Pharmacokinetics and Glucodynamics of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) versus Humalog® (Lispro) in Younger Adults and Elderly Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Helle Linnebjerg, Qianyi Zhang, Elizabeth LaBell, Mary Anne Dellva, David E Coutant, Ulrike Hövelmann, Leona Plum-Mörschel, Theresa Herbrand, Jennifer Leohr, Helle Linnebjerg, Qianyi Zhang, Elizabeth LaBell, Mary Anne Dellva, David E Coutant, Ulrike Hövelmann, Leona Plum-Mörschel, Theresa Herbrand, Jennifer Leohr

Abstract

Background: Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) is a novel insulin lispro formulation developed to more closely match physiological insulin secretion and improve postprandial glucose control. This study compared the pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, safety, and tolerability of URLi and Humalog® in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

Methods: This was a phase I, two-period, randomised, double-blind, crossover glucose clamp study in younger adult (aged 18-45 years; n = 41) and elderly (aged ≥65 years; n = 39) patients with T1DM. At each dosing visit, patients received either URLi or Humalog (15 units subcutaneously) followed by a 10 h automated euglycaemic clamp procedure. Serum insulin lispro and blood glucose were measured.

Results: Insulin lispro appeared in serum 6 min faster, and exposure was 7.2-fold greater over the first 15 min postdose with URLi versus Humalog in both age groups. Exposure beyond 3 h postdose was 39-41% lower, and exposure duration was reduced by 72-74 min with URLi versus Humalog in both age groups. Onset of insulin action was 11-12 min faster, and insulin action was 3-fold greater over the first 30 min postdose with URLi versus Humalog in both age groups. Insulin action beyond 4 h postdose was 44-54% lower, and duration of action was reduced by 34-44 min with URLi versus Humalog in both age groups. Overall exposure and total insulin action remained similar for both treatments. URLi and Humalog were well tolerated.

Conclusion: In patients with T1DM, URLi showed ultra-rapid pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics, with the differences between URLi and Humalog in elderly patients mirroring those in younger adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03166124.

Conflict of interest statement

Helle Linnebjerg, Qianyi Zhang, Elizabeth LaBell, Mary Anne Dellva, David E. Coutant, and Jennifer Leohr are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Ulrike Hövelmann, Leona Plum-Mörschel, and Theresa Herbrand are employees of Profil.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial design. SC subcutaneous, U units, URLi ultra rapid lispro
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (±SE) serum insulin lispro concentration-time profile for URLi and Humalog. a 0–8 h after injection in younger adult patients; b 0–8 h after injection in elderly patients; c 0–1 h after injection in younger adult patients; and d 0–1 h after injection in elderly patients. Dashed line shows LLOQ for the assay. LLOQ lower limit of quantification, SE standard error, U units, URLi ultra rapid lispro
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots of insulin lispro pharmacokinetic parameters. AUC area under the concentration-time curve, AUC0–15min AUC from 0 to 15 min, AUC0–30min AUC from 0 to 30 min, AUC0–1h AUC from 0 to 1 h, AUC2–10h AUC from 2 to 10 h, AUC3–10h AUC from 3 to 10 h, AUC0–∞ AUC from time 0 to infinity, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum observed drug concentration, early 50% tmax time to early half-maximal drug concentration, late 50% tmax time to late half-maximal drug concentration, LSM least squares means, URLi ultra rapid lispro
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean LOESS fits of glucose infusion rate over time for URLi and Humalog. a 0–8 h after injection in younger adult patients; b 0–8 h after injection in elderly patients; c 0–2 h after injection in younger adult patients; and d 0–2 h after injection in elderly patients. LOESS locally weighted scatterplot smoothing, U units, URLi ultra rapid lispro
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plots of insulin lispro glucodynamic parameters. a For glucodynamic parameters with at least one patient with a value of 0, treatment ratios of LSM and 95% CIs were estimated using Fieller’s theorem, and p-values were not calculable; presented p-values are for treatment difference in LSM. CI confidence interval, early 50% tRmax time to half-maximal glucose infusion rate before maximum glucose infusion rate, Gtot total amount of glucose infused over the duration of the clamp, Gtot,0–30min total amount of glucose infused over the first 30 min, Gtot,0–1h total amount of glucose infused over the first hour, Gtot,0–2h total amount of glucose infused over the first 2 h, Gtot,3h–End total amount of glucose infused from 3 h to end of the clamp, Gtot,4h–End total amount of glucose infused from 4 h to end of the clamp, late 50% tRmax time to half–maximal glucose infusion rate after maximum glucose infusion rate, LSM least squares means, Rmax maximum glucose infusion rate, Tonset time to onset of insulin action, URLi ultra rapid lispro

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–S66. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S011.
    1. Senior P, Hramiak I. Fast-acting insulin aspart and the need for new mealtime insulin analogues in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a Canadian perspective. Can J Diabetes. 2019;43(7):515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.01.004.
    1. Heinemann L, Muchmore DB. Ultrafast-acting insulins: state of the art. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(4):728–742. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600402.
    1. Heise T. Getting closer to physiologic insulin secretion. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl D:S161–5.
    1. Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(2):174–183. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040832.
    1. Heinemann L, Heise T, Wahl LC, Trautmann ME, Ampudia J, Starke AA, et al. Prandial glycaemia after a carbohydrate-rich meal in type I diabetic patients: using the rapid acting insulin analogue [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)] human insulin. Diabets Med. 1996;13(7):625–629. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199607)13:7<625::AID-DIA134>;2-2.
    1. Humalog [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2017.
    1. Remodulin [package insert for US]. Research Triangle Park, NC: United Therapeutics; 2019.
    1. Pratt E, Leohr J, Heilmann C, Johnson J, Landschulz W. Treprostinil causes local vasodilation, is well tolerated, and results in faster absorption of insulin lispro. Diabetes. 2017;66(Suppl 1):A253.
    1. Paavola CD, Cox AL, Sperry AE, Hansen RJ, Li S, Bradley SA, et al. A stable, hexameric, ultra-rapid insulin formulation containing citrate. Diabetes. 2017;66 (Suppl 1):A254.
    1. Shiramoto M, Nasu R, Oura T, Imori M, Ohwaki K. Ultra-Rapid Lispro results in accelerated insulin lispro absorption and faster early insulin action in comparison to Humalog® in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. Epub 9 Dec 2019. 10.1111/jdi.13195.
    1. Blevins T, Zhang Q, Frias JP, Jinnouchi H, Chang AM. Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing Ultra rapid lispro with Lispro in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes: PRONTO-T2D. Diabetes Care. 2020; (in press).
    1. Klaff LJ, Cao D, Dellva MA, Tobian J, Miura J, Dahl D, et al. Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) improves postprandial glucose (PPG) control vs. Humalog (Lispro) in T1D: PRONTO-T1D study. Diabetes. 2019;68 Suppl 1:144-OR.
    1. Kalyani RR, Golden SH, Cefalu WT. Diabetes and aging: unique considerations and goals of care. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):440–443. doi: 10.2337/dci17-0005.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Guideline for the study of drugs likely to be used in the elderly. 1989. Available at: . Accessed 30 Nov 2019.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus. 2012. Available at: . Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
    1. Chow S, Liu J. Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC; 2009. pp. 88–90.
    1. Polonsky KS, Given BD, Van Cauter E. Twenty-four-hour profiles and pulsatile patterns of insulin secretion in normal and obese subjects. J Clin Invest. 1988;81(2):442–448. doi: 10.1172/JCI113339.
    1. Defronzo RA. Glucose intolerance and aging: evidence for tissue insensitivity to insulin. Diabetes. 1979;28(12):1095–1101. doi: 10.2337/diab.28.12.1095.
    1. Kalyani RR, Egan JM. Diabetes and altered glucose metabolism with aging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):333–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.02.010.
    1. Minaker KL, Rowe JW, Tonino R, Pallotta JA. Influence of age on clearance of insulin in man. Diabetes. 1982;31(10):851–855. doi: 10.2337/diab.31.10.851.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit