A novel quick transendoscopic enteral tubing in mid-gut: technique and training with video

Chuyan Long, Yan Yu, Bota Cui, Sabreen Abdul Rahman Jagessar, Jie Zhang, Guozhong Ji, Guangming Huang, Faming Zhang, Chuyan Long, Yan Yu, Bota Cui, Sabreen Abdul Rahman Jagessar, Jie Zhang, Guozhong Ji, Guangming Huang, Faming Zhang

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and value of a quick technique for transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) through mid-gut.

Methods: A prospective interventional study was performed in a single center. A TET tube was inserted into mid-gut through the nasal orifice and fixed on the pylorus wall by one tiny titanium endoscopic clip under anesthesia. The feasibility, safety, success rate, and satisfaction with TET placement were evaluated for enteral nutrition or fecal microbiota transplantation.

Results: A total of 86 patients underwent mid-gut TET. The success rate of the TET procedure was 98.8% (85/86). Mean tubing time of the TET procedure was 4.2 ± 1.9 min. 10 cases of procedure was enough for training of general endoscopist to shorten the procedure time (7.0 min vs 4.0 min, p < 0.05). 97.7% (84/86) of patients were satisfied with the TET placement. Procedure-related and tube-related adverse events were observed in 8.1% (7/86) and 7.0% (6/86) of patients respectively. There were no moderate to severe adverse events during tube extubation.

Conclusions: TET through mid-gut is a novel, convenient, reliable and safe procedure for mid-gut administration with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration date: 29th November 2017.

Trial registration number: NCT03335982 .

Keywords: Endoscopy; Enteral nutrition; Fecal microbiota transplantation; Mid-gut; Nasal-jejunal tube; Transendoscopic enteral tubing.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2015KY042). Written informed consent was obtained from all adult subjects or parents in pediatric cases.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of clinical images and video was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

Faming Zhang is the inventor of TET. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Concept and procedure of administration through mid-gut tubing. a The concept of administration through mid-gut tubing; b The endoscopic view at mouth cavity when the soft tube tip from nasal cavity was inserted into hypopharynx close to esophagus; c One tiny endoscopic clip was used for fixation of the tube at gastric antrum before the guide wire within the tube was removed out; d The location of mid-gut tube could be confirmed by X-Ray and contrast agent, but is not necessary using this TET technique and device
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The tendency of operating time in two endoscopists. a The time of procedure for the general endoscopist showed significant decreasingtendency during the training; b The time of procedure decreased slightly during the training in the advanced endoscopist

References

    1. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H, Rajilic-Stojanovic M, Kump P, Satokari R, Sokol H, Arkkila P, Pintus C, Hart A, et al. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2017;66(4):569–580. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313017.
    1. Konig J, Siebenhaar A, Hogenauer C, Arkkila P, Nieuwdorp M, Noren T, Ponsioen CY, Rosien U, Rossen NG, Satokari R, et al. Consensus report: faecal microbiota transfer - clinical applications and procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(2):222–239. doi: 10.1111/apt.13868.
    1. Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, Ananthakrishnan AN, Curry SR, Gilligan PH, McFarland LV, Mellow M, Zuckerbraun BS. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(4):478–498. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.4.
    1. Cui B, Li P, Xu L, Zhao Y, Wang H, Peng Z, Xu H, Xiang J, He Z, Zhang T, et al. Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy: a pilot study for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:298. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0646-2.
    1. Peng Z, Xiang J, He Z, Zhang T, Xu L, Cui B, Li P, Huang G, Ji G, Nie Y, et al. Colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing: a novel way of transplanting fecal microbiota. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(6):E610–E613. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105205.
    1. Cui B, Feng Q, Wang H, Wang M, Peng Z, Li P, Huang G, Liu Z, Wu P, Fan Z, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation through mid-gut for refractory Crohn's disease: safety, feasibility, and efficacy trial results. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(1):51–58. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12727.
    1. He Z, Li P, Zhu J, Cui B, Xu L, Xiang J, Zhang T, Long C, Huang G, Ji G, et al. Multiple fresh fecal microbiota transplants induces and maintains clinical remission in Crohn's disease complicated with inflammatory mass. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04984-z.
    1. Halloran O, Grecu B, Sinha A. Methods and complications of nasoenteral intubation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(1):61–66. doi: 10.1177/0148607110370976.
    1. Blumenstein I, Shastri YM, Stein J. Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(26):8505–8524. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8505.
    1. Gerritsen A, van der Poel MJ, de Rooij T, Molenaar IQ, Bergman JJ, Busch OR, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Besselink MG. Systematic review on bedside electromagnetic-guided, endoscopic, and fluoroscopic placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(4):836–847. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.040.
    1. Mathus-Vliegen EM, Duflou A, Spanier MB, Fockens P. Nasoenteral feeding tube placement by nurses using an electromagnetic guidance system (with video) Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(4):728–736. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.046.
    1. Gray R, Tynan C, Reed L, Hasse J, Kramlich M, Roberts S, Suneson J, Thompson J, Neylon J. Bedside electromagnetic-guided feeding tube placement: an improvement over traditional placement technique? Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22(4):436–444. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022004436.
    1. Holzinger U, Brunner R, Miehsler W, Herkner H, Kitzberger R, Fuhrmann V, Metnitz PG, Kamolz LP, Madl C. Jejunal tube placement in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized trial comparing the endoscopic technique with the electromagnetically visualized method. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(1):73–77. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fb7b5f.
    1. Rivera R, Campana J, Hamilton C, Lopez R, Seidner D. Small bowel feeding tube placement using an electromagnetic tube placement device: accuracy of tip location. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(5):636–642. doi: 10.1177/0148607110386047.
    1. Constable G, Pappachan J, Stroud MA. Endoscopic placement of the Bengmark tube. Endoscopy. 2003;35(11):980–981. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-43472.
    1. Qin H, Lu XY, Zhao Q, Li DM, Li PY, Liu M, Zhou Q, Zhu L, Pang HF, Zhao HZ. Evaluation of a new method for placing nasojejunal feeding tubes. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(37):5295–5299.
    1. Hirdes MM, Monkelbaan JF, Haringman JJ, van Oijen MG, Siersema PD, Pullens HJ, Kesecioglu J, Vleggaar FP. Endoscopic clip-assisted feeding tube placement reduces repeat endoscopy rate: results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(8):1220–1227. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.169.
    1. Wildi SM, Gubler C, Vavricka SR, Fried M, Bauerfeind P. Transnasal endoscopy for the placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes: does the working length of the endoscope matter? Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(2):225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.054.
    1. Gerritsen A, Duflou A, Ramali M, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Besselink MG. Electromagnetic-guided versus endoscopic placement of Nasojejunal feeding tubes after Pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective pilot study. Pancreas. 2016;45(2):254–259. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000448.
    1. Gerritsen A, de Rooij T, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, Bergman JJ, Ubbink DT, van Duijvendijk P, Erkelens GW, Klos M, Kruyt PM, et al. Electromagnetic-guided bedside placement of Nasoenteral feeding tubes by nurses is non-inferior to endoscopic placement by gastroenterologists: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(8):1123–1132. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.224.
    1. Hernandez-Socorro CR, Marin J, Ruiz-Santana S, Santana L, Manzano JL. Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(10):1690–1694. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00015.
    1. Gilbert RT, Burns SM. Increasing the safety of blind gastric tube placement in pediatric patients: the design and testing of a procedure using a carbon dioxide detection device. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27(5):528–532. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2011.08.004.
    1. Milsom SA, Sweeting JA, Sheahan H, Haemmerle E, Windsor JA. Naso-enteric tube placement: a review of methods to confirm tip location, global applicability and requirements. World J Surg. 2015;39(9):2243–2252. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3077-6.
    1. Mahajan R, Gupta R, Sharma A. Role of neck flexion in facilitating nasogastric tube insertion. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):446–447. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00034.
    1. Bong CL, Macachor JD, Hwang NC. Insertion of the nasogastric tube made easy. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):266. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00058.
    1. de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Kudsk KA. Clinical costs of feeding tube placement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(4):269–273. doi: 10.1177/0148607107031004269.
    1. Welpe P, Frutiger A, Vanek P, Kleger GR. Jejunal feeding tubes can be efficiently and independently placed by intensive care unit teams. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):121–124. doi: 10.1177/0148607109354781.
    1. Boyer N, McCarthy MS, Mount CA. Analysis of an electromagnetic tube placement device versus a self-advancing nasal jejunal device for postpyloric feeding tube placement. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(1):23–28. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2122.
    1. Powers J, Luebbehusen M, Spitzer T, Coddington A, Beeson T, Brown J, Jones D. Verification of an electromagnetic placement device compared with abdominal radiograph to predict accuracy of feeding tube placement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(4):535–539. doi: 10.1177/0148607110387436.
    1. Holzinger U, Kitzberger R, Bojic A, Wewalka M, Miehsler W, Staudinger T, Madl C. Comparison of a new unguided self-advancing jejunal tube with the endoscopic guided technique: a prospective, randomized study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1614–1618. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1535-z.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit