A field trial to assess a blood-stage malaria vaccine

Mahamadou A Thera, Ogobara K Doumbo, Drissa Coulibaly, Matthew B Laurens, Amed Ouattara, Abdoulaye K Kone, Ando B Guindo, Karim Traore, Idrissa Traore, Bourema Kouriba, Dapa A Diallo, Issa Diarra, Modibo Daou, Amagana Dolo, Youssouf Tolo, Mahamadou S Sissoko, Amadou Niangaly, Mady Sissoko, Shannon Takala-Harrison, Kirsten E Lyke, Yukun Wu, William C Blackwelder, Olivier Godeaux, Johan Vekemans, Marie-Claude Dubois, W Ripley Ballou, Joe Cohen, Darby Thompson, Tina Dube, Lorraine Soisson, Carter L Diggs, Brent House, David E Lanar, Sheetij Dutta, D Gray Heppner Jr, Christopher V Plowe, Mahamadou A Thera, Ogobara K Doumbo, Drissa Coulibaly, Matthew B Laurens, Amed Ouattara, Abdoulaye K Kone, Ando B Guindo, Karim Traore, Idrissa Traore, Bourema Kouriba, Dapa A Diallo, Issa Diarra, Modibo Daou, Amagana Dolo, Youssouf Tolo, Mahamadou S Sissoko, Amadou Niangaly, Mady Sissoko, Shannon Takala-Harrison, Kirsten E Lyke, Yukun Wu, William C Blackwelder, Olivier Godeaux, Johan Vekemans, Marie-Claude Dubois, W Ripley Ballou, Joe Cohen, Darby Thompson, Tina Dube, Lorraine Soisson, Carter L Diggs, Brent House, David E Lanar, Sheetij Dutta, D Gray Heppner Jr, Christopher V Plowe

Abstract

Background: Blood-stage malaria vaccines are intended to prevent clinical disease. The malaria vaccine FMP2.1/AS02(A), a recombinant protein based on apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) from the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum, has previously been shown to have immunogenicity and acceptable safety in Malian adults and children.

Methods: In a double-blind, randomized trial, we immunized 400 Malian children with either the malaria vaccine or a control (rabies) vaccine and followed them for 6 months. The primary end point was clinical malaria, defined as fever and at least 2500 parasites per cubic millimeter of blood. A secondary end point was clinical malaria caused by parasites with the AMA1 DNA sequence found in the vaccine strain.

Results: The cumulative incidence of the primary end point was 48.4% in the malaria-vaccine group and 54.4% in the control group; efficacy against the primary end point was 17.4% (hazard ratio for the primary end point, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.09; P=0.18). Efficacy against the first and subsequent episodes of clinical malaria, as defined on the basis of various parasite-density thresholds, was approximately 20%. Efficacy against clinical malaria caused by parasites with AMA1 corresponding to that of the vaccine strain was 64.3% (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.86; P=0.03). Local reactions and fever after vaccination were more frequent with the malaria vaccine.

Conclusions: On the basis of the primary end point, the malaria vaccine did not provide significant protection against clinical malaria, but on the basis of secondary results, it may have strain-specific efficacy. If this finding is confirmed, AMA1 might be useful in a multicomponent malaria vaccine. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00460525.).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment and Follow-up of the Study Participants.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Estimates of the Cumulative…
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Estimates of the Cumulative Proportion of Children in the Intention-to-Treat Cohort with at Least One Episode of Clinical Malaria over Time, According to Vaccine Group
Clinical malaria was defined as a fever with a parasite density of at least 2500 parasites per cubic millimeter. Panel A shows the data for all (first or only) clinical malaria episodes. Panel B shows the data for all (first or only) clinical malaria episodes involving infection with a Plasmodium falciparum strain with an apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) sequence homologous to that of the vaccine strain. Immunizations were administered on study days 0, 30, and 60.
Figure 3. Geometric Mean Titers of Antibody…
Figure 3. Geometric Mean Titers of Antibody against Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1), According to Vaccine Group
Immunizations were administered on study days 0, 30, and 60. I bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit