Deep Remission With Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A GEMINI 1 post hoc Analysis

William J Sandborn, Jean-Frédéric Colombel, Remo Panaccione, Parambir S Dulai, Maria Rosario, Charlie Cao, Morris Barocas, Karen Lasch, William J Sandborn, Jean-Frédéric Colombel, Remo Panaccione, Parambir S Dulai, Maria Rosario, Charlie Cao, Morris Barocas, Karen Lasch

Abstract

Background and aims: This GEMINI 1 post hoc analysis evaluated vedolizumab efficacy for inducing deep remission in patients with ulcerative colitis and correlation between vedolizumab trough concentrations and deep remission rates.

Methods: Week 6 vedolizumab responders were re-randomized to placebo or vedolizumab every 8 or 4 weeks. Deep remission at Week 52 was measured using four different definitions [from most to least stringent]: [1] Mayo Clinic endoscopic score = 0, rectal bleeding score = 0 and decrease or no change from baseline in stool frequency score; [2] endoscopic score ≤1, rectal bleeding score = 0 and stool frequency score = 0; [3] endoscopic score ≤1, rectal bleeding score = 0, decrease or no change from baseline stool frequency score, and total score [endoscopic score + rectal bleeding score + stool frequency score] ≤1; and [4] endoscopic score ≤1, rectal bleeding score = 0 and stool frequency score ≤1. Steady-state trough vedolizumab serum concentrations were evaluated.

Results: At Week 6, 373 vedolizumab responders were re-randomized to maintenance placebo [n = 126] or vedolizumab every 8 [n = 122] or 4 [n = 125] weeks. Significantly more vedolizumab patients achieved deep remission at Week 52 for the most (placebo 8.7%, every 8 weeks 27.0% [p = 0.0001], every 4 weeks 28.0% [p < 0.0001]) and least (placebo 15.9%, every 8 weeks 43.4% [p < 0.0001], every 4 weeks 43.2% [p < 0.0001]) stringent definitions. Patients with higher vedolizumab trough concentration quartiles had higher deep remission rates [all definitions] compared with those with the lowest quartile or who received placebo.

Conclusion: Vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher deep remission rates than placebo at Week 52, regardless of deep remission definition [NCT00783718].

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Deep remission at Week 52a,b [maintenance ITT population]. One patient randomized to PLA still had active drug concentrations [9 μg/mL] at Week 46 and they were in remission according to all four definitions at Week 52. ES, endoscopic score; ITT, intention to treat; PLA, placebo; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; RBS, rectal bleeding score; SFS, stool frequency score; VDZ, vedolizumab. aPost hoc analyses; ball patients in the maintenance ITT population, including those in the PLA group, had received VDZ at Weeks 0 and 2 and had a clinical response at Week 6; †definition 1: Mayo Clinic ES = 0, RBS = 0 and decrease in SFS or no change from baseline [A]; ‡definition 2: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and SFS = 0 [B]; §definition 3: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0, decrease in SFS or no change from baseline, and total score [ES + RBS + SFS] ≤ 1 [C]; ¶definition 4: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and SFS ≤ 1 [D].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Endoscopic appearance in the maintenance phase for patients with UC in the GEMINI 1 trial.a,b ITT, intention to treat; PLA, placebo; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; UC, ulcerative colitis; VDZ, vedolizumab. aPercentages for each timepoint may not add up to 100% due to rounding; ball patients in the maintenance ITT population, including those in the placebo group, had received vedolizumab at Weeks 0 and 2 and had a clinical response at Week 6.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ES at Week 52 by RBS [A] and SFS [B]. ES, endoscopic score; PLA, placebo; Q4W, every 4 weeks; Q8W, every 8 weeks; RBS, rectal bleeding score; SFS, stool frequency score; VDZ, vedolizumab.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Rates of deep remission by vedolizumab trough serum steady-state concentration quartiles. ES, endoscopic score; ITT, intention to treat; PLA, placebo; RBS, rectal bleeding score; SFS, stool frequency score; VDZ, vedolizumab. †Definition 1: Mayo Clinic ES = 0, RBS = 0 and decrease in SFS or no change from baseline [A]; ‡definition 2: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and SFS = 0 [B]; §definition 3: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0, decrease in SFS or no change from baseline, and total score [ES + RBS + SFS] ≤ 1 [C]; ¶definition 4: Mayo Clinic ES ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and SFS ≤ 1 [D]; ††one patient randomized to PLA still had active drug concentrations [9 μg/mL] at Week 46 and was in remission according to all four definitions at Week 52; ‡‡the maintenance PLA non-ITT population received PLA as induction therapy and was not included in the primary maintenance ITT efficacy analyses.

References

    1. Zallot C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Deep remission in inflammatory bowel disease: looking beyond symptoms. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013;15:315.
    1. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sandborn W, Sands BE, et al. . Selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE): determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1324–38.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Ulcerative colitis: clinical trial endpoints guidance for Industry. 2016. Available at: . Accessed February 14, 2018.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Draft guideline on the development of new medicinal products for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. 2016. Available at: . Accessed February 14, 2018.
    1. Magro F, Gionchetti P, Eliakim R, et al. ; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Third European Evidence-based Consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 1: Definitions, diagnosis, extra-intestinal manifestations, pregnancy, cancer surveillance, surgery, and ileo-anal pouch disorders. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11:649–70.
    1. Rogler G, Vavricka S, Schoepfer A, Lakatos PL. Mucosal healing and deep remission: what does it mean?World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:7552–60.
    1. Paul S, Del Tedesco E, Marotte H, et al. . Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:2568–76.
    1. Roblin X, Marotte H, Rinaudo M, et al. . Association between pharmacokinetics of adalimumab and mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:80–84.e2.
    1. Papamichael K, Rakowsky S, Rivera C, Cheifetz AS, Osterman MT. Infliximab trough concentrations during maintenance therapy are associated with endoscopic and histologic healing in ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:478–84.
    1. Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE, et al. ; GEMINI 1 Study Group Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2013;369:699–710.
    1. Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, et al. . Third European evidence-based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11:769–84.
    1. Dassopoulos T, Cohen R, Schert E, Schwartz R, Kosinski L, Regueiro M.. Identification, assessment and initial medical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Clinical care pathway. Available at: . Accessed February 14, 2018.
    1. Rosario M, Abhyankar B, Sankoh S, Dirks N, Lasch K, Sandborn W. Relationship between vedolizumab pharmacokinetics and endoscopic outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9:S46.
    1. Ungar B, Kopylov U, Yavzori M, et al. . Association of vedolizumab level, anti-drug antibodies, and α4β7 occupancy with response in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:697–705.e7.
    1. Rosario M, French JL, Dirks NL, et al. . Exposure–efficacy relationships for vedolizumab induction therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11:921–9.
    1. Røseth AG, Aadland E, Grzyb K. Normalization of faecal calprotectin: a predictor of mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004;39:1017–20.
    1. Colombel JF, Keir ME, Scherl A, et al. . Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes, and endoscopic and histological appearance in UC. Gut 2017;66:2063–8.
    1. Jharap B, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. . Randomised clinical study: discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and endoscopic appearance in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;42:1082–92.
    1. Latella G, Rieder F. Time to look underneath the surface: ulcerative colitis-associated fibrosis. J Crohns Colitis 2015;9:941–2.
    1. Arias MT, Vande Casteele N, Vermeire S, et al. . A panel to predict long-term outcome of infliximab therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:531–8.
    1. Frøslie KF, Jahnsen J, Moum BA, Vatn MH; IBSEN Group Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a Norwegian population-based cohort. Gastroenterology 2007;133:412–22.
    1. Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, et al. . Cancer surveillance in longstanding ulcerative colitis: endoscopic appearances help predict cancer risk. Gut 2004;53:1813–6.
    1. Lukas M. Inflammatory bowel disease as a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Dig Dis 2010;28:619–24.
    1. Bernstein CN, Fried M, Krabshuis JH, et al. . World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IBD in 2010. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010;16:112–24.
    1. Kornbluth A, Sachar DB; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults: American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:501–23; quiz 524.
    1. Sandborn W, Colombel JF, Panaccione R, et al. . Deep clinical remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: evaluating the effects of vedolizumab on various combinations of endoscopic and patient-reported outcomes. 10th Congress of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation; 21 February, 2015; Barcelona, Spain. Poster P319a.
    1. Rosario M, Dirks NL, Gastonguay MR, et al. . Population pharmacokinetics– pharmacodynamics of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;42:188–202.
    1. D’Haens G, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, et al. . Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18:2218–24.
    1. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A, et al. . Fecal calprotectin more accurately reflects endoscopic activity of ulcerative colitis than the Lichtiger Index, C-reactive protein, platelets, hemoglobin, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:332–41.
    1. Sipponen T, Savilahti E, Kolho KL, Nuutinen H, Turunen U, Färkkilä M. Crohn’s disease activity assessed by fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin: correlation with Crohn’s disease activity index and endoscopic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008;14:40–6.
    1. Patel A, Panchal H, Dubinsky MC. Fecal calprotectin levels predict histological healing in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017;23: 1600–4.
    1. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 2006;55:749–53.
    1. Marchal-Bressenot A, Salleron J, Boulagnon-Rombi C, et al. . Development and validation of the Nancy histological index for UC. Gut 2017;66:43–9.
    1. Chernavskaia O, Heuke S, Vieth M, et al. . Beyond endoscopic assessment in inflammatory bowel disease: real-time histology of disease activity by non-linear multimodal imaging. Sci Rep 2016;6:29239.
    1. Bryant RV, Winer S, Travis SP, Riddell RH. Systematic review: histological remission in inflammatory bowel disease. Is ‘complete’ remission the new treatment paradigm? An IOIBD initiative. J Crohns Colitis 2014;8:1582–97.
    1. Bryant RV, Burger DC, Delo J, et al. . Beyond endoscopic mucosal healing in UC: histological remission better predicts corticosteroid use and hospitalisation over 6 years of follow-up. Gut 2016;65:408–14.
    1. Magro F, Lopes SI, Lopes J, et al. ; Portuguese IBD group [GEDII] Histological outcomes and predictive value of faecal markers in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis patients receiving infliximab. J Crohns Colitis 2016;10:1407–16.
    1. Loftus EV Jr, Colombel JF, Feagan BG, et al. . Long-term efficacy of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2017;11:400–11.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit