Establishing cut-points for physical activity classification using triaxial accelerometer in middle-aged recreational marathoners

Carlos Hernando, Carla Hernando, Eladio Joaquin Collado, Nayara Panizo, Ignacio Martinez-Navarro, Barbara Hernando, Carlos Hernando, Carla Hernando, Eladio Joaquin Collado, Nayara Panizo, Ignacio Martinez-Navarro, Barbara Hernando

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish GENEA (Gravity Estimator of Normal Everyday Activity) cut-points for discriminating between six relative-intensity activity levels in middle-aged recreational marathoners. Nighty-eight (83 males and 15 females) recreational marathoners, aged 30-45 years, completed a cardiopulmonary exercise test running on a treadmill while wearing a GENEA accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist. The breath-by-breath V̇O2 data was also collected for criterion measure of physical activity categories (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous and extremely vigorous). GENEA cut-points for physical activity classification was performed via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Spearman's correlation test was applied to determine the relationship between estimated and measured intensity classifications. Statistical analysis were done for all individuals, and separating samples by sex. The GENEA cut-points established were able to distinguish between all six-relative intensity levels with an excellent classification accuracy (area under the ROC curve (AUC) values between 0.886 and 0.973) for all samples. When samples were separated by sex, AUC values were 0.881-0.973 and 0.924-0.968 for males and females, respectively. The total variance in energy expenditure explained by GENEA accelerometer data was 78.50% for all samples, 78.14% for males, and 83.17% for females. In conclusion, the wrist-worn GENEA accelerometer presents a high capacity of classifying the intensity of physical activity in middle-aged recreational marathoners when examining all samples together, as well as when sample set was separated by sex. This study suggests that the triaxial GENEA accelerometers (worn on the non-dominant wrist) can be used to predict energy expenditure for running activities.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Correlation between the wrist-worn GENEA…
Fig 1. Correlation between the wrist-worn GENEA SVMgs (g·min) and the energy expenditure (METs) along the 98 cardiopulmonary exercise tests.
Vertical lines delimited the different relative-intensity levels according to SVMgs cut-points estimated, and horizontal lines delimited the different relative-intensity levels according to METs cut-points measured (equivalent to O2max classification). Grey regions delimit the consensus outcome between the measured and predicted intensity categories, and all observations inside these regions are correct classifications for each intensity level. SVMgs, signal magnitude vector gravity-subtracted. MET, metabolic equivalent task.

References

    1. El Helou N, Tafflet M, Berthelot G, Tolaini J, Marc A, Guillaume M, et al. Impact of environmental parameters on marathon running performance. PLOS ONE 2012;7:e37407 10.1371/journal.pone.0037407
    1. Zavorsky GS, Tomko KA, Smoliga JM. Declines in marathon performance: Sex differences in elite and recreational athletes. PLOS ONE 2017;12:e0172121 10.1371/journal.pone.0172121
    1. Ahmadyar B, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Participation and performance trends in elderly marathoners in four of the world’s largest marathons during 2004–2011. SpringerPlus 2015;4:465 10.1186/s40064-015-1254-6
    1. Hoffman MD, Ong JC, Wang G. Historical analysis of participation in 161 km ultramarathons in North America. Int J Hist Sport 2010;27:1877–91. 10.1080/09523367.2010.494385
    1. Hoffman MD, Krishnan E. Health and exercise-related medical issues among 1,212 ultramarathon runners: baseline findings from the Ultrarunners Longitudinal TRAcking (ULTRA) Study. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e83867 10.1371/journal.pone.0083867
    1. Knechtle B, Nikolaidis PT, Zingg MA, Rosemann T, Rüst CA. Differences in age of peak marathon performance between mountain and city marathon running—The ‘Jungfrau Marathon’ in Switzerland. Chin J Physiol 2017;60.
    1. Esteve-Lanao J, Moreno-Pérez D, Cardona CA, Larumbe-Zabala E, Muñoz I, Sellés S, et al. Is Marathon Training Harder than the Ironman Training? An ECO-method Comparison. Front Physiol 2017;8:298 10.3389/fphys.2017.00298
    1. Mansour SG, Verma G, Pata RW, Martin TG, Perazella MA, Parikh CR. Kidney Injury and Repair Biomarkers in Marathon Runners. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found 2017. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.01.045
    1. Vickers AJ, Vertosick EA. An empirical study of race times in recreational endurance runners. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2016;8:26 10.1186/s13102-016-0052-y
    1. Hoffman MD, Goulet EDB, Maughan RJ. Considerations in the Use of Body Mass Change to Estimate Change in Hydration Status During a 161-Kilometer Ultramarathon Running Competition. Sports Med 2017:1–8.
    1. Dijkstra HP, Pollock N, Chakraverty R, Alonso JM. Managing the health of the elite athlete: a new integrated performance health management and coaching model. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:523–31. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093222
    1. Angus SD. Did recent world record marathon runners employ optimal pacing strategies? J Sports Sci 2014;32:31–45. 10.1080/02640414.2013.803592
    1. Burrows M, Bird S. The physiology of the highly trained female endurance runner. Sports Med Auckl NZ 2000;30:281–300.
    1. Gabbett TJ, Nassis GP, Oetter E, Pretorius J, Johnston N, Medina D, et al. The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:1451–2. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097298
    1. Szabo A, Vega RDL, Ruiz-BarquÍn R, Rivera O. Exercise addiction in Spanish athletes: Investigation of the roles of gender, social context and level of involvement. J Behav Addict 2013;2:249–52. 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.4.9
    1. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washintong DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2008.
    1. Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA, et al. Guide to the Assessment of Physical Activity: Clinical and Research Applications A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013:01.cir.0000435708.67487.da. 10.1161/01.cir.0000435708.67487.da
    1. Montoye HJ, Washburn R, Servais S, Ertl A, Webster JG, Nagle FJ. Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983;15:403–7.
    1. Corder K, Ekelund U, Steele RM, Wareham NJ, Brage S. Assessment of physical activity in youth. J Appl Physiol 2008;105:977–87. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2008
    1. Cordero MJA, López AMS, Barrilao RG, Blanque RR, Segovia JN, Cano MDP. Accelerometer description as a method to assess physical activity in diferent periods of life; review. Nutr Hosp 2014;29:1250–61. 10.3305/nh.2014.29.6.7410
    1. Bassett DR, Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Wolff DL. Accelerometer-based physical activity: total volume per day and standardized measures. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:833–8. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000468
    1. Montoye AHK, Mudd LM, Biswas S, Pfeiffer KA. Energy Expenditure Prediction Using Raw Accelerometer Data in Simulated Free Living. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:1735–46. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000597
    1. Shephard RJ. Absolute versus relative intensity of physical activity in a dose-response context. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:S400–418; discussion S419-420.
    1. Phillips LRS, Parfitt G, Rowlands AV. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. J Sci Med Sport Sports Med Aust 2013;16:124–8. 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.05.013
    1. Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1085–93. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820513be
    1. Welch WA, Bassett DR, Thompson DL, Freedson PS, Staudenmayer JW, John D, et al. Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013;45:2012–9. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182965249
    1. Welch WA, Bassett DR, Freedson PS, John D, Steeves JA, Conger SA, et al. Cross-validation of waist-worn GENEA accelerometer cut-points. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014;46:1825–30. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000283
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1575–81. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
    1. Schaefer CA, Nigg CR, Hill JO, Brink LA, Browning RC. Establishing and evaluating wrist cutpoints for the GENEActiv accelerometer in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014;46:826–33. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000150
    1. Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Schutz Y. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 2005;99:1112–9. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00023.2004
    1. Zhang S, Murray P, Zillmer R, Eston RG, Catt M, Rowlands AV. Activity classification using the GENEA: optimum sampling frequency and number of axes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:2228–34. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825e19fd
    1. Nightingale TE, Walhin J-P, Thompson D, Bilzon JLJ. Influence of accelerometer type and placement on physical activity energy expenditure prediction in manual wheelchair users. PLOS ONE 2015;10:e0126086 10.1371/journal.pone.0126086
    1. Pentecost C, Farrand P, Greaves CJ, Taylor RS, Warren FC, Hillsdon M, et al. Combining behavioural activation with physical activity promotion for adults with depression: findings of a parallel-group pilot randomised controlled trial (BAcPAc). Trials 2015;16:367 10.1186/s13063-015-0881-0
    1. Hamlyn-Williams CC, Freeman P, Parfitt G. Acute affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise sessions in adolescent girls: an observational study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2014;6:35 10.1186/2052-1847-6-35
    1. Morgan KL, Rahman MA, Hill RA, Zhou S-M, Bijlsma G, Khanom A, et al. Physical Activity and Excess Weight in Pregnancy Have Independent and Unique Effects on Delivery and Perinatal Outcomes. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e94532 10.1371/journal.pone.0094532
    1. Wijndaele K, Westgate K, Stephens SK, Blair SN, Bull FC, Chastin SFM, et al. Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:2129–39. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661
    1. Myers J, Bellin D. Ramp exercise protocols for clinical and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Sports Med Auckl NZ 2000;30:23–9.
    1. Boone J, Bourgois J. The oxygen uptake response to incremental ramp exercise: methodogical and physiological issues. Sports Med Auckl NZ 2012;42:511–26. 10.2165/11599690-000000000-00000
    1. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF. Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J Biom Z 2008;50:419–30. 10.1002/bimj.200710415
    1. Zhang S, Rowlands AV, Murray P, Hurst TL. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:742–8. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31823bf95c
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S498–504.
    1. Fudge BW, Wilson J, Easton C, Irwin L, Clark J, Haddow O, et al. Estimation of oxygen uptake during fast running using accelerometry and heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:192–8. 10.1249/01.mss.0000235884.71487.21
    1. Trappe S. Marathon runners: how do they age? Sports Med Auckl NZ 2007;37:302–5.
    1. Hoffman MD, Parise CA. Longitudinal Assessment of Age and Experience on Performance in 161-km Ultramarathons. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014;10:93–8.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit