Effect of Tacrolimus vs Intravenous Cyclophosphamide on Complete or Partial Response in Patients With Lupus Nephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Zhaohui Zheng, Haitao Zhang, Xiaomei Peng, Chun Zhang, Changying Xing, Gang Xu, Ping Fu, Zhaohui Ni, Jianghua Chen, Zhonggao Xu, Ming-Hui Zhao, Shaomei Li, Xiangyang Huang, Lining Miao, Xiaonong Chen, Bicheng Liu, Yongcheng He, Jing Li, Lijun Liu, Haishan Kadeerbai, Zhangsuo Liu, Zhihong Liu, Zhaohui Zheng, Haitao Zhang, Xiaomei Peng, Chun Zhang, Changying Xing, Gang Xu, Ping Fu, Zhaohui Ni, Jianghua Chen, Zhonggao Xu, Ming-Hui Zhao, Shaomei Li, Xiangyang Huang, Lining Miao, Xiaonong Chen, Bicheng Liu, Yongcheng He, Jing Li, Lijun Liu, Haishan Kadeerbai, Zhangsuo Liu, Zhihong Liu

Abstract

Importance: Lupus nephritis (LN) is typically treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), which is associated with serious adverse effects. Tacrolimus may be an alternative for initial treatment of LN; however, large-scale, randomized clinical studies of tacrolimus are lacking.

Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs IVCY as an initial therapy for LN in China.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-controlled, phase 3, noninferiority clinical trial recruited patients aged 18 to 60 years with systemic lupus erythematosus and LN class III, IV, V, III+V, or IV+V primarily from outpatient settings at 35 centers in China. Inclusion criteria included body mass index of 18.5 or greater to less than 27, 24-hour urine protein of 1.5 g or greater, and serum creatinine of less than 260 μmol/L. Of 505 patients screened, 191 failed screening (163 ineligible, 25 withdrawn consent, and 3 other reasons). Overall, 314 were randomized. The first patient was enrolled March 10, 2015, and the study finished September 13, 2018. The follow-up period was 24 weeks. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to March 2020.

Interventions: Oral tacrolimus (target trough level, 4-10 ng/mL) or IVCY for 24 weeks plus prednisone.

Main outcomes and measures: Complete or partial response rate at week 24 (prespecified).

Results: A total of 314 patients were randomized (158 [50.3%] to tacrolimus and 156 [49.7%] to IVCY). Overall, 299 patients (95.2%) were treated (tacrolimus group, 157 [52.5%]; IVCY group, 142 [47.5%]). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were generally similar between groups (mean [SD] age, 34.2 [9.5] years; 262 [87.6%] female). Tacrolimus was found to be noninferior to IVCY for LN response at week 24. There was a complete or partial response rate of 83.0% (117 of 141 patients) in the tacrolimus group and 75.0% (93 of 124 patients) in the IVCY group (difference, 7.1%; 2-sided 95% CI, -2.7% to 16.9%; lower limit of 95% CI greater than -15%). At week 24, least-square mean change in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score was -8.6 with tacrolimus and -6.4 with IVCY (difference, -2.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to -1.3). Changes in other immune parameters and kidney function were generally similar between groups. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 29 patients in the tacrolimus group (18.5%) and 35 patients in the IVCY group (24.6%). Most common serious study drug-related TEAEs were infections (14 [8.9%] and 23 [16.2%], respectively). Seven patients in each group withdrew due to AEs.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, oral tacrolimus appeared noninferior to IVCY for initial therapy of active LN, with a more favorable safety profile than IVCY. Tacrolimus may be an alternative to IVCY as initial therapy for LN.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02457221.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr L. Liu and Mr Kadeerbai reported being employees of Astellas Pharma China. All authors report nonfinancial support from Astellas Pharma, Inc. during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Study Flowchart
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart
IVCY indicates intravenous cyclophosphamide; FAS, full analysis set; PPS, per-protocol set; SAF, safety set. aPPS comprised patients from the FAS with at least 12 weeks (85 ± 5 days) of follow-up (including early withdrawals due to lack of efficacy) who were compliant with medication (taking 80%-120% of required number of tablets) and had no major protocol deviations.
Figure 2.. Mean Change From Baseline to…
Figure 2.. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 24 for 24-Hour Urine Protein, Serum Albumin Level, and Serum Creatinine Level in the Per-Protocol Set
IVCY indicates intravenous cyclophosphamide. Whiskers indicate SEs. To convert serum albumin to grams per liter, multiply by 10; serum creatinine to milligrams per deciliter, divide by 88.4.

References

    1. Osio-Salido E, Manapat-Reyes H. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus in Asia. Lupus. 2010;19(12):1365-1373. doi:10.1177/0961203310374305
    1. Mok CC. Epidemiology and survival of systemic lupus erythematosus in Hong Kong Chinese. Lupus. 2011;20(7):767-771. doi:10.1177/0961203310388447
    1. Almaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(5):825-835. doi:10.2215/CJN.05780616
    1. Saxena R, Mahajan T, Mohan C. Lupus nephritis: current update. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):240. doi:10.1186/ar3378
    1. Mok CC, Kwok RCL, Yip PSF. Effect of renal disease on the standardized mortality ratio and life expectancy of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(8):2154-2160. doi:10.1002/art.38006
    1. Sui M, Ye X, Ma J, et al. . Epidemiology and risk factors for chronic kidney disease in Chinese patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Intern Med J. 2015;45(11):1167-1172. doi:10.1111/imj.12840
    1. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, et al. . 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):713-723. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924
    1. Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A, et al. ; American College of Rheumatology . American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(6):797-808. doi:10.1002/acr.21664
    1. Rovin BH, Caster DJ, Cattran DC, et al. ; Conference Participants . Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2019;95(2):281-295. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.008
    1. Mok CC, Yap DYH, Navarra SV, et al. ; Asian Lupus Nephritis Network (ALNN) . Overview of lupus nephritis management guidelines and perspective from Asia. Nephrology (Carlton). 2014;19(1):11-20. doi:10.1111/nep.12136
    1. Harward LE, Mitchell K, Pieper C, Copland S, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Clowse MEB. The impact of cyclophosphamide on menstruation and pregnancy in women with rheumatologic disease. Lupus. 2013;22(1):81-86. doi:10.1177/0961203312468624
    1. Ceccarelli F, Orefice V, Perrone G, et al. . Premature ovarian failure in patients affected by systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38(3):450-454.
    1. Mok CC. Calcineurin inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31(3):429-438. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2017.09.010
    1. Liao R, Liu Q, Zheng Z, et al. . Tacrolimus protects podocytes from injury in lupus nephritis partly by stabilizing the cytoskeleton and inhibiting podocyte apoptosis. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132724. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132724
    1. Borrows R, Loucaidou M, Van Tromp J, et al. . Steroid sparing with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(11):1845-1851. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00583.x
    1. Li X, Li H, Chen J, et al. . Tacrolimus as a steroid-sparing agent for adults with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(6):1919-1925. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm637
    1. Miyasaka N, Kawai S, Hashimoto H. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for lupus nephritis: a placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter study. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(6):606-615. doi:10.3109/s10165-009-0218-5
    1. Mok CC, Tong KH, To CH, Siu YP, Au TC. Tacrolimus for induction therapy of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: an open-labeled pilot study. Kidney Int. 2005;68(2):813-817. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00461.x
    1. Chen W, Tang X, Liu Q, et al. . Short-term outcomes of induction therapy with tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for active lupus nephritis: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(2):235-244. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.08.036
    1. Li X, Ren H, Zhang Q, et al. . Mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment for active lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(4):1467-1472. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr484
    1. Wang S, Li X, Qu L, et al. . Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide as treatment for diffuse proliferative or membranous lupus nephritis: a non-randomized prospective cohort study. Lupus. 2012;21(9):1025-1035. doi:10.1177/0961203312448105
    1. Palmer SC, Tunnicliffe DJ, Singh-Grewal D, et al. . Induction and maintenance immunosuppression treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70(3):324-336. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.008
    1. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725. doi:10.1002/art.1780400928
    1. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. ; International Society of Nephrology Working Group on the Classification of Lupus Nephritis; Renal Pathology Society Working Group on the Classification of Lupus Nephritis . The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int. 2004;65(2):521-530. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00443.x
    1. Mok CC, Ying KY, Yim CW, et al. . Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a randomised controlled trial and long-term follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):30-36. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206456
    1. Liu Z, Zhang H, Liu Z, et al. . Multitarget therapy for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):18-26. doi:10.7326/M14-1030
    1. Korbet SM, Lewis EJ; Collaborative Study Group . Severe lupus nephritis: the predictive value of a ≥ 50% reduction in proteinuria at 6 months. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(9):2313-2318. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft201
    1. Parodis I, Tamirou F, Houssiau FA. Prediction of prognosis and renal outcome in lupus nephritis. Lupus Sci Med. 2020;7(1):e000389. doi:10.1136/lupus-2020-000389
    1. Szeto C-C, Kwan BC-H, Lai FM-M, et al. . Tacrolimus for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with pure class V nephritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(11):1678-1681. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken335
    1. Okamoto M, Akioka K, Ushigome H, et al. . Ten-year protocol biopsy findings of renal allografts in the calcineurin inhibitor era. Clin Transplant. 2006;20(suppl 15):16-19. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00544.x
    1. Karolin A, Genitsch V, Sidler D. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in solid organ transplantation. Pharmacology. 2021;106(7-8):347-355. doi:10.1159/000515933
    1. Takeuchi T, Wakasugi N, Uno S, Makino H. Long-term safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus in lupus nephritis patients: 5-year interim post-marketing surveillance study in Japan (TRUST). J Rheumatol. 2021;48(1):74-81. doi:10.3899/jrheum.191008

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit