Association Between Visual Acuity and Fluid Compartments with Treat-and-Extend Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis

Varun Chaudhary, Frank G Holz, Sebastian Wolf, Edoardo Midena, Eric H Souied, Helmut Allmeier, George Lambrou, Tobias Machewitz, Paul Mitchell, ARIES study investigators, Varun Chaudhary, Frank G Holz, Sebastian Wolf, Edoardo Midena, Eric H Souied, Helmut Allmeier, George Lambrou, Tobias Machewitz, Paul Mitchell, ARIES study investigators

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, there has been growing interest in exploring the relationship between visual acuity and fluid localization in different retinal compartments. This post hoc analysis of the ARIES study explores the relationship between the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), both at baseline and throughout treatment, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in a treat-and-extend regimen.

Methods: ARIES (NCT02581891) was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study comparing the efficacy of two IVT-AFL treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. This post hoc analysis explores the relationship between the presence of SRF/IRF and absolute BCVA (letter score) at baseline and fixed visits.

Results: In 210 patients (treat-and-extend treatment arms combined), SRF presence at baseline was associated at every time point with a numerically higher mean BCVA than if absent, with 10 more letters at week 104. IRF presence at baseline was associated at all but one time point with a numerically lower mean BCVA than if absent (week 104, 8-letter difference). Baseline SRF+IRF was associated with lower BCVA (week 104, 7-letter difference) than if only SRF was present, but higher BCVA (week 104, 8-letter difference) than if only IRF was present. Absence of SRF+IRF was not associated with better BCVA at any time point during the study.

Conclusion: In ARIES, in patients with nAMD treated with IVT-AFL, the presence of SRF was associated with better visual acuity, whereas IRF was associated with poorer visual acuity. The findings of this post hoc analysis suggest that differentiating IRF from SRF may offer better prognostic value in guiding treatment-extension decisions than the use of combined or "any" IRF and SRF. Prospective trials are needed to validate these results and determine their clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT02581891. Association between Visual Acuity and Fluid Compartments with Treat-and-Extend Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis: A Video Abstract (MP4 308264 KB).

Keywords: Aflibercept; Intraretinal Fluid; Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration; Subretinal Fluid; Treat-and-Extend; Visual Acuity.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jul;123(7):1521-9
    1. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 Jan;50:1-24
    1. Retina. 2021 Aug 1;41(8):1579-1586
    1. Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126(5):723-734
    1. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):865-75
    1. Retina. 2021 Sep 1;41(9):1911-1920
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1144-67
    1. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 06;11:1957-1966
    1. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jan;123(1):60-9
    1. Ophthalmology. 2021 May;128(5):693-705
    1. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(1):1-19
    1. Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):822-32
    1. Eye (Lond). 2021 Aug;35(8):2119-2135
    1. Retina. 2015 Aug;35(8):1489-506
    1. Retina. 2022 Apr 1;42(4):589-606
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;98(12):1629-35
    1. Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1211-1219
    1. Eye (Lond). 2022 Nov;36(11):2075-2077
    1. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):252-260
    1. Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8036
    1. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2181-92
    1. Neuron. 2012 Jul 12;75(1):26-39
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;255(7):1259-1273
    1. Retina. 2020 Nov;40(11):2148-2157
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;233:8-17
    1. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jun;121(6):1237-45

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit