Strategies to Promote ResiliencY (SPRY): a randomised embedded multifactorial adaptative platform (REMAP) clinical trial protocol to study interventions to improve recovery after surgery in high-risk patients

Katherine Moll Reitz, Christopher W Seymour, Jennifer Vates, Melanie Quintana, Kert Viele, Michelle Detry, Michael Morowitz, Alison Morris, Barbara Methe, Jason Kennedy, Brian Zuckerbraun, Timothy D Girard, Oscar C Marroquin, Stephen Esper, Jennifer Holder-Murray, Anne B Newman, Scott Berry, Derek C Angus, Matthew Neal, Katherine Moll Reitz, Christopher W Seymour, Jennifer Vates, Melanie Quintana, Kert Viele, Michelle Detry, Michael Morowitz, Alison Morris, Barbara Methe, Jason Kennedy, Brian Zuckerbraun, Timothy D Girard, Oscar C Marroquin, Stephen Esper, Jennifer Holder-Murray, Anne B Newman, Scott Berry, Derek C Angus, Matthew Neal

Abstract

Introduction: As the population ages, there is interest in strategies to promote resiliency, especially for frail patients at risk of its complications. The physiological stress of surgery in high-risk individuals has been proposed both as an important cause of accelerated age-related decline in health and as a model testing the effectiveness of strategies to improve resiliency to age-related health decline. We describe a randomised, embedded, multifactorial, adaptative platform (REMAP) trial to investigate multiple perioperative interventions, the first of which is metformin and selected for its anti-inflammatory and anti-ageing properties beyond its traditional blood glucose control features.

Methods and analysis: Within a multihospital, single healthcare system, the Core Protocol for Strategies to Promote ResiliencY (SPRY) will be embedded within both the electronic health record (EHR) and the healthcare culture generating a continuously self-learning healthcare system. Embedding reduces the administrative burden of a traditional trial while accessing and rapidly analysing routine patient care EHR data. SPRY-Metformin is a placebo-controlled trial and is the first SPRY domain evaluating the effectiveness of three metformin dosages across three preoperative durations within a heterogeneous set of major surgical procedures. The primary outcome is 90-day hospital-free days. Bayesian posterior probabilities guide interim decision-making with predefined rules to determine stopping for futility or superior dosing selection. Using response adaptative randomisation, a maximum of 2500 patients allows 77%-92% power, detecting >15% primary outcome improvement. Secondary outcomes include mortality, readmission and postoperative complications. A subset of patients will be selected for substudies evaluating the microbiome, cognition, postoperative delirium and strength.

Ethics and dissemination: The Core Protocol of SPRY REMAP and associated SPRY-Metformin Domain-Specific Appendix have been ethically approved by the Institutional Review Board and are publicly registered. Results will be publicly available to healthcare providers, patients and trial participants following achieving predetermined platform conclusions.

Trial registration number: NCT03861767.

Keywords: adult surgery; clinical trials; information management; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concentric consort diagram: SPRY Core Protocol (A) and Domain-Specific Appendix SPRY-Metformin overlying the Core Protocol (B). (A) The Core Protocol creates a research platform or infrastructure within clinical care for all enrolled into any SPRY Domain-Specific Appendix. This infrastructure includes virtual screening, informed consent and randomisation at preoperative clinic, automated perioperative electronic health record (EHR) monitoring, and a primary outcome of 90-day hospital-free days. Patient privacy is maintained and protected by the embedded application functioning behind the institutional firewall. (B) The SPRY-Metformin Domain-Specific Appendix functions within the infrastructure of the SPRY Core Protocol. Prior to preoperative clinic, the SPRY-Application screens the scheduled preoperative clinic appointments and generates a list of potential patients for enrolling clinicians. In preoperative clinic recruitment, informed consent and randomisation are completed. Patients undergo baseline testing. Study drug exposure begins and continues through postoperative day 90 (green). The SPRY-Application (light blue) supports patient safety monitoring by generating EHR and email alerts, as needed. As possible, all trial aspects are embedded within the standard of care perioperative course. When 500 patients surpass postoperative day 90, a priori interim analysis is completed. Future enrolment is then guided by the predetermined response adaptive randomisation schemes and predetermined stopping rules. HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; POD, postoperative day; REMAP, randomised embedded multifactorial adaptive platform; SPRY, Strategies to Promote ResiliencY.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Virtual and in-person screening and randomisation. a<7 or >180 preoperative days. bCharlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) required within the 365 days prior to screening. Virtual recruitment is completed by Strategies to Promote ResiliencY (SPRY)-Application (light blue) reviewing a subset of SPRY and SPRY-Metformin enrolment criteria. The SPRY-Application then guides the clinical provider to complete the in-person screening and informed consent. Any discrepancies found between the clinical parameters within SPRY-Application and the patient’s reported health state are manually updated within the electronic health record (EHR) and patients are randomised. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SPRY-Metformin timeline. aIf patients are discharged on the day of the surgical intervention, laboratory sample 4 will be omitted. If hospital discharge occurs prior to postoperative day 3, laboratory sample 4 occur immediately prior to discharge. bLongitudinal testing at contact point 6 testing is dependent on participation in the motor subgroup (table 1). Patients are recruited, consented by providers, randomised, undergo baseline venous blood sampling and are provided study drug at preoperative clinic (contact point 1). In the 7–180 preoperative days, patients undergo baseline testing (table 1), and both patient safety and study drug compliance are monitored via phone interview (contact point 2). Three venous blood samples are coupled with clinical blood draws throughout the operative hospital admission (contact point 3). A final venous sample is collected in standard of care postoperative clinic (contact point 4). At postoperative days 30 and 90, patients are contacted to monitor both patient safety and study drug compliance, collect postoperative outcomes (box 2) and complete additional outcome testing (table 1).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Randomised, embedded, multifactorial, adaptative platform (REMAP) Strategies to Promote ResiliencY (SPRY) administrative organisation. The Trial Steering Committee receives trial updates from the Statistical Monitoring Committee as well as recommendations from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board to oversee all trial conduct.

References

    1. 2017 National Population Projections Table United States census Bur, 2017.
    1. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferrucci L, et al. . Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American geriatrics Society/National Institute on aging research conference on frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:991–1001. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x
    1. Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, et al. . Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients: a prospective analysis. JAMA Surg 2014;149:766–72. 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.296
    1. Fairhall N, Langron C, Sherrington C, et al. . Treating frailty-a practical guide. BMC Med 2011;9:83. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-83
    1. Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, et al. . Metformin as a tool to target aging. Cell Metab 2016;23:1060–5. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011
    1. Robinson TN, Walston JD, Brummel NE, et al. . Frailty for surgeons: review of a national Institute on aging conference on frailty for specialists. J Am Coll Surg 2015;221:1083–92. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.08.428
    1. The Department of Health and Human Services Profile of older Americans: 2015 profile. Administration on aging (AoA), Washington, DC, 2016.
    1. Eaton MP, Osler TM, Li Y, et al. . Hospital readmission after noncardiac surgery. JAMA Surg 2014;149:439.
    1. Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, et al. . Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. JAMA Surg 2017;152:233–40. 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4219
    1. Shinall MC, Arya S, Youk A, et al. . Association of preoperative patient frailty and operative stress with postoperative mortality. JAMA Surg 2019;15213:1–9. 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4620
    1. Shinall MC, Youk A, Massarweh NN, et al. . Association of preoperative frailty and operative stress with mortality after elective vs emergency surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2010358. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10358
    1. Neupane I, Arora RC, Rudolph JL. Cardiac surgery as a stressor and the response of the vulnerable older adult. Exp Gerontol 2017;87:168–74. 10.1016/j.exger.2016.04.019
    1. Joseph B, Zangbar B, Pandit V, et al. . Emergency general surgery in the elderly: too old or too frail? J Am Coll Surg 2016;222:805–13. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.063
    1. Angus DC. Fusing randomized trials with big data the key to Self-learning health care systems? JAMA 2019;314.
    1. Flory J, Lipska K. Metformin in 2019. JAMA 2019;321:1926–7. 10.1001/jama.2019.3805
    1. Madsen KS, Kähler P, Kähler LKA, et al. . Metformin and second- or third-generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD012368. 10.1002/14651858.CD012368.pub2
    1. American Diabetes Association Standard of medical care in diabetes - 2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42:S1–2.
    1. Konopka AR, Miller BF. Taming expectations of metformin as a treatment to extend healthspan. Geroscience 2019;41:101–8. 10.1007/s11357-019-00057-3
    1. Hadley EC, Kuchel GA, Newman AB, et al. . Report: NIa workshop on measures of physiologic Resiliencies in human aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:980–90. 10.1093/gerona/glx015
    1. Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG. Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;2016:200–7.
    1. The Adaptive Platform Trials Coalition Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019;18:797–807. 10.1038/s41573-019-0034-3
    1. Schultz A, Marsh JA, Saville BR, et al. . Trial refresh: a case for an adaptive platform trial for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. Front Pharmacol 2019;10:1–8. 10.3389/fphar.2019.00301
    1. Woodcock J, LaVange LM. Master protocols to study multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N Engl J Med 2017;377:62–70. 10.1056/NEJMra1510062
    1. Berry SM, Berry DA. Accounting for multiplicities in assessing drug safety: a three-level hierarchical mixture model. Biometrics 2004;60:418–26. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00186.x
    1. Milinovich A, Kattan MW. Extracting and utilizing electronic health data from EPIC for research. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:42. 10.21037/atm.2018.01.13
    1. Reitz KM, Marroquin OC, Zenati MS, et al. . Association between metformin exposure and postoperative outcomes in diabetic adults. JAMA Surg 2020;155:e200416.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The third International consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    1. Hou X, Song J, Li X-N, et al. . Metformin reduces intracellular reactive oxygen species levels by upregulating expression of the antioxidant thioredoxin via the AMPK-FOXO3 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010;396:199–205. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.017
    1. Turban S, Stretton C, Drouin O, et al. . Defining the contribution of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and protein kinase C (PKC) in regulation of glucose uptake by metformin in skeletal muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2012;287:20088–99. 10.1074/jbc.M111.330746
    1. Wu H, Esteve E, Tremaroli V, et al. . Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat Med 2017;23:850–8. 10.1038/nm.4345
    1. Campbell JM, Bellman SM, Stephenson MD, et al. . Metformin reduces all-cause mortality and diseases of ageing independent of its effect on diabetes control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2017;40:31–44. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.08.003
    1. Cameron AR, Morrison VL, Levin D, et al. . Anti-inflammatory effects of metformin irrespective of diabetes status. Circ Res 2016;119:652–65. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308445
    1. Lewis RJ, Angus DC, Laterre P-F, et al. . Rationale and design of an adaptive phase 2B/3 clinical trial of Selepressin for adults in septic shock. Selepressin evaluation programme for sepsis-induced shock-adaptive clinical trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018;15:250–7. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201708-669SD
    1. Ritch CR, Cookson MS, Chang SS, et al. . Impact of complications and hospital-free days on health related quality of life 1 year after radical cystectomy. J Urol 2014;192:1360–4. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.004
    1. Bateni SB, Gingrich AA, Stewart SL, et al. . Hospital utilization and disposition among patients with malignant bowel obstruction: a population-based comparison of surgical to medical management 11 medical and health sciences 1117 public health and health services. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1–10.
    1. Young P, Hodgson C, Dulhunty J, et al. . End points for phase II trials in intensive care: recommendations from the Australian and New Zealand clinical Trials Group consensus panel meeting. Crit Care Resusc 2012;14:211–5.
    1. Wahl TS, Graham LA, Hawn MT, et al. . Association of the modified frailty index with 30-day surgical readmission. JAMA Surg 2017;152:749–57. 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1025
    1. Rothenberg KA, Stern JR, George EL, et al. . Association of frailty and postoperative complications with unplanned readmissions after elective outpatient surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e194330. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330
    1. Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. . Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg 2005;242:463–71. 10.1097/01.sla.0000183348.15117.ab
    1. Shah R, Attwood K, Arya S, et al. . Association of frailty with failure to rescue after low-risk and high-risk inpatient surgery. JAMA Surg 2018;153:e180214. 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0214
    1. Fagenson AM, Powers BD, Zorbas KA, et al. . Frailty predicts morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an ACS-NSQIP cohort analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020:1–9. 10.1007/s11605-020-04570-1
    1. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, et al. . Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European perioperative clinical outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint Taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:88–105. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118
    1. Nsqip ACS. ACS NSQIP variables & definitions - chapter 4. ACS NSQIP Oper Man 2018:1–167.
    1. DeBord J, Novitsky Y, Fitzgibbons R, et al. . Ssi, Sso, SSE, SSOPI: the elusive language of complications in hernia surgery. Hernia 2018;22:737–8. 10.1007/s10029-018-1813-1
    1. Schneider EB, Gani F, Pawlik TM, et al. . Understanding variation in 30-day surgical readmission in the era of accountable care. JAMA Surg 2015;150:1042.
    1. Gelman A, Shalizi CR. Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2013;66:8–38. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x
    1. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 3rd edn Wiley, 2012.
    1. O’Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549–56. 10.2307/2530245

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit