eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World

Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner, Cameron D Norman, Harvey A Skinner

Abstract

Electronic health tools provide little value if the intended users lack the skills to effectively engage them. With nearly half the adult population in the United States and Canada having literacy levels below what is needed to fully engage in an information-rich society, the implications for using information technology to promote health and aid in health care, or for eHealth, are considerable. Engaging with eHealth requires a skill set, or literacy, of its own. The concept of eHealth literacy is introduced and defined as the ability to seek, find, understand, and appraise health information from electronic sources and apply the knowledge gained to addressing or solving a health problem. In this paper, a model of eHealth literacy is introduced, comprised of multiple literacy types, including an outline of a set of fundamental skills consumers require to derive direct benefits from eHealth. A profile of each literacy type with examples of the problems patient-clients might present is provided along with a resource list to aid health practitioners in supporting literacy improvement with their patient-clients across each domain. Facets of the model are illustrated through a set of clinical cases to demonstrate how health practitioners can address eHealth literacy issues in clinical or public health practice. Potential future applications of the model are discussed.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
eHealth literacy lily model
Figure 2
Figure 2
eHealth literacy analytic model
Figure 3
Figure 3
eHealth literacy context-specific model

References

    1. National Center for Educational Statistics, authors. National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL): A First Look at the Literacy of America's Adults in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education; 2005.
    1. Statistics Canada, authors. Building on Our Competencies: Canadian Results of the International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey, 2003. Ottawa, ON: Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and Statistics Canada; 2005.
    1. Veenhof B, Clermont Y, Sciadas G. Literacy and Digital Technologies: Linkages and Outcomes. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2005. [2006 Jun 16].
    1. Barbot Janine. How to build an "active" patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):538–51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.025.S0277-9536(05)00309-6
    1. Rootman Irving. Literacy and health in Canada: is it really a problem? Can J Public Health. 2003;94(6):405–6.
    1. Institute of Medicine, authors. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: Seldon CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, editors. National Library of Medicine Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health Literacy. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000-1 ed. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
    1. Lai Claudia K Y, Arthur David G, Chau Wing W H. Implication of Internet growth on enhancing health of disadvantaged groups in China: a global perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2004 Sep;13(6B):68–73.
    1. Pillon Sergio, Todini A R. eHealth in Antarctica: a model ready to be transferred to every-day life. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004 Dec;63(4):436–42.
    1. Rodrigues Roberto J, Risk Ahmad. eHealth in Latin America and the Caribbean: development and policy issues. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Mar 31;5(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.1.e4.
    1. Tatsumi H, Mitani H, Haruki Y, Ogushi Y. Internet medical usage in Japan: current situation and issues. J Med Internet Res. 2001 Mar 17;3(1):E12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.1.e12.
    1. Gray Nicola J, Klein Jonathan D, Noyce Peter R, Sesselberg Tracy S, Cantrill Judith A. The Internet: a window on adolescent health literacy. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3):243. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.08.023.S1054-139X(05)00115-1
    1. Norman CD, Chirrey S, Skinner HA. Consumer perspectives on e-Health. In: Skinner HA. Promoting Health through Organizational Change. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings; 2002. pp. 315–334.
    1. Mccray Alexa T. Promoting health literacy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(2):152–63. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1687.M1687
    1. Eng TR. The e-Health Landscape: A Terrain Map of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies in Health and Health Care. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2001.
    1. Oh Hans, Rizo Carlos, Enkin Murray, Jadad Alejandro. What is eHealth?: a systematic review of published definitions. World Hosp Health Serv. 2005;41(1):32–40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1.
    1. Friere P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1970.
    1. Lankshear C, McLaren PL, editors. Critical Literacy: Politics, Praxis, and the Postmodern. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 1993.
    1. Tyner K. Literacy in a Digital World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
    1. Global Reach. Global Internet Statistics: Sources& References. 2005.
    1. American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy, authors. Final Report. Washington, DC: American Library Association; 1989.
    1. Feuerstein M. Media literacy in support of critical thinking. Journal of Educational Media. 1999;24(1):43–54.
    1. Potter WJ. Theory of Media Literacy: A Cognitive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
    1. Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA . 1999 Feb 10;281(6):552–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.545.jcn80003
    1. Logan RK. The Fifth Language: Learning a Living in the Computer Age. Toronto, ON: Stoddart; 1995.
    1. Skinner Harvey, Biscope Sherry, Poland Blake. Quality of internet access: barrier behind internet use statistics. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):875–80. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00455-0.S0277953602004550
    1. Skinner Harvey, Biscope Sherry, Poland Blake, Goldberg Eudice. How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 18;5(4):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e32.
    1. Laugksch RC. Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education. 2000;84(1):71–94.
    1. Claeson B, Martin E, Richardson W, Schoch-Spana M, Taussig K-S. Scientific literacy: what it is, why it is important, and why scientists think we don't have it. In: Nader L, editor. Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge. New York: Routledge; 1996. pp. 101–116.
    1. Gregory J, Miller S. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum; 1998.
    1. Frontier College, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18]. .
    1. National Literacy Trust, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. National Center on Adult Literacy, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18]. .
    1. Office of Communications Strategy for Enhancing Media Literacy in the UK. Home page. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE), authors Media guide. [2006 Jan 5]. .
    1. Media Awareness Network, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18]. .
    1. American Library Association, authors. Information Literacy. [2005 Dec 18]. .
    1. Chartered Institute of Library and Information, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. Phillip Morris USA, authors. Home page. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. TeenNet Research Program, authors. The Smoking Zine. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. Health Canada, authors. Quit 4 Life. [2005 Dec 18].
    1. DISCERN. [2005 Dec 18]. Home page
    1. Griffiths Kathleen M, Christensen Helen. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55. v7i5e55
    1. Davis Dave, Evans Mike, Jadad Alex, Perrier Laure, Rath Darlyne, Ryan David, Sibbald Gary, Straus Sharon, Rappolt Susan, Wowk Maria, Zwarenstein Merrick. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):33–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33. 327/7405/33

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit