Scoliosis in Rett Syndrome: Progression, Comorbidities, and Predictors

John T Killian, Jane B Lane, Hye-Seung Lee, Steve A Skinner, Walter E Kaufmann, Daniel G Glaze, Jeffrey L Neul, Alan K Percy, John T Killian, Jane B Lane, Hye-Seung Lee, Steve A Skinner, Walter E Kaufmann, Daniel G Glaze, Jeffrey L Neul, Alan K Percy

Abstract

Background: Scoliosis is prominent in Rett syndrome (RTT). Following the prior report from the US Natural History Study, the onset and progression of severe scoliosis (≥40° Cobb angle) and surgery were examined regarding functional capabilities and specific genotypes, addressing the hypothesis that abnormal muscle tone, poor oral feeding, puberty, and delays or absence of sitting balance and ambulation may be responsible for greater risk in RTT.

Methods: The multicenter RTT Natural History Study gathered longitudinal data for classic RTT, including mutation type, scoliosis, muscle tone, sitting, ambulation, hand function, and feeding. Cox regression models were used to examine the association between scoliosis and functional characteristics. All analyses utilized SAS 9.4; two-sided P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Results: A total of 913 females with classic RTT were included. Scoliosis frequency and severity increased with age. Severe scoliosis was found in 251 participants (27%), 113 of whom developed severe scoliosis during the follow-up assessments; 168 (18%) had surgical correction. Severe MECP2 mutations (R106W, R168X, R255X, R270X, and large deletions) showed a higher proportion of scoliosis. Individuals developing severe scoliosis or requiring surgery were less likely to sit, ambulate, or use their hands and were more likely to have begun puberty. Significant differences were absent for epilepsy rates, sleep problems, or constipation.

Discussion: Scoliosis requires vigilance regarding the risk factors noted, particularly specific mutations and the role of puberty and motor abilities. Bracing is recommended for moderate curves and surgery for severe curves in accordance with published guidelines for scoliosis management.

Keywords: MECP2 mutations; Rett syndrome; puberty; scoliosis; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scoliosis by MECP2 mutation Scoliosis frequency is displayed by relevant mutations. The data are presented as those participants with “No scoliosis” (◆---◆), “Scoliosis

References

    1. Rett A. On a unusual brain atrophy syndrome in hyperammonemia in childhood. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1966;116(37):723–726.
    1. Hagberg B, Aicardi J, Dias K, Ramos O. A progressive syndrome of autism, dementia, ataxia, and loss of purposeful hand use in girls: Rett’s syndrome: report of 35 cases. Ann Neurol. 1983;14(4):471–479.
    1. Tarquinio DC, Motil KJ, Hou W, et al. Growth failure and outcome in Rett syndrome: specific growth references. Neurology. 2012;79(16):1653–1661.
    1. Hagberg B, Witt-Engerstrom I. Rett syndrome: a suggested staging system for describing impairment profile with increasing age towards adolescence. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;1:47–59.
    1. Naidu S, Murphy M, Moser HW, Rett A. Rett syndrome--natural history in 70 cases. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;1:61–72.
    1. Hennessy MJ, Haas RH. The orthopedic management of Rett syndrome. J Child Neurol. 1988;3(Suppl):S43–47.
    1. Keret D, Bassett GS, Bunnell WP, Marks HG. Scoliosis in Rett syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(2):138–142.
    1. Loder RT, Lee CL, Richards BS. Orthopedic aspects of Rett syndrome: a multicenter review. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(5):557–562.
    1. Bassett GS, Tolo VT. The incidence and natural history of scoliosis in Rett syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990;32(11):963–966.
    1. Harrison DJ, Webb PJ. Scoliosis in the Rett syndrome: natural history and treatment. Brain Dev. 1990;12(1):154–156.
    1. Holm VA, King HA. Scoliosis in the Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 1990;12(1):151–153.
    1. Guidera KJ, Borrelli J, Jr, Raney E, Thompson-Rangel T, Ogden JA. Orthopaedic manifestations of Rett syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(2):204–208.
    1. Huang TJ, Lubicky JP, Hammerberg KW. Scoliosis in Rett syndrome. Orthop Rev. 1994;23(12):931–937.
    1. Lidstrom J, Stokland E, Hagberg B. Scoliosis in Rett syndrome. Clinical and biological aspects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19(14):1632–1635.
    1. Kerr AM, Webb P, Prescott RJ, Milne Y. Results of surgery for scoliosis in Rett syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2003;18(10):703–708.
    1. Larsson EL, Aaro S, Ahlinder P, Normelli H, Tropp H, Oberg B. Long-term follow-up of functioning after spinal surgery in patients with Rett syndrome. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(4):506–511.
    1. Ager S, Downs J, Fyfe S, Leonard H. Parental experiences of scoliosis management in Rett syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(23):1917–1924.
    1. Percy AK, Lee HS, Neul JL, et al. Profiling scoliosis in Rett syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2010;67(4):435–439.
    1. Riise R, Brox JI, Sorensen R, Skjeldal OH. Spinal deformity and disability in patients with Rett syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(7):653–657.
    1. Killian JT, Lane JB, Cutter GR, et al. Pubertal development in Rett syndrome deviates from typical females. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51(6):769–775.
    1. Glaze DG, Percy AK, Skinner S, et al. Epilepsy and the natural history of Rett syndrome. Neurology. 2010;74(11):909–912.
    1. Hagberg B, Hanefeld F, Percy A, Skjeldal O. An update on clinically applicable diagnostic criteria in Rett syndrome. Comments to Rett Syndrome Clinical Criteria Consensus Panel Satellite to European Paediatric Neurology Society Meeting, Baden Baden, Germany, 11 September 2001. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2002;6(5):293–297.
    1. Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, et al. Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol. 2010;68(6):944–950.
    1. Neul JL, Lane JB, Lee HS, et al. Developmental delay in Rett syndrome: data from the natural history study. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6(1):20.
    1. Neul JL, Fang P, Barrish J, et al. Specific mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 confer different severity in Rett syndrome. Neurology. 2008;70(16):1313–1321.
    1. Cuddapah VA, Pillai RB, Shekar KV, et al. Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) mutation type is associated with disease severity in Rett syndrome. J Med Genet. 2014;51(3):152–158.
    1. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows [computer program]. Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; Released 2012.
    1. Bebbington A, Anderson A, Ravine D, et al. Investigating genotype-phenotype relationships in Rett syndrome using an international data set. Neurology. 2008;70(11):868–875.
    1. Terjesen T, Lange JE, Steen H. Treatment of scoliosis with spinal bracing in quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(7):448–454.
    1. Koop SE. Scoliosis in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(Suppl 4):92–98.
    1. Downs J, Bergman A, Carter P, et al. Guidelines for management of scoliosis in Rett syndrome patients based on expert consensus and clinical evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(17):E607–617.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit