Chronic Low-Level Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Long-Term Survival in Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats

Elizabeth M Annoni, Dusty Van Helden, Yugene Guo, Brett Levac, Imad Libbus, Bruce H KenKnight, John W Osborn, Elena G Tolkacheva, Elizabeth M Annoni, Dusty Van Helden, Yugene Guo, Brett Levac, Imad Libbus, Bruce H KenKnight, John W Osborn, Elena G Tolkacheva

Abstract

Chronic hypertension (HTN) affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Despite decades of promising research, effective treatment of HTN remains challenging. This work investigates vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a novel, device-based therapy for HTN treatment, and specifically evaluates its effects on long-term survival and HTN-associated adverse effects. HTN was induced in Dahl salt-sensitive rats using a high-salt diet, and the rats were randomly divided into two groups: VNS (n = 9) and Sham (n = 8), which were implanted with functional or non-functional VNS stimulators, respectively. Acute and chronic effects of VNS therapy were evaluated through continuous monitoring of blood pressure (BP) and ECG via telemetry devices. Autonomic tone was quantified using heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) analysis. Structural cardiac changes were quantified through gross morphology and histology studies. VNS significantly improved the long-term survival of hypertensive rats, increasing median event-free survival by 78% in comparison to Sham rats. Acutely, VNS improved autonomic balance by significantly increasing HRV during stimulation, which may lead to beneficial chronic effects of VNS therapy. Chronic VNS therapy slowed the progression of HTN through an attenuation of SBP and by preserving HRV. Finally, VNS significantly altered cardiac structure, increasing heart weight, but did not alter the amount of fibrosis in the hypertensive hearts. These results suggest that VNS has the potential to improve outcomes in subjects with severe HTN.

Keywords: autonomic; heart; hypertension; rat; survival; vagus nerve stimulation.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Experimental design. HTN was induced using a high salt diet (8% NaCl). At Week 4, the rats were implanted with vagal nerve stimulators and DSI transmitters, and randomly divided into Sham (n = 8) and VNS (n = 9) groups. VNS therapy was turned on at Week 6 and continuous BP and ECG were recorded until the end of the study. (B) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves for Sham and VNS rats are statistically different (P < 0.05). The dashed vertical line indicates the start of VNS therapy at Week 6. The number of rats remaining in each group is included along the x-axis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Acute cardiovascular and hemodynamic response of VNS rats (n = 6) at Week 9. (A) A representative example of VNS stimulation, BP and the BP derivative (dP/dt) traces showing segmentation into “Pre,” “VNS On,” Post 1,” and “Post 2” intervals. Acute SBP (B), BPV (C), contractility (dP/dtmax) (D), HR (E), and HRV (F) responses during VNS therapy in hypertensive rats for “Pre,” “VNS On,” “Post 1,” and “Post 2” intervals shown as percent change with respect to the “Pre” interval. †Indicates statistical significance between intervals.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relative changes in SBP (ΔSBP) as HTN progresses. ΔSBP as a function of time and slopes of the linear regressions are shown for Sham and VNS rats during the (A)Day12h and (B)Night12h intervals. Circadian rhythm of SBP for Sham and VNS rats are shown for Week 6 (C) and Week 9 (D). ∗Indicates statistical significance between Sham and VNS rats.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Relative changes in HR (ΔHR) as HTN progresses. ΔHR as a function of time and slopes of the linear regressions are shown for Sham and VNS rats during the (A)Day12h interval and (B)Night12h intervals. Circadian rhythm analysis of HR for Sham and VNS rats are shown for Week 6 (C) and Week 9 (D). ∗Indicates statistical significance between Sham and VNS rats.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Relative changes in HRV (ΔHRV) as HTN progresses. ΔHRV as a function of time and slopes of the linear regressions are shown for Sham and VNS rats during the (A)Day12h interval and (B)Night12h intervals. BRS was quantified during the Day4h(C) and Night4h(D) intervals for Week 6 through Week 9. ∗Indicates statistical significance between Sham and VNS rats.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Gross morphology and histology studies for Sham (n = 8) and VNS (n = 6) hypertensive rats. The effects of VNS on cardiac structural properties – (A) HW/TL, (B) HW/diameter, (C) percent fibrosis, (D) right ventricle (RV) and (E) left ventricle (LV) free wall thickness, and (F) septum thickness – as a function of survival rate along with corresponding linear regression fits.

References

    1. Annoni E. M., Tolkacheva E. G. (2018). “Acute hemodynamic effects of vagus nerve stimulation in conscious hypertensive rats,” in Paper Presented at the 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE-Engineering-in-Medicine-and-Biology-Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI. 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513025
    1. Annoni E. M., Xie X., Lee S. W., Libbus I., KenKnight B. H., Osborn J. W., et al. (2015). Intermittent electrical stimulation of the right cervical vagus nerve in salt-sensitive hypertensive rats: effects on blood pressure, arrhythmias, and ventricular electrophysiology. Physiol. Rep. 3:e12476. 10.14814/phy2.12476
    1. Bertinieri G., Di Rienzo M., Cavallazzi A., Ferrari A., Pedotti A., Mancia G. (1985). A new approach to analysis of the arterial baroreflex. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 3 S79–S81.
    1. Brack K. E., Patel V. H., Mantravardi R., Coote J. H., Ng G. A. (2009). Direct evidence of nitric oxide release from neuronal nitric oxide synthase activation in the left ventricle as a result of cervical vagus nerve stimulation. J. Physiol. 587 3045–3054. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169417
    1. Chapleau M. W. (2012). “Baroreceptor reflexes,” in Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System, 3rd Edn, eds Robertson D., Biaggioni I., Burnstock G., Low P. A., Paton J. F. R. (Amsterdam: Academic Press; ).
    1. Chapleau M. W., Rotella D. L., Reho J. J., Rahmouni K., Stauss H. M. (2016). Chronic vagal nerve stimulation prevents high-salt diet-induced endothelial dysfunction and aortic stiffening in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 311 H276–H285. 10.1152/ajpheart.00043.2016
    1. Clement D., Jordaens L., Heyndrickx G. (1984). Influence of vagal nervous activity on blood pressure variability. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 2 S391–S393.
    1. Dinh Q. N., Drummond G. R., Sobey C. G., Chrissobolis S. (2014). Roles of inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction in hypertension. Biomed Res. Int. 2014:406960. 10.1155/2014/406960
    1. Egan B. M., Zhao Y., Axon R. N., Brzezinski W. A., Ferdinand K. C. (2011). Uncontrolled and apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States, 1988 to 2008. Circulation 124 1046–1058. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030189
    1. Fields L. E., Burt V. L., Cutler J. A., Hughes J., Roccella E. J., Sorlie P. (2004). The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000 - A rising tide. Hypertension 44 398–404. 10.1161/01.hyp.0000142248.54761.56
    1. Guyenet P. G. (2006). The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7 335–346. 10.1038/nrn1902
    1. Huang J., Qian J., Yao W., Wang N., Zhang Z., Cao C., et al. (2015). Vagus nerve stimulation reverses ventricular electrophysiological changes induced by hypersympathetic nerve activity. Exp. Physiol. 100 239–248. 10.1113/expphysiol.2014.082842
    1. Inoko M., Kihara Y., Morii I., Fujiwara H., Sasayama S. (1994). Transition from compensatory hypertrophy to dilated, failing left ventricles in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 267 H2471–H2482. 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.6.H2471
    1. Lalande S., Johnson B. D. (2008). Diastolic dysfunction: a link between hypertension and heart failure. Drugs Today 44 503–513. 10.1358/dot.2008.44.7.1221662
    1. Lee S. W., Li Q., Libbus I., Xie X., KenKnight B. H., Garry M. G., et al. (2016). Chronic cyclic vagus nerve stimulation has beneficial electrophysiological effects on healthy hearts in the absence of autonomic imbalance. Physiol. Rep. 4:e12786. 10.14814/phy2.12786
    1. Li P., Nader M., Arunagiri K., Papademetriou V. (2016). Device-based therapy for drug-resistant hypertension: an update. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 18 1–12. 10.1007/s11906-016-0671-4
    1. Mancia G., De Backer G., Dominiczak A., Cifkova R., Fagard R., Germano G., et al. (2007). 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension - The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of hypertension (ESH) and of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 28 1462–1536. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236
    1. Mancia G., Grassi G. (2014). The autonomic nervous system and hypertension. Circ. Res. 114 1804–1814. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302524
    1. Mancia G., Romero J. C., Shepherd J. T. (1975). Continuous inhibition of renin release in dogs by vagally innervated receptors in the cardiopulmonary region. Circ. Res. 36 529–535. 10.1161/01.RES.36.4.529
    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration [NCD-RisC] (2017). Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19 1 million participants. Lancet 389 37–55.
    1. Nguyen T. P., Sovari A. A., Pezhouman A., Iyer S., Cao H., Ko C. Y., et al. (2016). Increased susceptibility of spontaneously hypertensive rats to ventricular tachyarrhythmias in early hypertension. J. Physiol. 594 1689–1707. 10.1113/JP271318
    1. Ojeda D., Le Rolle V., Romero-Ugalde H. M., Gallet C., Bonnet J.-L., Henry C., et al. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of vagus nerve stimulation parameters on acute cardiac autonomic responses: chronotropic, inotropic and dromotropic effects. PLoS One 11:e0163734. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163734
    1. Plachta D. T., Gierthmuehlen M., Cota O., Espinosa N., Boeser F., Herrera T. C., et al. (2014). Blood pressure control with selective vagal nerve stimulation and minimal side effects. J. Neural Eng. 11:036011. 10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/036011
    1. Plachta D. T., Zentner J., Aguirre D., Cota O., Stieglitz T., Gierthmuehlen M. (2016). Effect of cardiac-cycle-synchronized selective vagal stimulation on heart rate and blood pressure in rats. Adv. Ther. 33 1246–1261. 10.1007/s12325-016-0348-z
    1. Saku K., Kishi T., Sakamoto K., Hosokawa K., Sakamoto T., Murayama Y., et al. (2014). Afferent vagal nerve stimulation resets baroreflex neural arc and inhibits sympathetic nerve activity. Physiol. Rep. 2:e12136. 10.14814/phy2.12136
    1. Stauss H. M. (2017). Differential hemodynamic and respiratory responses to right and left cervical vagal nerve stimulation in rats. Physiol. Rep. 5:e13244. 10.14814/phy2.13244
    1. Tracey K. J. (2007). Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J. Clin. Investig. 117 289–296. 10.1172/jci30555
    1. White W. B. (2000). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: dippers compared with non-dippers. Blood Press. Monit. 5 S17–S23. 10.1097/00126097-200005001-00004
    1. White W. B. (2007). Importance of blood pressure control over a 24-hour period. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 13(8 Suppl. B), 34–39. 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.s8-b.34
    1. World Health Organization [WHO] (2013). Global Brief on Hypertension. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Xie X., Lee S. W., Johnson C., Ippolito J., KenKnight B. H., Tolkacheva E. G. (2014). “Intermittent vagal nerve stimulation alters the electrophysiological properties of atrium in the myocardial infarction rat model,” in Paper Presented at the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE-Engineering-in-Medicine-and-Biology-Society (EMBC), Chicago, IL. 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943904
    1. Zhang Y., Popovic Z. B., Bibevski S., Fakhry I., Sica D. A., Van Wagoner D. R., et al. (2009). Chronic vagus nerve stimulation improves autonomic control and attenuates systemic inflammation and heart failure progression in a canine high-rate pacing model. Circ. Heart Fail. 2 692–699. 10.1161/circheartfailure.109.873968

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit