A Non-Interventional Study of Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Any Triple Combination Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The EVELUT® Study Protocol

Roland Buhl, Michael Dreher, Stephanie Korn, Christian Taube, Christian Stock, Christoph M Zehendner, Anke Kondla, Claus F Vogelmeier, Roland Buhl, Michael Dreher, Stephanie Korn, Christian Taube, Christian Stock, Christoph M Zehendner, Anke Kondla, Claus F Vogelmeier

Abstract

Background: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2020 report recommends that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suffering from persistent dyspnea, despite long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy, are switched to either a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/LABA combination regimen or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy. However, to date, no studies have investigated the direct switch from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA therapy-instead of switching to triple therapy-in a prospective, real-world, non-interventional setting.

Methods: EVELUT® (NCT03954132) is an ongoing, prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-interventional study comparing the once-daily fixed-dose combination of tiotropium and olodaterol (tio/olo) versus any triple therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS) in patients with COPD who are symptomatic despite LABA/ICS maintenance therapy. Patients with acute or frequent COPD exacerbations are excluded from the study. Participants will receive LABA/ICS maintenance treatment until Visit 1, followed by switching of treatment to tio/olo or LAMA/LABA/ICS. The primary endpoints are changes in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT®) scores after approximately 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are change in the patients' general condition according to the Physician's Global Evaluation score, the proportion of responders with a change in mMRC score of ≥1 and in CAT® score of ≥2, and patient satisfaction with the inhaler and therapy. The study is expected to enroll approximately 900 patients.

Conclusion: EVELUT results are expected to add to the current real-world evidence informing therapeutic decisions for COPD in everyday clinical practice.

Trial registration: The European Union electronic Register of Post-authorisation Studies (EU PAS Register): EUPAS29784; the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM): NIS Study No 7305; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03954132.

Keywords: COPD; LAMA/LABA/ICS; Spiolto® Respimat®; tiotropium/olodaterol; triple therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Roland Buhl reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Roche, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Cipla, Sanofi and Teva, outside the submitted work. Michael Dreher received speaking fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Hamilton, Heinen und Löwenstein, Intermune, Linde, Novartis, Pfizer, Philips Respironics, ResMed, Roche, and Weinmann, and honoraria for advising from Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hamilton, Linde, Novartis, Pfizer, Philips Respironics, ResMed, and Roche; and grants from Linde, Philips Respironics, ResMed and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Stephanie Korn received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva, outside the submitted work. Christian Taube reports no conflict of interest. Christian Stock, Christoph M. Zehendner and Anke Kondla are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. Claus F Vogelmeier reports personal fees from Almirall, Cipla, Berlin Chemie/Menarini, CSL Behring and Teva; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, MedUpdate, Mundipharma, Novartis, Nuvaira, OmniaMed, and Takeda; and grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Competence Network Asthma and COPD (ASCONET), Bayer Schering Pharma AG, MSD and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2020 Buhl et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GOLD 2020 follow-up pharmacologic treatment recommendations.*Consider if eos ≥ 300 or eos ≥ 100 AND ≥ 2 moderate exacerbations/1 hospitalization. **Consider de-escalation of ICS or switch if pneumonia, inappropriate original indication or lack of response to ICS. ©2020, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, reproduced with permission. Abbreviations: eos, blood eosinophil count; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EVELUT® study overview. Abbreviations: ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; V, visit.

References

    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2020 report). Published 2019. Available from: . Accessed February14, 2020.
    1. Kardos P, Vogelmeier C, Buhl R, Criee CP, Worth H. The prospective non-interventional DACCORD study in the national COPD registry in Germany: design and methods. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:2. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-15-2
    1. Buhl R, Maltais F, Abrahams R, et al. Tiotropium and olodaterol fixed-dose combination versus mono-components in COPD (GOLD 2-4). Eur Respir J. 2015;45(4):969–979. doi:10.1183/09031936.00136014
    1. Wedzicha JA, Banerji D, Chapman KR, et al. Indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2222–2234. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1516385
    1. Beeh KM, Derom E, Echave-Sustaeta J, et al. The lung function profile of once-daily tiotropium and olodaterol via Respimat® is superior to that of twice-daily salmeterol and fluticasone propionate via Accuhaler® (ENERGITO® study). Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:193–205. doi:10.2147/COPD.S95055
    1. Lipson DA, Barnhart F, Brealey N, et al. Once-daily single-inhaler triple versus dual therapy in patients with COPD. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(18):1671–1680. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713901
    1. Buhl R, Criee CP, Kardos P, et al. Dual bronchodilation vs triple therapy in the “real-life” COPD DACCORD study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2557–2568. doi:10.2147/COPD.S169958
    1. Voorham J, Corradi M, Papi A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of triple therapy versus dual bronchodilation in COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(3):00106–02019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00106-2019
    1. Rabe KF. Improving dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal treatment strategies. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(3):270–275. doi:10.1513/pats.200601-002SF
    1. Beeh KM. A descriptive analysis of COPD patients in a large cohort in private practices in Germany. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:A603.
    1. Halpin DMG. The role of tiotropium+olodaterol dual bronchodilator therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2018;81(1):13–18. doi:10.4046/trd.2017.0098
    1. Ingelheim B. Spiolto® Respimat® (tiotropium/olodaterol) is Boehringer Ingelheim’s new advance in COPD maintenance therapy. Published 2018. Available from: . Accessed October18, 2019.
    1. Graf J, Jörres RA, Lucke T, Nowak D, Vogelmeier CF, Ficker JH. Medical treatment of COPD: an analysis of guideline-adherent prescribing in a large national cohort (COSYCONET). Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;155(37):599–605. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0599
    1. Kardos P, Vogelmeier C, Worth H, et al. A two-year evaluation of the ‘real life’ impact of COPD on patients in Germany: the DACCORD observational study. Respir Med. 2017;124:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.02.007
    1. Tsiligianni IG, Alma HJ, de Jong C, et al. Investigating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the clinical COPD questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:1045–1052. doi:10.2147/COPD.S99793
    1. Vogelmeier C, Buhl R, Burghuber O, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD patients-issued by the German Respiratory Society and the German Atemwegsliga in cooperation with the Austrian Society of Pneumology. Pneumologie. 2018;72(4):253–308. doi:10.1055/s-0043-125031
    1. Bestall JC, Paul EA, Garrod R, Garnham R, Jones PW, Wedzicha JA. Usefulness of the medical research council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999;54(7):581–586. doi:10.1136/thx.54.7.581
    1. Dodd JW, Hogg L, Nolan J, et al. The COPD assessment test (CAT): response to pulmonary rehabilitation. A multicentre, prospective study. Thorax. 2011;66(5):425–429. doi:10.1136/thx.2010.156372
    1. Herland K, Akselsen J-P, Skjønsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger “real life” population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005;99(1):11–19. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026
    1. Dhand R, Eicher J, Hansel M, Jost I, Meisenheimer M, Wachtel H. Improving usability and maintaining performance: human-factor and aerosol-performance studies evaluating the new reusable Respimat inhaler. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:509–523. doi:10.2147/COPD.S190639

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit