Effects of contralesional robot-assisted hand training in patients with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: a case series study

Valentina Varalta, Alessandro Picelli, Cristina Fonte, Giulia Montemezzi, Elisabetta La Marchina, Nicola Smania, Valentina Varalta, Alessandro Picelli, Cristina Fonte, Giulia Montemezzi, Elisabetta La Marchina, Nicola Smania

Abstract

Background: A reduction of hemispatial neglect due to stroke has been associated with activation of the contralesional hand in the contralesional hemispace. Robot-assisted upper limb training was found to effectively improve paretic arm function in stroke patients. To date no proof of concept of robot-assisted hemispatial neglect therapy has been reported in literature. This study aimed to determine whether robot-assisted left (contralesional) hand activation alone could lead to an improvement in hemispatial neglect following stroke.

Methods: Three stroke patients with right brain injury underwent a 2-week training program of robotic left hand activation with the Gloreha® hand rehabilitation glove, which provides repetitive, passive mobilization of the fingers. Outcomes were assessed using the Line Crossing test, the Bells test, the Sentence Reading test, the Saccadic Training, the Sustained Attention to Response Task, and the Purdue Pegboard test.

Results: Changes were observed after treatment as follows. Line Crossing test: all patients showed improved performance (6.7%, 89.5% and 80% increase in lines crossed) with two patients reaching normal performance levels. Bells test: one patient improved performance (50% increase), while one patient showed no change and one patient declined (-10.3% change); no patient reached normal performance levels. Sentence Reading test: all patients showed improved performance (800%, 57.1% and 42.9% increase in number of sentences read) with no patient reaching normal performance level. Saccadic Training: all patients showed improved performance (-62.8%, -15.5% and -9.7% change of the left hemifield reaction time). Sustained Attention to Response Task: all patients showed improved performance (-20.5%, -5.8% and -10% change of the reaction time) with two patients reducing incorrect responses (-42.9% and -73.3%) and one patient increasing them (9.1%). Purdue Pegboard test: all patients showed improved performance (100%, 27.3% and 75% change in the left + right + both hands sub-item score).

Conclusions: Some caution is warranted when interpreting our results, as the responses to the intervention were variable and might have been due to a placebo effect or fluctuating clinical conditions. However, robot-assisted hemispatial neglect therapy might be useful in stroke patients. Larger-scale investigations are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Robot-assisted hand training.

References

    1. Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Humphreys GW. Unilateral visual neglect symptoms: ALE meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:230. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00230.
    1. Yue Y, Song W, Huo S, Wang M. Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames. Arch Med Phys Rehab. 2012;93:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.192.
    1. Bowen A, Hazelton C, Pollock A, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD003586.
    1. Anderson B, Mennemeier M, Chatterjee A. Variability not ability: another basis for performance decrements in neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:785–796. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00137-2.
    1. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:217–234. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00065-3.
    1. van Kessel ME, van Nes IJ, Brouwer WH, Geurts AC, Fasotti L. Visuospatial asymmetry and non-spatial attention in subacute stroke patients with and without neglect. Cortex. 2010;46:602–612. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.004.
    1. Luauté J, Halligan P, Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D. Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:961–982. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.001.
    1. Ianes P, Varalta V, Gandolfi M, Picelli A, Corno M, Di Matteo A, Fiaschi A, Smania N. Stimulating visual exploration of the neglected space in the early stage of stroke by hemifield eye-patching: a randomized controlled trial in patients with right brain damage. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:189–196.
    1. Smania N, Fonte C, Picelli A, Gandolfi M, Varalta V. Effect of eye patching in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:527. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00527.
    1. Robertson IH, North N. Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: the role of hemispace, hand and motor activation. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30:553–563. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90058-T.
    1. Robertson IH, North N. Active and passive activation of left limbs: influence on visual and sensory neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1993;31:293–300. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90093-F.
    1. Robertson IH, Hogg K, McMillan TM. Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: improving function by contralesional limb activation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1998;8:19–29. doi: 10.1080/713755556.
    1. Gainotti G, Perri R, Cappa A. Left hand movements and right hemisphere activation in unilateral spatial neglect: a test of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1350–1355. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00211-1.
    1. Pitteri M, Arcara G, Passarini L, Meneghello F, Priftis K. Is two better than one? Limb activation treatment combined with contralesional arm vibration to ameliorate signs of left neglect. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:460. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00460.
    1. Frassinetti F, Rossi M, Làdavas E. Passive limb movements improve visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:725–733. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00156-1.
    1. Eskes GA, Butler B. Using limb movements to improve spatial neglect: the role of functional electrical stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24:385–398.
    1. Rizzolatti G, Berti A. Neglect as neural representation deficit. Rev Neurol. 1990;146:626–634.
    1. Robertson IH, Mattingley JB, Rorden C, Driver J. Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness. Nature. 1998;395:169–172. doi: 10.1038/25993.
    1. Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD006876.
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:111–121. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457.
    1. Hantson L, De Weerdt W, De Keyser J, Diener HC, Franke C, Palm R, Van Orshoven M, Schoonderwalt H, De Klippel N, Herroelen L. The European stroke scale. Stroke. 1994;25:2215–2219. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.25.11.2215.
    1. Halligan PW. The behavioural assessment of visual neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:5–32. doi: 10.1080/09602019108401377.
    1. Gauthier L, Deahaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11:49–54.
    1. Pizzamiglio L, Antonucci G, Judica A, Montenero P, Razzano C, Zoccolotti P. Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992;14:901–923. doi: 10.1080/01688639208402543.
    1. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206–207.
    1. Schuhfried G. RehaCom: basic manual. Hasomed: Magdeburg; 2003.
    1. Schendel KL, Robertson LC. Using reaction time to assess patients with unilateral neglect and extinction. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24:941–950. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.7.941.8390.
    1. Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J. ‘Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35:747–758. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8.
    1. Blair SJ, McCormick E, Bear-Lehman J. Evaluation of impairment of the upper extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;221:42–58.
    1. Reddon JR, Gill DM, Gauk SE, Marez ND. Purdue pegboard: test-retest estimates. Percept Mot Skills. 1988;66:503–506. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.503.
    1. Rizzolatti G, Camarda R. Neural circuits for spatial attention and unilateral neglect. In: Jeannerod M, editor. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1987. pp. 289–313.
    1. Molenberghs P, Gillebert CR, Schoofs H, Dupont P, Peeters R, Vandenberghe R. Lesion neuroanatomy of the Sustained Attention to Response task. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:2866–2875. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.012.
    1. Oren N, Soroker N, Deouell LY. Immediate effects of exposure to positive and negative emotional stimuli on visual search characteristics in patients with unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51:2729–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.033.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit