Dose-sparing effect of two adjuvant formulations with a pandemic influenza A/H7N9 vaccine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

Tazio Vanni, Beatriz C Thomé, Erin Sparrow, Martin Friede, Christopher B Fox, Anna Marie Beckmann, Chuong Huynh, Gabriella Mondini, Daniela H Silveira, Juliana Y K Viscondi, Patrícia Emilia Braga, Anderson da Silva, Maria da Graça Salomão, Roberta O Piorelli, Joane P Santos, Vera Lúcia Gattás, Maria Beatriz B Lucchesi, Mayra M M de Oliveira, Marcelo E Koike, Esper G Kallas, Lucia M A Campos, Eduardo B Coelho, Marilda A M Siqueira, Cristiana C Garcia, Milene Dias Miranda, Terezinha M Paiva, Maria do Carmo S T Timenetsky, Eduardo A Adami, Milena A Akamatsu, Paulo Lee Ho, Alexander R Precioso, Tazio Vanni, Beatriz C Thomé, Erin Sparrow, Martin Friede, Christopher B Fox, Anna Marie Beckmann, Chuong Huynh, Gabriella Mondini, Daniela H Silveira, Juliana Y K Viscondi, Patrícia Emilia Braga, Anderson da Silva, Maria da Graça Salomão, Roberta O Piorelli, Joane P Santos, Vera Lúcia Gattás, Maria Beatriz B Lucchesi, Mayra M M de Oliveira, Marcelo E Koike, Esper G Kallas, Lucia M A Campos, Eduardo B Coelho, Marilda A M Siqueira, Cristiana C Garcia, Milene Dias Miranda, Terezinha M Paiva, Maria do Carmo S T Timenetsky, Eduardo A Adami, Milena A Akamatsu, Paulo Lee Ho, Alexander R Precioso

Abstract

The emergence of potentially pandemic viruses has resulted in preparedness efforts to develop candidate vaccines and adjuvant formulations. We evaluated the dose-sparing effect and safety of two distinct squalene-based oil-in-water adjuvant emulsion formulations (IB160 and SE) with influenza A/H7N9 antigen. This phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial (NCT03330899), enrolled 432 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 59. Participants were randomly allocated to 8 groups: 1A) IB160 + 15μg H7N9, 1B) IB160 + 7.5μg H7N9, 1C) IB160 + 3.75μg H7N9, 2A) SE + 15μg H7N9, 2B) SE + 7.5μg H7N9, 2C) SE + 3.75μg H7N9, 3) unadjuvanted vaccine 15μg H7N9 and 4) placebo. Immunogenicity was evaluated through haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) tests. Safety was evaluated by monitoring local and systemic, solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AE) and reactions (AR) 7 and 28 days after each study injection, respectively, whereas serious adverse events (SAE) were monitored up to 194 days post-second dose. A greater increase in antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) was observed in groups receiving adjuvanted vaccines. Vaccinees receiving IB160-adjuvanted formulations showed the greatest response in group 1B, which induced an HI GMT increase of 4.7 times, HI titers ≥40 in 45.2% of participants (MN titers ≥40 in 80.8%). Vaccinees receiving SE-adjuvanted vaccines showed the greatest response in group 2A, with an HI GMT increase of 2.5 times, HI titers ≥40 in 22.9% of participants (MN titers ≥40 in 65.7%). Frequencies of AE and AR were similar among groups. Pain at the administration site and headache were the most frequent local and systemic solicited ARs. The vaccine candidates were safe and the adjuvanted formulations have a potential dose-sparing effect on immunogenicity against influenza A/H7N9. The magnitude of this effect could be further explored.

Conflict of interest statement

Daniela H Silveira, Juliana Y K Viscondi, Patrícia Emilia Braga, Maria da Graça Salomão, Vera Lúcia Gattás, Maria Beatriz B Lucchesi, Mayra M M de Oliveira, Marcelo E Koike, Milena A Akamatsu and Paulo Lee Ho are employees of Instituto Butantan-Fundação Butantan. Marilda A M Siqueira, Cristiana C Garcia, and Milene D Miranda are employees of Fiocruz. Maria do Carmo S T Timenetsky and Terezinha M Paiva are employees of Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Alexander R Precioso, Tazio Vanni, Beatriz C Thomé, Roberta O Piorelli, Anderson da Silva, Eduardo A Adami, Joane P Santos, and Gabriella Mondini are former employees of Instituto Butantan-Fundação Butantan. Esper G Kallas, Lucia M A Campos, and Eduardo B Coelho received research-grant from Fundação Butantan for their roles as principal investigators. Erin Sparrow, Martin Friede, Christopher B Fox. Anna Marie Beckmann, and Chuong Huynh are scientific and financial sponsors. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of participants…
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of participants through the study.
Fig 2. HI antibody against H7N9 reverse…
Fig 2. HI antibody against H7N9 reverse cumulative distribution curve after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration, intention-to-treat.
Fig 3. HI antibody against H7N9 reverse…
Fig 3. HI antibody against H7N9 reverse cumulative distribution curve after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration, per protocol analysis.
Fig 4. Association of HI seroprotection rate…
Fig 4. Association of HI seroprotection rate after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration with prior receipt of seasonal influenza vaccine, intention-to-treat analysis.
Fig 5. Association of HI seroprotection rate…
Fig 5. Association of HI seroprotection rate after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration with prior receipt of seasonal influenza vaccine, per protocol analysis.
Fig 6. MNT antibody against H7N9 reverse…
Fig 6. MNT antibody against H7N9 reverse cumulative distribution curve after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration, intention-to-treat.
Fig 7. MNT antibody against H7N9 reverse…
Fig 7. MNT antibody against H7N9 reverse cumulative distribution curve after 28(+7) days post 2nd dose administration, per protocol analysis.

References

    1. Li H, Cao B. Pandemic and Avian Influenza A Viruses in Humans: Epidemiology, Virology, Clinical Characteristics, and Treatment Strategy. Clin Chest Med. 2017. Mar;38(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.11.005 Epub 2016 Dec 10.
    1. Danqi B, Li Z, Liu Q, Richt JA. H7N9 avian influenza A virus in China: a short report on its circulation, drug resistant mutants and novel antiviral drugs. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017. Aug;15(8):723–727. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2017.1353419 Epub 2017 Jul 17.
    1. Xiao YL, Ren L, Zhang X, Qi L, Kash JC, Xiao Y, et al.. Deep Sequencing of H7N9 Influenza A Viruses from 16 Infected Patients from 2013 to 2015 in Shanghai Reveals Genetic Diversity and Antigenic Drift. mSphere. 2018. Sep 19;3(5):e00462–18. doi: 10.1128/mSphereDirect.00462-18
    1. Lin YJ, Shih YJ, Chen CH, Fang CT. Aluminum salts as an adjuvant for pre-pandemic influenza vaccines: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018. Jul 30;8(1):11460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29858-w
    1. Mulligan MJ, Bernstein DI, Winokur P, Rupp R, Anderson E, Rouphael N, et al.. DMID 13–0032 H7N9 Vaccine Study Group. Serological responses to an avian influenza A/H7N9 vaccine mixed at the point-of-use with MF59 adjuvant: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014. Oct 8;312(14):1409–19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.12854
    1. Jackson LA, Campbell JD, Frey SE, Edwards KM, Keitel WA, Kotloff KL, et al.. Effect of Varying Doses of a Monovalent H7N9 Influenza Vaccine With and Without AS03 and MF59 Adjuvants on Immune Response: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015. Jul 21;314(3):237–46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7916
    1. Madan A, Segall N, Ferguson M, Frenette L, Kroll R, Friel D, et al.. Immunogenicity and Safety of an AS03-Adjuvanted H7N9 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine in a Randomized Trial in Healthy Adults. J Infect Dis. 2016. Dec 1;214(11):1717–1727. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw414 Epub 2016 Sep 7.
    1. Zheng D, Gao F, Zhao C, Ding Y, Cao Y, Yang T, et al.. Comparative effectiveness of H7N9 vaccines in healthy individuals. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(1):80–90. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1515454 Epub 2018 Sep 14.
    1. Adami EA, Chavez Rico SL, Akamatsu MA, Miyaki C, Raw I, de Oliveira D, et al.. H7N9 pandemic preparedness: A large-scale production of a split inactivated vaccine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021. Mar 19;545:145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.058 Epub 2021 Feb 4.
    1. de Jonge J, van Dijken H, de Heij F, Spijkers S, Mouthaan J, de Jong R, et al.. H7N9 influenza split vaccine with SWE oil-in-water adjuvant greatly enhances cross-reactive humoral immunity and protection against severe pneumonia in ferrets. NPJ Vaccines. 2020. May 11;5(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-0187-4
    1. Akamatsu MA, Sakihara VA, Carvalho BP, de Paiva Abrantes A, Takano MAS, Adami EA, et al.. Preparedness against pandemic influenza: Production of an oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant in Brazil. PLoS One. 2020. Jun 3;15(6):e0233632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233632
    1. Treanor JJ, Chu L, Essink B, Muse D, El Sahly HM, Izikson R, et al.. Stable emulsion (SE) alone is an effective adjuvant for a recombinant, baculovirus-expressed H5 influenza vaccine in healthy adults: A Phase 2 trial. Vaccine. 2017. Feb 7;35(6):923–928. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.053 Epub 2017 Jan 11.
    1. WHO Serological detection of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infections by modified horse red blood cells haemagglutination-inhibition assay of 20 December 2013. Available from:
    1. Noah DL, Hill H, Hines D, White EL, Wolff MC. Qualification of the hemagglutination inhibition assay in support of pandemic influenza vaccine licensure. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16(4):558–566. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00368-08
    1. WHO Manual for the Laboratory Diagnosis and Virological Surveillance of Influenza: Serological diagnosis of influenza by microneutralization assay, 2011 (RIF. 2.G). Available from:
    1. EMA “Guideline on bioanalytical method validation”; 2011. Available from:
    1. FDA “Guidance for Industry; Q2B Validation on Analytical Procedures Methodology” and “Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology; 1997. Available from:
    1. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Q2(R1); 2005. Available from:
    1. World Health Organization. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment. Geneva: WHO; 2014. Available from:
    1. United States of America. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials. Rockville: DHHS; 2007. Available from:
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: clinical data needed to support the licensure of pandemic influenza vaccines, 2007. Available from:
    1. Davenport FM, Hennessy AV, Francis T Jr. Epidemiologic and immunologic significance of age distribution of antibody to antigenic variants of influenza virus. J Exp Med. 1953. Dec;98(6):641–56. doi: 10.1084/jem.98.6.641
    1. Kim JH, Davis WG, Sambhara S, Jacob J. Strategies to alleviate original antigenic sin responses to influenza viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. Aug 21;109(34):13751–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912458109 Epub 2012 Aug 6.
    1. Garçon N, Vaughn DW, Didierlaurent AM. Development and evaluation of AS03, an Adjuvant System containing α-tocopherol and squalene in an oil-in-water emulsion. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012. Mar;11(3):349–66. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.192
    1. Jansen JM, Gerlach T, Elbahesh H, Rimmelzwaan GF, Saletti G. Influenza virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity induced by infection and vaccination. J Clin Virol. 2019. Oct;119:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.08.009 Epub 2019 Aug 24.
    1. Altenburg AF, Rimmelzwaan GF, de Vries RD. Virus-specific T cells as correlate of (cross-)protective immunity against influenza. Vaccine. 2015. Jan 15;33(4):500–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.054 Epub 2014 Dec 9.
    1. Hillaire ML, Osterhaus AD, Rimmelzwaan GF. Induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes as a basis for the development of broadly protective influenza vaccines. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:939860. doi: 10.1155/2011/939860 Epub 2011 Oct 5.
    1. Trombetta CM, Remarque EJ, Mortier D, Montomoli E. Comparison of hemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, virus neutralization assays, and ELISA to detect antibody levels against seasonal influenza viruses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018. Nov;12(6):675–686. doi: 10.1111/irv.12591 Epub 2018 Aug 11.
    1. Trombetta CM, Perini D, Vitale L, Cox RJ, Stanzani V, Piccirella S, et al.. Validation of Single Radial Haemolysis assay: A reliable method to measure antibodies against influenza viruses. J Immunol Methods. 2015. Jul;422:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2015.04.009 Epub 2015 Apr 22.
    1. Prevato M, Cozzi R, Pezzicoli A, Taddei AR, Ferlenghi I, Nandi A, et al.. An Innovative Pseudotypes-Based Enzyme-Linked Lectin Assay for the Measurement of Functional Anti-Neuraminidase Antibodies. PLoS One. 2015. Aug 12;10(8):e0135383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135383
    1. Biuso F, Palladino L, Manenti A, Stanzani V, Lapini G, Gao J, et al.. Use of lentiviral pseudotypes as an alternative to reassortant or Triton X-100-treated wild-type Influenza viruses in the neuraminidase inhibition enzyme-linked lectin assay. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019. Sep;13(5):504–516. doi: 10.1111/irv.12669
    1. Stadlbauer D, Amanat F, Strohmeier S, Nachbagauer R, Krammer F. Cross-reactive mouse monoclonal antibodies raised against the hemagglutinin of A/Shanghai/1/2013 (H7N9) protect against novel H7 virus isolates in the mouse model. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018. Jun 20;7(1):110. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0115-0
    1. Tan GS, Leon PE, Albrecht RA, Margine I, Hirsh A, Bahl J, et al.. Broadly-Reactive Neutralizing and Non-neutralizing Antibodies Directed against the H7 Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Reveal Divergent Mechanisms of Protection. PLoS Pathog. 2016. Apr 15;12(4):e1005578. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005578
    1. Fox CB, Haensler J. An update on safety and immunogenicity of vaccines containing emulsion-based adjuvants. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013. Jul;12(7):747–58. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2013.811188

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit