The effect of topical airway anesthesia on hemodynamic profiles during the induction period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Wenya Du, Meng Lv, Tingting Chen, Xiaxuan Sun, Jihua Wang, Haixia Zhang, Chuansong Wei, Yi Liu, Changlong Qiao, Yuelan Wang, Wenya Du, Meng Lv, Tingting Chen, Xiaxuan Sun, Jihua Wang, Haixia Zhang, Chuansong Wei, Yi Liu, Changlong Qiao, Yuelan Wang

Abstract

Background: Patients scheduled for cardiac surgery are often accompanied by cardiac dysfunction and hemodynamic instability. However, the conventional induction strategy for anesthesia using high-dose intravenous anesthetics is often associated with persistent and recurrent hypotension after tracheal intubation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of topical airway anesthesia on the hemodynamic profile of patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the induction period.

Methods: This is a superiority, single-blind, randomized controlled study with two parallel groups. Participants scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery will be allocated into two blocks according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and then randomly assigned to the following two groups at a 1:1 ratio: the conventional induction group and the combined topical airway anesthesia induction group. The combined topical airway anesthesia induction strategy includes aerosol inhalation airway anesthesia, subglottic airway anesthesia, and general anesthesia induction using low-dose intravenous anesthetics. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) of blood pressure below baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) from 3 to 15 min after endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include the AUC above baseline MAP and below baseline MAP at other time points, the highest and lowest arterial blood pressure values during the induction period, type and dose of vasoactive drugs, incidence of arrhythmias, cardiac function, and the incidence of postoperative hoarseness and sore throat.

Discussion: The study will explore whether aerosol inhalation airway anesthesia and subglottic airway anesthesia could reduce the incidence and duration of hypotension during the induction period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Clinical trial registration: This trial was registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05323786).

Keywords: anesthesia induction; atomization inhalation; cardiac surgery; hemodynamics; topical airway anesthesia.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Du, Lv, Chen, Sun, Wang, Zhang, Wei, Liu, Qiao and Wang.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the clinical trial design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A stratified randomization flow chart.

References

    1. Soleimani A, Heidari N, Habibi MR, Kiabi FH, Khademloo M, Emami Zeydi A, et al. . Comparing hemodynamic responses to diazepam, propofol and etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Med Arch. (2017) 71:198–203. 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.198-203
    1. Mariateresa G, Lidia D, Filomena P, Giovanni R, Massimo M, Nicola B. Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact CardioVas Thoracic Surgery. (2012) 15:878–87. 10.1093/icvts/ivs323
    1. Wanderer JP, Rathmell JP. Bypassing poor outcomes: cardiac surgery and intraoperative hypotension. Anesthesiology. (2018) 129:A19. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002407
    1. Basciani RM, Rindlisbacher A, Begert E, Brander L, Jakob SM, Etter R, et al. . Anaesthetic induction with etomidate in cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. (2016) 33:417–24. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000434
    1. Vandenbulcke L, Lapage KG, Vanderstraeten KV, De Somer FM, De Hert SG, Moerman AT. Microvascular reactivity monitored with near-infrared spectroscopy is impaired after induction of anaesthesia in cardiac surgery patients: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. (2017) 34:688–94. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000684
    1. Dünser MW, Mayr AJ, Stallinger A, Ulmer H, Ritsch N, Knotzer H, et al. . Cardiac performance during vasopressin infusion in postcardiotomy shock. Intensive Care Med. (2002) 28:746–51. 10.1007/s00134-002-1265-y
    1. Vail EA, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Gershengorn HB, Walkey AJ, Lindenauer PK, et al. . Use of vasoactive medications after cardiac surgery in the United States. Ann Am Thorac Soc. (2021) 18:103–11. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-465OC
    1. Xue FS, Liu HP, He N, Xu YC, Yang QY, Liao X, et al. . Spray-as-you-go airway topical anesthesia in patients with a difficult airway: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% and 4% lidocaine. Anesthesia & Analgesia. (2009) 108:536–43. 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f1665
    1. Khandelwal M, Saini VK, Kothari S, Sharma G. Role of lignocaine nebulization as an adjunct to airway blocks for awake fiber-optic intubation: a comparative study. Anesth Essays Res. (2018) 12:735–41. 10.4103/aer.AER_112_18
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jeri'c K, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Int Med. (2013) 158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Hannam JA, Mitchell SJ, Cumin D, Frampton C, Merry AF, Moore MR, et al. . Haemodynamic profiles of etomidate vs propofol for induction of anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. (2019) 122:198–205. 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.027
    1. Wang JH, Wei CS, Gu CP, Wang YL. Addition of topical airway anaesthesia to conventional induction techniques to reduce haemodynamic instability during the induction period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e053337. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053337
    1. Pirlich N, Lohse JA, Noppens RR. Topical airway anesthesia for awake-endoscopic intubation using the spray-as-you-go technique with high oxygen flow. J Vis Exp. (2017) 119:55116. 10.3791/55116
    1. Noitasaeng P, Vichitvejpaisal P, Kaosombatwattana U, Tassanee J, Suwannee S. Comparison of spraying and nebulized lidocaine in patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thai. (2016) 99:462–68. 10.26226/morressier.57108e2dd462b80290b49f1f
    1. Liu DX, Ye Y, Zhu YH, Li J, He HY, Dong L, et al. . Intubation of non-difficult airways using video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a randomized, parallel-group study. BMC Anesthesiol. (2019) 19:75. 10.1186/s12871-019-0737-3
    1. Aqil M, Khan MU, Mansoor S, Mansoor S, Khokhar RS, Narejo AS. Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope. BMC Anesthesiol. (2018) 18:112. 10.1186/s12871-018-0575-8
    1. Yoon HK, Lee HC, Oh H, Jun K, Park HP. Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. (2019) 19:137. 10.1186/s12871-019-0811-x
    1. Wieczorek PM, Schricker T, Vinet B, Backman SB. Airway topicalisation in morbidly obese patients using atomised lidocaine: 2% compared with 4%. Anaesthesia. (2007) 62:984–88. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05179.x
    1. Yadav U, Kumar A, Gupta P. A comparative study of airway nerve blocks and atomized lidocaine by the laryngo-tracheal mucosal atomization device (LMA MADgic) airway for oral awake fiberoptic intubation. Cureus. (2021) 13:e15772. 10.7759/cureus.15772
    1. Xue FS, Yang QY, Liao X, Liu JH, Tong SY. Topical anesthesia of the airway using fibreoptic bronchoscope and the MADgic atomizer in patients with predicted difficult intubation. Can J Anaesth. (2007) 54:951–52. 10.1007/BF03026803

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit