Hypothetical Switch of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis

Cengiz Tuerksever, Gábor Márk Somfai, Susanne Oesch, Tobias Machewitz, Pascal W Hasler, Sandrine Zweifel, Cengiz Tuerksever, Gábor Márk Somfai, Susanne Oesch, Tobias Machewitz, Pascal W Hasler, Sandrine Zweifel

Abstract

Introduction: Switching to an alternative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent has been suggested for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who have a suboptimal response to initial therapy. However, post hoc analyses of some studies have shown that continuation of initial anti-VEGF therapy is, in many cases, associated with stable visual outcomes or gradual gains.

Methods: This ARIES (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891) post hoc analysis describes outcomes in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD receiving treat-and-extend intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for 104 weeks, who were identified as meeting criteria for an early hypothetical switch. Patients were categorized retrospectively according to six criteria (presence of central intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid at week 8 or 24, with/without a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, and with/without gains in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] ≤ 5 letters [with absolute BCVA < 70 letters]).

Results: Hypothetical switch criteria were largely met due to the presence of central subretinal fluid rather than intraretinal fluid. Depending on the criterion, 8-46% of patients were considered to be hypothetical switchers. BCVA outcomes were not worse in the hypothetical switchers, irrespective of criteria. Using criteria of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at week 24 and a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, mean changes in BCVA (letters) from baseline in hypothetical switchers and non-switchers were: + 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4, 8.8) and + 6.6 (95% CI 4.7, 8.6), respectively, at week 24; + 8.2 (95% CI 5.0, 11.3) and + 7.5 (95% CI 5.3, 9.7), respectively, at week 52; and + 5.7 (95% CI 1.3, 10.1) and + 3.4 (95% CI 0.1, 6.7), respectively, at week 104.

Conclusions: In newly diagnosed nAMD, there appears little rationale for early switching from IVT-AFL since, with continuous proactive treatment, comparable visual gains can be achieved by patients meeting hypothetical switch criteria compared with those who initially respond well on a treat-and-extend regimen. However, further prospective studies are needed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891. Video summary of the ARIES Post Hoc Analysis "Hypothetical Switch of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration" (MP4 54283 KB).

Keywords: Aflibercept; Age-related macular degeneration; Intravitreal injections; Optical coherence tomography; Treat-and-extend; Treatment outcome; Vascular endothelial growth factors.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of patients in the per-protocol set with central IRF and central SRF over time, grouped post baseline by hypothetical switch criteria 1, 3, and 5: the presence of central fluid at week 8 (a), week 24 (b), week 24 (c) and next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks. The dashed box indicates the “index” weeks at which time point hypothetical switch criteria were defined. IRF Intraretinal fluid, SRF subretinal fluid
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) absolute BCVA values over time in patients in the per-protocol population grouped post-baseline by hypothetical switch criteria 1, 3, and 5: the presence of central fluid at week 8 (a), week 24 (b), and week 24 (c) and next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks. The dashed line indicates the “index” weeks at which point hypothetical switch criteria were defined. BCVA Best-corrected visual acuity, BL baseline, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (± SEM) absolute CRT values over time in patients in the per-protocol population grouped post baseline by hypothetical switch criteria 1, 3, and 5: the presence of central fluid at week 8 (a), week 24 (b), and week 24 (c) and next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks. The dashed line indicates the “index” weeks at which point hypothetical switch criteria were defined. CRT Central retinal thickness

References

    1. Taylor DJ, Hobby AE, Binns AM, Crabb DP. How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011504.
    1. Assi L, Chamseddine F, Ibrahim P, et al. A global assessment of eye health and quality of life: a systematic review of systematic reviews. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:526–541. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0146.
    1. Moshfeghi AA, Lanitis T, Kropat G, et al. Social cost of blindness due to AMD and diabetic retinopathy in the United States in 2020. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2020;51:S6–S14. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20200401-01.
    1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e106–e116. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1.
    1. Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Zhang X, et al. Forecasting age-related macular degeneration through the year 2050: the potential impact of new treatments. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:533–540. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.58.
    1. Colijn JM, Buitendijk GHS, Prokofyeva E, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: the past and the future. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1753–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.035.
    1. Novartis. LUCENTIS® (ranibizumab injection) for intravitreal injection [prescribing information]. . 2018. Accessed Jan 2022.
    1. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Chong V, Loewenstein A, et al. Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA) Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1144–1167. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305702.
    1. Gale RP, Mahmood S, Devonport H, et al. Action on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD): recommendations for management and service provision in the UK hospital eye service. Eye (Lond) 2019;33:1–21. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0300-3.
    1. Arruabarrena C, Toro MD, Onen M, et al. Impact on visual acuity in neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Europe due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153281.
    1. Stattin M, Ahmed D, Graf A, et al. The effect of treatment discontinuation during the COVID-19 pandemic on visual acuity in exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year results. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;10:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00381-y.
    1. Bajka A, Wiest MRJ, Hamann T, Toro MD, Zweifel SA. Assessment of patients' confidence regarding a new triage concept in a medical retina clinic during the first COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:5846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115846.
    1. Wong DT, Lambrou GN, Loewenstein A, et al. Suspending treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in cases of futility. Retina. 2020;40:1010–1020. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002713.
    1. Zarbin M, Tsuboi M, Hill LF, Stoilov I. Simulating an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor switch in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a HARBOR subanalysis. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.003.
    1. Ferris FL, 3rd, Maguire MG, Glassman AR, Ying GS, Martin DF. Evaluating effects of switching anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:145–149. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4820.
    1. Mitchell P, Holz FG, Hykin P, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept using a treat-and-extend regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the ARIES study. Retina. 2021;41:1911–1920. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003128.
    1. Kodjikian L, Parravano M, Clemens A, et al. Fluid as a critical biomarker in neovascular age-related macular degeneration management: literature review and consensus recommendations. Eye. 2021;35:2119–2135. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01487-0.
    1. Chaudhary V, Matonti F, Zarranz-Ventura J, Stewart MW. The impact of fluid compartments on functional outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic literature review. Retina. 2021 doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003283.
    1. Zarbin MA, Hill L, Maunz A, Gliem M, Stoilov I. Anti-VEGF-resistant subretinal fluid is associated with better vision and reduced risk of macular atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318688.
    1. Siedlecki J, Fischer C, Schworm B, et al. Impact of sub-retinal fluid on the long-term incidence of macular atrophy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration under treat and extend anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64901-9.
    1. Amoaku WM, Chakravarthy U, Gale R, et al. Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:721–731. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.48.
    1. Sharma S, Toth CA, Daniel E, et al. Macular morphology and visual acuity in the second year of the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:865–875. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.002.
    1. Regillo CD, Busbee BG, Ho AC, Ding B, Haskova Z. Baseline predictors of 12-month treatment response to ranibizumab in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:1014–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.034.
    1. Waldstein SM, Simader C, Staurenghi G, et al. Morphology and visual acuity in aflibercept and ranibizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the VIEW trials. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1521–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.037.
    1. Guymer RH, Markey CM, McAllister IL, et al. Tolerating subretinal fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab using a treat-and-extend regimen: FLUID study 24-month results. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:723–734. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.025.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit