Bone Health Outcomes from the International, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled D-CARE Study Assessing Adjuvant Denosumab in Early Breast Cancer

Robert Coleman, Ying Zhou, Danielle Jandial, Benoit Cadieux, Arlene Chan, Robert Coleman, Ying Zhou, Danielle Jandial, Benoit Cadieux, Arlene Chan

Abstract

Introduction: D-CARE, an international, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in women with early-stage breast cancer at high risk of disease recurrence, failed to meet its primary endpoint-improvement in bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) with adjuvant denosumab vs placebo injections. As a result of the limitations of assessing BMFS, which includes relapse in bone with and without extraskeletal recurrences and deaths from any cause, the prespecified exploratory bone endpoints' analysis may provide a more clinically meaningful effect of denosumab in this disease setting.

Methods: The study enrolled women (aged ≥ 18 years) with histologically confirmed stage II/III breast cancer. Patients treated with adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy meeting inclusion criteria were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either denosumab (120 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every 3-4 weeks for about 6 months and then every 3 months for a total treatment duration of 5 years. Five prespecified exploratory bone endpoints and post hoc subgroup analysis based on age (< 50 and ≥ 50 years) and menopause status (premenopausal and postmenopausal) were evaluated.

Results: Overall, 4509 women with early-stage breast cancer were assigned to receive denosumab (N = 2256) or placebo (N = 2253). The baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two arms. The hazard ratio (HR) for time to first bone metastasis was 0.82 (95% CI 0.66-1.02; p = 0.068), with HRs of 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.94; p = 0.018) for patients < 50 years old and 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.98; p = 0.038) for premenopausal patients, favoring the denosumab group. The HRs for time to first on-study fracture and time to first on-study skeletal-related event were 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92; p = 0.004) and 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.78; p = 0.001), respectively, again favoring the denosumab group.

Conclusion: The exploratory bone endpoints indicate the benefits of denosumab treatment in patients with high-risk early breast cancer, supporting the expected bone health benefits contributed by denosumab.

Trial registration number: NCT01077154.

Keywords: Denosumab; Exploratory bone endpoints; High-risk early breast cancer; Post hoc analysis.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time to a first bone metastasis, b bone metastasis as site of first recurrence with non-bone site of first recurrence as a competing risk, c first symptomatic bone metastasis with asymptomatic bone metastasis as a competing risk, d first on-study fracture (before bone metastasis), and e first on-study SRE (following bone metastasis). CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, SRE skeletal-related event. *Based on subdistribution hazards (Gray [10] and Zhou et al. [11]) stratified by the randomization stratification factors

References

    1. National Institutes of Health. Cancer stat facts: female breast cancer. 2019. . Accessed 25 Sep 2019.
    1. Lipton A. Bone metastases in breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2003;4(2):151–158. doi: 10.1007/s11864-003-0016-9.
    1. Coleman R. Potential use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of metastases in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7(suppl 1):S29–S35. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2007.s.004.
    1. XGEVA®. Denosumab. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; 2018.
    1. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5132–5139. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101.
    1. Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(16):3082–3092. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002.
    1. Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Dubsky PC, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in breast cancer (ABCSG-18): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9992):433–443. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60995-3.
    1. Coleman R, Finkelstein DM, Barrios C, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in early breast cancer (D-CARE): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):60–72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30687-4.
    1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980.
    1. Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16:1141–1154. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350951.
    1. Zhou B, Latouche A, Rocha V, Fine J. Competing risks regression for stratified data. Biometrics. 2011;67(2):661–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01493.x.
    1. Gnant M, Mlineritsch B, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: 5-year follow-up of the ABCSG-12 bone-mineral density substudy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(9):840–849. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70204-3.
    1. Coleman R, Cameron D, Dodwell D, et al. Adjuvant zoledronic acid in patients with early breast cancer: final efficacy analysis of the AZURE (BIG 01/04) randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70302-X.
    1. Fizazi K, Lipton A, Mariette X, et al. Randomized phase II trial of denosumab in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer, breast cancer, or other neoplasms after intravenous bisphosphonates. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(10):1564–1571. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2146.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit