A flow cytometric method for characterization of circulating cell-derived microparticles in plasma

Morten Hjuler Nielsen, Henning Beck-Nielsen, Morten Nørgaard Andersen, Aase Handberg, Morten Hjuler Nielsen, Henning Beck-Nielsen, Morten Nørgaard Andersen, Aase Handberg

Abstract

Background and aim: Previous studies on circulating microparticles (MPs) indicate that the majority of MPs are of a size below the detection limit of most standard flow cytometers. The objective of the present study was to establish a method to analyze MP subpopulations above the threshold of detection of a new generation BD FACSAria™ III digital flow cytometer.

Methods: We analyzed MP subpopulations in plasma from 24 healthy individuals (9 males and 15 females). MPs were identified according to their size (<1.0-µm), by Lactadherin-FITC labelling, and by exposure of cell-specific markers. The sensitivity of the flow cytometer was tested against that of a previous-generation instrument FC500. Reproducibility of the FACSAria and our set-up was investigated, and the percentage of phosphatidylserine (PS) exposing MPs binding Lactadherin was determined.

Results: By using a flow cytometric approach we identified and quantitated MPs derived from platelets, monocytes, erythrocytes and endothelial cells. In addition, levels of tissue factor-positive MPs were determined. The FACSAria demonstrated improved sensitivity and increased MP detection range compared to the FC500 instrument. The reproducibility of PS+PMP and PS+MP measurements was 11.7 and 23.2%, respectively. When expressed as a percentage of total MPs, the PS-positive MP population represented 15.1±5.5%, and PS-positive MPs were significantly increased in men.

Conclusion: We have established a method to measure MPs above the detection limit of a new generation flow cytometer and derived from a number of cell-types in a healthy population of men and women.

Keywords: coincidence occurrence; endothelial cell-derived; erythrocyte-derived; extracellular vesicles; flow cytometry; lactadherin; monocyte-derived; platelet-derived; tissue-factor.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Construction of MP gates using size-calibrated fluorescent beads ranging from 200-nm to 3.0-µm. (A) Selection of bead subsets using the FACSAria instrument with a set SSC-A threshold of 200, and (B) construction of a MP gate with an upper limit of approximately 1 µm. (C) Selection of bead subsets using the FC500 instrument. (D) Threshold of 1 set on the SSC-A parameter eliminated the smallest (0.2 µm) beads. (E) Construction of a MP gate with an upper limit of approximately 1 µm. Background noise from the bead mix is shown in the left gate of the scatter plots.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Side-by-side determination of absolute events within the MP gate using FACSAria (left panel) and FC500 (right panel) flow cytometers. (A,B) absolute events in non-filtered plasma. (C,D) absolute events in 0.22-µm-filtered plasma. TruCount beads are shown in the upper right corner. (E,F) evaluation of background noise contribution from 0.22-µm-filtered PBS analyzed under similar conditions (flow rate and time period).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Side-by-side determination of Lactadherin-FITC positive events using FACSAria (left panel) and FC500 (right panel) flow cytometers. (A,B) Lactadherin-FITC positive events in non-filtered plasma. (C,D) Lactadherin-FITC positive events in 0.22-µm-filtered plasma (filtered prior to staining). (E,F) negative control for Lactadherin binding (unstained non-filtered plasma).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Side-by-side determination of (A,E) CD41 + PMPs and (C,G) CD142+ (tissue factor-positive) MPs using FACSAria (left panel) and FC500 (right panel) flow cytometers. Right columns correspond to the respective isotype controls.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Test for coincidence detection. (A) Serial dilutions of 200-nm beads mixed with a fixed number of Megamix beads, using the 900-nm sized beads as reference. We collected events triggered on side scatter (SSC-A) with a threshold of 200. Expressed is the ratio of 200-nm beads vs. 900-nm beads at each dilution. R2=0.951, as determined by linear regression. (B–C) To support our findings we conducted serial dilutions of 900-nm beads (R2=0.995) and 200-nm beads (R2=0.955), respectively. By serial dilution of plasma samples we observed a proportionally drop of all events within (D) the MP gate (R2=0.991) and of (E) all PS-positive events within the MP gate (R2=0.987).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Detection of microparticle (MP) subpopulations in human plasma. (A) Platelet-derived MPs (CD41 + PMPs). (B) Monocyte-derived MPs (CD14 + MMPs). (C) Endothelial-derived microparticles (CD31+ /CD42b− EMPs). (D) Erythrocyte-derived microparticles (CD235a + ErytMPs). (E) Total tissue factor-positive microparticles (CD142+(TF) MPs). Right columns correspond to the respective isotype controls.

References

    1. Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:581–93.
    1. Freyssinet JM. Cellular microparticles: what are they bad or good for? J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:1655–62.
    1. Shet AS. Characterizing blood microparticles: technical aspects and challenges. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:769–74.
    1. Leroyer AS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Microparticles and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2008;34(Suppl 1):S27–32.
    1. Leroyer AS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Role of microparticles in atherothrombosis. J Intern Med. 2008;263:528–37.
    1. Robert S, Poncelet P, Lacroix R, Arnaud L, Giraudo L, Hauchard A, et al. Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle counting using calibrated beads and a Cytomics FC500 routine flow cytometer: a first step towards multicenter studies? J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:190–7.
    1. Pelletier F, Garnache-Ottou F, Angelot F, Biichle S, Vidal C, Humbert P, et al. Increased levels of circulating endothelial-derived microparticles and small-size platelet-derived microparticles in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:1573–6.
    1. Chandler WL, Yeung W, Tait JF. A new microparticle size calibration standard for use in measuring smaller microparticles using a new flow cytometer. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1216–24.
    1. Robert S, Lacroix R, Poncelet P, Harhouri K, Bouriche T, Judicone C, et al. High-sensitivity flow cytometry provides access to standardized measurement of small-size microparticles – brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:1054–8.
    1. Perez-Pujol S, Marker PH, Key NS. Platelet microparticles are heterogeneous and highly dependent on the activation mechanism: studies using a new digital flow cytometer. Cytometry A. 2007;71:38–45.
    1. Shi J, Heegaard CW, Rasmussen JT, Gilbert GE. Lactadherin binds selectively to membranes containing phosphatidyl-L-serine and increased curvature. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1667:82–90.
    1. Shi J, Shi Y, Waehrens LN, Rasmussen JT, Heegaard CW, Gilbert GE. Lactadherin detects early phosphatidylserine exposure on immortalized leukemia cells undergoing programmed cell death. Cytometry A. 2006;69:1193–201.
    1. Dey-Hazra E, Hertel B, Kirsch T, Woywodt A, Lovric S, Haller H, et al. Detection of circulating microparticles by flow cytometry: influence of centrifugation, filtration of buffer, and freezing. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:1125–33.
    1. Lacroix R, Robert S, Poncelet P, Kasthuri RS, Key NS, Dignat-George F, et al. Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle enumeration by flow cytometry with calibrated beads: results of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis SSC Collaborative workshop. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2571–4.
    1. Mullier F, Bailly N, Chatelain C, Dogne JM, Chatelain B. More on: calibration for the measurement of microparticles: needs, interests, and limitations of calibrated polystyrene beads for flow cytometry-based quantification of biological microparticles. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1679–81. author reply 81–2.
    1. Dragovic RA, Gardiner C, Brooks AS, Tannetta DS, Ferguson DJ, Hole P, et al. Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using nanoparticle tracking analysis. Nanomedicine. 2011;7:780–8.
    1. Yuana Y, Oosterkamp TH, Bahatyrova S, Ashcroft B, Garcia Rodriguez P, Bertina RM, et al. Atomic force microscopy: a novel approach to the detection of nanosized blood microparticles. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:315–23.
    1. Gyorgy B, Modos K, Pallinger E, Paloczi K, Pasztoi M, Misjak P, et al. Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes due to shared biophysical parameters. Blood. 2011;117:e39.
    1. Shet AS, Aras O, Gupta K, Hass MJ, Rausch DJ, Saba N, et al. Sickle blood contains tissue factor-positive microparticles derived from endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 2003;102:2678–83.
    1. Jayachandran M, Litwiller RD, Owen WG, Heit JA, Behrenbeck T, Mulvagh SL, et al. Characterization of blood borne microparticles as markers of premature coronary calcification in newly menopausal women. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H931–H8.
    1. Bohling SD, Pagano MB, Stitzel MR, Ferrell C, Yeung W, Chandler WL. Comparison of clot-based vs chromogenic factor Xa procoagulant phospholipid activity assays. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:185–92.
    1. Mobarrez F, Antovic J, Egberg N, Hansson M, Jörneskog G, Hultenby K, et al. A multicolor flow cytometric assay for measurement of platelet-derived microparticles. Thromb Res. 2010;125:110. ee6.
    1. Connor DE, Exner T, Ma DD, Joseph JE. The majority of circulating platelet-derived microparticles fail to bind annexin V, lack phospholipid-dependent procoagulant activity and demonstrate greater expression of glycoprotein Ib. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103:1044–52.
    1. Dasgupta SK, Guchhait P, Thiagarajan P. Lactadherin binding and phosphatidylserine expression on cell surface-comparison with annexin A5. Transl Res. 2006;148:19–25.
    1. Hou J, Fu Y, Zhou J, Li W, Xie R, Cao F, et al. Lactadherin functions as a probe for phosphatidylserine exposure and as an anticoagulant in the study of stored platelets. Vox Sang. 2011;100:187–95.
    1. Enjeti AK, Lincz LF, Seldon M. Detection and measurement of microparticles: an evolving research tool for vascular biology. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33:771–9.
    1. Amabile N, Guerin AP, Leroyer A, Mallat Z, Nguyen C, Boddaert J, et al. Circulating endothelial microparticles are associated with vascular dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3381–8.
    1. Boulanger CM, Amabile N, Tedgui A. Circulating microparticles: a potential prognostic marker for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Hypertension. 2006;48:180–6.
    1. Jimenez JJ, Jy W, Mauro LM, Soderland C, Horstman LL, Ahn YS. Endothelial cells release phenotypically and quantitatively distinct microparticles in activation and apoptosis. Thromb Res. 2003;109:175–80.
    1. Lentz BR. Exposure of platelet membrane phosphatidylserine regulates blood coagulation. Prog Lipid Res. 2003;42:423–38.
    1. Lobo RA. Menopause and stroke and the effects of hormonal therapy. Climacteric. 2007;10(Suppl 2):27–31.
    1. Jayachandran M, Litwiller RD, Owen WG, Miller VM. Circulating microparticles and endogenous estrogen in newly menopausal women. Climacteric. 2009;12:177–84.
    1. Toth B, Nikolajek K, Rank A, Nieuwland R, Lohse P, Pihusch V, et al. Gender-specific and menstrual cycle dependent differences in circulating microparticles. Platelets. 2007;18:515–21.
    1. Nolan JP, Stoner SA. A trigger channel threshold artifact in nanoparticle analysis. Cytometry A. 2013;83:301–5.
    1. van der Vlist EJ, Nolte-'t Hoen EN, Stoorvogel W, Arkesteijn GJ, Wauben MH. Fluorescent labeling of nano-sized vesicles released by cells and subsequent quantitative and qualitative analysis by high-resolution flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:1311–26.
    1. Gardiner C, Ferreira YJ, Dragovic RA, Redman CW, Sargent IL. Extracellular vesicle sizing and enumeration by nanoparticle tracking analysis. J Extracell Vesicles. 2013;2 19671, doi: .
    1. Lacroix R, Robert S, Poncelet P, Dignat-George F. Overcoming limitations of microparticle measurement by flow cytometry. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010;36:807–18.
    1. van der Pol E, van Gemert MJ, Sturk A, Nieuwland R, van Leeuwen TG. Single vs. swarm detection of microparticles and exosomes by flow cytometry. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:919–30.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit