Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview

Mahmoud K Al-Omiri, Maher Al-Masri, Mohannad M Alhijawi, Edward Lynch, Mahmoud K Al-Omiri, Maher Al-Masri, Mohannad M Alhijawi, Edward Lynch

Abstract

Objectives. This article presents a review on the concerned topics and some considerations related to the concept of splinting teeth and implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism. Study Selection. An electronic PubMed/MEDLINE and manual search of identified articles and reviews as well as clinical, laboratory, and finite element studies was performed in this project. Due to the shortage in within-subject, long term, randomized, controlled clinical trials regarding the subject a meta-analysis was not possible. Results. Although surrounded with some controversy, joining teeth and implants during the rehabilitation of partial edentulism provides the clinicians with more treatment options where proprioception and bone volume are maintained and distal cantilevers and free end saddles are eliminated. It makes the treatment less complex, of less cost, and more acceptable for the patient. Conclusions. Whenever suitable and justified, combining implant and tooth support might be recommended as an alternative during rehabilitation of partial edentulism. Based on the literature, clinical tips and suggestions were recommended to increase the success of this treatment.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram showing the process of selection of papers for this review.

References

    1. Pesun I. J. Intrusion of teeth in the combination implant-to-natural-tooth fixed partial denture: a review of the theories. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1997;6(4):268–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1997.tb00107.x.
    1. Gross M., Laufer B.-Z. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part I: laboratory and clinical studies. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1997;24(11):863–870. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00582.x.
    1. Van Oosterwyck H., Duyck J., Sloten J. V., et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1998;9(6):407–418. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090606.x.
    1. Laufer B.-Z., Gross M. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part II: principles and applications. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1998;25(1):69–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00583.x.
    1. Howe L., Palmer P., Barrett V. Advanced restorative techniques. British Dental Journal. 1999;187(11):593–600.
    1. Becker C. M., Kaiser D. A., Jones J. D. Guidelines for splinting implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;84(2):210–214. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108672.
    1. Fugazzotto P. A., Kirsch A., Ackermann K.-L., Neuendorff G. Implant/tooth-connected restorations utilizing screw-fixed attachments: a survey of 3,096 sites in function for 3 to 14 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(6):819–823.
    1. Davies S. J., Gray R. J. M., Young M. P. J. Good occlusal practice in the provision of implant borne prostheses. British Dental Journal. 2002;192(2):79–88. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801298.
    1. Chee W. W., Mordohai N. Tooth-to-implant connection: a systematic review of the literature and a case report utilizing a new connection design. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2010;12(2):122–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00144.x.
    1. Hita-Carrillo C., Hernández-Aliaga M., Calvo-Guirado J.-L. Tooth-implant connection: a bibliographic review. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2010;15(2):e387–e394. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e387.
    1. Olsson M., Gunne J., Astrand P., Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five-year prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1995;6(2):114–121. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060207.x.
    1. Gunne J., Åstrand P., Lindh T., Borg K., Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10-year report. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;12(3):216–221.
    1. Hosny M., Duyck J., Van Steenberghe D., Naert I. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-lmplant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000;13(4):340–346.
    1. Cune M. S., de Putter C., Verhoeven J. W., Meijer G. J. Prosthetic dilemmas. Connecting natural teeth and implants. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Tandheelkunde. 2008;115(11):613–619.
    1. Nickenig H.-J., Spiekermann H., Wichmann M., Andreas S. K., Eitner S. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008;21(2):131–137.
    1. Fardal Ø., Linden G. J. Long-term outcomes for cross-arch stabilizing bridges in periodontal maintenance patients—a retrospective study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2010;37(3):299–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01528.x.
    1. Radnai M., Fazekas A., Vajdovich I., Kostinek D. Clinical study of tooth-to-implant supported fixed partial dentures. Fogorvosi Szemle. 1998;91(7):195–202.
    1. Mundt T., Heinemann F., Schwahn C., Biffar R. Retrievable, tooth-implant-supported, complete-arch fixed restorations in the maxilla: a 6-year retrospective study. Biomedizinische Technik. 2012;57(1):39–43. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0033.
    1. Belser U. C., Mericske-Stern R., Bernard J. P., Taylor T. D. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2000;11(supplement):126–145. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1126.x.
    1. Tangerud T., Grønningsaeter A. G., Taylor A. Fixed partial dentures supported by natural teeth and Brånemark system implants: a 3-year report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2002;17(2):212–219.
    1. Maezawa N., Shiota M., Kasugai S., Wakabayashi N. Three-dimensional stress analysis of tooth/implant-retained long-span fixed dentures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2007;22(5):710–718.
    1. Greenstein G., Cavallaro J., Smith R., Tarnow D. Connecting teeth to implants: a critical review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 2009;30(7):440–453.
    1. Sheets C. G., Earthman J. C. Tooth intrusion in implant-assisted prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;77(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70205-1.
    1. Kirsch A., Ackermann K. L. The IMZ osteointegrated implant system. Dental Clinics of North America. 1989;33(4):733–791.
    1. Rangert B. R., Sullivan R. M., Jemt T. M. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1997;12(3):360–370.
    1. Pjetursson B. E., Brägger U., Lang N. P., Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs) Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2007;18(supplement 3):97–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
    1. Pjetursson B. E., Lang N. P. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008;35(1):72–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01824.x.
    1. Lindh T. Should we extract teeth to avoid tooth-implant combinations? Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008;35(supplement 1):44–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01828.x.
    1. Salvi G. E., Lang N. P. Changing paradigms in implant dentistry. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2001;12(3):262–272. doi: 10.1177/10454411010120030501.
    1. Nickenig H.-J., Schäfer C., Spiekermann H. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2006;17(5):506–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01259.x.
    1. Weber H.-P., Sukotjo C. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes in the partially edentulous patient? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2007;22:140–172.
    1. Cordaro L., Ercoli C., Rossini C., Torsello F., Feng C. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(4):313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.007.
    1. Tsaousoglou P., Michalakis K., Kang K., Weber H., Sculean A. The effect of rigid and non-rigid connections between implants and teeth on biological and technical complications: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2016 doi: 10.1111/clr.12890.
    1. Muddugangadhar B. C., Amarnath G. S., Sonika R., Chheda P. S., Garg A. Meta-analysis of failure and survival rate of implantsupported single crowns, fixed partial denture and implant toothsupported prostheses. Journal of International Oral Health. 2015;7:11–17.
    1. Mozayek R. S., Allaf M., Abuharb M. B. Efficacy of adding a supporting implant in stress distribution of long-span fixed partial dentures: a 3D finite element analysis. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2016;10:81–86.
    1. Rangert B., Gunne J., Sullivan D. Y. Mechanical aspects of a Brånemark implant connected to a natural tooth: an in vitro study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1991;6(2):177–186.
    1. Schlumberger T. L., Bowley J. F., Maze G. I. Intrusion phenomenon in combination tooth-implant restorations: a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998;80(2):199–203. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70110-6.
    1. Ericsson I., Lekholm U., Brånemark P. I., Lindhe J., Glantz P. O., Nyman S. A clinical evaluation of fixed-bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titanium implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1986;13(4):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb02227.x.
    1. Kovács A. F. Assessment of prosthetic restorations on bone-lock implants in patients after oral tumor resection. The Journal of Oral Implantology. 1998;24(2):101–109. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0101:aoprob>;2.
    1. Linsen S., Niederhagen B., Braumann B., Koeck B. Functional and esthetic rehabilitation after mandibular resection in a child using a tooth/implant-supported distraction device: a case report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2004;19(4):603–608.
    1. Marcantonio E., Dela Coleta R., Spin-Neto R., Marcantonio E., Jr., Dela Coleta Pizzol K. E., Boeck E. M. Use of a tooth-implant supported bone distractor in oral rehabilitation: description of a personalized technique. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;66(11):2339–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.031.
    1. Kreissl M. E., Heydecke G., Metzger M. C., Schoen R. Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007;97(3):121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.009.
    1. Cohen S. R., Orenstein J. H. The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1994;9(2):230–234.
    1. Taylor T. D., Agar J. R., Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2000;15(1):66–75.
    1. Wang L., Sadler J. P., Breeding L. C., Dixon D. L. An in vitro study of implant-tooth-supported connections using a robot test system. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1999;121(3):290–297. doi: 10.1115/1.2798322.
    1. Lin C.-L., Chang S.-H., Wang J.-C. Finite element analysis of biomechanical interactions of a tooth-implant splinting system for various bone qualities. Chang Gung Medical Journal. 2006;29(2):143–153.
    1. Weinberg L. A., Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1994;78(1):22–27. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90112-0.
    1. Rieder C. E., Parel S. M. A survey of natural tooth abutment intrusion with implant-connected fixed partial dentures. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1993;13(4):334–347.
    1. Sheets C. G., Earthman J. C. Natural tooth intrusion and reversal in implant-assisted prosthesis: evidence of and a hypothesis for the occurrence. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993;70(6):513–520. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90265-p.
    1. Naert I. E., Duyck J. A. J., Hosny M. M. F., Van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part I: an up to 15-years clinical evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2001;12(3):237–244. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003237.x.
    1. Block M. S., Lirette D., Gardiner D., et al. Prospective evaluation of implants connected to teeth. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2002;17(4):473–487.
    1. Ormianer Z., Brosh T., Laufer B.-Z., Shifman A. Strains recorded in a combined tooth-implant restoration: an in vivo study. Implant Dentistry. 2005;14(1):58–62. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000154792.14103.94.
    1. Uysal H., Iplikcioglu H., Avci M., Gunduz Bilir O., Kural O. An experimental analysis of the stresses on the implant in an implant-tooth-supported prosthesis: a technical note. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1997;12(1):118–124.
    1. Swanberg D. F., Henry M. D. Avoiding implant overload. The Implant Society. 1995;6:12–14.
    1. Astrand P., Borg K., Gunne J., Olsson M. Combination of natural teeth and osseointegrated implants as prosthesis abutments: a 2-year longitudinal study. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1991;6(3):305–312.
    1. Gunne J., Astrand P., Ahlén K., Borg K., Olsson M. Implants in partially edentulous patients. A longitudinal study of bridges supported by both implants and natural teeth. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1992;3(2):49–56. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030201.x.
    1. Gunne J., Rangert B., Glantz P.-O., Svensson A. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1997;12(3):335–341.
    1. Lekholm U., Gunne J., Henry P., et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(5):639–645.
    1. Lindh T., Dahlgren S., Gunnarsson K., et al. Tooth-implant supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective multicenter study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14(4):321–328.
    1. Lindh T., Bäck T., Nyström E., Gunne J. Implant versus tooth-implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla: a 2-year report. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2001;12(5):441–449. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120503.x.
    1. Biancu S., Ericsson I., Lindhe J. The periodontal ligament of teeth connected to osseointegrated implants. An experimental study in the beagle dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1995;22(5):362–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00162.x.
    1. Menicucci G., Mossolov A., Mozzati M., Lorenzetti M., Preti G. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002;13(3):334–341. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130315.x.
    1. Rangert B., Gunne J., Glantz P. O., Svensson A. Vertical load distribution on a three-unit prosthesis supported by a natural tooth and a single Brånemark implant. An in vivo study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1995;6(1):40–46. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060105.x.
    1. El Charkawi H. G., Zekry K. A., El Wakad M. T. Stress analysis of different osseointegrated implants supporting a distal extension prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994;72(6):614–622. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90294-1.
    1. Kayacan R., Ballarini R., Mullen R. L. Theoretical study of the effects of tooth and implant mobility differences on occlusal force transmission in tooth/implant-supported partial prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;78(4):391–399. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70047-7.
    1. Palmer R. M., Howe L. C., Palmer P. J. A prospective 3-year study of fixed bridges linking Astra Tech ST implants to natural teeth. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16(3):302–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01110.x.
    1. Lin C.-L., Wang J.-C. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2003;18(3):331–340.
    1. Lin C.-L., Wang J.-C., Kuo Y.-C. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;39(3):453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.020.
    1. Lin C.-L., Wang J.-C., Chang W.-J. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2008;19(1):107–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01363.x.
    1. Zhiyong L., Arataki T., Shimamura I., Kishi M. The influence of prosthesis designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of tooth-implant supported prostheses. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 2004;45(4):213–221. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.45.213.
    1. Lin C.-L., Wang J.-C., Chang S.-H., Chen S.-T. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis. Journal of Periodontology. 2010;81(1):121–130. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090331.
    1. Ozçelik T. B., Ersoy A. E. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2007;16(2):107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00176.x.
    1. van Rossen I. P., Braak L. H., de Putter C., de Groot K. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64(2):198–205. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90179-g.
    1. Özcelik T. B., Ersoy E., Yilmaz B. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2011;20(1):16–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2010.00654.x.
    1. Baron M., Haas R., Baron W., Mailath-Pokorny G. Peri-implant bone loss as a function of tooth-implant distance. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;18(5):427–433.
    1. Pratheep K. V., Abraham A., Annapoorni H., Vigneshwaran S. Comparative evaluation of stresses in tooth implant connected fixed partial denture by varying the implant design and position: a 3D finite element study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2013;24(4):439–445. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.118388.
    1. Huang S.-F., Chen W.-R., Lin C.-L. Biomechanical interactions of endodontically treated tooth implant-supported prosthesis under fatigue test with acoustic emission monitoring. BioMedical Engineering Online. 2016;15(1, article 23) doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0140-y.
    1. Deines D. N., Eick J. D., Cobb C. M., Bowles C. Q., Johnson C. M. Photoelastic stress analysis of natural teeth and three osseointegrated implant designs. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1993;13(6):540–549.
    1. Ochiai K. T., Ozawa S., Caputo A. A., Nishimura R. D. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003;89(5):495–502. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00167-7.
    1. Nishimura R. D., Ochiai K. T., Caputo A. A., Jeong C. M. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999;81(6):696–703. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70109-5.
    1. Bavbek A. B., Dogan A., Çehreli M. C. Biomechanics of implant-tooth supported prostheses: effects of mesiodistal implant angulation and mode of prosthesis connection. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Biomechanics. 2011;9(2):118–126. doi: 10.5301/jabb.2011.8565.
    1. Naert I., Koutsikakis G., Duyck J., Quirynen M., Jacobs R., van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 1: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002;13(4):381–389. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x.
    1. Lekholm U., Ericsson I., Adell R., Slots J. The condition of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed bridges A microbiological and histological study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1986;13(6):558–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00847.x.
    1. Ericsson I., Giargia M., Lindhe J., Neiderud A. M. Progression of periodontal tissue destruction at splinted/non-splinted teeth. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1993;20(10):693–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00693.x.
    1. Pesun I. J., Steflik D. E., Parr G. R., Hanes P. J. Histologic evaluation of the periodontium of abutment teeth in combination implant/tooth fixed partial denture. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(3):342–350.
    1. Akagawa Y., Hosokawa R., Sato Y., Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histologic study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998;80(5):551–558. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70031-9.
    1. Trisi P., Keith D. J., Rocco S. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2005;20(1):124–130.
    1. Lang N. P., Pjetursson B. E., Tan K., Brägger U., Egger M., Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth-implant-supported FPDs. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2004;15(6):643–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x.
    1. Akça K., Çehreli M. C. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2008;28(6):593–599.
    1. Romeo E., Lops D., Margutti E., Ghisolfi M., Chiapasco M., Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2004;19(2):247–259.
    1. Brägger U., Karoussis I., Persson R., Pjetursson B., Salvi G., Lang N. P. Technical and biological complications/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16(3):326–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x.
    1. Kindberg H., Gunne J., Kronström M. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14(6):575–581.
    1. Rammelsberg P., Schwarz S., Schroeder C., Bermejo J. L., Gabbert O. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2013;24(7):758–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x.
    1. van Steenberghe D., Glauser R., Blombäck U., et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2005;7(supplement 1):S111–S120. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00083.x.
    1. Nothdurft F. P., Merker S., Pospiech P. R. Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2011;15(1):89–97. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0359-0.
    1. Dawson-Saunders B., Trapp R. G. Estimating & comparing means. In: Dolan J., Beal C., editors. Basic & Clinical Biostatistics. 2nd. Norwalk, Conn, USA: Appleton & Lange; 1994. pp. 99–124.
    1. Mau J., Behneke A., Behneke N., et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of two coatings of intramobile cylinder implants in 313 partially edentulous mandibles followed up for 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2002;13(5):477–487. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130506.x.
    1. Cho G. C., Chee W. W. L. Apparent intrusion of natural teeth under an implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;68(1):3–5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90274-e.
    1. English C. E. Implant-supported versus implant-natural-tooth-supported fixed partial dentures. The Journal of Dental Symposia. 1993;1:10–15.
    1. English C. E. Root intrusion in tooth-implant combination cases. Implant Dentistry. 1993;2(2):79–87. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199305000-00002.
    1. Garcia L. T., Oesterle L. J. Natural tooth intrusion phenomenon with implants: a survey. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1998;13(2):227–231.
    1. Lundgren D., Laurell L. Biomechanical aspects of fixed bridgework supported by natural teeth and endosseous implants. Periodontology 2000. 1994;4(1):23–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00003.x.
    1. Kirsch A., Mentag P. J. The IMZ endosseous two phase implant system: a complete oral rehabilitation treatment concept. The Journal of Oral Implantology. 1986;12(4):576–589.
    1. Krämer A., Weber H. The effect of bedding type on implant and abutment tooth in tooth/implant-supported bridgework. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift. 1991;46(10):686–688.
    1. Kay H. B. Free-standing versus implant-tooth-interconnected restorations: understanding the prosthodontic perspective. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1993;13(1):47–69. doi: 10.11607/prd.00.0040.
    1. Fugazzotto P. A., Maron D. The use of IMZ implants as pier abutments in the Class IV periodontal prosthetic patient. Implant Dentistry. 1994;3:86–89.
    1. Sullivan D. Y. Prosthetic considerations for the utilization of osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous arch. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1986;1(1):39–45.
    1. Ylantz R. O., Nyman S. A. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1986;13:307–312.
    1. Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1986;55(2):243–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90352-5.
    1. Misch C. M., Ismail Y. H. Finite element stress analysis of tooth-to-implant fixed partial denture designs. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1993;2(2):83–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00388.x.
    1. Finger I. M., Guerra L. R. Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology. Dental Clinics of North America. 1986;30(1):69–83.
    1. Naert I., Quirynen M., van Steenberghe D., Darius P. A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67(2):236–245. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90461-I.
    1. Naert I. E., Duyck J. A. J., Hosny M. M. F., Quirynen M., Van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part II: an up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2001;12(3):245–251. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003245.x.
    1. Chen Y., Han D.-W., Xu Q.-H. Study on the stress distribution of different superstructures for tooth-implant supported denture. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2006;15(2):206–209.
    1. Lin C.-L., Chang S.-H., Wang J.-C., Chang W.-J. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34(9):682–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.011.
    1. da Silva E. F., Pellizzer E. P., Quinelli Mazaro J. V., Garcia Júnior I. R. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2010;12(3):254–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00161.x.
    1. Mathews M. F., Breeding L. C., Dixon D. L., Aquilino S. A. The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991;65(6):822–827. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80021-6.
    1. Chee W. W. L., Cho G. C. A rationale for not connecting implants to natural teeth. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1997;6(1):7–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1997.tb00059.x.
    1. Boeckler A. F., Morton D., Kraemer S., Geiss-Gerstdorfer J., Setz J. M. Marginal accuracy of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after in vitro stress simulation. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2008;19(12):1261–1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01593.x.
    1. Hoffmann O., Zafiropoulos G.-G. Tooth-implant connection: a review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2012;38(2):194–200. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00071.
    1. Mamalis A., Markopoulou K., Kaloumenos K., Analitis A. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in partially edentulous patients: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2012;38(4):424–434. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00099.
    1. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1983;49(6):843–848. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X.
    1. Monteith B. D. Minimizing biomechanical overload in implant prostheses: a computerized aid to design. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993;69(5):495–502. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90159-l.
    1. Lin C.-L., Chang C.-H., Wang C.-H., Ko C.-C., Lee H.-E. Numerical investigation of the factors affecting interfacial stresses in an MOD restored tooth by auto-meshed finite element method. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28(6):517–525. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00689.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit