Facilitators to support the implementation of injury prevention training in youth handball: A concept mapping approach

Eva Ageberg, Sofia Bunke, Karolina Lucander, Per Nilsen, Alex Donaldson, Eva Ageberg, Sofia Bunke, Karolina Lucander, Per Nilsen, Alex Donaldson

Abstract

There is a need for research to identify effective implementation strategies for injury prevention training within real-world community sports. The aim of this ecological participatory study was to identify facilitators, among stakeholders at multiple levels, that could help injury prevention training become part of regular training routines in youth team handball. Concept mapping, a mixed-method approach for qualitative data collection and quantitative data analysis, was used. Stakeholders (n = 196) of two community team handball clubs (29% players, 13% coaches, 38% caregivers, 11% club, district and national handball administrators, 9% unknown) participated in a brainstorming process. After the research team synthesized the 235 generated statements, 50 stakeholders (34% players, 22% coaches, 24% caregivers, 20% administrators) sorted 89 unique facilitator statements into clusters and rated them for importance and feasibility. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis yielded five clusters (stress value 0.231): "Understanding and applying knowledge," "Education, knowledge, and consistency," "Set-up and exercises," "Inspiration, motivation, and routines," and "Club policy and expert collaboration." The cluster "Understanding and applying knowledge" had the highest mean importance (3.17 out of 4) and feasibility (2.93) ratings. The 32 statements rated as both highly important and feasible (Go-zone) indicate action is required at the individual (end-users) and organizational (policymakers) levels to implement injury prevention training. Results suggest that developing evidence-based context-specific injury prevention training, incorporating physiological, biomechanical and psychological components, and an associated context-specific implementation plan in partnership with all stakeholders should be a high priority to facilitate the implementation of injury prevention training in youth team handball.

Keywords: adolescent; concept mapping; health plan implementation; preventive therapy; sports injuries; team ball sports.

© 2018 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An ecological model, adapted from Emery et al (Injury prevention in child and adolescent sport: whose responsibility is it? Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16:514‐521. https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/pages/default.aspx),15 defining a responsibility hierarchy in preventing injuries in youth sport. The lowest level of responsibility assigned to the child (player) and highest level to organizations with the potential to affect the most. The modification of this Figure has been reviewed and approved by the publisher, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Figure 2
Figure 2
The five‐cluster map of facilitators, perceived by stakeholders, to enhance the implementation of injury prevention training in youth team handball. Statements that were more frequently sorted together are positioned closer together on the map, and statements that were less frequently sorted together are positioned further away from each other
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pattern matching graph for average cluster ratings between importance and feasibility (all stakeholders), indicating low agreement between the rating variables (r = 0.17). Significant differences observed between the ratings for the clusters “Understanding and applying knowledge” (P < 0.05), “Education, knowledge, and consistency” (P < 0.02), and “Club policy and expert collaboration” (P < 0.001), but not for the clusters “Inspiration, motivation, and routines” or “Set‐up and exercises” (P > 0.05)
Figure 4
Figure 4
The “Go‐Zone” graph showing ratings of importance and feasibility. The top right quadrant indicates the Go‐Zone, including statements that were rated above the mean for both importance and feasibility. Go‐Zone quadrants: 1 = Top right; 2 = Bottom right, 3 = Top left; 4 = Bottom left. The statements in the Go‐Zone (quadrant 1) represent the most actionable statements

References

    1. Bergeron MF, Mountjoy M, Armstrong N, et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:843‐851.
    1. Åman M, Forssblad M, Larsen K. Incidence and body location of reported acute sport injuries in seven sports using a national insurance database. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;28:1147‐1158.
    1. Cheron C, Le Scanff C, Leboeuf‐Yde C. Association between sports type and overuse injuries of extremities in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24:41.
    1. Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Injury pattern in youth team handball: a comparison of two prospective registration methods. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16:426‐432.
    1. Soomro N, Sanders R, Hackett D, et al. The efficacy of injury prevention programs in adolescent team aports: a Meta‐analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2415‐2424.
    1. Rössler R, Donath L, Verhagen E, Junge A, Schweizer T, Faude O. Exercise‐based injury prevention in child and adolescent sport: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44:1733‐1748.
    1. Emery CA, Roy TO, Whittaker JL, Nettel‐Aguirre A, van Mechelen W. Neuromuscular training injury prevention strategies in youth sport: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:865‐870.
    1. Finch CF, Donaldson A. A sports setting matrix for understanding the implementation context for community sport. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:973‐978.
    1. Donaldson A, Finch CF. Applying implementation science to sports injury prevention. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:473‐475.
    1. O'Brien J, Finch CF. Injury prevention exercise programmes in professional youth soccer: understanding the perceptions of programme deliverers. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2:e000075.
    1. Saunders N, Otago L, Romiti M, Donaldson A, White P, Finch C. Coaches' perspectives on implementing an evidence‐informed injury prevention programme in junior community netball. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:1128‐1132.
    1. Norcross MF, Johnson ST, Bovbjerg VE, Koester MC, Hoffman MA. Factors influencing high school coaches' adoption of injury prevention programs. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:299‐304.
    1. Lindblom H, Carlfjord S, Hägglund M. Adoption and use of an injury prevention exercise program in female football: a qualitative study among coaches. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;28(3):1295‐1303.
    1. Donaldson A, Callaghan A, Bizzini M, Jowett A, Keyzer P, Nicholson M. A concept mapping approach to identifying the barriers to implementing an evidence‐based sports injury prevention programme. Inj Prev. 2018. 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042639.
    1. Emery CA, Hagel B, Morrongiello BA. Injury prevention in child and adolescent sport: whose responsibility is it? Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16:514‐521.
    1. O'Brien J, Donaldson A, Finch CF. It will take more than an existing exercise programme to prevent injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:264‐265.
    1. Klugl M, Shrier I, McBain K, et al. The prevention of sport injury: an analysis of 12,000 published manuscripts. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:407‐412.
    1. O'Brien J, Finch CF. The implementation of musculoskeletal injury‐prevention exercise programmes in team ball sports: a systematic review employing the RE‐AIM framework. Sports Med. 2014;44:1305‐1318.
    1. Finch C. A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9:3‐9.
    1. Padua DA, Frank B, Donaldson A, et al. Seven steps for developing and implementing a preventive training program: lessons learned from JUMP‐ACL and beyond. Clin Sports Med. 2014;33:615‐632.
    1. Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:187‐191.
    1. Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35:236‐245.
    1. Donaldson A, Finch CF. Planning for implementation and translation: seek first to understand the end‐users' perspectives. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:306‐307.
    1. Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44:177‐194.
    1. Kane M, Trochim W. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
    1. Concept Systems, Incorporated . Build 2013.322.11. Web‐based Platform. 2012;
    1. Donaldson A, Lloyd DG, Gabbe BJ, et al. Scientific evidence is just the starting point: a generalizable process for developing sports injury prevention interventions. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2016;5:334‐341.
    1. Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13:71‐78.
    1. Petersen W, Braun C, Bock W, et al. A controlled prospective case control study of a prevention training program in female team handball players: the German experience. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:614‐621.
    1. Wedderkopp N, Kaltoft M, Lundgaard B, Rosendahl M, Froberg K. Prevention of injuries in young female players in European team handball. A prospective intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1999;9:41‐47.
    1. Andersson SH, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Myklebust G. Preventing overuse shoulder injuries among throwing athletes: a cluster‐randomised controlled trial in 660 elite handball players. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1073‐1080.
    1. Soligard T, Nilstad A, Steffen K, et al. Compliance with a comprehensive warm‐up programme to prevent injuries in youth football. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:787‐793.
    1. Keats MR, Emery CA, Finch CF. Are we having fun yet? Fostering adherence to injury preventive exercise recommendations in young athletes. Sports Med. 2012;42:175‐184.
    1. Ivarsson A, Tranaeus U, Johnson U, Stenling A. Negative psychological responses of injury and rehabilitation adherence effects on return to play in competitive athletes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Open Access J Sports Med. 2017;8:27‐32.
    1. Johnson U, Ivarsson A. Psychological predictors of sport injuries among junior soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21:129‐136.
    1. Ekstrand J, Lundqvist D, Lagerback L, Vouillamoz M, Papadimitiou N, Karlsson J. Is there a correlation between coaches' leadership styles and injuries in elite football teams? A study of 36 elite teams in 17 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2017;52:527‐531.
    1. Brandes M, Elvers S. Elite youth soccer players' physiological responses, time‐motion characteristics, and game performance in 4 vs. 4 small‐sided games: the influence of coach feedback. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31:2652‐2658.
    1. Nilsen P, Roback K, Broström A, Ellström PE. Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012;7:53.
    1. McGlashan AJ, Finch CF. The extent to which behavioural and social sciences theories and models are used in sport injury prevention research. Sports Med. 2010;40:841‐858.
    1. Bekker S, Paliadelis P, Finch CF. The translation of sports injury prevention and safety promotion knowledge: insights from key intermediary organisations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:25.
    1. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit