Twelve-Month Results of Tack-Optimized Balloon Angioplasty Using the Tack Endovascular System in Below-the-Knee Arteries (TOBA II BTK)

Patrick J Geraghty, George L Adams, Andrej Schmidt, Michael Lichtenberg, Christian Wissgott, Ehrin J Armstrong, Klaus Hertting, TOBA II BTK investigators, Joseph Cardenas, Michael Lichtenberg, Christian Wissgott, Klaus Hertting, Ehrin Armstrong, Marcus Thieme, Zoltan Ruzsa, Robert Staffa, Jaafer Golzar, Marianne Brodmann, Andrew Holden, Nicolas Shammas, Vaqar Ali, George Adams, Jeffrey Carr, Nelson Bernardo, Jon George, Ashit Jain, John Rundback, Andrew Klein, Muhammad Khan, Gary Ansel, Sundeep Das, Peter Soukas, Craig Walker, Gaurav Aggarwala, Rahul Bose, Klaus Brechtel, Bryan Fisher, Sashi Kilaru, Bela Merkley, Robert Attaran, Jack Chamberlin, Thomas Davis, Gabriel Delgado, David Dexter, Richard Kovach, Siddhartha Rao, Andrej Schmidt, Michael Silva, Neil Strickman, Patrick J Geraghty, George L Adams, Andrej Schmidt, Michael Lichtenberg, Christian Wissgott, Ehrin J Armstrong, Klaus Hertting, TOBA II BTK investigators, Joseph Cardenas, Michael Lichtenberg, Christian Wissgott, Klaus Hertting, Ehrin Armstrong, Marcus Thieme, Zoltan Ruzsa, Robert Staffa, Jaafer Golzar, Marianne Brodmann, Andrew Holden, Nicolas Shammas, Vaqar Ali, George Adams, Jeffrey Carr, Nelson Bernardo, Jon George, Ashit Jain, John Rundback, Andrew Klein, Muhammad Khan, Gary Ansel, Sundeep Das, Peter Soukas, Craig Walker, Gaurav Aggarwala, Rahul Bose, Klaus Brechtel, Bryan Fisher, Sashi Kilaru, Bela Merkley, Robert Attaran, Jack Chamberlin, Thomas Davis, Gabriel Delgado, David Dexter, Richard Kovach, Siddhartha Rao, Andrej Schmidt, Michael Silva, Neil Strickman

Abstract

Purpose: To report the 12-month safety and efficacy outcomes of the investigational device exemption trial evaluating an implantable below-the-knee (BTK) dissection repair device. Materials and Methods: The prospective, multicenter, single-arm Tack-Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) II BTK study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02942966) evaluated the Tack Endovascular System in the BTK arteries vs objective performance goals derived from a systematic review of BTK angioplasty literature. Patients presenting with Rutherford category 3-5 ischemia were eligible and were enrolled during the procedure if angioplasty resulted in dissection(s) of the BTK arteries. Between February 2017 and December 2018, the study enrolled 233 patients (mean age 74.4±10.0 years; 157 men). Most lesions (93.8%) were de novo; almost half (118/248, 47.6%) were total occlusions. Mean target lesion length was 80±49 mm. Moderate to severe calcium was present in 89 (35.8%) lesions. The 30-day primary safety endpoint was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and all-cause perioperative death (POD). The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of MALE at 6 months and 30-day POD. These safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed at 12 months as observational endpoints along with amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), vessel patency, and changes from baseline in clinical and quality of life measures. Results: All patients had post-PTA dissection and received at least 1 Tack implant (range 1 to 16). The angiographic core laboratory noted successful resolution of 100% of the 341 treated dissections. At 12 months, 93.4% (170/182) of patients remained free of the composite endpoint of MALE + POD. Tacked segment patency was 81.3% and limb salvage was 96.8% at 12 months; freedom from CD-TLR and AFS were 83.1% and 89.3%, respectively. Sustained Rutherford category improvement was reported in 82.4% of evaluated patients, with 62.4% improving ≥3 categories (p<0.001). Ninety of 124 index wounds (72.5%) healed or improved. Conclusion: The Tack Endovascular System is safe and effective in the treatment of post-angioplasty BTK dissections. Twelve-month outcome data from the TOBA II BTK study demonstrate high rates of patency, limb salvage, and wound healing.

Keywords: balloon angioplasty; chronic limb-threatening ischemia; critical limb ischemia; dissection; endovascular revascularization; infrapopliteal disease; peripheral artery disease; restenosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: George L. Adams is a consultant/advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Bard, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, W.L. Gore & Associates, Medtronic, and Cordis, a Cardinal Health Company. Ehrin J. Armstrong is a consultant/advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, W.L. Gore & Associates, Intact Vascular, Janssen, Medtronic, and Philips Healthcare. Patrick J. Geraghty is a consultant/advisory board member for Bard Peripheral Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Ascension Ventures; he has an equity investment in Euphrates Vascular. Michael Lichtenberg is a consultant/advisory board member for Intact Vascular. Andrej Schmidt is a consultant/speaker for Abbott Vascular, Bard/BD, Cook Medical, Reflow Medical, Upstream Peripheral, and Cordis, a Cardinal Health Company. Christian Wissgott is a consultant/advisory board member for Intact Vascular.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Tack Implant and Tack Endovascular System (4F).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient enrollment and follow-up. D, day; M, month; RC, Rutherford category.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves for freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) + postoperative death (POD) in intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects. RC, Rutherford category.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves for (A) Tacked segment patency, (B) target lesion patency, (C) target limb salvage, and (D) amputation-free survival in intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects up to 12 months. RC, Rutherford category.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Sustained improvement in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and toe-brachial index (TBI). D, day; M, month.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Sustained improvement in the Rutherford category (RC) status.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Post hoc Kaplan-Meier analyses in intent-to-treat subjects by dissection grade of (A) freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) and perioperative death (POD), (B) Tacked segment patency, (C) target limb salvage, and (D) target lesion patency.

References

    1. Mustapha JA, Katzen BT, Neville RF, et al.. Determinants of long-term outcomes and costs in the management of critical limb ischemia: a population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009724.
    1. Guo X, Shi Y, Huang X, et al.. Features analysis of lower extremity arterial lesions in 162 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:781360.
    1. Eggers PW, Gohdes D, Pugh J. Nontraumatic lower extremity amputations in the Medicare end-stage renal disease population. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1524–1533.
    1. Hirsch AT, Duval S. The global pandemic of peripheral artery disease. Lancet. 2013;382:1312–1314.
    1. Kröger K, Berg C, Santosa F, et al.. Lower limb amputation in Germany: an analysis of data from the German Federal Statistical Office between 2005 and 2014. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114:130–136.
    1. Goodney PP, Travis LL, Nallamothu BK, et al.. Variation in the use of lower extremity vascular procedures for critical limb ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:94–102.
    1. Mentias A, Qazi A, McCoy K, et al.. Trends in hospitalization, management, and clinical outcomes among veterans with critical limb ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e008597.
    1. Goodney PP, Beck AW, Nagle J, et al.. National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:54–60.
    1. Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Formanek A, Tadavarthy M, et al.. The mechanism of balloon angioplasty. Radiology. 1980;135:565–571.
    1. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al.. Endovascular revascularization below the knee: 6-month results and predictive value of C-reactive protein level. Radiology. 2003;227:419–425.
    1. Iida O, Soga Y, Kawasaki D, et al.. Angiographic restenosis and its clinical impact after infrapopliteal angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:425–431.
    1. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al.. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:18S–31S.
    1. Nolan BW, de Martino RR, Stone DH, et al.. Prior failed ipsilateral percutaneous endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia predicts poor outcome after lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:730–736.
    1. Conte MS, Geraghty PJ, Bradbury AW, et al.. Suggested objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(6):1462-73.e1-3.
    1. Geraghty PJ, Adams G, Schmidt A. 6-Month pivotal results of tack optimized balloon angioplasty using the Tack Endovascular System in below-knee arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2020; in press.
    1. Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al.. The Society for Vascular Surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system: risk stratification based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:220–234.e2.
    1. Zhan LX, Branco BC, Armstrong DG, et al.. The Society for Vascular Surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system based on Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) correlates with risk of major amputation and time to wound healing. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:939–944.
    1. EuroQoL—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
    1. Nicolaï SPA, Kruidenier LM, Rouwet E, et al.. The walking impairment questionnaire: an effective tool to assess the effect of treatment in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:89–94.
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Coronary artery angiographic changes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Manual of Operations: NHLBI PTCA Registry. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1985:6–9 (86).
    1. Patel MR, Conte MS, Cutlip DE, et al.. Evaluation and treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:931–941.
    1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al.. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:S5–S67.
    1. Razavi MK, Mustapha JA, Miller LE. Contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of early outcomes with percutaneous treatment for infrapopliteal atherosclerotic disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:1489–1496.e3.
    1. Romiti M, Albers M, Brochado-Neto FC, et al.. Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:975–981.
    1. Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Hendriks JMH, et al.. Results from the Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) study demonstrate the benefits of minimal metal implants for dissection repair after angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:109–116.
    1. Gray WA, Cardenas JA, Brodmann M, et al.. Treating post-angioplasty dissection in the femoropopliteal arteries using the Tack Endovascular System: 12-month results from the TOBA II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:2375–2384.
    1. Brodmann M, Wissgott C, Brechtel K, et al.. Optimized drug-coated balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries using the Tack Endovascular System: TOBA III 12-month results [published online May 12, 2020]. J Vasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.078
    1. Brodmann M, Wissgott C, Holden A, et al.. Treatment of infrapopliteal post-PTA dissection with Tack implants: 12-month results from the TOBA-BTK study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:96–105.
    1. Lichtenberg M, Wojczik H, Stahlhoff S, et al.. Practical applications of Tack implants for infrainguinal dissection repair: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27:86–93.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit