Immunologic responses to xenogeneic tyrosinase DNA vaccine administered by electroporation in patients with malignant melanoma

Jianda Yuan, Geoffrey Y Ku, Matthew Adamow, Zhenyu Mu, Sapna Tandon, Drew Hannaman, Paul Chapman, Gary Schwartz, Richard Carvajal, Katherine S Panageas, Alan N Houghton, Jedd D Wolchok, Jianda Yuan, Geoffrey Y Ku, Matthew Adamow, Zhenyu Mu, Sapna Tandon, Drew Hannaman, Paul Chapman, Gary Schwartz, Richard Carvajal, Katherine S Panageas, Alan N Houghton, Jedd D Wolchok

Abstract

Background: Prior studies show that intramuscular injection and particle-mediated epidermal delivery of xenogeneic melanosomal antigens (tyrosinase or Tyr, gp100) induce CD8(+) T cell responses to the syngeneic protein. To further define the optimal vaccination strategy, we conducted a phase I study of in vivo electroporation (EP) of a murine Tyr DNA vaccine (pINGmuTyr) in malignant melanoma patients.

Methods: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1, A2, A24 or B35 stage IIb-IV melanoma patients received up to five doses of the mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccine by EP every three weeks at dose levels of 0.2 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1.5 mg per injection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected, cultured with a peptide pool containing eight HLA class I-restricted Tyr-specific T-cell epitopes, and analyzed by HLA-A*0101-restricted tetramers and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS).

Results: Twenty-four patients received ≥1 dose of the pINGmuTyr vaccine; PBMCs from 21 patients who completed all five doses were available for Tyr immune assays. The only common toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction. Six of 15 patients (40%) in the 1.5 mg dose cohort developed Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell responses following stimulation, defined as a ≥3 standard deviation increase in baseline reactivity by tetramer or ICS assays. No Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell response was detected in the 0.2 mg and 0.5 mg dose cohort patients. Epitope spreading of CD8(+) T cell response to NY-ESO-1 was observed in one patient with vitiligo. One patient subsequently received ipilimumab and developed an enhanced Tyr-reactive response with polyfunctional cytokine profile. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, median survival has not been reached.

Conclusions: A regimen of five immunizations with pINGmuTyr administered by EP was found to be safe and resulted in Tyr-reactive immune responses in six of 15 patients at 1.5 mg dose cohort.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00471133.

Keywords: DNA vaccine; Electroporation; Epitope spreading; Immune response; Melanoma patient; Tyrosinase.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Increase in tyrosinase243-251HLA*A010-restricted tetramer-reactive CD8+T cells following mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccination. Multiparameter flow cytometry was performed at baseline, prior to the third vaccination (week 10) and after the fifth vaccination (Week 16). Patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cultured for 10 days with a pool of tyrosinase peptides. Representative dot plots from Patient Tyr-26 reveal an increase in the frequency of tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells in this patient, with the peak at Week 10.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in tyrosinase146-156and tyrosinase243-251HLA*A0101-restricted tetramer-reactive CD8+T cells following mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccination. Each point refers to the mean of triplicate values. Most patients also underwent two peripheral blood draws at baseline one week apart prior to receiving vaccination. The values at baseline represent the mean of both of these time-points. * Refers to patients with increase in tetramer-reactive CD8+ cells. (Patient Tyr-9 scored positive for both Tyr tetramers, patient Tyr-26, 27 and Tyr-28 had a single Tyr tetramer positive after vaccination).
Figure 3
Figure 3
CCR7, CD45RA, CD27 and CD28 subpopulations in tyrosinase243-251HLA*A0101-restricted tetramer-reactive CD8+T cells are consistent with an effector phenotype. PMBCs were analyzed by tetramer assay after in vitro culture with tyrosinase peptide pool. Representative dot plots for CD3+CD8+ T cells of patient Tyr-26 at Week 16 show the expression of CCR7, CD45RA, CD28 and CD27 on tyrosinase243-251 HLA*A0101 tetramer reactive CD8+ T cells (A). Further characterization in contour plots of CD3+CD8+tetramer+ T cells revealed that these cells were CCR7-CD45RA-CD27loCD28mid, consistent with an effector phenotype (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Increase in tyrosinase-reactive CD8+IFN-γ+T cells following mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccination. Intracellular cytokine staining was performed by multiparameter flow cytometry after culturing patient PBMCs with a tyrosinase peptide epitope pool for 10 days. These are representative dot plots of CD3+CD8+ T cells from Patient Tyr-25 who had an increase in CD8+IFN-γ+ cells following vaccination. There was evidence of polyfunctionality, including cells that were both IFN-γ+, and either CD107a+, MIP-1β+ or TNF-α+.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Changes in frequency of tyrosinase-reactive CD8+IFN-γ+T cells following mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccination. Each point refers to the mean of triplicate values in intracellular cytokine staining assays. Most patients also underwent two peripheral blood draws at baseline one week apart prior to receiving vaccination. The values at baseline represent the mean of both of these time-points. * Refers to patients with increase in CD8+ IFN-γ + T cells.
Figure 6
Figure 6
CTLA-4 blockade induced tyrosinase-specific CD8+IFN-γ+T cell responses. ICS was performed on PBMCs from Patient Tyr-25 at various time-points. He developed a tyrosinase-specific CD8+IFN-γ+ T cell response following vaccination. Subsequently, he developed recurrent disease and was treated with ipilimumab. A persistent tyrosinase-specific CD8+IFN-γ+ response was noted prior to ipilimumab therapy, which increased with ipilimumab therapy and peaked after the second dose (at Week 7).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccination and subsequent NY-ESO-1 specific tetramer and IFN-γ response. Patient Tyr-2 was known to have baseline seropositivity for NY-ESO-1. Thawed PBMCs from pre- and post- pINGmuTyr vaccination were cultured for 10 days with NY-ESO-1 overlapping peptides before tetramer analysis and ICS. Following vaccination, there was an increase in (A) HLA/B*35 NY-ESO-194-102 tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells and (B) NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ and CD8+ IFN-γ+ T cells.

References

    1. Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;1:3042–3047. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2063.
    1. Hohnheiser AM, Gefeller O, Gohl J, Schuler G, Hohenberger W, Merkel S. Malignant Melanoma of the Skin: Long-term Follow-up and Time to First Recurrence. World J Surg. 2011;1(3):580–589. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0859-8.
    1. Treisman J, Garlie N. Systemic therapy for cutaneous melanoma. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;1:127–146. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2009.07.008.
    1. Kirkwood JM, Manola J, Ibrahim J, Sondak V, Ernstoff MS, Rao U. A pooled analysis of eastern cooperative oncology group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;1:1670–1677. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1103-3.
    1. Sivendran S, Glodny B, Pan M, Merad M, Saenger Y. Melanoma immunotherapy. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;1:620–642. doi: 10.1002/msj.20215.
    1. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB. et al.Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;1:711–723. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466.
    1. Buonerba C, Ferro M, Di Lorenzo G. Sipuleucel-T for prostate cancer: the immunotherapy era has commenced. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011;1:25–28. doi: 10.1586/era.10.180.
    1. Liu MA. DNA vaccines: an historical perspective and view to the future. Immunol Rev. 2011;1:62–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00980.x.
    1. Chen YT, Stockert E, Tsang S, Coplan KA, Old LJ. Immunophenotyping of melanomas for tyrosinase: implications for vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;1:8125–8129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8125.
    1. Houghton AN, Real FX, Davis LJ, Cordon-Cardo C, Old LJ. Phenotypic heterogeneity of melanoma. Relation to the differentiation program of melanoma cells. J Exp Med. 1987;1:812–829. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.3.812.
    1. Jungbluth AA, Iversen K, Coplan K, Kolb D, Stockert E, Chen YT. et al.T311–an anti-tyrosinase monoclonal antibody for the detection of melanocytic lesions in paraffin embedded tissues. Pathol Res Pract. 2000;1:235–242. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(00)80072-2.
    1. Boon T, Cerottini JC, Van den Eynde B, van der Bruggen P, Van Pel A. Tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;1:337–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.002005.
    1. Brichard V, Van Pel A, Wolfel T, Wolfel C, De Plaen E, Lethe B. et al.The tyrosinase gene codes for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas. J Exp Med. 1993;1:489–495. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.2.489.
    1. Wolfel T, Van Pel A, Brichard V, Schneider J, Seliger B, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH. et al.Two tyrosinase nonapeptides recognized on HLA-A2 melanomas by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1994;1:759–764. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830240340.
    1. Gold JS, Ferrone CR, Guevara-Patino JA, Hawkins WG, Dyall R, Engelhorn ME. et al.A single heteroclitic epitope determines cancer immunity after xenogeneic DNA immunization against a tumor differentiation antigen. J Immunol. 2003;1:5188–5194.
    1. Manley CA, Leibman NF, Wolchok JD, Riviere IC, Bartido S, Craft DM. et al.Xenogeneic Murine Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine for Malignant Melanoma of the Digit of Dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;1(1):94–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0627.x.
    1. Bergman PJ, Camps-Palau MA, McKnight JA, Leibman NF, Craft DM, Leung C. et al.Development of a xenogeneic DNA vaccine program for canine malignant melanoma at the Animal Medical Center. Vaccine. 2006;1:4582–4585. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.027.
    1. Bergman PJ, McKnight J, Novosad A, Charney S, Farrelly J, Craft D. et al.Long-term survival of dogs with advanced malignant melanoma after DNA vaccination with xenogeneic human tyrosinase: a phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;1:1284–1290.
    1. USDA licenses DNA vaccine for treatment of melanoma in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;1:495.
    1. Wolchok JD, Yuan J, Houghton AN, Gallardo HF, Rasalan TS, Wang J. et al.Safety and immunogenicity of tyrosinase DNA vaccines in patients with melanoma. Mol Ther. 2007;1:2044–2050. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300290.
    1. Yuan J, Ku GY, Gallardo HF, Orlandi F, Manukian G, Rasalan TS. et al.Safety and immunogenicity of a human and mouse gp100 DNA vaccine in a phase I trial of patients with melanoma. Cancer Immun. 2009;1:5.
    1. Ginsberg BA, Gallardo HF, Rasalan TS, Adamow M, Mu Z, Tandon S. et al.Immunologic response to xenogeneic gp100 DNA in melanoma patients: comparison of particle-mediated epidermal delivery with intramuscular injection. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;1:4057–4065. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1093.
    1. Bowne WB, Srinivasan R, Wolchok JD, Hawkins WG, Blachere NE, Dyall R. et al.Coupling and uncoupling of tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 1999;1:1717–1722. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.11.1717.
    1. Gregor PD, Wolchok JD, Turaga V, Latouche JB, Sadelain M, Bacich D. et al.Induction of autoantibodies to syngeneic prostate-specific membrane antigen by xenogeneic vaccination. Int J Cancer. 2005;1:415–421. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21014.
    1. Palomba ML, Roberts WK, Dao T, Manukian G, Guevara-Patino JA, Wolchok JD. et al.CD8+ T-cell-dependent immunity following xenogeneic DNA immunization against CD20 in a tumor challenge model of B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;1:370–379.
    1. Coban C, Kobiyama K, Aoshi T, Takeshita F, Horii T, Akira S. et al.Novel strategies to improve DNA vaccine immunogenicity. Curr Gene Ther. 2011;1:479–484. doi: 10.2174/156652311798192815.
    1. Tamura T, Sakata T. Application of in vivo electroporation to cancer gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther. 2003;1:59–64. doi: 10.2174/1566523033347462.
    1. Best SR, Peng S, Juang CM, Hung CF, Hannaman D, Saunders JR. et al.Administration of HPV DNA vaccine via electroporation elicits the strongest CD8+ T cell immune responses compared to intramuscular injection and intradermal gene gun delivery. Vaccine. 2009;1:5450–5459. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.005.
    1. Vasan S, Hurley A, Schlesinger SJ, Hannaman D, Gardiner DF, Dugin DP. et vivo electroporation enhances the immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2011;1:e19252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019252.
    1. Bagarazzi ML, Yan J, Morrow MP, Shen X, Parker RL, Lee JC. et al.Immunotherapy against HPV16/18 generates potent TH1 and cytotoxic cellular immune responses. Sci Transl Med. 2012;1:155ra38.
    1. Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;1:745–763. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104702.
    1. Romero P, Zippelius A, Kurth I, Pittet MJ, Touvrey C, Iancu EM. et al.Four functionally distinct populations of human effector-memory CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2007;1:4112–4119.
    1. Lin Y, Gallardo HF, Ku GY, Li H, Manukian G, Rasalan TS. et al.Optimization and validation of a robust human T-cell culture method for monitoring phenotypic and polyfunctional antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses. Cytotherapy. 2009;1:912–922. doi: 10.3109/14653240903136987.
    1. Yuan J, Gnjatic S, Li H, Powel S, Gallardo HF, Ritter E. et al.CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;1:20410–20415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810114105.
    1. Perales MA, Yuan J, Powel S, Gallardo HF, Rasalan TS, Gonzalez C. et al.Phase I/II study of GM-CSF DNA as an adjuvant for a multipeptide cancer vaccine in patients with advanced melanoma. Mol Ther. 2008;1:2022–2029. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.196.
    1. Yuan J, Ginsberg B, Page D, Li Y, Rasalan T, Gallardo HF. et al.CTLA-4 blockade increases antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells in prevaccinated patients with melanoma: three cases. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;1(8):1137–1146. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1011-9.
    1. Gnjatic S, Nishikawa H, Jungbluth AA, Gure AO, Ritter G, Jager E. et al.NY-ESO-1: review of an immunogenic tumor antigen. Adv Cancer Res. 2006;1:1–30.
    1. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;1:162–174. doi: 10.1038/nri2506.
    1. Goldberg SM, Bartido SM, Gardner JP, Guevara-Patino JA, Montgomery SC, Perales MA. et al.Comparison of two cancer vaccines targeting tyrosinase: plasmid DNA and recombinant alphavirus replicon particles. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;1:8114–8121. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1410.
    1. Yuan J, Gallardo HF, Rasalan T, Ranganathan R, Wang J, Zhang Y. et vitro expansion of Ag-specific T cells by HLA-A*0201-transfected K562 cells for immune monitoring. Cytotherapy. 2006;1:498–508. doi: 10.1080/14653240600868262.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit