Telemedicine During COVID-19 for Outpatient Sports and Musculoskeletal Medicine Physicians

Adam S Tenforde, Mary A Iaccarino, Haylee Borgstrom, Jaye E Hefner, Julie Silver, Marwa Ahmed, Ashwin N Babu, Cheri A Blauwet, Lauren Elson, Christine Eng, Dana Kotler, Scott Homer, Steven Makovitch, Kelly C McInnis, Ariana Vora, Joanne Borg-Stein, Adam S Tenforde, Mary A Iaccarino, Haylee Borgstrom, Jaye E Hefner, Julie Silver, Marwa Ahmed, Ashwin N Babu, Cheri A Blauwet, Lauren Elson, Christine Eng, Dana Kotler, Scott Homer, Steven Makovitch, Kelly C McInnis, Ariana Vora, Joanne Borg-Stein

Abstract

Introduction: The global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in an expansion of telemedicine. Measures of quality and barriers for rapid use by patients and physicians are not well described.

Objective: To describe results from a quality improvement initiative during a rapid adoptive phase of telemedicine during the pandemic.

Design: Patient and physician satisfaction with synchronous audiovisual telemedicine visits was measured during the early adoptive phase (6 April 2020-17 April 2020) within the division of sports medicine in an academic Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) department. Patients were invited to participate in a quality improvement initiative by completing an online survey at the end of a telemedicine visit. Physicians completed a separate survey.

Primary outcome measures: Patient measures included visit type, duration of encounter, quality, and satisfaction. Physicians reported on experiences performed telemedicine.

Results: Surveys were completed by 119 patients (293 telemedicine encounters, response rate 40.6%) and 14 physiatrists. Telemedicine was utilized primarily for follow-up visits (n = 74, 70.6%), and the most common duration was 15 to 29 minutes. Patients rated their telemedicine visit as "excellent" or "very good" across measures (91.6%-95.0%) including addressing concerns, communication, developing a treatment plan, convenience, and satisfaction. Value of completing a future telemedicine visit was measured at 84.9%. Most reported estimated travel time saved was in excess of 30 minutes. Rate of no-show was 2.7%. Most physicians (57.1%) had no prior experience with telemedicine visits, and most were comfortable performing these visits after completing 1 to 4 sessions (71%). Nearly all physicians (92.9%) rated their telemedicine experience as very good or excellent. The key barrier identified for telemedicine was technical issues. All physicians reported plans to perform telemedicine visits if reimbursement continues.

Conclusions: In summary, rapid expansion of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic was well-received by a majority of patients and physicians. This suggests feasibility in rapid expansion of telemedicine for other outpatient sports medicine practices.

© 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient responses across 119 telemedicine encounters, divided by question. Each question response was “excellent,” “very good,” “good,” “fair,” or “poor.” Most patients reported “excellent” or “very good” to their experience with telemedicine visit.

References

    1. Tenforde AS, Hefner JE, Kodish‐Wachs JE, Iaccarino MA, Paganoni S. Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a narrative review. PM R. 2017;9(5S):S51‐S58.
    1. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4‐12.
    1. Adler‐Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW. Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(2):207‐215.
    1. Verduzco‐Gutierrez M, Bean AC, Tenforde AS, Tapia RN, Silver JK. How to conduct an outpatient telemedicine rehabilitation or prehabilitation visit. PM R. 2020. 10.1002/pmrj.12380. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986‐992.
    1. Orlando JF, Beard M, Kumar S. Systematic review of patient and caregiversʼ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patientsʼ health. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221848.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377‐381.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
    1. Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu‐Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine‐based, real‐time, online consultation at patientsʼ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407.
    1. Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow‐up care. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(1):40‐44.
    1. Thiyagarajan A, Grant C, Griffiths F, Atherton H. Exploring patientsʼ and cliniciansʼ experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review. BJGP Open. 2020;4(1). 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101020.
    1. Abbott DE, Macke RA, Kurtz J, et al. Financial and temporal advantages of virtual consultation in veterans requiring specialty care. Mil Med. 2018;183(1–2):e71‐e76.
    1. Soegaard Ballester JM, Scott MF, Owei L, Neylan C, Hanson CW, Morris JB. Patient preference for time‐saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting. Surgery. 2018;163(4):672‐679.
    1. Lee SR, Dix DB, McGwin G, et al. Correlation of appointment times and subspecialty with the no‐show rates in an orthopedic ambulatory clinic. J Healthc Manag. 2018;63(6):e159‐e169.
    1. Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CS, Banahene J, Ernest O. Predictive factors of physiciansʼ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics J. 2019;1460458219892162. 10.1177/1460458219892162. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. PEW Research Center . Mobile facts sheet. . Published June 2019. Accessed April 19, 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit