Post Hoc Biomarker Analyses from a Phase 4, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Repository Corticotropin Injection (Acthar® Gel) for Persistently Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Anca D Askanase, Dale Wright, Enxu Zhao, Julie Zhu, Roman Bilyk, Richard A Furie, Anca D Askanase, Dale Wright, Enxu Zhao, Julie Zhu, Roman Bilyk, Richard A Furie

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted post hoc analyses of biomarker results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar® Gel) in patients with persistently active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) despite treatment with moderate-dose glucocorticoids.

Methods: Adults with active SLE and moderate to severe rash and/or arthritis were enrolled in the primary study. Patients had active SLE despite treatment with stable glucocorticoids, antimalarials, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or immunosuppressants. Patients were randomly assigned to 80 U of RCI or placebo subcutaneously every other day for 4 weeks and then twice weekly through week 24. Blood samples were analyzed for serum cytokines and complement proteins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent or Luminex assays and for circulating leukocytes using flow cytometry. Biomarker levels were reported as percentages of the baseline and were further evaluated in subgroups stratified by baseline SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scores (< 10 vs. ≥ 10), baseline anti-double-stranded DNA levels (< 15 IU/mL vs. ≥ 15 IU/mL), and BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responses at week 20 and 24.

Results: RCI treatment resulted in reduced levels of B cell-activating factor and interleukin-6 cytokines in all subgroups compared with placebo. RCI treatment also resulted in lower levels of CD19+ B cells and CD19+IgD-CD27-CD95+ atypical activated memory B cells than did placebo in the higher baseline disease activity subgroups and in BICLA non-responders. Furthermore, RCI treatment led to greater increases in complement component (C)3 and C4 levels than did placebo in the higher baseline disease activity subgroups and in BICLA responders.

Conclusions: RCI may reduce inflammation through B cell immunomodulation in patients with persistently active SLE, particularly in those with higher disease activity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02953821.

Keywords: Acthar gel; Autoimmune disease; Biomarker; Cytokine; Glucocorticoid; Immune cell; Repository corticotropin injection; Systemic lupus erythematosus.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline BAFF levels reported by baseline SLEDAI-2 K score (A), baseline anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aPatients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. *p < 0.05 (nominal), **p < 0.01 (nominal) for the LS mean difference using ANCOVA models with the change from baseline as the dependent variable, treatments as the factor, and baseline values of corresponding endpoints as the covariate, with stratification for location (US and outside the US) and baseline prednisone or equivalent glucocorticoid dose (≤ 20 mg/day and > 20 mg/day). ANCOVA analysis of covariance; anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA, BAFF B cell-activating factor, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, LS least squares, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline IL-6 levels reported by baseline SLEDAI-2K score (A), baseline anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aPatients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. anti-dsDNA anti-double-stranded DNA, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, IL-6 interleukin 6, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline CD19+ B cells reported by baseline SLEDAI-2K score (A), baseline anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aParticipants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. *p < 0.05 (nominal) for the LS mean difference using ANCOVA models with the change from baseline as the dependent variable, treatments as the factor, and baseline values of corresponding endpoints as the covariate, with stratification for location (US and outside the US) and baseline prednisone or equivalent glucocorticoid dose (≤ 20 mg/day and > 20 mg/day). ANCOVA analysis of covariance; anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, CD cluster of differentiation, LS least squares, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline CD19+IgD−CD27−CD95+ B cells reported by baseline SLEDAI-2K scores (A), baseline anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aParticipants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. anti-dsDNA anti-double-stranded DNA, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, CD cluster of differentiation, IgD immunoglobulin D, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline complement C3 levels reported by baseline SLEDAI-2K scores (A), baseline Anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aParticipants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. *p < 0.05 (nominal), **p < 0.01 (nominal) for the LS mean difference using ANCOVA models with the change from baseline as the dependent variable, treatments as the factor, and baseline values of corresponding endpoints as the covariate, with stratification for location (US and outside the US) and baseline prednisone or equivalent glucocorticoid dose (≤ 20 mg/day and > 20 mg/day). ANCOVA analysis of covariance, anti-dsDNA anti-double-stranded DNA, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, C component, LS least squares, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean (SEM) percentage of baseline complement C4 levels reported by baseline SLEDAI-2K scores (A), baseline Anti-dsDNA levels (B), and BICLA response (C), mITT populationa. aParticipants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and contributed any postbaseline efficacy data. The dotted line represents baseline. *p < 0.05 (nominal), **p < 0.01 (nominal) for the LS mean difference using ANCOVA models with the change from baseline as the dependent variable, treatments as the factor, and baseline values of corresponding endpoints as the covariate, with stratification for location (US and outside the US) and baseline prednisone or equivalent glucocorticoid dose (≤ 20 mg/day and > 20 mg/day). ANCOVA analysis of covariance, anti-dsDNA anti-double-stranded DNA, BICLA British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Combined Lupus Assessment, C component, LS least squares, mITT modified intention to treat, RCI repository corticotropin injection, SEM standard error of the mean, SLEDAI-2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000

References

    1. Ohl K, Tenbrock K. Inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:432595.
    1. Feng Y, Yang M, Wu H, Lu Q. The pathological role of B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: from basic research to clinical. Autoimmunity. 2020;53(2):56–64. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2019.1700232.
    1. Arriens C, Wren JD, Munroe ME, Mohan C. Systemic lupus erythematosus biomarkers: the challenging quest. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(suppl 1):i32-i45.
    1. Grondal G, Gunnarsson I, Ronnelid J, Rogberg S, Klareskog L, Lundberg I. Cytokine production, serum levels and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000;18(5):565–570.
    1. Jacobi AM, Reiter K, Mackay M, Aranow C, Hiepe F, Radbruch A, et al. Activated memory B cell subsets correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: delineation by expression of CD27, IgD, and CD95. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(6):1762–1773. doi: 10.1002/art.23498.
    1. Wei C, Anolik J, Cappione A, Zheng B, Pugh-Bernard A, Brooks J, et al. A new population of cells lacking expression of CD27 represents a notable component of the B cell memory compartment in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2007;178(10):6624–6633. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6624.
    1. Acthar Gel. Package insert. Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals; 2021.
    1. Huang YJ, Galen K, Zweifel B, Brooks LR, Wright AD. Distinct binding and signaling activity of Acthar Gel compared to other melanocortin receptor agonists. J Recept Signal Transduct. 2020:1–9.
    1. Loram LC, Culp ME, Connolly-Strong EC, Sturgill-Koszycki S. Melanocortin peptides: potential targets in systemic lupus erythematosus. Inflammation. 2015;38(1):260–271. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-0029-5.
    1. Decker DA, Grant C, Oh L, Becker PM, Young D, Jordan S. Immunomodulatory effects of H.P. Acthar Gel on B cell development in the NZB/W F1 mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2014;23(8):802–12.
    1. Higgins P, Decker D, Becker P. Immunomodulatory effects of repository corticotropin injection (H.P. Acthar® gel) on the MRL/lpr model of lupus. J Immunol. 2016;196(1 Supplement):210.11-.11.
    1. Olsen NJ, Decker DA, Higgins P, Becker PM, McAloose CA, Benko AL, et al. Direct effects of HP acthar gel on human B lymphocyte activation in vitro. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:300. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0823-y.
    1. Benko AL, McAloose CA, Becker PM, Wright D, Sunyer T, Kawasawa YI, et al. Repository corticotrophin injection exerts direct acute effects on human B cell gene expression distinct from the actions of glucocorticoids. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;192(1):68–81. doi: 10.1111/cei.13089.
    1. Wright D, Zweifel B, Prabha S, Galen K, Fitch R. Reduced steriodogenic activity of repository corticotropin injection (RCI) induces a distinct cytokine response following T cell activation [EULAR abstract AB0082] Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(suppl 2):1504.
    1. Fiechtner JJ, Montroy T. Treatment of moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus with adrenocorticotropic hormone: a single-site, open-label trial. Lupus. 2014;23(9):905–912. doi: 10.1177/0961203314532562.
    1. Fiechtner J, Montroy T. Six months’ treatment of moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus with repository corticotropin injection: an extension of a single-site, open-label trial. J Immunol Clin Res. 2016;3(1):1025–1030.
    1. Furie R, Mitrane M, Zhao E, Das M, Li D, Becker PM. Efficacy and tolerability of repository corticotropin injection in patients with persistently active SLE: results of a phase 4, randomised, controlled pilot study. Lupus Sci Med. 2016;3(1):e000180.
    1. Furie RA, Mitrane M, Zhao E, Becker PM. Repository corticotropin injection in patients with persistently active SLE requiring corticosteroids: post hoc analysis of results from a two-part, 52-week pilot study. Lupus Sci Med. 2017;4(1):e000240.
    1. Askanase AD, Zhao E, Zhu J, Bilyk R, Furie RA. Repository corticotropin injection for persistently active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7(4):893–908. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00236-1.
    1. Mackay F, Schneider P. Cracking the BAFF code. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(7):491–502. doi: 10.1038/nri2572.
    1. Askanase AD, Zhao E, Zhu J, Connolly-Strong E, Furie RA. Acthar Gel (repository corticotropin injection) for persistently active SLE: study design and baseline characteristics from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lupus Sci Med. 2020;7(1):e000383.
    1. Hochberg MC. Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928.
    1. Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(2):288–291.
    1. Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, et al. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(7):902–6.
    1. Bootsma H, Spronk PE, Ter Borg EJ, Hummel EJ, de Boer G, Limburg PC, et al. The predictive value of fluctuations in IgM and IgG class anti-dsDNA antibodies for relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective long-term observation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(11):661–6.
    1. Cortes-Hernandez J, Ordi-Ros J, Labrador M, Bujan S, Balada E, Segarra A, et al. Antihistone and anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibodies are associated with renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med. 2004;116(3):165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.034.
    1. Merrill JT, Furie R, Werth VP, Khamashta M, Drappa J, Wang L, et al. Anifrolumab effects on rash and arthritis: impact of the type I interferon gene signature in the phase IIb MUSE study in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. 2018;5(1):e000284.
    1. Jacob N, Stohl W. Cytokine disturbances in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(4):228. doi: 10.1186/ar3349.
    1. Healy LM, Jang JH, Lin YH, Rao V, Antel JP, Wright D. Melanocortin receptor mediated anti-inflammatory effect of repository corticotropin injection on human monocyte-derived macrophages [ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS abstract EP1481] Mult Scler J. 2017;23(suppl 3):777.
    1. Patel S, Brassil K, Jngsuwadee P. Expanding the role of CAR-T cell therapy to systemic lupus erythematosus. EMJ Hematol. 2020;8(1):105–112.
    1. Chatham WW, Kimberly RP. Treatment of lupus with corticosteroids. Lupus. 2001;10(3):140–147. doi: 10.1191/096120301675075008.
    1. Datta A, David R, Glennie S, Scott D, Cernuda-Morollon E, Lechler RI, et al. Differential effects of immunosuppressive drugs on T-cell motility. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(12):2871–2883. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01553.x.
    1. Pallet N, Fernandez-Ramos AA, Loriot MA. Impact of immunosuppressive drugs on the metabolism of T cells. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2018;341:169–200. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2018.05.009.
    1. Sandhu V, Quan M. SLE and serum complement: causative, concomitant or coincidental? Open Rheumatol J. 2017;11:113–122. doi: 10.2174/1874312901711010113.
    1. Walport MJ. Complement and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl 3):S279–S293. doi: 10.1186/ar586.
    1. Ramsey-Goldman R, Li J, Dervieux T, Alexander RV. Cell-bound complement activation products in SLE. Lupus Sci Med. 2017;4(1):e000236.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit