradish, Diana Amanyire, Andrew Gidudu, Francis Aucur, Julius Twesigye, Faith Kyateka, Samuel Balamaga, Alison Buttenheim, Emily Zimmerman

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a peer-referral and clinic welcome programme for reducing barriers to adolescents' uptake of family planning services in Uganda.

Methods: We developed an intervention using behavioural design and carried out a stratified, randomized controlled evaluation of the intervention in girls aged 15-19 years. Sexual and reproductive health clinics were randomized into control (56 clinics) and intervention groups (60 clinics). All intervention clinics received the core intervention (materials to create an adolescent-friendly environment and referral cards to give to friends), while a subset of clinics additionally received training in youth-friendly service provision. We collected clinics' routine data on monthly numbers of visits by adults and adolescents over a 15-month baseline and 6-month intervention period, 2018-2020.

Findings: In multivariate regression analysis we found significant effects of the intervention on primary outcomes in the pooled intervention group compared with control. Mean monthly visits by adolescents increased by 45% (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 1.45; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.14-1.85), or over five additional adolescent clients per clinic per month. The mean adolescent proportion of total clients improved by 5.3 percentage points (95% CI: 0.02-0.09). Within treatment arms, clinics receiving the training in youth-friendly service provision showed the strongest effects: a 62% increase (IRR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.21-2.17) in adolescent clients, or over seven additional adolescents per clinic per month, relative to the control group.

Conclusion: A behavioural change intervention designed to target identified barriers can increase adolescents' uptake of family planning counselling and services.

(c) 2021 The authors; licensee World Health Organization.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the stratified, randomized controlled field trial of the peer-referral and clinic welcome family planning intervention for adolescents, Uganda, 2020

References

    1. Sully E, Biddlecom A, Darroch JE, Riley T, Ashford LS, Lince-Deroche N, et al. Adding it up: investing in sexual and reproductive health 2019. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2020. 10.1363/2020.31593
    1. Adolescents: health risks and solutions [internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: [cited 2020 Oct 23].
    1. Birungi H, Undie C-C, MacKenzie I, Katahoire A, Obare F, Machawira P. Education sector response to early and unintended pregnancy: a review of country experiences in sub-Saharan Africa. STEP UP and UNESCO research report. New York: Population Council; 2015. Available from: [cited 2020 Oct 23].
    1. de Vargas Nunes Coll C, Ewerling F, Hellwig F, de Barros AJD. Contraception in adolescence: the influence of parity and marital status on contraceptive use in 73 low-and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2019. February 21;16(1):21. 10.1186/s12978-019-0686-9
    1. Uganda demographic and health survey 2016. Maryland: ICF International & Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2018. Available from: [cited 2020 Oct 23].
    1. Amongin D, Nakimuli A, Hanson C, Nakafeero M, Kaharuza F, Atuyambe L, et al. Time trends in and factors associated with repeat adolescent birth in Uganda: analysis of six demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2020. April 14;15(4):e0231557. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231557
    1. Sully EA, Atuyambe L, Bukenya J, Whitehead HS, Blades N, Bankole A. Estimating abortion incidence among adolescents and differences in postabortion care by age: a cross-sectional study of postabortion care patients in Uganda. Contraception. 2018. December;98(6):510–16. 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.135
    1. Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health for adolescents in Uganda, 2018. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018. Available from: [cited 2020 Nov 5].
    1. Yakubu I, Salisu WJ. Determinants of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018. January 27;15(1):15. 10.1186/s12978-018-0460-4
    1. Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C, Wong S. What does not work in adolescent sexual and reproductive health: a review of evidence on interventions commonly accepted as best practices. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015. August 31;3(3):333–40. 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00126
    1. Datta S, Mullainathan S. Behavioral design: a new approach to development policy. Rev Income Wealth. 2014;60(1):7–35. 10.1111/roiw.12093
    1. Ashton L, Giridhar N, Holcombe SJ, Madon T, Turner E. A review of behavioral economics in reproductive health. Berkeley: Center for Effective Global Action; 2015. Available from: [cited 2020 Oct 23].
    1. Tested solutions for adolescent family planning [internet]. New York: ideas42, MSI Reproductive Choices Reproductive Choices & Marie Stopes Uganda; 2021. Available from: [cited 2021 Aug 1].
    1. Flanagan S, Gorstein A, Nicholson M, Bradish S, Amanyire D, Gidudu A, et al. Increasing adolescent uptake of family planning: a randomized controlled evaluation of a behavioural intervention in Uganda: supplementary materials [data repository]. London: figshare; 2021. 10.6084/m9.figshare.1495932010.6084/m9.figshare.14959320
    1. Aronson E, editor. Readings about the social animal. London: Macmillan; 2003.
    1. Hardin CD, Higgins ET. Shared reality: how social verification makes the subjective objective. Handbook of motivation and cognition: the interpersonal context. Volume 3. New York: Guilford Press; 1996.
    1. Gerber AS, Green DP. Field experiments: design, analysis, and interpretation. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2012.
    1. Gelman A, Hill J, Vehtari A. Regression and other stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. 10.1017/9781139161879
    1. Empowering adolescent girls as peer advocates for family planning: designing and testing a peer referral and clinic welcome program in Uganda. New York: ideas42; 2021. Available from: [cited 2021 Aug 1].
    1. Herbert S. Social norms, contraception and family planning. Birmingham: Governance and Social Development Resource Centre; 2015.
    1. Mmari KN, Magnani RJ. Does making clinic-based reproductive health services more youth-friendly increase service use by adolescents? Evidence from Lusaka, Zambia. J Adolesc Health. 2003. October;33(4):259–70. 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00062-4
    1. Mazur A, Brindis CD, Decker MJ. Assessing youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. March 27;18(1):216. 10.1186/s12913-018-2982-4
    1. Diamond-Smith N, Warnock R, Sudhinaraset M. Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review. Reprod Health. 2018. August 28;15(1):144. 10.1186/s12978-018-0592-6
    1. Tylee A, Haller DM, Graham T, Churchill R, Sanci LA. Youth-friendly primary-care services: how are we doing and what more needs to be done? Lancet. 2007. May 5;369(9572):1565–73. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60371-7

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit