Danish method study on cervical screening in women offered HPV vaccination as girls (Trial23): a study protocol

Lise Holst Thamsborg, Berit Andersen, Lise Grupe Larsen, Jette Christensen, Tonje Johansen, Jalil Hariri, Sanne Christiansen, Carsten Rygaard, Elsebeth Lynge, Lise Holst Thamsborg, Berit Andersen, Lise Grupe Larsen, Jette Christensen, Tonje Johansen, Jalil Hariri, Sanne Christiansen, Carsten Rygaard, Elsebeth Lynge

Abstract

Introduction: The first birth cohorts of women offered human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination as girls are now entering cervical screening. However, there is no international consensus on how to screen HPV vaccinated women. These women are better protected against cervical cancer and could therefore be offered less intensive screening. Primary HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology, allowing for a longer screening interval. The aim of Trial23 is to investigate if primary HPV testing with cytology triage of HPV positive samples is a reasonable screening scheme for women offered HPV vaccination as girls.

Methods: Trial23 is a method study embedded in the existing cervical screening programme in four out of five Danish regions. Without affecting the screening programme, women born in 1994 are randomised to present screening with liquid-based cytology every third year (present programme arm) or present screening plus an HPV test (HPV arm). The study started 1 February 2017 and will run over three screening rounds corresponding to 7-8 years.

Analyses: The primary endpoint is cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or above. The trial is undertaken as a non-inferiority study including intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The potential effect of primary HPV screening with a 6-year interval will be calculated from the observed data.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been submitted to the ethical committee and deemed a method study. All women are screened according to routine guidelines. The study will contribute new evidence on the future screening of HPV vaccinated birth cohorts of women. All results will be published in open-access journal.

Trial registration: NCT03049553; Pre-results.

Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cervical screening; hpv-testing; hpv-vaccination; human papillomavirus (hpv).

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Roche has sponsored test kits for the trial. BA had participation in a scientific conference sponsored by Roche and participated in other studies with test kits sponsored by Roche and self-sampling devices sponsored by Axlab. EL and CR participated in meetings with Roche with fees paid to the University of Copenhagen. The remaining authors have no other conflicts of interest.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow for participation in cervical screening. *Abnormal cytology, high grade: HSIL, ASCH and AIS (Bethesda classification). **Abnormal cytology, low grade: ASCUS, AGC and LSIL (Bethesda classification). ***Colposcopy with biopsy. AGC, atypical glandular cells; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; ASCH, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude; ASCUS, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HPV, human papillomavirus; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepitehlial lesions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Map over the geographical areas covered by Trial23.

References

    1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. . Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12–19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>;2-F
    1. EPI-NEWS. Statens Serum Institut [in Danish]. 2008.
    1. de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, et al. . Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1048–56. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8
    1. Garland SM, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, et al. . Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1928–43. 10.1056/NEJMoa061760
    1. FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1915–27. 10.1056/NEJMoa061741
    1. Muñoz N, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, et al. . Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:325–39. 10.1093/jnci/djp534
    1. National recommendations for cervical screening. (Sundhedsstyrelsens anbefalinger) [summary in English]. 2012. (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
    1. Quality report on the Danish cervical cancer screening program (DKLS årsrapport). 2015. .
    1. Lam JU, Lynge E, Njor SH, et al. . Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark. Acta Oncol 2015;54:1136–43. 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1016625
    1. Saville AM. Cervical cancer prevention in Australia: Planning for the future. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:235–40. 10.1002/cncy.21643
    1. Swedish recommendations for cervical Screening. 2015. (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
    1. National Screening Unit. Planned changes to cervical screening test in 2018. New Zealand, 2018. (accessed 10 May 2018).
    1. National Institute of Public Health and Environment. Cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands. (accessed 10 May 2017).
    1. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. . Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2014;383:524–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7
    1. Dillner J, Rebolj M, Birembaut P, et al. . Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1754 10.1136/bmj.a1754
    1. Kitchener HC, Gilham C, Sargent A, et al. . A comparison of HPV DNA testing and liquid based cytology over three rounds of primary cervical screening: extended follow up in the ARTISTIC trial. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:864–71. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.008
    1. European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
    1. van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD. Epidemiological evidence for age-dependent regression of pre-invasive cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1991;64:559–65. 10.1038/bjc.1991.350
    1. Kjær SK, Munk C, Junge J, et al. . Carcinogenic HPV prevalence and age-specific type distribution in 40,382 women with normal cervical cytology, ASCUS/LSIL, HSIL, or cervical cancer: what is the potential for prevention? Cancer Causes Control 2014;25:179–89. 10.1007/s10552-013-0320-z
    1. Statens Serum Institut. Vaccine coverage [in Danish]. (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
    1. Statens Institut for Folkesundhed. School Survey 2010 (Skolebørnsundersøgelsen) [in Danish]. (accessed 20 Dec 2015).
    1. Statistics Denmark. Population count. (accessed 10 Jul 2017).
    1. Guidelines Danish society of gynecology and obstetrics [in Danish].
    1. Roche Molecular Diagnostics. Cobas HPV-test. (accessed 3 Jul 2017).
    1. Roche. PKG INS, CINtec p16 Histology, English. (accessed 3 Jul 2017).
    1. Hestbech MS, Lynge E, Kragstrup J, et al. . The impact of HPV vaccination on future cervical screening: a simulation study of two birth cohorts in Denmark. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007921 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007921
    1. Rigsarkivat. Danish data archive [in Danish]. (accessed 6 Oct 2017).
    1. Lamin H, Eklund C, Elfström KM, et al. . Randomised healthcare policy evaluation of organised primary human papillomavirus screening of women aged 56-60. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014788 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014788
    1. Leinonen M, Nieminen P, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, et al. . Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1612–23. 10.1093/jnci/djp367
    1. Giorgi Rossi P, Carozzi F, Federici A, et al. . Cervical cancer screening in women vaccinated against human papillomavirus infection: Recommendations from a consensus conference. Prev Med 2017;98:21–30. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.020
    1. Mølbak K, Hansen ND, Valentiner-Branth P. Pre-vaccination care-seeking in females reporting severe adverse reactions to hpv vaccine. a registry based case-control study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162520 10.1371/journal.pone.0162520
    1. Hanley SJB, Yoshioka E, Ito Y, et al. . HPV vaccination crisis in Japan. The Lancet 2015;385:2571 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61152-7
    1. National Institute for Public Helath and Enviroment. Risk of measles outbreaks increases with decreasing vaccination coverage. The Netherlands, 2017. (accessed 3 Jul 2017).
    1. . News article: Irish parents are stopping their children from getting a cervical cancer vaccine - but why?

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit