Rotator cuff unloading versus loading exercise program in the conservative treatment of patients with rotator cuff tear: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Larissa Pechincha Ribeiro, Ann Cools, Paula Rezende Camargo, Larissa Pechincha Ribeiro, Ann Cools, Paula Rezende Camargo

Abstract

Introduction: Atraumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tears are common in individuals over 55 years of age. This condition can have a high impact on social life and is associated with chronic pain, weakness and dysfunction of the upper limb. There is evidence that conservative approaches should be the first treatment option. Conservative treatment usually addresses a variety of therapeutic behaviours without providing scientific arguments for the choice and progression of exercises.

Objective: To compare the effects of two different exercise programmes based on the load of the rotator cuff on a population with shoulder pain and rotator cuff tears.

Methods and analysis: This is a controlled, randomised, blinded clinical trial. Seventy-eight individuals with shoulder pain and presence of atraumatic and degenerative rotator cuff tear will participate and will be randomly distributed between two groups. The primary outcome will be quality of life (The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index), and secondary outcomes will include pain, function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), fear avoidance beliefs (Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire-Brazil), kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale), Pain Catastrophizing Scale, muscle strength of abductors, external and internal rotators of the shoulder, range of motion of arm elevation and patient satisfaction. The treatment will be performed for 12 weeks (2 x/week) acording to the selected group (Rotator Cuff Unloading x Rotator Cuff Loading Exercise Programme).

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT03962231.

Keywords: pain management; rehabilitation medicine; shoulder.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Muscle strength of abductors (A), external rotators (B) and internal rotators (C) of the shoulder.

References

    1. Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, et al. . A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1913–21. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001
    1. Bunker T. Rotator cuff disease. Curr Orthop 2002;16:223–33. 10.1054/cuor.2002.0257
    1. Spargoli G. Supraspinatus tendon pathomechanics: a current concepts review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2018;13:1083–94. 10.26603/ijspt20181083
    1. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, et al. . Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: from mass-screening in one village. J Orthop 2013;10:8–12. 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008
    1. Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris MG, et al. . MRI of symptomatic and asymptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears. A comparison of findings in 100 subjects. Acta Orthop 2010;81:361–6. 10.3109/17453674.2010.483993
    1. Barreto RPG, Braman JP, Ludewig PM, et al. . Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging findings in individuals with unilateral shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:1699–706. 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.001
    1. Lowe CJM, Moser J, Barker K. Living with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear “bad days, bad nights”: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:1–10.
    1. Malavolta EA, Assunção JH, Beraldo RA. Pinto G de MR, Gracitelli MEC, Ferreira Neto AA. Rotator cuff repair in the Brazilian unified health system: Brazilian trends from 2003 to 2015. Rev Bras Ortop (English Ed 2017;52:501–5.
    1. Syed UAM, Aleem AW, Wowkanech C, et al. . Neer Award 2018: the effect of preoperative education on opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2018;27:962–7. 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.039
    1. Westermann RW, Anthony CA, Bedard N, et al. . Opioid consumption after rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 2017;33:1467–72. 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.016
    1. Uquillas CA, Capogna BM, Rossy WH, et al. . Postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Elbow Surgery 2016;25:1204–13. 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.026
    1. Piper CC, Hughes AJ, Ma Y, et al. . Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:572–6. 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.032
    1. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, An Q, et al. . Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1371–9. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026
    1. Jeanfavre M, Husted S, Leff G. Exercise therapy in the non-operative treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2018;13:335–78. 10.26603/ijspt20180335
    1. Lopes A, Standniki S, Masiero D, et al. . Tradução E Adaptação Cultural Do Worc : Um Questionário De Qualidade De Vida Para Alterações Do Manguito Rotador. Rev bras fisioter 2006;3:309–15.
    1. Lopes AD, Ciconelli RM, Carrera EF, et al. . Validity and reliability of the Western Ontario rotator cuff index (WORC) for use in Brazil. Clin J Sport Med 2008;18:266–72. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817282f4
    1. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, et al. . Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999;83:157–62. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00101-3
    1. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:920–6. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015
    1. Orfale AG, Araújo PMP, Ferraz MB, et al. . Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005;38:293–302. 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018
    1. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). Am J Ind Med 2017;608:527–46.
    1. Abreu AM de, Faria CDC de M, Cardoso SMV, et al. . Versão brasileira do fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire. Cad. Saúde Pública 2008;24:615–23. 10.1590/S0102-311X2008000300015
    1. de Souza FS, Marinho CdaS, Siqueira FB, et al. . Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian-Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance beliefs questionnaire, and the Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties. Spine 2008;33:1028–33. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329
    1. Mintken PE, Cleland JA, Whitman JM, et al. . Psychometric properties of the Fear-Avoidance beliefs questionnaire and Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with shoulder pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1128–36. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.009
    1. Riley SP, Tafuto V, Cote M, et al. . Reliability and relationship of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire with the shoulder pain and disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. Physiother Theory Pract 2019;35:1–7. 10.1080/09593985.2018.1453004
    1. Woollard JD, Bost JE, Piva SR, et al. . The ability of preoperative factors to predict patient-reported disability following surgery for rotator cuff pathology. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:2087–96. 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219396
    1. Siqueira FB, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Magalhães LDC. Análise das propriedades psicométricas dA versão brasileira dA escala Tampa de cinesiofobia. Acta ortop. bras. 2007;15:19–24. 10.1590/S1413-78522007000100004
    1. Sehn F, Chachamovich E, Vidor LP, et al. . Cross-Cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain Med 2012;13:1425–35. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x
    1. George SZ, Hirsh AT. Psychologic influence on experimental pain sensitivity and clinical pain intensity for patients with shoulder pain. J Pain 2009;10:293–9. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.004
    1. George SZ, Staud R, Borsa PA, et al. . Biopsychosocial influence on shoulder pain: rationale and protocol for a pre-clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2017;56:9–17. 10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.005
    1. Katoh M. Test-retest reliability of isometric shoulder muscle strength measurement with a handheld dynamometer and belt. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:1719–22. 10.1589/jpts.27.1719
    1. Schrama PPM, Stenneberg MS, Lucas C, et al. . Intraexaminer reliability of hand-held dynamometry in the upper extremity: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:2444–69. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.019
    1. Cools AMJ, Vanderstukken F, Vereecken F, et al. . Eccentric and isometric shoulder rotator cuff strength testing using a hand-held dynamometer: reference values for overhead athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:3838–47. 10.1007/s00167-015-3755-9
    1. Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:306–13.
    1. Kolber MJ, Vega F, Widmayer K, et al. . The reliability and minimal detectable change of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer. Physiother Theory Pract 2011;27:176–84. 10.3109/09593985.2010.481011
    1. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2009;17:163–70. 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163
    1. Edwards PK, Ebert JR, Littlewood C, et al. . A systematic review of electromyography studies in normal shoulders to inform postoperative rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47:931–44. 10.2519/jospt.2017.7271
    1. Levy O, Mullett H, Roberts S, et al. . The role of anterior deltoid reeducation in patients with massive irreparable degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:863–70. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.04.005
    1. Kibler WB, Sciascia AD, Uhl TL, et al. . Electromyographic analysis of specific exercises for scapular control in early phases of shoulder rehabilitation. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1789–98. 10.1177/0363546508316281
    1. De Mey K, Danneels L, Cagnie B, et al. . Kinetic chain influences on upper and lower trapezius muscle activation during eight variations of a scapular retraction exercise in overhead athletes. J Sci Med Sport 2013;16:65–70. 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.04.008
    1. Gagnier JJ, Robbins C, Bedi A, et al. . Establishing minimally important differences for the American shoulder and elbow surgeons score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:e160–6. 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.042
    1. Fehringer EV, Sun J, VanOeveren LS, et al. . Full-Thickness rotator cuff tear prevalence and correlation with function and co-morbidities in patients sixty-five years and older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:881–5. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.039

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit