Successful treatment of depressed, distensible acne scars using autologous fibroblasts: a multi-site, prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Girish S Munavalli, Stacy Smith, John M Maslowski, Robert A Weiss, Girish S Munavalli, Stacy Smith, John M Maslowski, Robert A Weiss

Abstract

Background: A previous clinical trial evaluating autologous fibroblasts (human dermal) injections for the treatment of facial contour deformities found significantly greater improvements in wrinkle and acne scar appearance than with placebo treatment.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of autologous fibroblast treatment of moderate to severe, depressed, distensible facial acne scars with that of vehicle control.

Methods: This was a randomized multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in subjects with bilateral moderate to severe acne scarring; subjects served as their own controls. Skin biopsies were obtained from randomized subjects for fibroblast production. Subjects (n = 99) underwent three intradermal injection sessions with 2 mL of autologous fibroblast suspension (10-20 million cells/mL) on one cheek and vehicle control (cell culture medium) on the other at 14-day intervals. Efficacy was based on the blinded subject's, evaluator's, and independent photographic viewer's (IPR) assessment of acne scarring 1 to 4 months after the last treatment.

Results: Autologous fibroblast treatment was associated with significantly greater treatment success than vehicle control for the subject (43% vs.18%), evaluator (59% vs. 2%), and IPR assessments. Autologous fibroblast injections were well tolerated, without permanent adverse effects.

Conclusions: Autologous fibroblast injections safely and effectively improved the appearance of depressed distensible acne scars.

© 2013 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment was performed using a 28 G tuberculin syringe. Note the superficial nature of the needle placement, below and surrounding each identifiable scar in the field. The endpoint of this injection is a visible wheal with blanching (276 × 162 mm; 72 × 72 dots per inch).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficacy assessments as a function of time: subjects and physician evaluators rated acne scar appearance of both cheeks 1 to 4 months after three treatments using autologous fibroblast and vehicle control as described in the Materials and Methods section. Subjects and evaluators were blinded to the treatment received on each cheek. The percentages of responders based on the subject assessment (A) are shown for autologous fibroblast– (filled squares) and vehicle control–treated (open squares) cheeks. The percentages of responders based on the evaluator assessment (B) are shown for autologous fibroblast–(filled circles) and vehicle control–treated (open circles) cheeks. A responder is defined as a 2-point improvement from baseline on the subject assessment and a 1-point improvement from baseline on the evaluator assessment. *Statistically significant difference between autologous fibroblast and vehicle control treatment based on the McNemar paired test of proportions (p < .05) (40 × 54 mm; 300 × 300 dots per inch).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clinical response. Subjects received three treatments on the left cheek subunit with autologous fibroblasts at 2-week intervals as described in the Materials and Methods section. Shown are sample photographs of a subject taken before (A) and 4 months after (B) treatment with autologous fibroblasts. The control side on the right cheek subunit is shown in monographs before (C) and 4 months after (D) treatment (52 × 45 mm (300 × 300 dots per inch).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sustained response noted from subject on the autologous fibroblast–treated left cheek 2 years after the last study treatment: (A) baseline, (B) 2 years after treatment (54 × 39 mm; 300 × 300 dots per inch).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sustained response from subject BJ on the control side right cheek 2 years after the last study treatment: (A) baseline, (B and C) 2 years after treatment (54 × 27 mm; 300 × 300 dots per inch).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sustained response from autologous fibroblast–treated cheek on study subject 2.5 years after final study treatment: (A) baseline, (B) 2.5 years after treatment (54 × 39 mm; 300 × 300 dots per inch).

References

    1. Koo J. The psychosocial impact of acne: patients’ perceptions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32(Suppl):S26–30.
    1. Goodman GJ, Baron JA. Postacne scarring: a qualitative global scarring grading system. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:1458–66.
    1. Dreno B, Khammari A, Orain N, Noray C, et al. ECCA grading scale: an original validated acne scar grading scale for clinical practice in dermatology. Dermatology. 2007;214:46–51.
    1. Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, D’Arco V, et al. Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:893080.
    1. Rivera AE. Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:659–76.
    1. Shamban AT, Narurkar VA. Multimodal Treatment of Acne, acne scars and pigmentation. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27:459–71.
    1. Varnavides CK, Forster RA, Cunliffe WJ. The role of bovine collagen in the treatment of acne scars. Br J Dermatol. 1987;116:199–206.
    1. Hasson A, Romero WA. Treatment of facial atrophic scars with Esthélis, a hyaluronic acid filler with polydense cohesive matrix (CPM) J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9:1507–9.
    1. Goldberg DJ, Amin S, Hussain M. Acne scar correction using calcium hydroxylapatite in a carrier-based gel. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8:134–6.
    1. Barnett JG, Barnett CR. Treatment of acne scars with liquid silicone injections: 30-year perspective. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(11 Pt 2):1542–9.
    1. Wang F, Garza LA, Kang S, Varani J, et al. In vivo stimulation of de novo collagen production caused by cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections in photodamaged human skin. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(2):155–63.
    1. Cox SE. Clinical experience with filler complications. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(suppl 2):1661–6.
    1. Narins RS, Jewell M, Rubin M, Cohen J, et al. Clinical Conference: management of rare events following dermal fillers–focal necrosis and angry red bumps. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:426–34.
    1. Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:109–17.
    1. Hedelund L, Haak CS, Togsverd-Bo K, Bogh MK, et al. Fractional CO(2) laser resurfacing for atrophic acne scars: a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(6):447–52. Aug;
    1. Kadunc BV. Trindade de Almeida AR. Surgical treatment of facial acne scars based on morphologic classification: a Brazilian experience. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:1200–9.
    1. Johnen C, Hartmann B, Steffen I, Bräutigam K, et al. Skin cell isolation and expansion for cell transplantation is limited in patients using tobacco, alcohol, or are exhibiting diabetes mellitus. Burns. 2006;32:194–200.
    1. Chhetri DK, Berke GS. Injection of cultured autologous fibroblasts for human vocal fold scars. The Laryngoscope. 2011;121:785–92.
    1. Cohen SR, Holmes RE. Artecoll: a long-lasting injectable wrinkle filler material: report of a controlled, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 251 Subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:964–76.
    1. Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Beasley KL, Munavalli G. Autologous cultured fibroblast injection for facial contour deformities: a prospective, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:263–8.
    1. Watson D, Keller GS, Lacombe V, Fodor PB, et al. Autologous fibroblasts for treatment of facial rhytids and dermal depressions. A pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(165):170.
    1. Boss WK, Jr, Usal H, Fodor PB, Chernoff G. Autologous cultured fibroblasts: a protein repair system. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;44:536–42.
    1. Alam M, Omura N, Kaminer MS. Subcision for acne scarring: technique and outcomes in 40 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:310–7.
    1. Fabbrocini G, Fardella N, Monfrecola A, Proietti I, et al. Acne scarring treatment using skin needling. Clinical and Experimental Dermatol. 2009;34:874–9.
    1. Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MWJ. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review. J Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surg. 2009;62:703–20.
    1. McLeod LD, Fehnel SE, Brandman J, Symonds T. Evaluating minimal clinically important differences for the acne-specific quality of life questionnaire. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21:1069–79.
    1. Alam M, Dover JS. Treatment of acne scarring. Skin Therapy Letter. 2006;11:1–7. Available from: Accessed June 25, 2010.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit