Clinical Characterization of Suprachoroidal Injection Procedure Utilizing a Microinjector across Three Retinal Disorders

Chen-Rei Wan, Barry Kapik, Charles C Wykoff, Christopher R Henry, Mark R Barakat, Milan Shah, Rafael V Andino, Thomas A Ciulla, Chen-Rei Wan, Barry Kapik, Charles C Wykoff, Christopher R Henry, Mark R Barakat, Milan Shah, Rafael V Andino, Thomas A Ciulla

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed physician-investigator experience with suprachoroidal (SC) injections, an investigational therapeutic administration technique using a 900 or 1100 µm microneedle to inject drugs into the SC space.

Methods: Datasets from six clinical trials across three diseases (noninfectious uveitis; diabetic macula edema, and retinal vein occlusion) were assessed. In addition to a user survey, retrospective correlations were performed between procedural variables (needle length), and demographics, and ocular characteristics.

Results: In the user survey, 84% (31/37) of physician-investigators did not perceive the SC injections to be meaningfully more challenging than other ocular injections. For the correlation analysis, the 900 µm needle was used for 71% (412/581) of baseline injections, and switching to the longer needle occured in the remaining 29% of baseline injections. No statistical correlations were found between needle lengths and age, race, disorder, refraction, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, retinal central subfield thickness, or lens status. Patient gender and needle length were statistically associated, with 76% (210/275) versus 66% (202/306) of injections administered with 900 µm needles for female and male gender, respectively. Injection quadrant correlated to needle length with 78% (214/275) of superotemporal quadrant injections administered with 900 µm needles, compared with 65% (73/113) of inferotemporal quadrant injections.

Conclusions: Both the user survey and the correlation analysis demonstrated that SC injection is well accepted by physician-investigators, and the two needle lengths accommodate a wide range of anatomic and demographic variables.

Translational relevance: These results, along with the presented ex-vivo endoscopic imaging, suggest that SC injection could be readily adopted in clinical practice for targeted compartmentalized delivery of ocular therapeutics.

Keywords: SCS; microinjector; microneedle; suprachoroidal.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Chen-rei Wan, Clearside (E, I); B. Kapik, Clearside (E, I); C.C. Wykoff, Clearside (F, C); C.R. Henry, Clearside (C), Alimera (C), Bausch & Lomb (C); M.R. Barakat, Bausch & Lomb (C), Regenxbio (C), Clearside (R); M. Shah, Clearside (F); R.V. Andino, Clearside (E, I); T.A. Ciulla, Clearside (E, I)

Copyright 2020 The Authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Key suprachoroidal injection techniques. The needle must be inserted perpendicularly to the ocular surface because the free needle length is on the order of the thickness of the sclera. The needle hub is designed to compress on the ocular surface to reduce the thickness of the conjunctiva and to form an indentation. Because the SCS, a potential space, is opened as the injection occurs, slow injection is essential once loss of resistance is experienced. It is recommended for the physician to first attempt the SC injection with the shorter needle. The two needle lengths of 900 µm and 1100 µm are offered to accommodate variations in patient anatomy. If persistent resistance is felt, then the longer needle may be used to complete the injection, after ensuring appropriate injection technique.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlations between procedural variables (900 µm vs. 1100 µm needles) and (a) gender or (b) administration quadrant (univariate analysis). Among all evaluated variables (disorder, refraction, IOP, lens status, gender, age, race, and quadrant of administration), statistical significance was only observed in (a) gender and (b) quadrant of administration. Evaluating by gender, the 900 µm needle was used for 76% (209 of 275) of the female patients compared to 66% (202 of 306) of the male patients. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between the needle usage and the administration quadrant: the 900 µm needle was used for 78% of injections administered in the superotemporal quadrant, compared to 65% of the injections in the inferotemporal quadrant.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Ex vivo endoscopic visualization of SC injection. For endoscopic view setup, enucleated porcine eyes were inflated to an appropriate intraocular pressure by maintaining a 20-cm water column. An aqueous-based green dye was used for easy external visualization. (a) Schematic (image updated from Andrew Meyerson, distributed under a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license) and endoscopic view. (b–d) SC injection visualized externally and internally. (b) Before injection, a smooth, uncompressed inner retinal surface was observed. (c) As pressure was applied from the needle hub to form a dimple externally, a smooth deformation was observed internally. The needle tip, as a sharp point, was not observed. (d) As the SCS was accessed, injectate was immediately observed to flow posteriorly and circumferentially. The black arrowheads highlight the fluid boundary as it expands the SCS.

References

    1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. .. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2017; 5(12): e1221–e1234.
    1. Laouri M, Chen E, Looman M, Gallagher M. The burden of disease of retinal vein occlusion: Review of the literature. Eye. 2011; 25(8): 981–988.
    1. Lowder C, Belfort R, Lightman S, et al. .. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011; 129(5): 545–553.
    1. Wykoff CC, Hariprasad SM. DRCR Protocol-T: Reconciling 1- and 2-year data for managing diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2016; 47(4): 308–312.
    1. Heier JS, Clark WL, Boyer DS, et al. .. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: two-year results from the COPERNICUS study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(7): 1–2.
    1. Clark WL, Boyer DS, Heier JS, et al. .. Intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion 52-week results of the VIBRANT Study. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(2): 330–336.
    1. Varma R, Bressler NM, Suñer I, et al. .. Improved vision-related function after ranibizumab for macular edema after retinal vein occlusion: results from the BRAVO and CRUISE trials. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(10): 2108–2118.
    1. Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Pearson A, et al. .. Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts provide benefit for at least 3 years in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(10): 2125–2132.
    1. Boyer DS, Yoon YH, Belfort R, et al. .. Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(10): 1904–1914.
    1. Heier JS, Korobelnik JF, Brown DM, et al. .. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 148-week results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 2016;123: 2376–2385.
    1. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. .. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase iii randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(4): 789–801.
    1. Martin DF, Maguire MG, Ying GS, Grunwald JE, Fine SL, Jaffe GJ. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(20): 1897–1908.
    1. Brown DM, Michels M, Kaiser PK, Heier JS, Sy JP, Ianchulev T. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of the ANCHOR Study. Ophthalmology. 2006; 116(1): 57–65.e5.
    1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. .. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(14): 1419–1431.
    1. Korobelnik JF, Holz FG, Roider J, et al. .. Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema resulting from central retinal vein occlusion: one-year results of the phase 3 GALILEO study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(1): 202–208.
    1. Ciulla TA, Bracha P, Pollack J, Williams DF. Real-world outcomes of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema in the United States. Ophthalmol Retin. 2018; 2(12): 1179–1187.
    1. Rao P, Lum F, Wood K, et al. .. Real-world vision in age-related macular degeneration patients treated with single anti-VEGF drug type for 1 year in the IRIS Registry. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125(4): 522–528.
    1. Ciulla TA, Hussain RM, Pollack JS, Williams DF. Visual acuity outcomes and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy intensity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: a real-world analysis of 49 485 eyes. Ophthalmol Retin. 2020; 4(1): 19–30.
    1. Habot-Wilner Z, Noronha G, Wykoff CC. Suprachoroidally injected pharmacological agents for the treatment of chorio-retinal diseases: a targeted approach. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97(5): 460–472.
    1. Edelhauser H, Patel SR, Meschter C, Dean R, Powell K, Verhoeven R. Suprachoroidal microinjection delivers triamcinolone acetonide to therapeutically-relevant posterior ocular structures and limits exposure in the anterior segment. In: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(15): 5063.
    1. Gilger BC, Abarca EM, Salmon JH, Patel S. Treatment of acute posterior uveitis in a porcine model by injection of triamcinolone acetonide into the suprachoroidal space using microneedles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(4): 2483–2492.
    1. Campochiaro PA, Wykoff CC, Brown DM, et al. .. Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Results of the Tanzanite Study. Ophthalmol Retin. 2018; 2(4): 320–328.
    1. Barakat M, Wykoff CC, Gonzalez V, Hu A, Marcus D. Aflibercept with or without suprachoroidal CLS-TA for diabetic macular edema: a randomized, double-masked, parallel-design, controlled study. Ophthalmol Retin. E-pub ahead of print, doi:10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.007.
    1. Wykoff CC, Khurana RN, Lampen SIR, et al. .. Suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema: the HULK Trial. Ophthalmol Retin. 2018; 2(8): 874–877.
    1. Yeh S, Khurana RN, Shah M, et al. .. Efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal CLS-TA for macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis: phase 3, randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2020; 127(7): 948–955.
    1. Kempen JH, Altaweel MM, Holbrook JT, et al. .. Randomized comparison of systemic anti-inflammatory therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide implant for intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis: The multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(10): 1916–1926.
    1. Yap YC, Papathomas T, Kamal A. Results of intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg (Ozurdex) in non-infectious posterior uveitis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(4): 835–838.
    1. Kempen JH, Jabs DA.. Benefits of systemic anti-inflammatory therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide intraocular implant for intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis: fifty-four-month results of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(10): 1967–1975.
    1. Cho HY, Kang SW, Kim YT, Chung SE, Lee SW. A three-year follow-up of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and macular laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012; 26(5): 362–368.
    1. Yang Y, Bailey C, Loewenstein A, Massin P. Intravitreal corticosteroids in diabetic macular edema: pharmacokinetic considerations. Retina. 2015; 35(12): 2440–2449.
    1. Sen HN, Vitale S, Gangaputra SS, et al. .. Periocular corticosteroid injections in uveitis: effects and complications. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(11): 2275–2286.
    1. Kothari S, Foster CS, Pistilli M, et al. .. The risk of intraocular pressure elevation in pediatric noninfectious uveitis. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(10): 1987–2001.
    1. James ER. The etiology of steroid cataract. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 23(5): 403–420.
    1. Regenxbio. Regenxbio reports first quarter 2020 financial results and operational highlights, . Accessed July 13, 2020.
    1. Aura Biosciences Presents Updated AU-011 Clinical Data at ARVO 2020, . Accessed July 13, 2020.
    1. Clearside Biomedical. CLS-AX: Axitinib for Suprachoroidal Injection, . Accessed July 30, 2020.
    1. Olsen T. Calculating axial length in the aphakic and the pseudophakic eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988; 14(4): 413–416.
    1. Gu B, Liu J, Li X, Ma Q, Shen M, Cheng L. Real-time monitoring of suprachoroidal space (SCS) following SCS injection using ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography in guinea pig eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(6): 3623–3634.
    1. Chiang B, Venugopal N, Grossniklaus HE, Jung JH, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. Thickness and closure kinetics of the suprachoroidal space following microneedle injection of liquid formulations. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(1): 555–564.
    1. Lampen SIR, Khurana RN, Noronha G, Brown DM, Wykoff CC. Suprachoroidal space alterations following delivery of triamcinolone acetonide: Post-hoc analysis of the phase 1/2 HULK study of patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2018; 49(9): 692–697.
    1. Vurgese S, Panda-Jonas S, Jonas JB. Scleral thickness in human eyes. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1): e29692.
    1. Ikuno Y. Overview of the complications of high myopia. Retina. 2017; 37(12): 2347–2351.
    1. Jonas JB, Holbach L, Panda-Jonas S. Scleral cross section area and volume and axial length. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3): e93551.
    1. Wong CW, Phua V, Lee SY, Wong TY, Cheung CMG. Is choroidal or scleral thickness related to myopic macular degeneration? Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(2): 907–913.
    1. Shen L, You QS, Xu X, et al. .. Scleral and choroidal thickness in secondary high axial myopia. Retina. 2016; 36(8): 1579–1585.
    1. Norman RE, Flanagan JG, Rausch SMK, et al. .. Dimensions of the human sclera: Thickness measurement and regional changes with axial length. Exp Eye Res. 2010; 90(2): 277–284.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit