Intended versus actual delivery location and factors associated with change in delivery location among pregnant women in Southern Province, Zambia: a prespecified secondary observational analysis of the ZamCAT

Hiwote Solomon, Elizabeth G Henry, Julie Herlihy, Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, Godfrey Biemba, Kebby Musokotwane, Afsah Bhutta, Davidson H Hamer, Katherine E A Semrau, Hiwote Solomon, Elizabeth G Henry, Julie Herlihy, Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, Godfrey Biemba, Kebby Musokotwane, Afsah Bhutta, Davidson H Hamer, Katherine E A Semrau

Abstract

Objectives: This prespecified, secondary analysis of the Zambia Chlorhexidine Application Trial (ZamCAT) aimed to determine the proportion of women who did not deliver where they intended, to understand the underlying reasons for the discordance between planned and actual delivery locations; and to assess sociodemographic characteristics associated with concordance of intention and practice.

Design: Prespecified, secondary analysis from randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Recruitment occurred in 90 primary health facilities (HFs) with follow-up in the community in Southern Province, Zambia.

Participants: Between 15 February 2011 and 30 January 2013, 39 679 pregnant women enrolled in ZamCAT.

Secondary outcome measures: The location where mothers gave birth (home vs HF) was compared with their planned delivery location.

Results: When interviewed antepartum, 92% of respondents intended to deliver at an HF, 6.1% at home and 1.2% had no plan. However, of those who intended to deliver at an HF, 61% did; of those who intended to deliver at home, only 4% did; and of those who intended to deliver at home, 2% delivered instead at an HF. Among women who delivered at home, women who were aged 25-34 and ≥35 years were more likely to deliver where they intended than women aged 20-24 years (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.31, 95% CI=1.11 to 1.50 and aOR=1.32, 95% CI=1.12 to 1.57, respectively). Women who delivered at HFs had greater odds of delivering where they intended if they received any primary schooling (aOR=1.34, 95% CI=1.09 to 1.72) or more than a primary school education (aOR=1.54, 95% CI=1.17 to 2.02), were literate (aOR=1.33, 95% CI=1.119 to 1.58), and were not in the lowest quintile of the wealth index.

Conclusion: Discrepancies between intended and actual delivery locations highlight the need to go beyond the development of birth plans and exposure to birth planning messaging. More research is required to address barriers to achieving intentions of a facility-based childbirth.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT01241318).

Keywords: epidemiology; maternal medicine; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, et al. . Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet 2016;388:2164–75. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31533-1
    1. mortality UN, Published UD, 2018. Available: [Accessed May 13, 2020].
    1. United Nations . Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development | department of economic and social affairs, 2015. Available: [Accessed 9 January 2021].
    1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. . Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. The Lancet 2016;388:3027–35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8
    1. Hanson C, Waiswa P, Pembe A, et al. . Health system redesign for equity in maternal and newborn health must be codesigned, country led, adapted to context and fit for purpose. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5:e003748. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003748
    1. McCauley H, Lowe K, Furtado N, et al. . What are the essential components of antenatal care? A systematic review of the literature and development of signal functions to guide monitoring and evaluation. BJOG 2021;11. 10.1111/1471-0528.17029
    1. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. Lancet maternal survival series steering group. strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet Lond Engl 2006;368:1284–99.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, et al. . Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet 2014;384:347–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3
    1. Doctor HV, Nkhana-Salimu S, Abdulsalam-Anibilowo M. Health facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: successes, challenges, and implications for the 2030 development agenda. BMC Public Health 2018;18:765. 10.1186/s12889-018-5695-z
    1. Pervin J, Moran A, Rahman M, et al. . Association of antenatal care with facility delivery and perinatal survival - a population-based study in Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:111. 10.1186/1471-2393-12-111
    1. Roder-DeWan S, Nimako K, Twum-Danso NAY, et al. . Health system redesign for maternal and newborn survival: rethinking care models to close the global equity gap. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5:e002539. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002539
    1. Semrau KEA, Herlihy J, Grogan C, et al. . Effectiveness of 4% chlorhexidine umbilical cord care on neonatal mortality in Southern Province, Zambia (ZamCAT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:e827–36. 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30215-7
    1. Zambia Statistics Agency . Population and Demographic Projections, 2011-2035 - Zambia Data Portal, 2020. Available: [Accessed 31 January 2021].
    1. Central Statistical Office/Zambia, Ministry of Health/Zambia, University of Zambia Teaching Hospital Virology Laboratory, University of Zambia Department of Population Studies, Tropical Diseases Research Centre/Zambia, I. C. F. International. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2013-14. Published online March 1, 2015. Available: [Accessed 14 February 2020].
    1. Hamer DH, Herlihy JM, Musokotwane K, et al. . Engagement of the community, traditional leaders, and public health system in the design and implementation of a large community-based, cluster-randomized trial of umbilical cord care in Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015;92:666–72. 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0218
    1. SAS Institute . SAS University Edition.;, 2020. Available: [Accessed January 9, 2021].
    1. Kyei-Nimakoh M, Carolan-Olah M, McCann TV. Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa-a systematic review. Syst Rev 2017;6:110. 10.1186/s13643-017-0503-x
    1. Sather M, Fajon A-V, Zaentz R, et al. . Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (5 of 7): advocacy barriers and opportunities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10 Suppl 1:S5. 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S5
    1. Sialubanje C, Massar K, Hamer DH, et al. . Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:216. 10.1186/s12884-015-0652-7
    1. Mannava P, Durrant K, Fisher J, et al. . Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review. Global Health 2015;11:36. 10.1186/s12992-015-0117-9
    1. Yakong VN, Rush KL, Bassett-Smith J, et al. . Women's experiences of seeking reproductive health care in rural Ghana: challenges for maternal health service utilization. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:2431–41. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05404.x
    1. Cheptum JJ, Gitonga MM, Mutua EM, et al. . Perception about traditional birth attendants by men and women of reproductive age in rural Migori County, Kenya. Int J Afr Nurs Sci 2017;7:55–61. 10.1016/j.ijans.2017.07.002
    1. Dayyabu AL, Murtala Y, Grünebaum A, et al. . Midwife-assisted planned home birth: an essential component of improving the safety of childbirth in sub-Saharan Africa. J Perinat Med 2018;47:16–21. 10.1515/jpm-2018-0066
    1. Smith J, Banay R, Zimmerman E, et al. . Barriers to provision of respectful maternity care in Zambia: results from a qualitative study through the lens of behavioral science. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:26. 10.1186/s12884-019-2579-x
    1. Biemba G, Yeboah-Antwi K, Semrau K. Who is assisting women to deliver babies within health facilities. Anal Deliv Four Prov Zamb Austin J Public Health Epidemiol 2014;1:1007.
    1. Some TD, Sombie I, Meda N. Women's perceptions of homebirths in two rural medical districts in Burkina Faso: a qualitative study. Reprod Health 2011;8:3. 10.1186/1742-4755-8-3
    1. Berhe R, Nigusie A. Perceptions of home delivery risk and associated factors among pregnant mothers in North Achefer district, Amhara region of Ethiopia: the health belief model perspective. Family Medicine & Medical Science Research 2019;8:10.
    1. Ajah LO, Onu FA, Ogbuinya OC, et al. . Choice of birth place among antenatal clinic attendees in rural mission hospitals in Ebonyi state, south-east Nigeria. PLoS One 2019;14:e0211306. 10.1371/journal.pone.0211306
    1. Lwelamira J, Safari J. Choice of place for childbirth: prevalence and determinants of health facility delivery among women in Bahi district, central Tanzania. AJMS 2011;4.
    1. Pardeshi GS, Dalvi SS, Pergulwar CR, et al. . Trends in choosing place of delivery and assistance during delivery in Nanded district, Maharashtra, India. J Health Popul Nutr 2011;29:71–6. 10.3329/jhpn.v29i1.7568
    1. Scott NA, Henry EG, Kaiser JL, et al. . Factors affecting home delivery among women living in remote areas of rural Zambia: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis. Int J Womens Health 2018;10:589–601. 10.2147/IJWH.S169067
    1. Henry EG, Semrau K, Hamer DH, et al. . The influence of quality maternity waiting homes on utilization of facilities for delivery in rural Zambia. Reprod Health 2017;14:68. 10.1186/s12978-017-0328-z
    1. Lori JR, Perosky J, Munro-Kramer ML, et al. . Maternity waiting homes as part of a comprehensive approach to maternal and newborn care: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:228. 10.1186/s12884-019-2384-6
    1. Zambia Statistics Agency, Ministry of Health/Zambia, University Teaching Hospital Virology Laboratory, ICF . Demographic and health survey 2018, 2020. Available: [Accessed 2 February 2022].
    1. Amref Health Africa . Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and response on reproductive, maternal, child and adolescent health service provision in Zambia. Amref health Africa, 2021. Available: [Accessed 13 December 2021].
    1. Tiruneh GT, Karim AM, Avan BI, et al. . The effect of implementation strength of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) on facility deliveries and the met need for BEmONC at the primary health care level in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:123. 10.1186/s12884-018-1751-z
    1. Bintabara D, Ernest A, Mpondo B. Health facility service availability and readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in a low-resource setting: evidence from a Tanzania national survey. BMJ Open 2019;9:e020608. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020608

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit