Primary results of the Spanish Cryoballoon Ablation Registry: acute and long-term outcomes of the RECABA study

Ángel Ferrero-De-Loma-Osorio, Rocío Cózar, Arcadio García-Alberola, Ermengol Valles, Alberto Barrera, Jorge Toquero, Jose Miguel Ormaetxe, Juan Martínez Sánchez, Ricardo Ruiz-Granell, Pablo Bastos Amador, Jose Manuel Rubio, Julio Martí-Amor, Patricia Pascual, Irene Molina, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, RECABA Investigators, Ángel Ferrero-De-Loma-Osorio, Rocío Cózar, Arcadio García-Alberola, Ermengol Valles, Alberto Barrera, Jorge Toquero, Jose Miguel Ormaetxe, Juan Martínez Sánchez, Ricardo Ruiz-Granell, Pablo Bastos Amador, Jose Manuel Rubio, Julio Martí-Amor, Patricia Pascual, Irene Molina, Jesús Daniel Martínez-Alday, RECABA Investigators

Abstract

Cryoablation is safe and effective for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in controlled clinical trials, but contemporary real-world usage and outcomes are limited. The Report of the Spanish Cryoballoon Ablation Registry (RECABA) was designed to evaluate acute and 12-month outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of AF in Spain. Patients from 27 Spanish centers were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with cryoballoon ablation and managed according to standard of care protocols at each center. The primary endpoint was ≥ 30 s freedom from AF at 12-month after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints included a description of patient characteristics, cryoablation procedural strategy and safety, and predictors of efficacy. In total, 1742 patients (71.4% PAF, 68.8% male, mean age 58.02 ± 10.40 years, 76.1% overweight or obese, CHA2DS2-VASc index 1.40 ± 1.28) were enrolled. Patients received 7.2 ± 2.67 cryo-applications. PV potentials could be detected in 61% of the PVs during ablation, with a mean time to block of 52.9 ± 37.02 s. Acute PVI was observed in 97% of PVs with 75.8% isolated with the first cryo-application. Mean procedural time was 113 ± 41 min. Acute complications occurred in 4.4% of the cases. With follow-up in 1628 patients, AF-free survival was 78.5% (PAF: 80.6% vs PersAF 73.3%; p < 0.001). Left atrium enlargement, female sex, non-PAF, and early recurrence were independent predictors of AF recurrence (p < 0.05). RECABA provides detailed insight into current dosing practices and demonstrates cryoablation is safe and effective in real-world use.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02785991.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Toquero is member of the Medtronic European advisory board. Dr. Toquero,, Dr. Cózar, Dr. Barrera have received speaker honorarium from Medtronic. Dr. Toquero and Dr. García-Aberola have received educational grant from Medtronic. Dr. Martinez Alday has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Abbott Laboratories. Dr. Ferrero and Dr. Ruiz have received speaker honorarium from Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Patricia Pascual and Irene Molina are employees of Medtronic Iberia, S.A. Rest of authors declare no competing interest.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual representation of RECABA protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histograms of the distribution of frequencies: total cryotherapy time (A), total procedural time (B), time-to-effect (C), temperature at PVI (D), minimal temperature during application (E), time per-application (F). SD standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AF recurrence at 12-months for all patients (A). Comparison between PAF versus perAF (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AF recurrence at 12-months. Analysis of different predictive factors for AF recurrence.
Figure 5
Figure 5
AF recurrence and no-recurrence at 12-months of follow-up (absolute number of patients) by center experience. Centers were divided into four quartiles of expertise with a fixed range of 55 patients in each quartile, increasing in the level of experience. There was not statistical difference regarding either overall recurrence at 12-month follow-up or the rate of adverse events. Procedure characteristics were different between quartiles (Table S2).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flow-chart showing AF recurrence data according to type of AF, AAD at discharge and AAD usage at the final follow-up for the entire population. (see text for details).

References

    1. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:2235–2245. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
    1. Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;384:305–315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029980.
    1. Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, et al. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:316–324. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029554.
    1. Chun KRJ, Okumura K, Scazzuso F, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF in a real-world global setting: Results from the Cryo AF Global Registry. J. Arrhythmia. 2021;37:356–3673. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12504.
    1. Friedman DJ, Holmes D, Curtis AB, et al. Procedure characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation procedures using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation: A report from the GWTG-AFIB registry. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2021;32(2):248–259. doi: 10.1111/jce.14858.
    1. Hoffmann E, Straube F, Wegscheider K, et al. Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2019;21:1313–1324. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz155.
    1. Tondo C, Iacopino S, Pieragnoli P, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation cryoablation for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Clinical outcomes from the real-world multicenter observational project. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.038.
    1. Miyazaki S, Kobori A, Sasaki Y, et al. Real-world safety profile of atrial fibrillation ablation using a second-generation cryoballoon in Japan: Insight From a large-multicenter observational study. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.016.
    1. Quesada A, Cózar R, Anguera I, Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry 19th Official Report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2019) Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.08.005.
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC-Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J. 2020 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
    1. Su W, Kowal R, Kowalski M, Metzner A, Svinarich JT, et al. Best practice guide for cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: The compilation experience of more than 3000 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1658–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.021.
    1. Su W, Aryana A, Passman R, et al. Cryoballoon Best Practices II: Practical guide to procedural monitoring and dosing during atrial fibrillation ablation from the perspective of experienced users. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1348–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.021.
    1. Miyamoto K, Doi A, Hasegawa K, et al. Multicenter Study of the validity of additional freeze cycles for cryoballon ablation in the patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The AD-Ballon Study. Circ. Arrhythm Eletcrophysiol. 2019 doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118006989.
    1. Mörtsell D, Arbelo E, Dagres N, et al. Cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace. 2019;21:581–589. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy239.
    1. Wasserlauf J, Knight BP, Li Z, et al. Moderate sedation reduces lab time compared to general anesthesia during cryoballoon ablation for AF without compromising safety or long-term efficacy. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2016;39:1359–1365. doi: 10.1111/pace.12961.
    1. Ferrero-de-Loma-Osorio A, García-Fernández A, Castillo-Castillo J, et al. Time-to-effect-based dosing strategy for cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results of the plusONE Multicenter Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2017;10(12):e005318. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005318.
    1. Aryana A, Kenigsberg DN, Kowalski M, et al. Verification of a novel atrial fibrillation cryoablation dosing algorithm guided by time-to-pulmonary-vein isolation: Results from the Cryo-DOSING Study (Cryoballoon-ablation DOSING Based on the Assessment of Time-to-Effect and Pulmonary-Vein Isolation Guidance) Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.020.
    1. Chun J, Stich M, Fürnkranz A, et al. Individualized cryoballoon energy pulmonary vein isolation guided by real-time pulmonary vein recordings, the randomized ICE-T trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:495–500. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.12.014.
    1. Iacopino S, Pieragnoli P, Arena G, et al. A comparison of acute procedural outcomes within four generations of cryoballoon catheters utilized in the real-world multicenter experience of 1STOP. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2020;31:80–88. doi: 10.1111/jce.14271.
    1. Kaitani K, Inoue K, Kobori A, et al. Efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs short-term-use after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (EAST-AF) trial. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37:610–618. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv501.
    1. Chen W, Liu H, Ling Z, et al. Efficacy of short-term antiarrhythmic drugs use after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation—A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156121.
    1. Duytschaever M, Demolder A, Phlips T, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation with vs without continued antiarrhythmic drug treatment in subjects with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (POWDER AF): Results from a multicentre randomized trial. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39:1429–1437. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx666.
    1. Arbelo E, Brugada J, Hindricks G, et al. The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: A European Survey on Methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur. Heart J. 2014;35:1466–1478. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu001.
    1. Bavishi AA, Kaplan RM, Peigh G, et al. Patient characteristics as predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cryoballoon ablation. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 2019;42:694–704. doi: 10.1111/pace.13669.
    1. Boveda S, Metzner A, Nguyen DQ, et al. Single-procedure outcomes and quality-of-life improvement 12-months post-cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF Trial. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2018;4(11):1440–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.007.
    1. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Impact of female sex on clinical outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ. Arrhtyhmia Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006204.
    1. Liu J, Yang H, Liu Y, et al. Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia during the 90-day blanking period after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: The characteristics and predictive value of early recurrence on long-term outcomes. J. Electrocardiol. 2020;58:46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.004.
    1. Uetake S, Miyauchi Y, Mitsuishi T, Maruyama M, Seino Y, Shimizu W. Re-definition of blanking period in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the contact force era. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/jce.14643.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit