A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009-2014

Danielle R Davis, Allison N Kurti, Joan M Skelly, Ryan Redner, Thomas J White, Stephen T Higgins, Danielle R Davis, Allison N Kurti, Joan M Skelly, Ryan Redner, Thomas J White, Stephen T Higgins

Abstract

This report describes a systematic literature review of voucher and related monetary-based contingency management (CM) interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) over 5.2years (November 2009 through December 2014). Reports were identified using the search engine PubMed, expert consultations, and published bibliographies. For inclusion, reports had to (a) involve monetary-based CM; (b) appear in a peer-reviewed journal; (c) include an experimental comparison condition; (d) describe an original study; (e) assess efficacy using inferential statistics; (f) use a research design allowing treatment effects to be attributed to CM. Sixty-nine reports met inclusion criteria and were categorized into 7 research trends: (1) extending CM to special populations, (2) parametric studies, (3) extending CM to community clinics, (4) combining CM with pharmacotherapies, (5) incorporating technology into CM, (6) investigating longer-term outcomes, (7) using CM as a research tool. The vast majority (59/69, 86%) of studies reported significant (p<0.05) during-treatment effects. Twenty-eight (28/59, 47%) of those studies included at least one follow-up visit after CM was discontinued, with eight (8/28, 29%) reporting significant (p<0.05) effects. Average effect size (Cohen's d) during treatment was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.70) and post-treatment it was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.41). Overall, the literature on voucher-based CM over the past 5years documents sustained growth, high treatment efficacy, moderate to large effect sizes during treatment that weaken but remain evident following treatment termination, and breadth across a diverse set of SUDs, populations, and settings consistent with and extending results from prior reviews.

Keywords: Behavior change; Behavioral economics; Behavioral interventions; Contingency management; Financial incentives; Psychosocial interventions; Substance use disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative plot of the number of citations identified in a PubMed search of the term ‘contingency management’ involving substance use disorders (SUDs). The search included all citations through May of 2015.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit