Barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) by a multidisciplinary team in China: a multicentre qualitative study

Dan Wang, Zhenmi Liu, Jing Zhou, Jie Yang, Xinrong Chen, Chengting Chang, Changqing Liu, Ka Li, Jiankun Hu, Dan Wang, Zhenmi Liu, Jing Zhou, Jie Yang, Xinrong Chen, Chengting Chang, Changqing Liu, Ka Li, Jiankun Hu

Abstract

Objective: To explore the attitudes and barriers encountered in the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in China from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members.

Design: Based on Donabedian's structure-process-outcome (SPO) model, a multicentre qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted.

Setting: From September 2020 to December 2020, the participants of this study were interviewed from six tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province (n=3), Jiangsu province (n=2) and Guangxi province (n=1) in China.

Participants: A total of 42 members, including surgeons (n=11), anaesthesiologists (n=10), surgical nurses (n=14) and dietitians(n=7) were interviewed.

Results: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) members still face many barriers during the process of implementing ERAS. Eight main themes are described around the barriers in the implementation of ERAS. Themes in the structure dimension are: (1) shortage of medical resources, (2) lack of policy support and (3) outdated concepts. Themes in the process dimension are: (1) poor doctor-patient collaboration, (2) poor communication and collaboration among MDT members and (3) lack of individualised management. Themes in the outcome dimension are: (1) low compliance and (2) high medical costs. The current implementation of ERAS is still based on ideas more than reality.

Conclusions: In general, barriers to ERAS implementation are broad. Identifying key elements of problems in the application and promotion of ERAS from the perspective of the MDT would provide a starting point for future quality improvement of ERAS, enhance the clinical effect of ERAS and increase formalised ERAS utilisation in China.

Keywords: organisation of health services; qualitative research; quality in health care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A summary of the criteria for selecting hospitals. ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.

References

    1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:606–17. 10.1093/bja/78.5.606
    1. Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. . Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations—2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019;29:651–68. 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356
    1. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 2001;322:473–6. 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473
    1. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 2017;152:292–8. 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952
    1. Department of Health . Enhanced recovery partnership programme project report. 2011. Available: [Accessed 1 Feb 2017].
    1. Zhao J, Hu J, Jiang Z, et al. . Outcome of discharge within 72 hours of robotic gastrectomy using enhanced recovery after surgery programs. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018;28:1279–86. 10.1089/lap.2018.0051
    1. Liu X-X, Pan H-F, Jiang Z-W, et al. . "Fast-track" and "Minimally Invasive" Surgery for Gastric Cancer. Chin Med J 2016;129:2294–300. 10.4103/0366-6999.190659
    1. Kjølhede P, Bergdahl O, Borendal Wodlin N, et al. . Effect of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery for gynecologic malignancy: an open-label randomised trial. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024484. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024484
    1. Liang X, Ying H, Wang H, et al. . Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care after laparoscopic liver resections: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2018;32:2746–57. 10.1007/s00464-017-5973-3
    1. Cui H, Sun Z, Ruan J, et al. . Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on the postoperative outcomes of elbow arthrolysis: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2019;68:78–84. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.010
    1. Lin T, Li K, Liu H, et al. . Enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy with ileal urinary diversion: a multi-institutional, randomized, controlled trial from the Chinese bladder cancer Consortium. World J Urol 2018;36:41–50. 10.1007/s00345-017-2108-3
    1. Xu X, Wang Y, Feng T. Nonstrict and individual enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in partial hepatectomy. Springerplus 2011;2016:5.
    1. Liu B, Liu S, Wang Y, et al. . Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme for elective craniotomies: are patients satisfied with their experiences? A quantitative and qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 2019;9:e028706. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028706
    1. Yamagata Y, Yoshikawa T, Yura M, et al. . Current status of the "enhanced recovery after surgery" program in gastric cancer surgery. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019;3:231–8. 10.1002/ags3.12232
    1. Suharwardy S, Carvalho B. Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32:113–20. 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000616
    1. Kołodziej T, Maciejewski T, Mendrala K, et al. . Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2019;16:32–6. 10.5114/kitp.2019.83943
    1. Rossoni C, Oliveira Magro D, Santos ZC, et al. . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS)-analysis of practices in nutritional aspects from five continents. Obes Surg 2020;30:4510–8. 10.1007/s11695-020-04835-3
    1. Chen X, Li K, Yang K, et al. . Effects of preoperative oral single-dose and double-dose carbohydrates on insulin resistance in patients undergoing gastrectomy:a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition 2021;40:1596–603. 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.002
    1. Rattray M, Roberts S, Desbrow B, et al. . A qualitative exploration of factors influencing medical staffs' decision-making around nutrition prescription after colorectal surgery. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:178. 10.1186/s12913-019-4011-7
    1. Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P, et al. . Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005015. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005015
    1. Pearsall EA, McLeod RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery: implementation strategies, barriers and facilitators. Surg Clin North Am 2018;98:1201–10. 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.007
    1. Cohen R, Gooberman-Hill R. Staff experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2019;9:e022259. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022259
    1. Seow-En I, Wu J, Yang LWY, et al. . Results of a colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme and a qualitative analysis of healthcare workers' perspectives. Asian J Surg 2021;44:307–12. 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.07.020
    1. Wong DJN, Harris SK, Moonesinghe SR, et al. . Cancelled operations: a 7-day cohort study of planned adult inpatient surgery in 245 UK National health service hospitals. Br J Anaesth 2018;121:730–8. 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.002
    1. Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, et al. . A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 2015;261:92–6. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000604
    1. Byrnes A, Young A, Mudge A, et al. . Exploring practice gaps to improve perioperative nutrition care (experience study): a qualitative analysis of barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019;73:94–101. 10.1038/s41430-018-0276-x
    1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q 2005;83:691–729. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x
    1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. JAMA 1988;260:1743–8. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
    1. Castle NG, Ferguson JC. What is nursing home quality and how is it measured? Gerontologist 2010;50:426–42. 10.1093/geront/gnq052
    1. Cherry RL. Agents of nursing home quality of care: ombudsmen and staff ratios revisited. Gerontologist 1991;31:302–8. 10.1093/geront/31.3.302
    1. Shah R, Diaz A, Tripepi M, et al. . Quality versus costs related to gastrointestinal surgery: disentangling the value proposition. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2874–83. 10.1007/s11605-020-04748-7
    1. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109–12. 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109
    1. Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. In: Smith JA, ed. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, 2015.
    1. Fram S. The constant comparative analysis method outside of Grounded theory. Qual Rep 2013;18:1–25.
    1. Boyatzis R. Transforming qualitative information. London: Sage, 1998.
    1. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey E. Introduction to applied thematic analysis, Applied Thematic Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, 2012.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Gramlich L, Nelson G, Nelson A, et al. . Moving enhanced recovery after surgery from implementation to sustainability across a health system: a qualitative assessment of leadership perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:361. 10.1186/s12913-020-05227-0
    1. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. . Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018;52:1893–907. 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
    1. Wang J, Wang Y, Cai H, et al. . Analysis of the status quo of the elderly's demands of medical and elderly care combination in the underdeveloped regions of Western China and its influencing factors: a case study of Lanzhou. BMC Geriatr 2020;20:338. 10.1186/s12877-020-01616-6
    1. Francis NK, Walker T, Carter F, et al. . Consensus on training and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery: a Delphi study. World J Surg 2018;42:1919–28. 10.1007/s00268-017-4436-2
    1. Penm J, MacKinnon NJ, Strakowski SM, et al. . Minding the gap: factors associated with primary care coordination of adults in 11 countries. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:113–9. 10.1370/afm.2028
    1. Li L, Jin J, Min S, et al. . Compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study. Oncotarget 2017;8:53531–41. 10.18632/oncotarget.18602
    1. Lyon A, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD. A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. World J Surg 2014;38:1374–80. 10.1007/s00268-013-2441-7
    1. Li H, Jiang L. Catastrophic medical insurance in China. Lancet 2017;390:1724–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32603-X

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit