A randomized trial of trigger point dry needling versus sham needling for chronic tension-type headache

Sila Gildir, Emine Handan Tüzün, Goncagül Eroğlu, Levent Eker, Sila Gildir, Emine Handan Tüzün, Goncagül Eroğlu, Levent Eker

Abstract

Background: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling in patients with chronic tension-type headache in reducing headache frequency, intensity and duration, and improvement of health-related quality of life.

Methods: The 168 patients in 2 neurology clinics with chronic tension-type headache. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for dry needling or sham dry needling, delivered in 3 sessions a week for 2 weeks. The 160 patients fulfilled the study requirements. The dry needling was applied in active trigger points located in the musculature of the head and the neck. The patients received dry needling using sterile stainless-steel acupuncture needles of 0.25 × 40 mm and 0.25 × 25 mm dimensions. The sham dry needling procedure was applied into the adipose tissue located at any area where an active trigger point was absent. The primary outcome measurement was the headache intensity. Secondary outcomes were frequency and duration of headache, and quality of life, assessed by the Short Form-36. All outcomes were measured at baseline, at the end of 2-week, and 1-month follow-up period.

Results: In the dry needling group, intensity, frequency and duration of headache, and the scores of Short Form-36 subscales were significantly improved after treatment (P < .05). In the dry needling group, all the effect sizes for headache variables were large.

Conclusions: The results of this clinical trial suggest that trigger point dry needling in patients with chronic tension-type headache is effective and safe in reducing headache intensity, frequency and duration, and increasing health-related quality of life.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT03500861.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of weekly headache index trends in the DN and SDN groups.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386:743–800.
    1. Bendtsen L, Jensen R. Tension type headache: the most common, but also the most neglected headache disorder. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;5:342–6.
    1. Arendt-Nielsen L, Castaldo M, Mechelli F, et al. Muscle triggers as a possible source of pain in a subgroup of tension-type headache patients? Clin J Pain 2016;32:711–8.
    1. Yu S, Han X. Update of chronic tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2015;19:469.
    1. Gerwin R. Ferguson L, Gerwin R. Headache. Clinical Mastery in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2005. 1–24.
    1. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. In: Upper Half of Body. Volume 1, 2nd ed., Baltimore: Williams, Wilkins; 1999.
    1. Jensen R, Roth JM. Olesen J, Goadsby PJ, Ramadan N, Peer Pfelt-Hansen K, Welch Michael A. Physiotherapy of Tension-Type Headaches. The Headaches 3rd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2005. 721–6.
    1. Fernandez-De-Las-Penas C. Physical therapy and exercise in headache. Cephalalgia 2008;(1 suppl):36–8.
    1. Ohlsen BA. Combination of acupuncture and spinal manipulative therapy: management of a 32-year-old patient with chronic tension-type headache and migraine. J Chiropr Med 2012;11:192–201.
    1. Espí-López GV, Arnal-Gómez A, Arbós-Berenguer T, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy in patients with tension-type headache: literature review. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc 2014;17:31–8.
    1. Unverzagt C, Berglund K, Thomas JJ. Dry needling for myofascial trigger point pain: a clinical commentary. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015;10:402–18.
    1. France S, Bown J, Nowosilskyj M, et al. Evidence for the use of dry needling and physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic or tension-type headache: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2014;34:994–1003.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1988.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd ed. (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808.
    1. Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:26.
    1. Jensen MP, Turbner JA, Romano JM, et al. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999;83:157–62.
    1. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form-36 (SF-36): a study in a group of patients will rheumatic diseases. Turk J Drugs Ther 1999;12:102–6. (in Turkish).
    1. Ware JE, Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:903–12.
    1. Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:256–63.
    1. Herbert R. 2016 Confidence Interval Calculator. Available at: [access date August 10, 2017].
    1. Knezevic A. StatNews # 73: Overlapping Confidence Intervals and Statistical Significance. Available at: [access date August 10, 2017].
    1. Becker LA. Effect Size Calculators. Available at: [access date August 10, 2017].
    1. Kalichman L, Vulfsons S. Dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain. JABFM 2010;23:640–6.
    1. Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Gragg LA. Quality of and well-being of headache patients: measurement by the medical outcomes study instrument. Headache 1993;33:351–8.
    1. Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Lu SR, et al. Quality of life differs among headache diagnoses: analysis of SF-36 survey in 901 headache patients. Pain 2001;89:285–92.
    1. Holroyd KA, Stensland M, Lipchik GL, et al. Psychosocial correlates and impact of chronic tension-type headaches. Headache 2000;40:3–16.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit