Three- and four-dimensional mapping of speech and language in patients with epilepsy

Yasuo Nakai, Jeong-Won Jeong, Erik C Brown, Robert Rothermel, Katsuaki Kojima, Toshimune Kambara, Aashit Shah, Sandeep Mittal, Sandeep Sood, Eishi Asano, Yasuo Nakai, Jeong-Won Jeong, Erik C Brown, Robert Rothermel, Katsuaki Kojima, Toshimune Kambara, Aashit Shah, Sandeep Mittal, Sandeep Sood, Eishi Asano

Abstract

We have provided 3-D and 4D mapping of speech and language function based upon the results of direct cortical stimulation and event-related modulation of electrocorticography signals. Patients estimated to have right-hemispheric language dominance were excluded. Thus, 100 patients who underwent two-stage epilepsy surgery with chronic electrocorticography recording were studied. An older group consisted of 84 patients at least 10 years of age (7367 artefact-free non-epileptic electrodes), whereas a younger group included 16 children younger than age 10 (1438 electrodes). The probability of symptoms transiently induced by electrical stimulation was delineated on a 3D average surface image. The electrocorticography amplitude changes of high-gamma (70-110 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) activities during an auditory-naming task were animated on the average surface image in a 4D manner. Thereby, high-gamma augmentation and beta attenuation were treated as summary measures of cortical activation. Stimulation data indicated the causal relationship between (i) superior-temporal gyrus of either hemisphere and auditory hallucination; (ii) left superior-/middle-temporal gyri and receptive aphasia; (iii) widespread temporal/frontal lobe regions of the left hemisphere and expressive aphasia; and (iv) bilateral precentral/left posterior superior-frontal regions and speech arrest. On electrocorticography analysis, high-gamma augmentation involved the bilateral superior-temporal and precentral gyri immediately following question onset; at the same time, high-gamma activity was attenuated in the left orbitofrontal gyrus. High-gamma activity was augmented in the left temporal/frontal lobe regions, as well as left inferior-parietal and cingulate regions, maximally around question offset, with high-gamma augmentation in the left pars orbitalis inferior-frontal, middle-frontal, and inferior-parietal regions preceded by high-gamma attenuation in the contralateral homotopic regions. Immediately before verbal response, high-gamma augmentation involved the posterior superior-frontal and pre/postcentral regions, bilaterally. Beta-attenuation was spatially and temporally correlated with high-gamma augmentation in general but with exceptions. The younger and older groups shared similar spatial-temporal profiles of high-gamma and beta modulation; except, the younger group failed to show left-dominant activation in the rostral middle-frontal and pars orbitalis inferior-frontal regions around stimulus offset. The human brain may rapidly and alternately activate and deactivate cortical areas advantageous or obtrusive to function directed toward speech and language at a given moment. Increased left-dominant activation in the anterior frontal structures in the older age group may reflect developmental consolidation of the language system. The results of our functional mapping may be useful in predicting, across not only space but also time and patient age, sites specific to language function for presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsy.

Keywords: developmental consolidation; electrical stimulation; epilepsy surgery; high-frequency oscillations (HFOs); intracranial electrocorticography (ECoG) recording.

© The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regions of interest and distribution of subdural electrodes included in the analysis. (A) aCC = anterior cingulate gyrus; aFG = anterior fusiform gyrus; aITG = anterior inferior temporal gyrus; aMTG = anterior middle temporal gyrus; aSFG = anterior superior frontal gyrus; aSTG anterior superior temporal gyrus; cMFG = caudal middle frontal gyrus; Cun = cuneus gyrus; Ent = entorhinal gyrus; FP = frontal pole; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; iPoCG = inferior postcentral gyrus; iPreCG = inferior precentral gyrus; LG = lingual gyrus; LOG = lateral occipital gyrus; MOF = medial orbitofrontal gyrus; pCC = posterior cingulate gyrus; PCL = paracentral lobule; PCun = precuneus gyrus; pFG = posterior inferior temporal gyrus; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; pITG = posterior inferior temporal gyrus; pMTG = posterior middle temporal gyrus; Pop/PTr/POr = pars opercularis/pars triangularis/pars orbitalis within the inferior frontal gyrus. LOF = lateral orbitofrontal gyrus; pSFG = posterior superior frontal gyrus; pSTG = posterior superior temporal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle frontal gyrus; SMG = supramarginal gyrus; SPL = superior parietal lobule; sPoCG superior postcentral gyrus; sPreCG = superior precentral gyrus; TP = temporal pole. The numbers of ≥10-year-old (B) and (C) <10-year-old patients whose ECoG data at a given site contributed to further analysis are presented.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Task. Patients were asked to listen to a series of questions and to overtly verbalize a relevant answer during extraoperative ECoG recording. We then measured the per cent change of high-gamma amplitudes compared to the baseline period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D probabilistic mapping of cortical function based on the results of cortical stimulation in the older group. Auditory hallucination: perception of various pitches of sounds or alteration of the neuropsychologist’s voice’s pitch. Speech arrest: inability to initiate and continue vocalization not directly explained by the effect of forced jerking of tongue or lip. Expressive aphasia: dysnomia or inability to provide a relevant answer during a 5-s stimulation although the neuropsychologist (R.R.) confirmed that a given question was understood and the capability of vocalization was maintained. Receptive aphasia: inability to understand a question though being aware that a question was given by the neuropsychologist. To differentiate the nature of aphasia, the neuropsychologist asked each patient the reason, in case he/she failed to verbalize a relevant answer during stimulation. The locations of stimulation-induced sensory/motor symptoms are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2. The maps derived from the younger group are provided in Supplementary Fig. 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Snapshots of 4D mapping of speech and language based on the results of auditory naming-related modulation of high-gamma and beta activity in the older group. Event-related amplitude augmentation is reflected by red, whereas attenuation by blue. ‘+0.4’ indicates that the amplitude was augmented by 40% compared to the mean during the resting period between −600 and −200 ms relative to stimulus onset. (A) At +70 ms relative to stimulus onset, high-gamma and beta activities were both augmented in the superior-temporal gyri, bilaterally. (B) At +500 ms relative to stimulus onset, high-gamma activity was augmented, whereas beta activity was attenuated in the superior-temporal gyri, bilaterally. (C) At stimulus offset, widespread areas of the left temporal-frontal lobes as well as the right superior-temporal region showed high-gamma augmentation and beta attenuation. Simultaneously, widespread areas of the right frontal-parietal lobes showed high-gamma attenuation and beta augmentation. (D) Beta attenuation in widespread areas lingered between stimulus offset and response onset. Conversely, at response onset, high-gamma augmentation was confined to the posterior superior-frontal as well as pre-/postcentral gyri, bilaterally. Supplementary Videos 1 (older group) and 2 (younger group) delineate the spatiotemporal profiles of high-gamma and beta amplitude modulations in the lateral, medial, and inferior surfaces of the cerebral hemispheres relative to stimulus onset, stimulus offset, and response onset.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Region of interest analyses in the older group. (A) The changes of high-gamma (pink) and beta (blue) amplitudes within each region of interest are plotted relative to stimulus onset (bold line: mean; thin lines: standard error). Upper and lower horizontal bars indicate the timing when ECoG amplitudes were significantly augmented or attenuated compared to the baseline value during the resting period, respectively. ‘+0.2’ indicates 20% amplitude augmentation compared to the baseline value during the resting period. pSTG = posterior superior-temporal gyrus; iPreCG = inferior precentral gyrus; POr = pars orbitalis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. (B) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the left hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. cMFG = caudal middle-frontal gyrus; ENT = entorhinal gyrus; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; pCC = posterior cingulate gyrus; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; pMTG = posterior middle-temporal gyrus; pSFG = posterior superior-frontal gyrus; PTr = pars triangularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. POp = pars opercularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle-frontal gyrus; SMG = supramarginal gyrus. (C) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the right hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. (D) The changes of ECoG amplitudes are plotted relative to response onset. iPoCG = inferior postcentral gyrus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Region of interest analyses in the older group. (A) The changes of high-gamma (pink) and beta (blue) amplitudes within each region of interest are plotted relative to stimulus onset (bold line: mean; thin lines: standard error). Upper and lower horizontal bars indicate the timing when ECoG amplitudes were significantly augmented or attenuated compared to the baseline value during the resting period, respectively. ‘+0.2’ indicates 20% amplitude augmentation compared to the baseline value during the resting period. pSTG = posterior superior-temporal gyrus; iPreCG = inferior precentral gyrus; POr = pars orbitalis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. (B) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the left hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. cMFG = caudal middle-frontal gyrus; ENT = entorhinal gyrus; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; pCC = posterior cingulate gyrus; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; pMTG = posterior middle-temporal gyrus; pSFG = posterior superior-frontal gyrus; PTr = pars triangularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. POp = pars opercularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle-frontal gyrus; SMG = supramarginal gyrus. (C) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the right hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. (D) The changes of ECoG amplitudes are plotted relative to response onset. iPoCG = inferior postcentral gyrus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Region of interest analyses in the older group. (A) The changes of high-gamma (pink) and beta (blue) amplitudes within each region of interest are plotted relative to stimulus onset (bold line: mean; thin lines: standard error). Upper and lower horizontal bars indicate the timing when ECoG amplitudes were significantly augmented or attenuated compared to the baseline value during the resting period, respectively. ‘+0.2’ indicates 20% amplitude augmentation compared to the baseline value during the resting period. pSTG = posterior superior-temporal gyrus; iPreCG = inferior precentral gyrus; POr = pars orbitalis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. (B) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the left hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. cMFG = caudal middle-frontal gyrus; ENT = entorhinal gyrus; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; pCC = posterior cingulate gyrus; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; pMTG = posterior middle-temporal gyrus; pSFG = posterior superior-frontal gyrus; PTr = pars triangularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. POp = pars opercularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle-frontal gyrus; SMG = supramarginal gyrus. (C) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the right hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. (D) The changes of ECoG amplitudes are plotted relative to response onset. iPoCG = inferior postcentral gyrus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Region of interest analyses in the older group. (A) The changes of high-gamma (pink) and beta (blue) amplitudes within each region of interest are plotted relative to stimulus onset (bold line: mean; thin lines: standard error). Upper and lower horizontal bars indicate the timing when ECoG amplitudes were significantly augmented or attenuated compared to the baseline value during the resting period, respectively. ‘+0.2’ indicates 20% amplitude augmentation compared to the baseline value during the resting period. pSTG = posterior superior-temporal gyrus; iPreCG = inferior precentral gyrus; POr = pars orbitalis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. (B) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the left hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. cMFG = caudal middle-frontal gyrus; ENT = entorhinal gyrus; IPL = inferior parietal lobule; pCC = posterior cingulate gyrus; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; pMTG = posterior middle-temporal gyrus; pSFG = posterior superior-frontal gyrus; PTr = pars triangularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus. POp = pars opercularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle-frontal gyrus; SMG = supramarginal gyrus. (C) The changes of ECoG amplitudes in the right hemisphere are plotted relative to stimulus offset. (D) The changes of ECoG amplitudes are plotted relative to response onset. iPoCG = inferior postcentral gyrus.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Difference in auditory naming-related high-gamma modulation in the inferior/middle frontal gyri between the older and younger groups. Orange line: mean amplitude change in the left hemisphere. Green line: mean amplitude change in the right hemisphere. ‘+0.1’ indicates 10% amplitude augmentation compared to the baseline during the resting period. Pink vertical bars denote the epochs when left-to-right asymmetry significantly differed between the older and younger groups (Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05). cMFG = caudal middle-frontal gyrus; POr = pars orbitalis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; PTr = pars triangularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; POp = pars opercularis of the inferior-frontal gyrus; rMFG = rostral middle-frontal gyrus.

References

    1. Akanuma N, Alarcón G, Lum F, Kissani N, Koutroumanidis M, Adachi N et al. . Lateralising value of neuropsychological protocols for presurgical assessment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2003; 44: 408–18.
    1. Alkonyi B, Juhász C, Muzik O, Asano E, Saporta A, Shah A et al. . Quantitative brain surface mapping of an electrophysiologic/metabolic mismatch in human neocortical epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2009; 87: 77–87.
    1. Anticevic A, Cole MW, Murray JD, Corlett PR, Wang XJ, Krystal JH. The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16: 584–92.
    1. Aron AR, Monsell S, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW. A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. Brain 2004; 127: 1561–73.
    1. Arya R, Wilson JA, Vannest J, Byars AW, Greiner HM, Buroker J et al. . Electrocorticographic language mapping in children by high-gamma synchronization during spontaneous conversation: comparison with conventional electrical cortical stimulation. Epilepsy Res 2015; 110: 78–87.
    1. Asano E, Juhász C, Shah A, Sood S, Chugani HT. Role of subdural electrocorticography in prediction of long-term seizure outcome in epilepsy surgery. Brain 2009a; 132: 1038–47.
    1. Asano E, Nishida M, Fukuda M, Rothermel R, Juhász C, Sood S. Differential visually-induced gamma-oscillations in human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage 2009b; 45: 477–89.
    1. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4: 417–23.
    1. Barch DM, Braver TS, Nystrom LE, Forman SD, Noll DC, Cohen JD. Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1373–80.
    1. Benasich AA, Choudhury NA, Realpe-Bonilla T, Roesler CP. Plasticity in developing brain: active auditory exposure impacts prelinguistic acoustic mapping. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 13349–63.
    1. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, Morris GL, Mueller WM, Fischer M et al. . Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996; 46: 978–84.
    1. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002; 25: 151–88.
    1. Brown EC, Rothermel R, Nishida M, Juhász C, Muzik O, Hoechstetter K et al. . In vivo animation of auditory-language-induced gamma-oscillations in children with intractable focal epilepsy. Neuroimage 2008; 41: 1120–31.
    1. Brown EC, Matsuzaki N, Asano E. The transient effect of interictal spikes from a frontal focus on language-related gamma activity. Epilepsy Behav 2012a; 24: 497–502.
    1. Brown EC, Muzik O, Rothermel R, Matsuzaki N, Juhász C, Shah AK et al. . Evaluating reverse speech as a control task with language-related gamma activity on electrocorticography. Neuroimage 2012b; 60: 2335–45.
    1. Brown EC, Jeong JW, Muzik O, Rothermel R, Matsuzaki N, Juhász C et al. . Evaluating the arcuate fasciculus with combined diffusion-weighted MRI tractography and electrocorticography. Hum Brain Mapp 2014; 35: 2333–47.
    1. Boatman D, Freeman J, Vining E, Pulsifer M, Miglioretti D, Minahan R et al. . Language recovery after left hemispherectomy in children with late-onset seizures. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 579–86.
    1. Bouchard KE, Mesgarani N, Johnson K, Chang EF. Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 2013; 495: 327–32.
    1. Burke JF, Long NM, Zaghloul KA, Sharan AD, Sperling MR, Kahana MJ. Human intracranial high-frequency activity maps episodic memory formation in space and time. Neuroimage 2014; 85: 834–43.
    1. Cervenka MC, Boatman-Reich DF, Ward J, Franaszczuk PJ, Crone NE. Language mapping in multilingual patients: electrocorticography and cortical stimulation during naming. Front Hum Neurosci 2011; 5: 13.
    1. Cervenka MC, Corines J, Boatman-Reich DF, Eloyan A, Sheng X, Franaszczuk PJ et al. . Electrocorticographic functional mapping identifies human cortex critical for auditory and visual naming. Neuroimage 2013; 69: 267–76.
    1. Chan AM, Baker JM, Eskandar E, Schomer D, Ulbert I, Marinkovic K et al. . First-pass selectivity for semantic categories in human anteroventral temporal lobe. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 18119–29.
    1. Chang EF, Breshears JD, Raygor KP, Lau D, Molinaro AM, Berger MS. Stereotactic probability and variability of speech arrest and anomia sites during stimulation mapping of the language dominant hemisphere. J Neurosurg 2016. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151087.
    1. Cho-Hisamoto Y, Kojima K, Brown EC, Matsuzaki N, Asano E. Cooing- and babbling-related gamma-oscillations during infancy: intracranial recording. Epilepsy Behav 2012; 23: 494–6.
    1. Cogan GB, Thesen T, Carlson C, Doyle W, Devinsky O, Pesaran B. Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally. Nature 2014; 507: 94–8.
    1. Crone NE, Miglioretti DL, Gordon B, Lesser RP. Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. II. Event-related synchronization in the gamma band. Brain 1998a; 121: 2301–15.
    1. Crone NE, Miglioretti DL, Gordon B, Sieracki JM, Wilson MT, Uematsu S et al. . Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. I. Alpha and beta event-related desynchronization. Brain 1998b; 121: 2271–99.
    1. Crone NE, Boatman D, Gordon B, Hao L. Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Brazier Award-winning article, 2001. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 565–82.
    1. Dalal SS, Edwards E, Kirsch HE, Barbaro NM, Knight RT, Nagarajan SS. Localization of neurosurgically implanted electrodes via photograph-MRI-radiograph coregistration. J Neurosci Methods 2008; 174: 106–15.
    1. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
    1. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D et al. . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 968–80.
    1. Dick AS, Bernal B, Tremblay P. The language connectome: new pathways, new concepts. Neuroscientist 2014; 20: 453–67.
    1. Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez N, Denvil D, Lopes M, Sichez JP et al. . Intraoperative mapping of the subcortical language pathways using direct stimulations. An anatomo-functional study. Brain 2002; 125: 199–214.
    1. Elger CE, Helmstaedter C, Kurthen M. Chronic epilepsy and cognition. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 663–72.
    1. Enatsu R, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Kubota Y, Mosher J, Burgess RC et al. . Connections of the limbic network: a corticocortical evoked potentials study. Cortex 2015; 62: 20–33.
    1. Flinker A, Chang EF, Kirsch HE, Barbaro NM, Crone NE, Knight RT. Single-trial speech suppression of auditory cortex activity in humans. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 16643–50.
    1. Flinker A, Korzeniewska A, Shestyuk AY, Franaszczuk PJ, Dronkers NF, Knight RT, Crone NE. Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 2871–5.
    1. Fontaine D, Capelle L, Duffau H. Somatotopy of the supplementary motor area: evidence from correlation of the extent of surgical resection with the clinical patterns of deficit. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 297–303.
    1. Foster BL, Kaveh A, Dastjerdi M, Miller KJ, Parvizi J. Human retrosplenial cortex displays transient theta phase locking with medial temporal cortex prior to activation during autobiographical memory retrieval. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 10439–46.
    1. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 9673–8.
    1. Fox KC, Spreng RN, Ellamil M, Andrews-Hanna JR, Christoff K. The wandering brain: meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of mind-wandering and related spontaneous thought processes. Neuroimage 2015; 111: 611–21.
    1. Fukuda M, Juhász C, Hoechstetter K, Sood S, Asano E. Somatosensory-related gamma-, beta- and alpha-augmentation precedes alpha- and beta-attenuation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 366–75.
    1. Gaillard WD, Hertz-Pannier L, Mott SH, Barnett AS, LeBihan D, Theodore WH. Functional anatomy of cognitive development: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults. Neurology 2000; 54: 180–5.
    1. Gaulin CA, Campbell TF. Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: some preliminary data. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 79: 55–64.
    1. Ghosh SS, Kakunoori S, Augustinack J, Nieto-Castanon A, Kovelman I, Gaab N et al. . Evaluating the validity of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration for developmental cognitive neuroscience studies in children 4 to 11 years of age. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 85–93.
    1. Greenlee JD, Jackson AW, Chen F, Larson CR, Oya H, Kawasaki H et al. . Human auditory cortical activation during self-vocalization. PLoS One 2011; 6: e14744.
    1. Hamberger MJ, Goodman RR, Perrine K, Tamny T. Anatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex. Neurology 2001; 56: 56–61.
    1. Hamberger MJ. Cortical language mapping in epilepsy: a critical review. Neuropsychol Rev 2007; 17: 477–89.
    1. Hertz-Pannier L, Chiron C, Jambaqué I, Renaux-Kieffer V, Van de Moortele PF, Delalande O et al. . Late plasticity for language in a child’s non-dominant hemisphere: a pre- and post-surgery fMRI study. Brain 2002; 125: 361–72.
    1. Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8: 393–402.
    1. Hoechstetter K, Bornfleth H, Weckesser D, Ille N, Berg P, Scherg M. BESA source coherence: a new method to study cortical oscillatory coupling. Brain Topogr 2004; 16: 233–8.
    1. Holland SK, Plante E, Weber Byars A, Strawsburg RH, Schmithorst VJ, Ball WS Jr. Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 837–43.
    1. Howard MW, Rizzuto DS, Caplan JB, Madsen JR, Lisman J, Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R et al. . Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13: 1369–74.
    1. Jacobs J, Kobayashi K, Gotman J. High-frequency changes during interictal spikes detected by time-frequency analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 32–42.
    1. Jerbi K, Vidal JR, Ossandon T, Dalal SS, Jung J, Hoffmann D et al. . Exploring the electrophysiological correlates of the default-mode network with intracerebral EEG. Front Syst Neurosci 2010; 4: 27.
    1. Kambara T, Brown EC, Jeong JW, Ofen N, Nakai Y, Asano E. Spatio-temporal dynamics of working memory maintenance and scanning of verbal information. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017; 128: 882–91.
    1. Keller CJ, Honey CJ, Entz L, Bickel S, Groppe DM, Toth E et al. . Corticocortical evoked potentials reveal projectors and integrators in human brain networks. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 9152–63.
    1. Khalsa S, Mayhew SD, Chechlacz M, Bagary M, Bagshaw AP. The structural and functional connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex: comparison between deterministic and probabilistic tractography for the investigation of structure-function relationships. Neuroimage 2014; 102: 118–27.
    1. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Flöel A et al. . Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000; 123: 2512–8.
    1. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Théoret H, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 2004; 62: 91–8.
    1. Koga S, Rothermel R, Juhász C, Nagasawa T, Sood S, Asano E. Electrocorticographic correlates of cognitive control in a Stroop task-intracranial recording in epileptic patients. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 1580–91.
    1. Kojima K, Brown EC, Rothermel R, Carlson A, Matsuzaki N, Shah A et al. . Multimodality language mapping in patients with left-hemispheric language dominance on Wada test. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 1917–24.
    1. Kojima K, Brown EC, Matsuzaki N, Rothermel R, Fuerst D, Shah A et al. . Gamma activity modulated by picture and auditory naming tasks: intracranial recording in patients with focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2013a; 124: 1737–44.
    1. Kojima K, Brown EC, Rothermel R, Carlson A, Fuerst D, Matsuzaki N et al. . Clinical significance and developmental changes of auditory-language-related gamma activity. Clin Neurophysiol 2013b; 124: 857–69.
    1. Kombos T, Suess O, Kern BC, Funk T, Hoell T, Kopetsch O et al. . Comparison between monopolar and bipolar electrical stimulation of the motor cortex. Acta Neurochir 1999; 141: 1295–301.
    1. Korkman M, Kemp SL, Kirk U. Effects of age on neurocognitive measures of children ages 5 to 12: a cross-sectional study on 800 children from the United States. Dev Neuropsychol 2001; 20: 331–54.
    1. Kumar G, Juhász C, Sood S, Asano E. Olfactory hallucinations elicited by electrical stimulation via subdural electrodes: effects of direct stimulation of olfactory bulb and tract. Epilepsy Behav 2012; 24: 264–8.
    1. Kunii N, Kawai K, Kamada K, Ota T, Saito N. The significance of parahippocampal high gamma activity for memory preservation in surgical treatment of atypical temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2014; 55: 1594–601.
    1. Kuschmann A, Lowit A. Phonological and phonetic marking of information status in Foreign Accent Syndrome. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012; 47: 738–49.
    1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Neuropsychological effects of epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs. Lancet 2001; 357: 216–22.
    1. Lachaux JP, Axmacher N, Mormann F, Halgren E, Crone NE. High-frequency neural activity and human cognition: past, present and possible future of intracranial EEG research. Prog Neurobiol 2012; 98: 279–301.
    1. Lane H, Tranel B, Sisson C. Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 47: 618–24.
    1. Lee HW, Shin JS, Webber WR, Crone NE, Gingis L, Lesser RP. Reorganisation of cortical motor and language distribution in human brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 285–90.
    1. Lesser RP, Crone NE, Webber WR. Subdural electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1376–92.
    1. Leuthardt EC, Miller K, Anderson NR, Schalk G, Dowling J, Miller J et al. . Electrocorticographic frequency alteration mapping: a clinical technique for mapping the motor cortex. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 260–70.
    1. MacDonald AW III, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 2000; 288: 1835–8.
    1. Maddock RJ, Garrett AS, Buonocore MH. Remembering familiar people: the posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroscience 2001; 104: 667–76.
    1. Mackey WE, Devinsky O, Doyle WK, Meager MR, Curtis CE. Human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is not necessary for spatial working memory. J Neurosci 2016; 36: 2847–56.
    1. Mainy N, Jung J, Baciu M, Kahane P, Schoendorff B, Minotti L et al. . Cortical dynamics of word recognition. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 1215–30.
    1. Malow BA, Blaxton TA, Sato S, Bookheimer SY, Kufta CV, Figlozzi CM et al. . Cortical stimulation elicits regional distinctions in auditory and visual naming. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 245–52.
    1. Matsumoto R, Nair DR, LaPresto E, Najm I, Bingaman W, Shibasaki H et al. . Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. Brain 2004; 127: 2316–30.
    1. Matsuzaki N, Schwarzlose RF, Nishida M, Ofen N, Asano E. Upright face-preferential high-gamma responses in lower-order visual areas: evidence from intracranial recordings in children. Neuroimage 2015; 109: 249–59.
    1. Meltzer JA, Zaveri HP, Goncharova II, Distasio MM, Papademetris X, Spencer SS et al. . Effects of working memory load on oscillatory power in human intracranial EEG. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18: 1843–55.
    1. Michels L, Bucher K, Lüchinger R, Klaver P, Martin E, Jeanmonod D et al. . Simultaneous EEG-fMRI during a working memory task: modulations in low and high frequency bands. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10298.
    1. Miller KJ, Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Rao RP, Anderson NR, Moran DW et al. . Spectral changes in cortical surface potentials during motor movement. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 2424–32.
    1. Minagawa-Kawai Y, Cristià A, Dupoux E. Cerebral lateralization and early speech acquisition: a developmental scenario. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2011; 1: 217–32.
    1. Möddel G, Lineweaver T, Schuele SU, Reinholz J, Loddenkemper T. Atypical language lateralization in epilepsy patients. Epilepsia 2009; 50: 1505–16.
    1. Muzik O, Chugani DC, Zou G, Hua J, Lu Y, Lu S et al. . Multimodality data integration in epilepsy. Int J Biomed Imaging 2007; 2007: 13963.
    1. Nagasawa T, Matsuzaki N, Juhász C, Hanazawa A, Shah A, Mittal S et al. . Occipital gamma-oscillations modulated during eye movement tasks: simultaneous eye tracking and electrocorticography recording in epileptic patients. Neuroimage 2011; 58: 1101–9.
    1. Narayanan NS, Prabhakaran V, Bunge SA, Christoff K, Fine EM, Gabrieli JD. The role of the prefrontal cortex in the maintenance of verbal working memory: an event-related FMRI analysis. Neuropsychology 2005; 19: 223–32.
    1. Nishida M, Juhász C, Sood S, Chugani HT, Asano E. Cortical glucose metabolism positively correlates with gamma-oscillations in nonlesional focal epilepsy. Neuroimage 2008; 42: 1275–84.
    1. Nishida M, Zestos MM, Asano E. Spatial-temporal patterns of electrocorticographic spectral changes during midazolam sedation. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 1223–32.
    1. Nonoda Y, Miyakoshi M, Ojeda A, Makeig S, Juhász C, Sood S et al. . Interictal high-frequency oscillations generated by seizure onset and eloquent areas may be differentially coupled with different slow waves. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 2489–99.
    1. Noy N, Bickel S, Zion-Golumbic E, Harel M, Golan T, Davidesco I et al. . Intracranial recordings reveal transient response dynamics during information maintenance in human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36: 3988–4003.
    1. Ojemann G, Ojemann J, Lettich E, Berger M. Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. J Neurosurg 1989; 71: 316–26.
    1. Ojemann SG, Berger MS, Lettich E, Ojemann GA. Localization of language function in children: results of electrical stimulation mapping. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 465–70.
    1. Papp N, Ktonas P. Critical evaluation of complex demodulation techniques for the quantification of bioelectrical activity. Biomed Sci Instrum 1977; 13: 135–45.
    1. Penfield W, Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937; 60: 389–443.
    1. Penfield W, Jasper H. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1954.
    1. Penfield W, Roberts L. Speech and brain-mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1959, pp. 103–37.
    1. Perrine K, Devinsky O, Uysal S, Luciano DJ, Dogali M. Left temporal neocortex mediation of verbal memory: evidence from functional mapping with cortical stimulation. Neurology 1994; 44: 1845–50.
    1. Pieters TA, Conner CR, Tandon N. Recursive grid partitioning on a cortical surface model: an optimized technique for the localization of implanted subdural electrodes. J Neurosurg 2013; 118: 1086–97.
    1. Price CJ. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 816–47.
    1. Pujol J, Deus J, Losilla JM, Capdevila A. Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology 1999; 52: 1038–43.
    1. Raichle ME. The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 2015; 38: 433–47.
    1. Ramot M, Fisch L, Harel M, Kipervasser S, Andelman F, Neufeld MY et al. . A widely distributed spectral signature of task-negative electrocorticography responses revealed during a visuomotor task in the human cortex. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 10458–69.
    1. Rasmussen T, Milner B. The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1977; 299: 355–69.
    1. Rauschecker JP, Scott SK. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 718–24.
    1. Ruescher J, Iljina O, Altenmüller DM, Aertsen A, Schulze-Bonhage A, Ball T. Somatotopic mapping of natural upper- and lower-extremity movements and speech production with high gamma electrocorticography. Neuroimage 2013; 81: 164–77.
    1. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS. Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 18–27.
    1. Schäffler L, Lüders HO, Beck GJ. Quantitative comparison of language deficits produced by extraoperative electrical stimulation of Broca’s, Wernicke’s, and basal temporal language areas. Epilepsia 1996; 37: 463–75.
    1. Scheeringa R, Fries P, Petersson KM, Oostenveld R, Grothe I, Norris DG et al. . Neuronal dynamics underlying high- and low-frequency EEG oscillations contribute independently to the human BOLD signal. Neuron 2011; 69: 572–83.
    1. Schevon CA, Carlson C, Zaroff CM, Weiner HJ, Doyle WK, Miles D et al. . Pediatric language mapping: sensitivity of neurostimulation and Wada testing in epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2007; 48: 539–45.
    1. Seghier ML, Patel E, Prejawa S, Ramsden S, Selmer A, Lim L et al. . The PLORAS database: a data repository for predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke. Neuroimage 2016; 124: 1208–12.
    1. Shimotake A, Matsumoto R, Ueno T, Kunieda T, Saito S, Hoffman P et al. . Direct exploration of the role of the ventral anterior temporal lobe in semantic memory: cortical stimulation and local field potential evidence from subdural grid electrodes. Cereb Cortex 2015; 25: 3802–17.
    1. Shmuel A, Augath M, Oeltermann A, Logothetis NK. Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 569–77.
    1. Sinai A, Bowers CW, Crainiceanu CM, Boatman D, Gordon B, Lesser RP et al. . Electrocorticographic high gamma activity versus electrical cortical stimulation mapping of naming. Brain 2005; 128: 1556–70.
    1. Skeide MA, Friederici AD. The ontogeny of the cortical language network. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17: 323–32.
    1. Sugishita M, Konno K, Kabe S, Yunoki K, Togashi O, Kawamura M. Electropalatographic analysis of apraxia of speech in a left hander and in a right hander. Brain 1987; 110: 1393–417.
    1. Szaflarski JP, Binder JR, Possing ET, McKiernan KA, Ward BD, Hammeke TA. Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data. Neurology 2002; 59: 238–44.
    1. Tanji K, Suzuki K, Yamadori A, Tabuchi M, Endo K, Fujii T et al. . Pure anarthria with predominantly sequencing errors in phoneme articulation: a case report. Cortex 2001; 37: 671–8.
    1. Tate MC, Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Tate JE, Duffau H. Probabilistic map of critical functional regions of the human cerebral cortex: Broca’s area revisited. Brain 2014; 137: 2773–82.
    1. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP et al. . Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 524–34.
    1. Toyoda G, Brown EC, Matsuzaki N, Kojima K, Nishida M, Asano E. Electrocorticographic correlates of overt articulation of 44 English phonemes: intracranial recording in children with focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125: 1129–37.
    1. Towle VL, Yoon HA, Castelle M, Edgar JC, Biassou NM, Frim DM et al. . ECoG gamma activity during a language task: differentiating expressive and receptive speech areas. Brain 2008; 131: 2013–27.
    1. Trojanowski JQ, Green RC, Levine DN. Crossed aphasia in a dextral: a clinicopathological study. Neurology 1980; 30: 709–13.
    1. Uematsu M, Matsuzaki N, Brown EC, Kojima K, Asano E. Human occipital cortices differentially exert saccadic suppression: intracranial recording in children. Neuroimage 2013; 83: 224–36.
    1. Valenstein E, Bowers D, Verfaellie M, Heilman KM, Day A, Watson RT. Retrosplenial amnesia. Brain 1987; 110: 1631–46.
    1. Vargha-Khadem F, O’Gorman AM, Watters GV. Aphasia and handedness in relation to hemispheric side, age at injury and severity of cerebral lesion during childhood. Brain 1985; 108: 677–96.
    1. Wang Y, Fifer MS, Flinker A, Korzeniewska A, Cervenka MC, Anderson WS et al. . Spatial-temporal functional mapping of language at the bedside with electrocorticography. Neurology 2016; 86: 1181–9.
    1. Wellmer J, von Oertzen J, Schaller C, Urbach H, König R, Widman G et al. . Digital photography and 3D MRI-based multimodal imaging for individualized planning of resective neocortical epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2002; 43: 1543–50.
    1. Wickens DD. Encoding categories of words: an empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Rev 1970; 77: 1–15.
    1. Zijlmans M, Jacobs J, Kahn YU, Zelmann R, Dubeau F, Gotman J. Ictal and interictal high frequency oscillations in patients with focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2011; 122: 664–71.
    1. Zweiphenning WJ, van ‘t Klooster MA, van Diessen E, van Klink NE, Huiskamp GJ, Gebbink TA et al. . High frequency oscillations and high frequency functional network characteristics in the intraoperative electrocorticogram in epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 12: 928–939.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit