Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

John Phineas O'Donnell, Cróchán J O'Sullivan, John Phineas O'Donnell, Cróchán J O'Sullivan

Abstract

The limited durability of surgical bioprostheses, combined with an ageing population, has led to an increasing demand for replacing degenerated bioprosthetic surgical heart valves, which is projected to increase. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation involves implanting a transcatheter heart valve within a degenerated bioprosthetic surgical heart valve. A significant minority of patients, however, are left with a suboptimal haemodynamic result with high residual gradients. This is more common with smaller surgical bioprostheses, and may be associated with a worse prognosis. The novel concept of fracturing the previously implanted bioprosthetic surgical heart valve during valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation to create a more favourable haemodynamic profile has shown great promise, particularly in smaller valves. Herein, we describe the benefits, limitations and potential complications of this novel approach.

Keywords: Bioprosthetic aortic valve fracture; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; valve-in-valve.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: CJO has received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences. JPO has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Copyright © 2019, Radcliffe Cardiology.

Figures

Figure 1:. Fluoroscopic Images of the Stages…
Figure 1:. Fluoroscopic Images of the Stages of Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Followed by Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture
Figure 2:. Images from In Vitro Testing…
Figure 2:. Images from In Vitro Testing Prior to an Early In Vivo Trial
Figure 3:. The Constrained Area of a…
Figure 3:. The Constrained Area of a Self-expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve where the Commissures Attach to the Nitinol Frame

References

    1. Mazine A, Ouzounian M. Aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults: looking beyond the tree that hides the forest. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:92. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.06.
    1. Nishimura R, Otto C, Bonow R et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011.
    1. Wenaweser P, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve revalving system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:760–4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21300.
    1. Nielsen-Kudsk J, Christiansen E, Terkelsen C et al. Fracturing the ring of small mitroflow bioprostheses by high-pressure balloon predilatation in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002667.
    1. Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312:162–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7246.
    1. Eggebrecht H, Schäfer U, Treede H et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1218–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015.
    1. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92:1022–9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.067363.
    1. Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Saxon JT Bioprosthetic valve fracture: technical insights from a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019.
    1. Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Cohen DJ et al. Bioprosthetic valve fracture to facilitate transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:1501–8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.007.
    1. Johansen P, Engholt H, Tang M et al. Fracturing mechanics before valve-in-valve therapy of small aortic bioprosthetic heart valves. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:e1026–31. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00245.
    1. Sathananthan J, Sellers S, Barlow AM et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement and bioprosthetic valve fracture comparing different transcatheter heart valve designs. an ex vivo bench study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.043.
    1. Saxon JT, Allen KB, Cohen DJ et al. Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve TAVI: Bench to Bedside. Interv Cardiol Rev. 2018;13:20–6. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:29:1.
    1. Chhatriwalla AK, Allen KB, Saxon JT et al. Bioprosthetic valve fracture improves the hemodynamic results of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005216.
    1. Nielsen-Kudsk J, Andersen A, Therkelsen C et al. High-pressure balloon fracturing of small dysfunctional Mitroflow bioprostheses facilitates transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:1020–5. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00244.
    1. Abbasi M, Azadani AN. Leaflet stress and strain distributions following incomplete transcatheter aortic valve expansion. J Biomech. 2015;48:3663–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.012.
    1. Saxon JT, Allen KB, Cohen DJ et al. Complications of bioprosthetic valve fracture as an adjunct to valve-in-valve TAVI. Structural Heart. 2019;3:92–9. doi: 10.1080/24748706.2019.1578446.
    1. Harvey JE, Nicholson WJ, Burlingame MW et al. Aortic migration of a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve during intended bioprosthetic valve fracture. Structural Heart. 2019;3:255–7. doi: 10.1080/24748706.2019.1583395.
    1. Chhatriwalla AK, Saxon JT, Cohen DJ et al. Is bioprosthetic valve fracture beneficial for patients with larger surgical valves undergoing valve in valve TAVR? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20:95. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1035-2.
    1. Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley D et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart. 2003;89:715–21. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.7.715.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit