A Culturally Sensitive Social Support Intervention for Chinese American Breast Cancer Survivors (Joy Luck Academy): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Qian Lu, Krystal Warmoth, Lingjun Chen, Christine S Wu, Qiao Chu, Yisheng Li, Matthew W Gallagher, Annette L Stanton, Marjorie Kagawa Singer, Lucy Young, Alice Loh, Qian Lu, Krystal Warmoth, Lingjun Chen, Christine S Wu, Qiao Chu, Yisheng Li, Matthew W Gallagher, Annette L Stanton, Marjorie Kagawa Singer, Lucy Young, Alice Loh

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among Asian American women. Chinese American immigrant breast cancer survivors face unique challenges because of cultural and socioecological factors. They report emotional distress and the need for social, emotional, and spiritual support. However, culturally and linguistically appropriate information for managing survivorship health care is often unavailable.

Objective: To improve the health outcomes for this underserved and understudied population, we developed, designed, and launched a randomized controlled trial to test the health benefits of a culturally sensitive social support intervention (Joy Luck Academy). In this paper, we describe the research protocol.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial will enroll Chinese-speaking, stage 0 to 3 breast cancer survivors who have completed treatment within the previous 36 months using a community-based participatory research approach. We will randomly assign 168 participants to the intervention or control group. The intervention arm will attend 7 weekly 3.5-hour peer mentor and educational sessions. The control group will receive the educational information. We will assess health outcomes at baseline, immediately after the Joy Luck Academy, and at 1- and 4-month follow-ups. The primary outcome is quality of life, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale. Secondary outcomes include depressive symptoms, positive affect, fatigue, and perceived stress. We will also explore how the intervention influences cortisol levels. To identify how and to whom the program is effective, we will measure social and personal resources and theorized mechanisms and perform qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants to enhance the interpretation of quantitative data.

Results: Recruitment began in February 2015, and data collection was completed in February 2019. We expect to complete data management by August 2021 and publish results in 2022.

Conclusions: If the Joy Luck Academy is demonstrated to be effective, it may be easily disseminated as an intervention for other groups of Asian American immigrant breast cancer survivors. Furthermore, similar programs could be integrated into other diverse communities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02946697; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02946697.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/30950.

Keywords: Chinese cancer survivors; breast cancer; peer mentor support; randomized controlled trial; social support.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Qian Lu, Krystal Warmoth, Lingjun Chen, Christine S Wu, Qiao Chu, Yisheng Li, Matthew W Gallagher, Annette L Stanton, Marjorie Kagawa Singer, Lucy Young, Alice Loh. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.09.2021.

References

    1. Gomez SL, Noone A, Lichtensztajn DY, Scoppa S, Gibson JT, Liu L, Morris C, Kwong S, Fish K, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Deapen D, Miller BA. Cancer incidence trends among Asian American populations in the United States, 1990-2008. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Aug 07;105(15):1096–110. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt157. djt157
    1. Thompson CA, Gomez SL, Hastings KG, Kapphahn K, Yu P, Shariff-Marco S, Bhatt AS, Wakelee HA, Patel MI, Cullen MR, Palaniappan LP. The Burden of Cancer in Asian Americans: A report of national mortality trends by Asian ethnicity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Oct 02;25(10):1371–82. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0167.
    1. Stanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 10;24(32):5132–7. doi: 10.1200/jco.2006.06.8775.
    1. Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, Kahn B, Polinsky ML, Petersen L. Breast cancer survivors: Psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 1996 Jun;38(2):183–99. doi: 10.1007/bf01806673.
    1. Ashing-Giwa KT. The contextual model of HRQoL: a paradigm for expanding the HRQoL framework. Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):297–307. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0729-7.
    1. Warmoth K, Cheung B, You J, Yeung NC, Lu Q. Exploring the social needs and challenges of Chinese American immigrant breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study using an expressive writing approach. Int J Behav Med. 2017 Dec 5;24(6):827–35. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9661-4.10.1007/s12529-017-9661-4
    1. Leng J, Lee T, Sarpel U, Lau J, Li Y, Cheng C, Chang M, Gany F. Identifying the informational and psychosocial needs of Chinese immigrant cancer patients: a focus group study. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec 25;20(12):3221–9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1464-1.
    1. Wen K, Fang CY, Ma GX. Breast cancer experience and survivorship among Asian Americans: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Mar 9;8(1):94–107. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0320-8.
    1. Lee S, Chen L, Ma GX, Fang CY, Oh Y, Scully L. Challenges and needs of Chinese and Korean American breast cancer survivors: in-depth interviews. N Am J Med Sci (Boston) 2013 Feb 02;6(1):1–8. doi: 10.7156/najms.2013.0601001.
    1. Wen K, Hu A, Ma G, Fang C, Daly M. Information and communication needs of Chinese American breast cancer patients: perspectives on survivorship care planning. J Community Support Oncol. 2014 Dec;12(12):439–45. doi: 10.12788/jcso.0095.
    1. Stanton AL, Rowland JH, Ganz PA. Life after diagnosis and treatment of cancer in adulthood: contributions from psychosocial oncology research. Am Psychol. 2015 Feb;70(2):159–74. doi: 10.1037/a0037875.2015-08692-008
    1. Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Küffner R. Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):782–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8922.JCO.2011.40.8922
    1. Scheier MF, Helgeson VS, Schulz R, Colvin S, Berga S, Bridges MW, Knapp J, Gerszten K, Pappert WS. Interventions to enhance physical and psychological functioning among younger women who are ending nonhormonal adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 01;23(19):4298–11. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.05.362.
    1. Tabrizi FM, Radfar M, Taei Z. Effects of supportive-expressive discussion groups on loneliness, hope and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a randomized control trial. Psychooncology. 2016 Sep 15;25(9):1057–63. doi: 10.1002/pon.4169.
    1. Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J. Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: Who benefits from what? Health Psychol. 2000;19(2):107–14. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.2.107.
    1. Shin H, Kominski R. Language use in the United States: 2007. American Community Survey Reports (ACS-12), U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. [2021-08-03]. .
    1. Lu Q, You J, Man J, Loh A, Young L. Evaluating a culturally tailored peer-mentoring and education pilot intervention among chinese breast cancer survivors using a mixed-methods approach. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Oct 29;41(6):629–37. doi: 10.1188/14.onf.629-637.
    1. Kagawa-Singer M. Improving the validity and generalizability of studies with underserved U.S. Populations expanding the research paradigm. Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;10(8):92–103. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00192-7.
    1. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes 2nd Edition. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. pp. 1–544.
    1. Tanjasiri SP, Kagawa-Singer M, Nguyen T, Foo MA. Collaborative research as an essential component for addressing cancer disparities among Southeast Asian and Pacific Islander women. Health Promot Pract. 2002 Apr 01;3(2):144–54. doi: 10.1177/152483990200300210.
    1. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Garlehner G, Lohr KN, Griffith D, Rhodes S, Samuel-Hodge C, Maty S, Lux L, Webb L, Sutton SF, Swinson T, Jackman A, Whitener L. Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2004 Aug;(99):1–8.
    1. Lu Q, Yeung NC, You J, Dai J. Using expressive writing to explore thoughts and beliefs about cancer and treatment among Chinese American immigrant breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2016 Nov 25;25(11):1371–4. doi: 10.1002/pon.3991.
    1. Warmoth K, Yeung NC, Xie J, Feng H, Loh A, Young L, Lu Q. Benefits of a psychosocial intervention on positive affect and posttraumatic growth for Chinese American breast cancer survivors: a pilot study. Behav Med. 2020 Jan 18;46(1):34–42. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2018.1541862.
    1. Zhou M. Contemporary Chinese America: Immigration, Ethnicity, and Community Transformation. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States: Temple University Press; 2009. pp. 1–328.
    1. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data, 2nd Edition - Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. pp. 1–408.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103. doi: 10.2307/2529712.
    1. Andersen BL, Golden-Kreutz DM, Emery CF, Thiel DL. Biobehavioral Intervention for Cancer Stress: Conceptualization, Components, and Intervention Strategies. Cognit Behav Pract. 2009 Aug;16(3):253–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.11.002.
    1. Cancer information in other languages. American Cancer Society. [2021-08-03]. .
    1. Stephenson M. Development and validation of the Stephenson Multigroup Acculturation Scale (SMAS) Psychol Assess. 2000;12(1):77–88. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.77.
    1. Wan C, Zhang D, Yang Z, Tu X, Tang W, Feng C, Wang H, Tang X. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Dec 22;106(3):413–8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9511-1.
    1. Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974–86. doi: 10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974.
    1. Boey KW. Cross-validation of a short form of the CES-D in Chinese elderly. Int J Geriat Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;14(8):608–17. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199908)14:8<608::aid-gps991>;2-z.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977 Jun 01;1(3):385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Wong R, Wu R, Guo C, Lam JK, Snowden LR. Culturally sensitive depression assessment for Chinese American Immigrants: Development of a comprehensive measure and a screening scale using an item response approach. Asian Am J Psychol. 2012 Dec;3(4):230–53. doi: 10.1037/a0025628.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–70. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, Gladman DD. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul 02;66(7):936–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.065763. ard.2006.065763
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
    1. Sephton S, Sapolsky RM, Kraemer HC, Spiegel D. Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jun 21;92(12):994–1000. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.12.994.
    1. Smyth JM, Ockenfels MC, Gorin AA, Catley D, Porter LS, Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH, Stone AA. Individual differences in the diurnal cycle of cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1997 Feb;22(2):89–105. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(96)00039-x.
    1. Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH. Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: Recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1994 Jan;19(4):313–33. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(94)90013-2.
    1. Gagné M. The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motiv Emot. 2003;27(3):199–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1025007614869.
    1. Mak WW, Cheung RY. Self-stigma among concealable minorities in Hong Kong: conceptualization and unified measurement. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010 Apr;80(2):267–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01030.x.AJOP1030
    1. Merluzzi TV, Nairn RC, Hegde K, Martinez Sanchez MA, Dunn L. Self-efficacy for coping with cancer: Revision of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (version 2.0) Psychooncology. 2001 May;10(3):206–17. doi: 10.1002/pon.511. 10.1002/pon.511
    1. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991 Jan;32(6):705–14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B.
    1. Yu DS, Lee DT, Woo J. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C) Res Nurs Health. 2004 Apr;27(2):135–43. doi: 10.1002/nur.20008.
    1. Lai JC, Cheung H, Lee W, Yu H. The utility of the revised life orientation test to measure optimism among Hong Kong Chinese. Int J Psychol. 1998 Feb;33(1):45–56. doi: 10.1080/002075998400600.
    1. Lu Q, Zheng D, Young L, Kagawa-Singer M, Loh A. A pilot study of expressive writing intervention among Chinese-speaking breast cancer survivors. Health Psychol. 2012 Sep;31(5):548–51. doi: 10.1037/a0026834. 2012-00040-001
    1. Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: Sage Publications Inc; 1994. pp. 1–272.
    1. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006 Feb 01;18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
    1. Kahan BC, Morris TP. Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation. Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):328–40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4431.
    1. Miller R, Stalder T, Jarczok M, Almeida DM, Badrick E, Bartels M, Boomsma DI, Coe CL, Dekker MC, Donzella B, Fischer JE, Gunnar MR, Kumari M, Lederbogen F, Power C, Ryff CD, Subramanian S, Tiemeier H, Watamura SE, Kirschbaum C. The CIRCORT database: Reference ranges and seasonal changes in diurnal salivary cortisol derived from a meta-dataset comprised of 15 field studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Nov;73:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.07.201. S0306-4530(16)30423-1
    1. Pruessner JC, Kirschbaum C, Meinlschmid G, Hellhammer DH. Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003 Oct;28(7):916–31. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(02)00108-7.
    1. Cash E, Sephton S, Chagpar A, Spiegel D, Rebholz W, Zimmaro L, Tillie J, Dhabhar F. Circadian disruption and biomarkers of tumor progression in breast cancer patients awaiting surgery. Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Aug;48:102–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.02.017.S0889-1591(15)00059-8
    1. Ho RT, Fong TC, Chan CK, Chan CL. The associations between diurnal cortisol patterns, self-perceived social support, and sleep behavior in Chinese breast cancer patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Oct;38(10):2337–42. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.004.S0306-4530(13)00181-9
    1. MacKinnon D. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008.
    1. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instru Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717–31. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553.
    1. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879–91. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit