Eptinezumab for the prevention of chronic migraine: efficacy and safety through 24 weeks of treatment in the phase 3 PROMISE-2 (Prevention of migraine via intravenous ALD403 safety and efficacy-2) study

Stephen Silberstein, Merle Diamond, Nada A Hindiyeh, David M Biondi, Roger Cady, Joe Hirman, Brent Allan, Susan Pederson, Barbara Schaeffler, Jeff Smith, Stephen Silberstein, Merle Diamond, Nada A Hindiyeh, David M Biondi, Roger Cady, Joe Hirman, Brent Allan, Susan Pederson, Barbara Schaeffler, Jeff Smith

Abstract

Background: PROMISE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat intravenous (IV) doses of the calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted monoclonal antibody eptinezumab (ALD403) for migraine prevention in adults with chronic migraine. This report describes the results of PROMISE-2 through 24 weeks of treatment.

Methods: Patients received up to two 30-min IV administrations of eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo separated by 12 weeks. Patients recorded migraine and headache endpoints in a daily eDiary. Additional assessments, including patient-reported outcomes, were performed at regularly scheduled clinic visits throughout the 32-week study period (screening, day 0, and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 32).

Results: A total of 1072 adults received treatment: eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 356; eptinezumab 300 mg, n = 350; placebo, n = 366. The reduction in mean monthly migraine days observed during the first dosing interval (100 mg, - 7.7 days; 300 mg, - 8.2 days; placebo, - 5.6 days) was further decreased after an additional dose (100 mg, - 8.2 days; 300 mg, - 8.8 days; placebo, - 6.2 days), with both doses of eptinezumab demonstrating consistently greater reductions from baseline compared to placebo. The ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) increased after a second dose, with more eptinezumab-treated patients experiencing migraine response than placebo patients (≥50% MRRs weeks 13-24: 100 mg, 61.0%; 300 mg, 64.0%; placebo, 44.0%; and ≥ 75% MRRs weeks 13-24: 100 mg, 39.3%; 300 mg, 43.1%; placebo, 23.8%). The percentages of patients who improved on patient-reported outcomes, including the Headache Impact Test and Patient Global Impression of Change, increased following the second dose administration at week 12, and were greater with eptinezumab than with placebo at all time points. No new safety concerns were identified with the second dose regarding the incidence, nature, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusion: Eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg administered IV at day 0 and repeated at week 12 provided sustained migraine preventive benefit over a full 24 weeks and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in patients with chronic migraine.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02974153 ). Registered November 23, 2016.

Keywords: Chronic migraine; Efficacy; Eptinezumab; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

SS: Receives or has received, as a consultant and/or advisory panel member, honoraria from Allergan, Amgen, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Cefaly, Curelator, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Egalet Corporation, electroCore Medical, eNeura, Lilly USA, Lundbeck Seattle Biopharmaceuticals, Medscape, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theranica, and Trigemina, and reports consulting fees from Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Avanir, Curelator, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, electroCore, Eli Lilly, eNeura, Medscape, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Supernus, Teva, Theranica, and Trigemina.

MD: Advisory boards and a consultant for Amgen, Lundbeck Seattle Biopharmaceuticals, Promius Pharma, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; advisory boards for Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Depomed, Eli Lilly, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Upsher-Smith Laboratories; speakers’ bureaus for Amgen, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Depomed, Pernix Therapeutics, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; Board of Directors for the National Headache Foundation and the Diamond Headache Clinic Research and Educational Foundation.

NAH: Serves on speaker’s bureaus for Amgen, Eli Lilly, and electroCore, and serves on advisory boards for Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck Chicago Biopharmaceuticals, and Zosano Pharma.

DB: Full-time employee of Alder BioPharmaceuticals (currently known as Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals) at the time of the study; Contracted service provider during manuscript development.

RC: Full-time employee of Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

JH: Contracted service provider of biostatistical resources to Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

BA: Full-time employee of Alder BioPharmaceuticals (currently known as Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals) at the time of the study; Contracted service provider during manuscript development.

SP: Full-time employee of Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals.

BS: Full-time employee of Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals at the time of the study and during manuscript development.

JS: Full-time employee of Alder BioPharmaceuticals (currently known as Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals) at the time of the study; Contracted service provider during manuscript development.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PROMISE-2 study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reduction in mean monthly migraine days by (a) 12-week dosing interval and (b) 4-week interval (efficacy population). *P < 0.001 vs placebo. †Nominal P < 0.001 vs placebo (analyses of monthly migraine days over weeks 13–24 were not formally tested per the predefined statistical hierarchy)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Rates of ≥50% migraine response by 12-week dosing interval and (b) cumulative 4-week intervals with ≥50% migraine response (efficacy population). *P < 0.001 vs placebo. †Nominal P < 0.001 vs placebo (analyses of migraine responder rates over weeks 13–24 were not formally tested per the predefined statistical hierarchy)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Rates of ≥75% migraine response by 12-week dosing interval and (b) cumulative 4-week intervals with ≥75% migraine response (efficacy population). *P ≤ 0.001 vs placebo
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Rates of 100% migraine response by 4-week interval (efficacy population). †Nominal P < 0.001 vs placebo (analyses of migraine responder rates over weeks 13–24 were not formally tested per the predefined statistical hierarchy)

References

    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202
    1. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Buse D, Scher A, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Acute migraine medications and evolution from episodic to chronic migraine: a longitudinal population-based study. Headache. 2008;48:1157–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01217.x.
    1. Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, Lipton RB. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:86–92. doi: 10.1007/s11916-011-0233-z.
    1. Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton RB. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:428–432. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492.
    1. Ashina M, Saper J, Cady R, Schaeffler B, Biondi DM, Hirman J, et al. Eptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1) Cephalalgia. 2020;40:241–254. doi: 10.1177/0333102420905132.
    1. Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine. PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020;94:e1365–e1e77. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009169.
    1. Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE, Jr, Garber WH, Batenhorst A, et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:963–974. doi: 10.1023/A:1026119331193.
    1. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs; 1976
    1. Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the headache impact test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:357–367. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890.
    1. Houts CR, Wirth RJ, McGinley JS, Gwaltney C, Kassel E, Snapinn S, et al. Content validity of HIT-6 as a measure of headache impact in people with migraine: a narrative review. Headache. 2020;60:28–39. doi: 10.1111/head.13701.
    1. Wirth R, McGinley JS, Hirman J, Snapinn S, Houts CR, Cady R. Item response theory analysis of the HIT-6 in a chronic migraine population. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:246.
    1. Houts CR, Wirth R, McGinley JS, Gwaltney C, Cady R. Validity evidence of the HIT-6 total score in a sample of patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:246–247.
    1. Bayliss MS, Batenhorst AS. The HIT-6™: a User’s guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2002.
    1. Posner K, Brent D, Lucas C, Gould M, Stanley B, Brown G et al. Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Columbia University. Updated 14 January 2009. Accessed 2 Oct 2015. Available at:
    1. Silberstein SD, Lee L, Gandhi K, Fitzgerald T, Bell J, Cohen JM. Health care resource utilization and migraine disability along the migraine continuum among patients treated for migraine. Headache. 2018;58:1579–1592. doi: 10.1111/head.13421.
    1. Porter JK, Di Tanna GL, Lipton RB, Sapra S, Villa G. Costs of acute headache medication use and productivity losses among patients with migraine: insights from three randomized controlled trials. Pharmacoecon Open. 2019;3:411–417. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0105-0.
    1. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357:757–762. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6.
    1. Meissner K, Fässler M, Rücker G, et al. Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1941–1951. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10391.
    1. Mitsikostas DD, Benedetti F. Placebos and Nocebos in headaches: springer international publishing. 2019.
    1. Forbes RB, McCarron M, Cardwell CR (2020) Efficacy and contextual (placebo) effects of CGRP antibodies for migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. 10.1111/head.13907
    1. Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, et al. Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1100–1107. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70209-1.
    1. Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Silberstein S, Goadsby PJ, Biondi D, Hirman J, et al. Eptinezumab for prevention of chronic migraine: a randomized phase 2b clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:1075–1085. doi: 10.1177/0333102419858355.
    1. Leonardi M, Raggi A. A narrative review on the burden of migraine: when the burden is the impact on people's life. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:41. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0993-0.
    1. Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Quintana R, Carboni V, Diener HC, et al. My migraine voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:115. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0946-z.
    1. Buse DC, Scher AI, Dodick DW, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Manack Adams A, et al. Impact of migraine on the family: perspectives of people with migraine and their spouse/domestic partner in the CaMEO study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:596–611. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.013.
    1. Baker B, Schaeffler B, Beliveau M, Rubets I, Pederson S, Trinh M, et al. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of eptinezumab in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020;8:e00567. doi: 10.1002/prp2.567.
    1. Scuteri D, Corasaniti MT, Tonin P, Bagetta G. Eptinezumab for the treatment of migraine. Drugs Today (Barc) 2019;55:695–703. doi: 10.1358/dot.2019.55.11.3069864.
    1. AIMOVIG . Package insert. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; 2020.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20:22–33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit