Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction based on individual patient data

Mariann Gyöngyösi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Patricia Lemarchand, Ketil Lunde, Michal Tendera, Jozef Bartunek, Eduardo Marban, Birgit Assmus, Timothy D Henry, Jay H Traverse, Lemuel A Moyé, Daniel Sürder, Roberto Corti, Heikki Huikuri, Johanna Miettinen, Jochen Wöhrle, Slobodan Obradovic, Jérome Roncalli, Konstantinos Malliaras, Evgeny Pokushalov, Alexander Romanov, Jens Kastrup, Martin W Bergmann, Douwe E Atsma, Axel Diederichsen, Istvan Edes, Imre Benedek, Theodora Benedek, Hristo Pejkov, Noemi Nyolczas, Noemi Pavo, Jutta Bergler-Klein, Imre J Pavo, Christer Sylven, Sergio Berti, Eliano P Navarese, Gerald Maurer, ACCRUE Investigators, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Dietmar Glogar, Sasko Kedev, Erik Jørgensen, Yongzhong Wang, Rasmus S Ripa, Mariann Gyöngyösi, Wojciech Wojakowski, Patricia Lemarchand, Ketil Lunde, Michal Tendera, Jozef Bartunek, Eduardo Marban, Birgit Assmus, Timothy D Henry, Jay H Traverse, Lemuel A Moyé, Daniel Sürder, Roberto Corti, Heikki Huikuri, Johanna Miettinen, Jochen Wöhrle, Slobodan Obradovic, Jérome Roncalli, Konstantinos Malliaras, Evgeny Pokushalov, Alexander Romanov, Jens Kastrup, Martin W Bergmann, Douwe E Atsma, Axel Diederichsen, Istvan Edes, Imre Benedek, Theodora Benedek, Hristo Pejkov, Noemi Nyolczas, Noemi Pavo, Jutta Bergler-Klein, Imre J Pavo, Christer Sylven, Sergio Berti, Eliano P Navarese, Gerald Maurer, ACCRUE Investigators, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Dietmar Glogar, Sasko Kedev, Erik Jørgensen, Yongzhong Wang, Rasmus S Ripa

Abstract

Rationale: The meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first prospectively declared collaborative multinational database, including individual data of patients with ischemic heart disease treated with cell therapy.

Objective: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (ASTAMI, Aalst, BOOST, BONAMI, CADUCEUS, FINCELL, REGENT, REPAIR-AMI, SCAMI, SWISS-AMI, TIME, LATE-TIME; n=1252).

Methods and results: The primary end point was freedom from combined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (including all-cause death, AMI recurrance, stroke, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end point was freedom from hard clinical end points (death, AMI recurrence, or stroke), assessed with random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions for interactions. Secondary efficacy end points included changes in end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction, analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and ANCOVA. We reported weighted mean differences between cell therapy and control groups. No effect of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.18) or death (1.4% versus 2.1%) or death/AMI recurrence/stroke (2.9% versus 4.7%) was identified in comparison with controls. No changes in ejection fraction (mean difference: 0.96%; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 2.1), end-diastolic volume, or systolic volume were observed compared with controls. These results were not influenced by anterior AMI location, reduced baseline ejection fraction, or the use of MRI for assessing left ventricular parameters.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials in patients with recent AMI revealed that intracoronary cell therapy provided no benefit, in terms of clinical events or changes in left ventricular function.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01098591.

Keywords: anterior wall myocardial infarction; heart failure; meta-analysis; outcome assessment; stem cells.

© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Figures

Figure. 1. Flow diagram of the ACCRUE…
Figure. 1. Flow diagram of the ACCRUE database and participating studies
G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; iCMP: ischemic cardiomyopathy
Figure 2. Primary endpoint analysis
Figure 2. Primary endpoint analysis
2A. Major adverse cardiac events (MACCE)-free survival of patients with recent acute myocardial infarction who were randomized to either cell therapy or control treatment (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of risk factors that favor cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). MACCE defined as all-cause death, re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke; DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction 2B. Forest plot of MACCE-free survival in subgroups, with hazard ratio (Haz), CI: confidence interval, P inter: P for interaction,CK: creatine kinase, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
Figure 2. Primary endpoint analysis
Figure 2. Primary endpoint analysis
2A. Major adverse cardiac events (MACCE)-free survival of patients with recent acute myocardial infarction who were randomized to either cell therapy or control treatment (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of risk factors that favor cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). MACCE defined as all-cause death, re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke; DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction 2B. Forest plot of MACCE-free survival in subgroups, with hazard ratio (Haz), CI: confidence interval, P inter: P for interaction,CK: creatine kinase, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
3A. Kaplan-Meier analysis of death/AMI/stroke–free survival of patients randomized either to cell-therapy or controls (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). AMI: acute myocardial infarction, DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction. 3B.Forest plot of death/AMI/stroke-free survival in subgroups with hazard ratio (Haz), CI = confidence interval, p inter= P for interaction, AMI: acute myocardial infarction, CK: creatine kinase, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging 3C.Kaplan-Meier analysis of target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
3A. Kaplan-Meier analysis of death/AMI/stroke–free survival of patients randomized either to cell-therapy or controls (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). AMI: acute myocardial infarction, DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction. 3B.Forest plot of death/AMI/stroke-free survival in subgroups with hazard ratio (Haz), CI = confidence interval, p inter= P for interaction, AMI: acute myocardial infarction, CK: creatine kinase, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging 3C.Kaplan-Meier analysis of target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
Figure 3. Secondary endpoint analysis
3A. Kaplan-Meier analysis of death/AMI/stroke–free survival of patients randomized either to cell-therapy or controls (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). AMI: acute myocardial infarction, DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction. 3B.Forest plot of death/AMI/stroke-free survival in subgroups with hazard ratio (Haz), CI = confidence interval, p inter= P for interaction, AMI: acute myocardial infarction, CK: creatine kinase, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging 3C.Kaplan-Meier analysis of target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival (upper). Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals of risk factors favoring cell therapy or control treatment (bottom). DM: diabetes mellitus; EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in…
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes in patients treated with intracoronary cell therapy after recent acute myocardial infarction
Unadjusted difference in mean with 95% confidence intervals. 4A. Forest plot of changes in ejection fraction. 4B. Forest plot of changes in end-diastolic volumes. 4C. Forest plot of changes in end-systolic volumes
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in…
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes in patients treated with intracoronary cell therapy after recent acute myocardial infarction
Unadjusted difference in mean with 95% confidence intervals. 4A. Forest plot of changes in ejection fraction. 4B. Forest plot of changes in end-diastolic volumes. 4C. Forest plot of changes in end-systolic volumes
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in…
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes in patients treated with intracoronary cell therapy after recent acute myocardial infarction
Unadjusted difference in mean with 95% confidence intervals. 4A. Forest plot of changes in ejection fraction. 4B. Forest plot of changes in end-diastolic volumes. 4C. Forest plot of changes in end-systolic volumes

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit