Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome

Bilal Chughtai, Christa Abraham, Daniel Finn, Stuart Rosenberg, Bharat Yarlagadda, Michael Perrotti, Bilal Chughtai, Christa Abraham, Daniel Finn, Stuart Rosenberg, Bharat Yarlagadda, Michael Perrotti

Abstract

Introduction. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of reducing postoperative hospital stay following open partial nephrectomy through the implementation of a goal directed clinical management pathway. Materials and Methods. A fast track clinical pathway for open partial nephrectomy was introduced in July 2006 at our institution. The pathway has daily goals and targets discharge for all patients on the 3rd postoperative day (POD). Defined goals are (1) ambulation and liquid diet on the evening of the operative day; (2) out of bed (OOB) at least 4 times on POD 1; (3) removal of Foley catheter on the morning of POD 2; (4) removal of Jackson Pratt drain on the afternoon of POD 2; (4) discharge to home on POD 3. Patients and family are instructed in the fast track protocol preoperatively. Demographic data, tumor size, length of stay, and complications were captured in a prospective database, and compared to a control group managed consecutively immediately preceding the institution of the fast track clinical pathway. Results. Data on 33 consecutive patients managed on the fast track clinical pathway was compared to that of 25 control patients. Twenty two (61%) out of 36 fast track patients and 4 (16%) out of 25 control patients achieved discharge on POD 3. Overall, fast track patients had a shorter hospital stay than controls (median, 3 versus 4 days; P = .012). Age (median, 55 versus 57 years), tumor size (median, 2.5 versus 2.5 cm), readmission within 30 days (5.5% versus 5.1%), and complications (10.2% versus 13.8%) were similar in the fast track patients and control, respectively. Conclusions. In the present series, a fast track clinical pathway after open partial nephrectomy reduced the postoperative length of hospital stay and did not appear to increase the postoperative complication rate.

References

    1. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma—a meta-analysis and review. The Journal of Urology. 2008;179(4):1227–1234.
    1. Bandi G, Hedican SP, Nakada SY. Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Urology. 2008;71(1):113–117.
    1. Matuszewski M, Krajka K. Radio-frequency ablation: new technology for palliative treatment of hematuria in disseminated renal cell carcinoma. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2007;41(6):563–564.
    1. Perrotti M, Badger WJ, Mcleod D, Prater S, Moran ME. Does laparoscopy beget underuse of partial nephrectomy for T1 renal masses? Competing treatment decision pathways may influence utilization. Journal of Endourology. 2007;21(10):1223–1228.
    1. Aron M, Gill IS. Partial nephrectomy—why, when, how...? The Journal of Urology. 2008;179(3):811–812.
    1. Riggs SB, Klatte T, Belldegrun AS. Update on partial nephrectomy and novel techniques. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2007;25(6):520–522.
    1. Merseburger AS, Kuczyk MA. Changing concepts in the surgery of renal cell carcinoma. World Journal of Urology. 2008;26(2):127–133.
    1. Ramírez ML, Evans CP. Current management of small renal masses. The Canadian Journal of Urology. 2007;14(supplement 1):39–47.
    1. Firoozfard B, Christensen TH, Bendixen A, Nordling J, Kehlet H. Nephrectomy in denmark 2002–2005. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2006;168(15):1526–1528.
    1. Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a “fast track” postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2007;50(2):137–146.
    1. Harinath G, Somasekar K, Haray PN. The effectiveness of new criteria for colorectal fast track clinics. Colorectal Disease. 2002;4(2):115–117.
    1. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Scarpa RM. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. European Urology. 2008;53(4):732–743.
    1. Heinzer H, Heuer R, Nordenflycht OV, et al. Fast-track surgery in radical retropubic prostatectomy. First experiences with a comprehensive program to enhance postoperative convalescence. Der Urologe A. 2005;44(11):1287–1294.
    1. Murphy MA, Richards T, Atkinson C, Perkins J, Hands LJ. Fast track open aortic surgery: reduced post operative stay with a goal directed pathway. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2008;34(3):274–278.
    1. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Melissano G, Chiesa R. Letter to the editor regarding “Fast track open aortic surgery: reduced post operative stay with a goal directed pathway”. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2008;35(2):251 pages.
    1. Muehling BM, Halter G, Lang G, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate “fast-track” elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2008;393(3):281–287.
    1. Reismann M, von Kampen M, Laupichler B, Suempelmann R, Schmidt AI, Ure BM. Fast-track surgery in infants and children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2007;42(1):234–238.
    1. Firoozfard B, Christensen T, Kristensen JK, Mogensen S, Kehlet H. Fast-track open transperitoneal nephrectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. 2003;37(4):305–308.
    1. Recart A, Duchene D, White PF, Thomas T, Johnson DB, Cadeddu JA. Efficacy and safety of fast-track recovery strategy for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology. 2005;19(10):1165–1169.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit