Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Requiring Intensive Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis

Sebastian Wolf, Frank G Holz, Edoardo Midena, Eric H Souied, George Lambrou, Tobias Machewitz, Helmut Allmeier, Paul Mitchell, ARIES Study Investigators, Sebastian Wolf, Frank G Holz, Edoardo Midena, Eric H Souied, George Lambrou, Tobias Machewitz, Helmut Allmeier, Paul Mitchell, ARIES Study Investigators

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this post hoc analysis of the ARIES study is to explore the requirement for intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment intervals of < 8 weeks (w) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to assess vision and anatomic outcomes in such patients who require more intensive treatment.

Methods: ARIES was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study that investigated the efficacy of two IVT-AFL proactive, individualized, treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Patients were determined as injection-intensive if the study investigator identified that a treatment interval of < 8 w was needed and if they had ≥ 1 interval of < 8 w after three initial monthly doses. Treatment intervals could be extended subsequently if extension criteria were met. This is a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in ARIES and statistical analysis is descriptive.

Results: Of 269 patients in the combined treatment arms, 23.0% (n = 62) were injection-intensive (Year 1: 13.8% [n = 37]; Year 2: 9.3% [n = 25]). Time from IVT-AFL initiation to injection-intensive determination varied (range, 16-100 w; median: 43.2 w). Mean treatment interval was 8.4 w before and 6.1 w after injection-intensive determination. Overall, 59.7% achieved treatment intervals of ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. Vision improvements from baseline to Week 104 were smaller for injection-intensive patients than non-injection-intensive patients (mean [SD] best-corrected visual acuity change: + 2.3 [15.6] vs. + 5.9 [12.3] letters). Anatomic outcomes were similar between injection-intensive and non-injection-intensive patients (central retinal thickness change from baseline to Week 104: - 160 [154] vs. - 167 [136] µm).

Conclusions: In ARIES, 23% of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD experienced at least one treatment interval of < 8 w. Injection-intensive patients showed improved vision and anatomic outcomes. For most, treatment intervals could be extended to ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination.

Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT02581891.

Keywords: Injection-intensive; Intravitreal aflibercept; Neovascular age-related macular degeneration; Treat-and-extend; Treatment intervals; Treatment outcomes.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier plot for time to injection-intensive visit (all injection-intensive patients)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Duration of the longest interval after the injection-intensive visit. Categorization: 8 weeks = 49–63 days; 10 weeks = 64–77 days; 12 weeks = 78–91 days; 14 weeks = 92–105 days; 16 weeks = 106–119 days; ≥ 16 weeks =  ≥ 119 days. Max maximum, Min minimum, SD standard deviation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a BCVA and b CRT outcomes by injection-intensive status. Full analysis set. Last observation carried forward. Injection-intensive visit could occur at any time from randomization (Week 16) to Week 104. BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, BL baseline, CRT central retinal thickness, SEM standard error of the mean

References

    1. Fauser S, Schwabecker V, Muether PS. Suppression of intraocular vascular endothelial growth factor during aflibercept treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:532–536. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.025.
    1. Jaffe GJ, Kaiser PK, Thompson D, et al. Differential response to anti-VEGF regimens in age-related macular degeneration patients with early persistent retinal fluid. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1856–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.016.
    1. Lanzetta P, Loewenstein A, Vision Academy Steering Committee Fundamental principles of an anti-VEGF treatment regimen: optimal application of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy of macular diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255:1259–1273. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3647-4.
    1. Mitchell P, Holz GF, Hykin P, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept using a treat-and-extend regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the ARIES study. Retina. 2021;41:1911–1920. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003128.
    1. Ross AH, Downey L, Devonport H. Recommendations by a UK expert panel on an aflibercept treat-and-extend pathway for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:1825–1834. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0747-x.
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Kaiser PK, Korobelnik JF, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: ninety-six-week results of the VIEW studies. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.011.
    1. Eylea [prescribing information]. In. Tarrytown, NY: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2021.
    1. Aflibercept (Eylea) summary of product characteristics, Nov 2021. . Accessed June 2022.
    1. Ohji M, Takahashi K, Okada AA, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept treat-and-extend regimens in exudative age-related macular degeneration: 52- and 96-week findings from ALTAIR. Adv Ther. 2020;37:1173–1187. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01236-x.
    1. Brown DM. Evaluation of 8 mg intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the phase 2 CANDELA study. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) 2022.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit