Effects of Computer-Aided Interlimb Force Coupling Training on Paretic Hand and Arm Motor Control following Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chueh-Ho Lin, Li-Wei Chou, Hong-Ji Luo, Po-Yi Tsai, Fu-Kong Lieu, Shang-Lin Chiang, Wen-Hsu Sung, Chueh-Ho Lin, Li-Wei Chou, Hong-Ji Luo, Po-Yi Tsai, Fu-Kong Lieu, Shang-Lin Chiang, Wen-Hsu Sung

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the training effects of interlimb force coupling training on paretic upper extremity outcomes in patients with chronic stroke and analyzed the relationship between motor recovery of the paretic hand, arm and functional performances on paretic upper limb.

Design: A randomized controlled trial with outcome assessment at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention.

Setting: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University.

Participants: Thirty-three subjects with chronic stroke were recruited and randomly assigned to training (n = 16) and control groups (n = 17).

Interventions: The computer-aided interlimb force coupling training task with visual feedback included different grip force generation methods on both hands.

Main outcome measures: The Barthel Index (BI), the upper extremity motor control Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE), the Motor Assessment Score (MAS), and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). All assessments were executed by a blinded evaluator, and data management and statistical analysis were also conducted by a blinded researcher.

Results: The training group demonstrated greater improvement on the FMA-UE (p<.001), WMFT (p<.001), MAS (p = .004) and BI (p = .037) than the control group after 4 weeks of intervention. In addition, a moderate correlation was found between the improvement of scores for hand scales of the FMA and other portions of the FMA UE (r = .528, p = .018) or MAS (r = .596, p = .015) in the training group.

Conclusion: Computer-aided interlimb force coupling training improves the motor recovery of a paretic hand, and facilitates motor control and enhances functional performance in the paretic upper extremity of people with chronic stroke.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02247674.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow diagram of the randomization…
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the randomization procedure and the outcome measurements.

References

    1. Duncan PW. Stroke disability. Physical therapy. 1994;74(5):399–407. Epub 1994/05/01. .
    1. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disability and rehabilitation. 1999;21(5–6):258–68. Epub 1999/06/25. .
    1. Rosenstein L, Ridgel AL, Thota A, Samame B, Alberts JL. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. 2008;62(1):28–35. Epub 2008/02/08. .
    1. Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E, Sodring KM, Wyller TB, Laake K. Association between impairments, self-care ability and social activities 1 year after stroke. Disability and rehabilitation. 1999;21(8):372–7. Epub 1999/09/30. .
    1. Colle F, Bonan I, Gellez Leman MC, Bradai N, Yelnik A. Fatigue after stroke. Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique: revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique. 2006;49(6):272–6, 361–4. Epub 2006/05/24. 10.1016/j.annrmp.2006.04.009 .
    1. Kilbreath SL, Heard RC. Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. The Australian journal of physiotherapy. 2005;51(2):119–22. Epub 2005/06/01. .
    1. Kang N, Cauraugh JH. Paretic hand unimanual force control: Improved submaximal force production and regularity. Neuroscience research. 2014. 10.1016/j.neures.2014.12.005 .
    1. Lodha N, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH. Bimanual isometric force control: asymmetry and coordination evidence post stroke. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2012;123(4):787–95. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.014 .
    1. Gowland C, deBruin H, Basmajian JV, Plews N, Burcea I. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Physical therapy. 1992;72(9):624–33. Epub 1992/09/01. .
    1. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2002;83(11):1629–37. Epub 2002/11/08. .
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2003;34(9):2181–6. Epub 2003/08/09. 10.1161/ .
    1. Kang N, Cauraugh JH. Bimanual force variability in chronic stroke: With and without visual information. Neuroscience letters. 2015;587C:41–5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.12.028 .
    1. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiology of learning and memory. 2000;74(1):27–55. Epub 2000/06/30. 10.1006/nlme.1999.3934 .
    1. Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Prejean T, Grenda R. Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1992;12(8):2918–47. Epub 1992/08/01. .
    1. Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Ochs MT, Allard T, Guic-Robles E. Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation. Journal of neurophysiology. 1990;63(1):82–104. Epub 1990/01/01. .
    1. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791–4. Epub 1996/06/21. .
    1. Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Progress in neurobiology. 2005;75(5):309–20. Epub 2005/05/12. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001 .
    1. van Delden AL, Peper CL, Nienhuys KN, Zijp NI, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb training after stroke: the Upper Limb Training After Stroke clinical trial. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2013;44(9):2613–6. Epub 2013/07/23. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001969 .
    1. Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC, Chen HC, Tsay PK. Randomized trial of distributed constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor control and function after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2011;25(2):130–9. 10.1177/1545968310380686 .
    1. Reistetter T, Abreu BC, Bear-Lehman J, Ottenbacher KJ. Unilateral and bilateral upper extremity weight-bearing effect on upper extremity impairment and functional performance after brain injury. Occupational therapy international. 2009;16(3–4):218–31. Epub 2009/06/25. 10.1002/oti.278
    1. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2000;31(10):2390–5. Epub 2000/10/07. .
    1. Rose DK, Winstein CJ. Bimanual training after stroke: are two hands better than one? Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2004;11(4):20–30. Epub 2004/12/14. .
    1. Krishnan V, Jaric S. Effects of task complexity on coordination of inter-limb and within-limb forces in static bimanual manipulation. Motor control. 2010;14(4):528–44. .
    1. Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N. Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2004;8(1):18–25. .
    1. van Delden AL, Peper CL, Kwakkel G, Beek PJ. A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. Stroke research and treatment. 2012;2012:972069 Epub 2012/12/20. 10.1155/2012/972069
    1. van Delden AL, Peper CL, Harlaar J, Daffertshofer A, Zijp NI, Nienhuys K, et al. Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design. BMC neurology. 2009;9:57 10.1186/1471-2377-9-57
    1. Hu X, Newell KM. Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks. Experimental brain research. 2011;208(4):533–41. Epub 2010/12/07. 10.1007/s00221-010-2502-1 .
    1. Cauraugh JH, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Human movement science. 2010;29(5):853–70. 10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.004
    1. Naik SK, Patten C, Lodha N, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH. Force control deficits in chronic stroke: grip formation and release phases. Experimental brain research. 2011;211(1):1–15. Epub 2011/03/31. 10.1007/s00221-011-2637-8 .
    1. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical therapy. 1987;67(2):206–7. Epub 1987/02/01. .
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research. 1975;12(3):189–98. Epub 1975/11/01. .
    1. Jaric S, Collins JJ, Marwaha R, Russell E. Interlimb and within limb force coordination in static bimanual manipulation task. Experimental brain research. 2006;168(1–2):88–97. Epub 2005/08/04. 10.1007/s00221-005-0070-6 .
    1. Jaric S, Knight CA, Collins JJ, Marwaha R. Evaluation of a method for bimanual testing coordination of hand grip and load forces under isometric conditions. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2005;15(6):556–63. Epub 2005/06/09. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.03.003 .
    1. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Experimental brain research. 1995;105(3):455–64. Epub 1995/01/01. .
    1. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, Chen CH, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Physical therapy. 2009;89(8):840–50. Epub 2009/06/27. 10.2522/ptj.20080285 .
    1. Sabari JS, Lim AL, Velozo CA, Lehman L, Kieran O, Lai JS. Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the motor assessment scale for stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(8):1609–15. Epub 2005/08/09. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.028 .
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. 1975;7(1):13–31. Epub 1975/01/01. .
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine Supplement. 1980;7:85–93. Epub 1980/01/01. .
    1. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2001;82(6):750–5. Epub 2001/06/02. 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183 .
    1. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2001;32(7):1635–9. Epub 2001/07/07. .
    1. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Experimental neurology. 1989;104(2):125–32. Epub 1989/05/01. .
    1. Blennerhassett JM, Carey LM, Matyas TA. Clinical measures of handgrip limitation relate to impaired pinch grip force control after stroke. Journal of hand therapy: official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2008;21(3):245–52; quiz 53. Epub 2008/07/26. 10.1197/j.jht.2007.10.021 .
    1. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical therapy. 1985;65(2):175–80. Epub 1985/02/01. .
    1. Carson RG. Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs. Brain research Brain research reviews. 2005;49(3):641–62. Epub 2005/05/21. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.03.005 .
    1. Kazennikov O, Hyland B, Corboz M, Babalian A, Rouiller EM, Wiesendanger M. Neural activity of supplementary and primary motor areas in monkeys and its relation to bimanual and unimanual movement sequences. Neuroscience. 1999;89(3):661–74. Epub 1999/04/13. .
    1. Rouiller EM, Yu XH, Moret V, Tempini A, Wiesendanger M, Liang F. Dexterity in adult monkeys following early lesion of the motor cortical hand area: the role of cortex adjacent to the lesion. The European journal of neuroscience. 1998;10(2):729–40. Epub 1998/09/28. .
    1. Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements. The Journal of physiology. 2002;543(Pt 1):307–16. Epub 2002/08/16.
    1. Liepert J, Hamzei F, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle & nerve. 2000;23(11):1761–3. Epub 2000/10/31. .
    1. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2003;34(6):1553–66. Epub 2003/05/10. 10.1161/01.STR.0000071761.36075.A6 .
    1. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2002;125(Pt 4):773–88. Epub 2002/03/26. .
    1. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1997;28(12):2518–27. Epub 1997/12/31. .

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit