Telemedicine During COVID-19 for Outpatient Sports and Musculoskeletal Medicine Physicians
Adam S Tenforde, Mary A Iaccarino, Haylee Borgstrom, Jaye E Hefner, Julie Silver, Marwa Ahmed, Ashwin N Babu, Cheri A Blauwet, Lauren Elson, Christine Eng, Dana Kotler, Scott Homer, Steven Makovitch, Kelly C McInnis, Ariana Vora, Joanne Borg-Stein, Adam S Tenforde, Mary A Iaccarino, Haylee Borgstrom, Jaye E Hefner, Julie Silver, Marwa Ahmed, Ashwin N Babu, Cheri A Blauwet, Lauren Elson, Christine Eng, Dana Kotler, Scott Homer, Steven Makovitch, Kelly C McInnis, Ariana Vora, Joanne Borg-Stein
Abstract
Introduction: The global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in an expansion of telemedicine. Measures of quality and barriers for rapid use by patients and physicians are not well described.
Objective: To describe results from a quality improvement initiative during a rapid adoptive phase of telemedicine during the pandemic.
Design: Patient and physician satisfaction with synchronous audiovisual telemedicine visits was measured during the early adoptive phase (6 April 2020-17 April 2020) within the division of sports medicine in an academic Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) department. Patients were invited to participate in a quality improvement initiative by completing an online survey at the end of a telemedicine visit. Physicians completed a separate survey.
Primary outcome measures: Patient measures included visit type, duration of encounter, quality, and satisfaction. Physicians reported on experiences performed telemedicine.
Results: Surveys were completed by 119 patients (293 telemedicine encounters, response rate 40.6%) and 14 physiatrists. Telemedicine was utilized primarily for follow-up visits (n = 74, 70.6%), and the most common duration was 15 to 29 minutes. Patients rated their telemedicine visit as "excellent" or "very good" across measures (91.6%-95.0%) including addressing concerns, communication, developing a treatment plan, convenience, and satisfaction. Value of completing a future telemedicine visit was measured at 84.9%. Most reported estimated travel time saved was in excess of 30 minutes. Rate of no-show was 2.7%. Most physicians (57.1%) had no prior experience with telemedicine visits, and most were comfortable performing these visits after completing 1 to 4 sessions (71%). Nearly all physicians (92.9%) rated their telemedicine experience as very good or excellent. The key barrier identified for telemedicine was technical issues. All physicians reported plans to perform telemedicine visits if reimbursement continues.
Conclusions: In summary, rapid expansion of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic was well-received by a majority of patients and physicians. This suggests feasibility in rapid expansion of telemedicine for other outpatient sports medicine practices.
© 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Figures
References
- Tenforde AS, Hefner JE, Kodish‐Wachs JE, Iaccarino MA, Paganoni S. Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a narrative review. PM R. 2017;9(5S):S51‐S58.
- Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4‐12.
- Adler‐Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW. Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(2):207‐215.
- Verduzco‐Gutierrez M, Bean AC, Tenforde AS, Tapia RN, Silver JK. How to conduct an outpatient telemedicine rehabilitation or prehabilitation visit. PM R. 2020. 10.1002/pmrj.12380. [Epub ahead of print].
- Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986‐992.
- Orlando JF, Beard M, Kumar S. Systematic review of patient and caregiversʼ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patientsʼ health. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221848.
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377‐381.
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
- Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu‐Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine‐based, real‐time, online consultation at patientsʼ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407.
- Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow‐up care. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(1):40‐44.
- Thiyagarajan A, Grant C, Griffiths F, Atherton H. Exploring patientsʼ and cliniciansʼ experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review. BJGP Open. 2020;4(1). 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101020.
- Abbott DE, Macke RA, Kurtz J, et al. Financial and temporal advantages of virtual consultation in veterans requiring specialty care. Mil Med. 2018;183(1–2):e71‐e76.
- Soegaard Ballester JM, Scott MF, Owei L, Neylan C, Hanson CW, Morris JB. Patient preference for time‐saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting. Surgery. 2018;163(4):672‐679.
- Lee SR, Dix DB, McGwin G, et al. Correlation of appointment times and subspecialty with the no‐show rates in an orthopedic ambulatory clinic. J Healthc Manag. 2018;63(6):e159‐e169.
- Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CS, Banahene J, Ernest O. Predictive factors of physiciansʼ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics J. 2019;1460458219892162. 10.1177/1460458219892162. [Epub ahead of print].
- PEW Research Center . Mobile facts sheet. . Published June 2019. Accessed April 19, 2019.
Source: PubMed