MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum

Bradley J Monk, Rachel N Grisham, Susana Banerjee, Elsa Kalbacher, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Ignacio Romero, Peter Vuylsteke, Robert L Coleman, Felix Hilpert, Amit M Oza, Anneke Westermann, Martin K Oehler, Sandro Pignata, Carol Aghajanian, Nicoletta Colombo, Esther Drill, David Cibula, Kathleen N Moore, Janna Christy-Bittel, Josep M Del Campo, Regina Berger, Christian Marth, Jalid Sehouli, David M O'Malley, Cristina Churruca, Adam P Boyd, Gunnar Kristensen, Andrew Clamp, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Ignace Vergote, Bradley J Monk, Rachel N Grisham, Susana Banerjee, Elsa Kalbacher, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Ignacio Romero, Peter Vuylsteke, Robert L Coleman, Felix Hilpert, Amit M Oza, Anneke Westermann, Martin K Oehler, Sandro Pignata, Carol Aghajanian, Nicoletta Colombo, Esther Drill, David Cibula, Kathleen N Moore, Janna Christy-Bittel, Josep M Del Campo, Regina Berger, Christian Marth, Jalid Sehouli, David M O'Malley, Cristina Churruca, Adam P Boyd, Gunnar Kristensen, Andrew Clamp, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Ignace Vergote

Abstract

Purpose: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC.

Methods: This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician's choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety.

Results: A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent.

Conclusion: Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01849874.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram (data cutoff date: January 20, 2016). BICR, blinded independent central review; LGS, low-grade serous. (*) Patients may be counted as not meeting > 1 criterion; most common reasons provided. (**) These patients had signed ICF prior to the data cutoff date but the outcome of their screening process was still pending as of the cutoff date.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier plot of progression-free survival per (A) blinded independent central review and (B) local assessment. HR, hazard ratio; PCC, physician’s choice chemotherapy; PFS, progression free survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) Binimetinib treatment group: univariate analysis of molecular alterations and response to therapy. (B) Physician’s choice chemotherapy group: univariate analysis of molecular alterations and response to therapy. OR, odds ratio.

References

    1. Colombo N, Peiretti M, Parma G, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v23–v30.
    1. Diaz-Padilla I, Malpica AL, Minig L, et al. Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma: A comprehensive update. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:279–285.
    1. Grisham RN, Iyer G, Garg K, et al. BRAF mutation is associated with early stage disease and improved outcome in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2013;119:548–554.
    1. Grisham RN, Sylvester BE, Won H, et al. Extreme outlier analysis identifies occult mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4099–4105.
    1. Hunter SM, Anglesio MS, Ryland GL, et al. Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes. Oncotarget. 2015;6:37663–37677.
    1. Vang R, Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: Pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:267–282.
    1. Wong KK, Tsang YT, Deavers MT, et al. BRAF mutation is rare in advanced-stage low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1611–1617.
    1. Yoon S, Seger R. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: Multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions. Growth Factors. 2006;24:21–44.
    1. Scholl FA, Dumesic PA, Khavari PA. Effects of active MEK1 expression in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2005;230:1–5.
    1. Winski S, Anderson D, Bouhana K, et al. MEK162 (ARRY-162), a novel MEK 1/2 inhibitor, inhibits tumor growth regardless of KRas/Raf pathway mutations. Eur J Cancer. 2010;8:56.
    1. Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V, et al. Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:134–140.
    1. Vergote I, Pujade-Lauraine E, Pignata S, et al. European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups’ requirements for trials between academic groups and pharmaceutical companies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:476–478.
    1. Kittelson JM, Emerson SS. A unifying family of group sequential test designs. Biometrics. 1999;55:874–882.
    1. Gershenson DM, Miller A, Brady W, et al: A randomized phase II/III study to assess the efficacy of trametinib in patients with recurrent or progressive low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal cancer. Ann Oncol 30: v851-v934, 2019 (suppl 5)
    1. Mektovi: US Prescribing Information. Pfizer Inc
    1. Bedard PL, Tabernero J, Janku F, et al. A phase Ib dose-escalation study of the oral pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) in combination with the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in patients with selected advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:730–738.
    1. Said R, Ye Y, Falchook GS, et al. Outcomes of patients with advanced cancer and KRAS mutations in phase I clinical trials. Oncotarget. 2014;5:8937–8946.
    1. Spreafico A, Oza AM, Clarke BA, et al. Genotype-matched treatment for patients with advanced type I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144:250–255.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit