Visually-guided gait training in paretic patients during the first rehabilitation phase: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Cathia Rossano, Philippe Terrier, Cathia Rossano, Philippe Terrier

Abstract

Background: After a lesion to the central nervous system, many patients suffer from reduced walking capability. In the first rehabilitation phase, repeated walking exercises facilitate muscular strength and stimulate brain plasticity and motor relearning. However, marked limping, an unsteady gait, and poor management of obstacle clearance may persist, which increases a patient's risk of falling. Gait training with augmented reality has been recommended to improve gait coordination. The objective of this study is to test whether a gait rehabilitation program using augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent intensity.

Methods/design: The GASPAR trial (Gait Adaptation for Stroke Patients with Augmented Reality) is a pragmatic, parallel-arm, single-center, nonblind, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The setting is a rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland. The planned number of participants is 70-100. The intervention uses instrumented treadmills equipped with projectors that display shapes on the walking surface. The principle is that patients must adapt their gait to the image that unfolds in front of them. Specific exercises for gait symmetry, coordination enhancement, and gait agility are provided. The program includes twenty 30-min sessions spanning 4 weeks. The comparator group receives standard treadmill training of a similar frequency and intensity. The main outcome to be measured in the trial is walking speed, which is assessed with the 2-min Walk Test. Moreover, gait parameters are recorded during the gait training sessions. Other outcomes are balance control (Berg Balance Scale) and the fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale). The statistical analyses will compare the baseline assessment for each participant (before the intervention) with a post-intervention assessment (taken a few days after the end of the program). Furthermore, a follow-up assessment will take place 3 months after discharge.

Discussion: The study results will provide new knowledge about recovery in neurological patients and will contribute to the design of better rehabilitation programs to accompany this process. The findings will also help health care funders to decide whether treadmills equipped with augmented reality capabilities are a worthwhile investment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02808078 , registered on 16 June 2016.

Keywords: Augmented reality; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; Stroke; Traumatic brain injury.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the Gait Adaptation for Stroke Patients with Augmented Reality (GASPAR) trial

References

    1. Meyer K, Simmet A, Arnold M, Mattle H, Nedeltchev K. Stroke events and case fatalities in Switzerland based on hospital statistics and cause of death statistics. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:65–9.
    1. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4.
    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998.
    1. Walder B, Haller G, Rebetez MML, Delhumeau C, Bottequin E, Schoettker P, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury in a high-income country: an epidemiological study. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1934–42. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2955.
    1. Chamberlain JD, Deriaz O, Hund-Georgiadis M, Meier S, Scheel-Sailer A, Schubert M, et al. Epidemiology and contemporary risk profile of traumatic spinal cord injury in Switzerland. Inj Epidemiol. 2015;2:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0061-4.
    1. Lam T, Eng JJ, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JT, Whittaker M, Team SR. A systematic review of the efficacy of gait rehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007;13:32–57. doi: 10.1310/sci1301-32.
    1. Jørgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Olsen T. Stroke. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999;10:887–906.
    1. van den Brand R, Heutschi J, Barraud Q, DiGiovanna J, Bartholdi K, Huerlimann M, et al. Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science. 2012;336:1182–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1217416.
    1. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:861–72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735.
    1. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:923–31. doi: 10.1177/1545968312440745.
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5.
    1. Breceda EY, Dromerick AW. Motor rehabilitation in stroke and traumatic brain injury: stimulating and intense. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26:595–601. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000024.
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
    1. Polese JC, Ada L, Dean CM, Nascimento LR, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Treadmill training is effective for ambulatory adults with stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59:73–80. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70159-0.
    1. Peurala SH, Karttunen AH, Sjögren T, Paltamaa J, Heinonen A. Evidence for the effectiveness of walking training on walking and self-care after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:387–99. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1805.
    1. Dickstein R. Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:649–60. doi: 10.1177/1545968308315997.
    1. van Hedel HJ, Dietz V. Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28:123–34.
    1. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke. 1995;26:838–42. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.26.5.838.
    1. McCulloch KL, Buxton E, Hackney J, Lowers S. Balance, attention, and dual‐task performance during walking after brain injury: associations with falls history. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:155–63. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181dc82e7.
    1. Brotherton SS, Krause JS, Nietert PJ. Falls in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:37–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101909.
    1. Kenzie JM, Semrau JA, Findlater SE, Herter TM, Hill MD, Scott SH, et al. Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke: a case series. J Neurol Sci. 2014;342:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.025.
    1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32:1279–84. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1279.
    1. Smania N, Picelli A, Gandolfi M, Fiaschi A, Tinazzi M. Rehabilitation of sensorimotor integration deficits in balance impairment of patients with stroke hemiparesis: a before/after pilot study. Neurol Sci. 2008;29:313–9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-008-0988-0.
    1. Patterson KK, Mansfield A, Biasin L, Brunton K, Inness EL, McIlroy WE. Longitudinal changes in poststroke spatiotemporal gait asymmetry over inpatient rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;29:153–62. doi: 10.1177/1545968314533614.
    1. Hollands KL, Pelton TA, Tyson SF, Hollands MA, van Vliet PM. Interventions for coordination of walking following stroke: systematic review. Gait Posture. 2012;35:349–59. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.10.355.
    1. Nascimento LR, de Oliveira CQ, Ada L, Michaelsen SM, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Walking training with cueing of cadence improves walking speed and stride length after stroke more than walking training alone: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2015;61:10–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.11.015.
    1. Heeren A, van Ooijen MW, Geurts AC, Day BL, Janssen TW, Beek PJ, et al. Step by step: a proof of concept study of C-Mill gait adaptability training in the chronic phase after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:616–22. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1180.
    1. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. RALLOC: Stata module to design randomized controlled trials. . Accessed 10 Jun 2016.
    1. Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:141–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9.
    1. Schlick C, Ernst A, Bötzel K, Plate A, Pelykh O, Ilmberger J. Visual cues combined with treadmill training to improve gait performance in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:463–71. doi: 10.1177/0269215515588836.
    1. van Ooijen MW, Heeren A, Smulders K, Geurts AC, Janssen TW, Beek PJ, et al. Improved gait adjustments after gait adaptability training are associated with reduced attentional demands in persons with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233:1007–18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4175-7.
    1. Hollands KL, Pelton TA, Wimperis A, Whitham D, Tan W, Jowett S, et al. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of visual cue training to improve adaptability of walking after stroke: multi-centre, single-blind randomised control pilot trial. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139261.
    1. Swiss Heart Foundation. . Accessed 10 Jun 2016.
    1. Pin TW. Psychometric properties of 2-minute walk test: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1759–75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.034.
    1. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:559–66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205.
    1. Büla CJ, Martin E, Rochat S, Piot-Ziegler C. Validation of an adapted Falls Efficacy Scale in older rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:291–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.152.
    1. Ware JE, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903–12. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-X.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit